Abiky
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1364
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
 |
January 08, 2016, 10:48:46 PM |
|
Maybe two different wallet codebases should be maintained. One for the new version with the new features and other for the standard one based on bitcoin. I fear that the new feature rich client will require an installation program to operate and not be just a simple executable like the old version (and bitcoin). It is the reason I have yet to install the newer version of the CSC wallet and have no plans to do so if it requires an application installation.
Why would you not want to use an installer? I think 99% of the users prefer it as its the way they normally install software. Anyway, we could also just create a zip file that contains the extra Qt files and supply that as secondary install method, then you just unzip and run from the directory where you put it. A second codebase is not going to happen, at least i will not maintain that ...... for now the old wallet still works and i suspect that with the new additions i am currently developing it will all still be backwards compatible with the v1.3 wallet as well as we do not touch the blockchain itself, you will just be missing out on all the new v2.0 release features! Also by having an installer for CasinoCoin, is doesn't make it portable right? Because in the old version, it was a standalone executable wallet (no installer) and I could put the same on my USB flash drive, and take it anywhere and it would open on any Windows PC. If the new one could also be like this, I think it would be pretty cool.  That...and not everyone has the ability to install software on their computers. I put all my QT wallets on OneDrive...that way I have access to all of them when I switch to a new computer....there are soooo many that having to install each one would not be something I would do. I switch computers a lot since I usually get the latest and greatest. Also, doing an install makes it available to all users on the system. I have different user accounts for personal and business and do not want QT wallets showing up in my business account. I don't put my wallet.dat files on one drive even though I have two factor...just in case.  Placing QT wallets on OneDrive is a clever idea. About placing the wallet.dat directly into OneDrive is not safe, but you can make it safe by using TrueCrypt or VeraCrypt to make an encrypted file container and place your wallet.dat there. The safest way for encryption would be using a password with at least 60 characters of length (you can use password generator for this) and also a keyfile (any file that could be used as a token to unlock your encrypted file container) for maximum security. I have done this with most of my wallet.dat files and they are safely encrypted on that file container within the cloud storage service (such as OneDrive or Dropbox). |
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 08, 2016, 10:52:26 PM |
|
Maybe two different wallet codebases should be maintained. One for the new version with the new features and other for the standard one based on bitcoin. I fear that the new feature rich client will require an installation program to operate and not be just a simple executable like the old version (and bitcoin). It is the reason I have yet to install the newer version of the CSC wallet and have no plans to do so if it requires an application installation.
Why would you not want to use an installer? I think 99% of the users prefer it as its the way they normally install software. Anyway, we could also just create a zip file that contains the extra Qt files and supply that as secondary install method, then you just unzip and run from the directory where you put it. A second codebase is not going to happen, at least i will not maintain that ...... for now the old wallet still works and i suspect that with the new additions i am currently developing it will all still be backwards compatible with the v1.3 wallet as well as we do not touch the blockchain itself, you will just be missing out on all the new v2.0 release features! Also by having an installer for CasinoCoin, is doesn't make it portable right? Because in the old version, it was a standalone executable wallet (no installer) and I could put the same on my USB flash drive, and take it anywhere and it would open on any Windows PC. If the new one could also be like this, I think it would be pretty cool. That...and not everyone has the ability to install software on their computers. I put all my QT wallets on OneDrive...that way I have access to all of them when I switch to a new computer....there are soooo many that having to install each one would not be something I would do. I switch computers a lot since I usually get the latest and greatest. Also, doing an install makes it available to all users on the system. I have different user accounts for personal and business and do not want QT wallets showing up in my business account. I don't put my wallet.dat files on OneDrive even though I have two factor...just in case. Placing QT wallets on OneDrive is a clever idea. About placing the wallet.dat directly into OneDrive is not safe, but you can make it safe by using TrueCrypt or VeraCrypt to make an encrypted file container and place your wallet.dat there. The safest way for encryption would be using a password with at least 60 characters of length (you can use password generator for this) and also a keyfile (any file that could be used as a token to unlock your encrypted file container) for maximum security. I have done this with most of my wallet.dat files and they are safely encrypted on that file container within the cloud storage service (such as OneDrive or Dropbox). Thanks...good idea. I don't put my wallet files (and the large blockchains) on OneDrive due to security AND storage space constraints on OneDrive for personal use...bumping up against the limit as it is. |
|
|
|
CartmanSPC
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1270
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 08, 2016, 10:58:02 PM |
|
Maybe two different wallet codebases should be maintained. One for the new version with the new features and other for the standard one based on bitcoin. I fear that the new feature rich client will require an installation program to operate and not be just a simple executable like the old version (and bitcoin). It is the reason I have yet to install the newer version of the CSC wallet and have no plans to do so if it requires an application installation.
