[ANN][X11] X11/Darkcoin Gpu Miner - updated to use leaked binaries - even faster

[gilad215]

Well, -I 19 and GPU engine 1100 gave my 280x a 1.0MH Increase! from 2.15 to 3.15!

lets see how it goes..

[1714472517]

1714472517

[1714472517]

1714472517

[1714472517]

1714472517

[anatolikostis]

i got only 20% increase (but 2% goes to donator so 18% only)

options:
-I 13 --xintensity 4 -w 256 --lookup-gap 2 -g 2 --shaders 2048 --thread-concurrency 8192
--gpu-engine 1080 --gpu-memclock 1500 --auto-fan --gpu-powertune 0
--temp-target 70 --temp-overheat 80 --temp-cutoff 87

meaby i miss something ?

check the pool stats of your worker  - I`m not sure you have +18% hashrate increase 

[gilad215]

Trying to set up my 290s rigs with no success!

2 of my 280x rigs works just fine with the miner with good improvement but with my 290s i get a kernel error and a gpu failure.

anyone can help?

[Freekje]

Code:

[08:11][root@pimp:/opt/sph-sgminer]# ./sgminer -k darkcoin -c config.conf
./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./sgminer)
./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./sgminer)

guess I'll have to way for the sourcecode :[

[anatolikostis]

ok! 0.15btc prize for win32 free release   
PM me.

[tytanick]

yeah 2.1MH -> 3.1 MH boost
280x
-I 19 and gpu clock 1080
memory 1500

nice !

[goodluck0319]

what is the setting for 290 non x and 270x on this miner?

[Sglasio]

Cool! i have 3.3 Mhs per VGA (280x)
But, how run after CGwatcher? dll error (((

[marcoman22]

How this affects the temperature and power consumption of cards ? Has anyone compared ?

[kaene]

After 20 minutes of testing:

first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs.
second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs.
one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.

So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.

No settings changed. No temperature changes.

Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...

I like the "No temperature changes" part

[marcoman22]

After 20 minutes of testing:

first 7950 from 1.97 Mhs to 2.77 Mhs.
second 7950 from 1.88 Mhs to 2.64 Mhs.
one 280x from 2.22 Mhs to 2.65 Mhs.

So this rig (2x 7950 + 1x 280x) from 6.0 Mhs to 8.0 Mhs.

No settings changed. No temperature changes.

Not bad. Strange that 7950 gets higher Mhs than 280x ?! Maybe can improve a bit more...

I like the "No temperature changes" part

If no temp changes then its great .

[coin123123]

after hour of use i have +10c all rigs,

i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs

about 50% gains


EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.

[anatolikostis]

EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.

That`s it 

what is the setting for 290 non x

-tc 20481 or 22529
-w 256
-I 21
-g 1

PS Now I`m working to generate correct *.bin files with this miner to import It to the ordinary sph-sgminer directory 

[bestsponsor]

Speed ​​at the pool is constantly falling. Now there is no gain in speed. Only miner shows inflated figures.

[Demontager]

Code:

[08:11][root@pimp:/opt/sph-sgminer]# ./sgminer -k darkcoin -c config.conf
./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.15' not found (required by ./sgminer)
./sgminer: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./sgminer)

guess I'll have to way for the sourcecode :[

You have to add testing repo first

Code:

nano /etc/apt/sources.list

#Tesing
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian/ testing non-free contrib main

Then

Code:

apt-get update
apt-get -t testing install libc6-dev

[coin123123]

after hour of use i have +10c all rigs,

i have gigabyte, msi and sapphire 280x's rigs

about 50% gains


EDIT: just checked pool and there is no speed difference than before, only miner showing improvement, ill revert and compare WU now.

WU is hogher like speed, 50% gain but still pool not showing this hashrate.

somebody checked that 2% is really 2% ?

[Amph]

did anyone check the temp, to see if the cards are using more power? they should if the miner is really more optimized

also more consumption

[Jos-T]

did anyone check the temp, to see if the cards are using more power? they should if the miner is really more optimized

also more consumption

I'm using it on two HD7950's and the power consumption is around the same, give or take 10W.
Mh/s and WU seems higher. The pool I'm using hasn't entirely made up its mind about whether or not the figures are actually true...

Edit:
I just rented my own rig at Betarigs for 3 hours so I can use the graphs that get displayed there.
Will let you know whether or not the reported Mh/s is higher than usual.

[cayars]

It's lower.

Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.

[Amph]

It's lower.

Only reported higher on the client but far less shares are accepted.

it make sense because if the cards aren't drawing more power they can't perform a better hashrate, you can't escape from this