Why would you not want to use an installer? I think 99% of the users prefer it as its the way they normally install software. Anyway, we could also just create a zip file that contains the extra Qt files and supply that as secondary install method, then you just unzip and run from the directory where you put it. A second codebase is not going to happen, at least i will not maintain that ...... for now the old wallet still works and i suspect that with the new additions i am currently developing it will all still be backwards compatible with the v1.3 wallet as well as we do not touch the blockchain itself, you will just be missing out on all the new v2.0 release features! Also by having an installer for CasinoCoin, is doesn't make it portable right? Because in the old version, it was a standalone executable wallet (no installer) and I could put the same on my USB flash drive, and take it anywhere and it would open on any Windows PC. If the new one could also be like this, I think it would be pretty cool. Usually for QT clients that only have installers I have been able to install it using a burner system (VM) and then copy the resulting .exe in Program Files to my main computer. Haven't tried that with the new CSC QT but it might work...and if it does this whole conversation is moot...but the additions sounded like they needed an installer to work..so I brought it up. |
|
|
|
Abiky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1364
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
|
January 08, 2016, 11:50:18 PM |
|
Maybe two different wallet codebases should be maintained. One for the new version with the new features and other for the standard one based on bitcoin. I fear that the new feature rich client will require an installation program to operate and not be just a simple executable like the old version (and bitcoin). It is the reason I have yet to install the newer version of the CSC wallet and have no plans to do so if it requires an application installation.
Why would you not want to use an installer? I think 99% of the users prefer it as its the way they normally install software. Anyway, we could also just create a zip file that contains the extra Qt files and supply that as secondary install method, then you just unzip and run from the directory where you put it. A second codebase is not going to happen, at least i will not maintain that ...... for now the old wallet still works and i suspect that with the new additions i am currently developing it will all still be backwards compatible with the v1.3 wallet as well as we do not touch the blockchain itself, you will just be missing out on all the new v2.0 release features! Also by having an installer for CasinoCoin, is doesn't make it portable right? Because in the old version, it was a standalone executable wallet (no installer) and I could put the same on my USB flash drive, and take it anywhere and it would open on any Windows PC. If the new one could also be like this, I think it would be pretty cool. Usually for QT clients that only have installers I have been able to install it using a burner system (VM) and then copy the resulting .exe in Program Files to my main computer. Haven't tried that with the new CSC QT but it might work...and if it does this whole conversation is moot...but the additions sounded like they needed an installer to work..so I brought it up. Great! But if it does not work for you, you can always convert the installer into a portable application by using a program called Cameyo for Windows. I have tried it with several programs, including games and they have worked like a charm with this useful program. You should try it out!  |
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
January 10, 2016, 10:02:32 PM |
|
Just noticed this one is'nt on Bittrex, was is there and was it delisted ?
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
GoldSeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 10, 2016, 10:24:31 PM |
|
Just noticed this one is'nt on Bittrex, was is there and was it delisted ?
bittrex doesn't allow gambling coins. |
Moving to Puerto Rico...
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
January 10, 2016, 10:27:37 PM |
|
Just noticed this one is'nt on Bittrex, was is there and was it delisted ?
bittrex doesn't allow gambling coins. ah, what a pity, ok. |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
ajochems
|
|
January 10, 2016, 10:29:19 PM |
|
Just noticed this one is'nt on Bittrex, was is there and was it delisted ?
bittrex doesn't allow gambling coins. ah, what a pity, ok. Yes but very ironic as if bitcoin is not used in gambling.... |
|
████▄██████████▄
███▄████████████
▄███▀
████
████
████
▀███▄
███▀████████████
████▀██████████▀ |
▄██████████▄
████████████
███████████▀███▄
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
▀███▄███████████
████████████████
████▀██████████▀ |
▄██▄█████████▄██▄
▀████▄█████▄████▀
▀████▄█▄████▀
███████████
▄████▀█████▀████▄
█████████████████
█████████████████
█████████████████
▀███████████████▀
|
▄███████████████▄
█████████████████
████▀███▀██████▀
███████▄█████▀
████▄▄██████████▄
█▀▀██████▀███████
█▄██████▄███▄████
█████▀███████████
▀██▀███▀████████▀ |
████▄███████████
████████████████
▄███▀███████████
████████████████
████████████████
████████████████
███████████▄███▀
████████████
▀██████████▀ | | | | ████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██ | |
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████████
| | | | | | .
Listed
on
| | BINANCE
KUCOIN
Gate.io | | |
|
|
|
|
Marec4
|
|
January 11, 2016, 05:18:30 AM |
|
I asked Bittrex again few days ago. They said that they wont add coins whose primary purpose is to support gambling. As far as I know, there is only one coin with ths kind of primary purpose - CasinoCoin.
|
|
|
|
|
GoldSeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 11, 2016, 07:07:29 AM |
|
I asked Bittrex again few days ago. They said that they wont add coins whose primary purpose is to support gambling. As far as I know, there is only one coin with ths kind of primary purpose - CasinoCoin.
there were some before but they all died. lottocoin, jackpotcoin, etc No worries. We don't need Bittrex. |
Moving to Puerto Rico...
|
|
|
edmundduke
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1007
|
|
January 11, 2016, 08:59:03 AM |
|
I asked Bittrex again few days ago. They said that they wont add coins whose primary purpose is to support gambling. As far as I know, there is only one coin with ths kind of primary purpose - CasinoCoin.
there were some before but they all died. lottocoin, jackpotcoin, etc No worries. We don't need Bittrex. Would be nice to still have them. If they don't want the coin, maybe ask Polo? Because right now the markets movement is really low, almost no trading. Could really use a bigger exchange that would take the place that cryptsy had but in a good way lol. Getting close to February, exited to see what happens! |
|
|
|
|
Abiky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1364
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
|
January 11, 2016, 08:22:07 PM |
|
Would be nice to still have them. If they don't want the coin, maybe ask Polo? Because right now the markets movement is really low, almost no trading. Could really use a bigger exchange that would take the place that cryptsy had but in a good way lol.
Getting close to February, exited to see what happens!
I agree with you as well. The movement in trading of CSC is getting really slow these days. There isn't almost trading activity in it. Sometimes there is some activity in alcurex and sometimes it is in alterdice. (according to coinmarketcap) But I guess all the excitement will come as soon as Prypto releases its CSC cards and real casinos join in the party. With a huge stack of CSC being hold onto my wallet, I am patiently waiting for February to come.  |
|
|
|
|
|
GoldSeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 11, 2016, 11:27:59 PM |
|
BTW, some people were complaining to me that there aren't enough coins for sale and they are having difficulty accumulating meaningful quantities at current prices. So, if you have <200k, please try to sell them during the next two weeks.
|
Moving to Puerto Rico...
|
|
|
Abiky
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1364
www.Crypto.Games: Multiple coins, multiple games
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:16:01 AM |
|
BTW, some people were complaining to me that there aren't enough coins for sale and they are having difficulty accumulating meaningful quantities at current prices. So, if you have <200k, please try to sell them during the next two weeks.
Is that why the price has gone lower now? It is now at $0.019 per coin right now (according to Coinmarketcap) Perhaps it is time for CSC to be added to other exchanges to increase trading activity. Getting added to Poloniex will be a wonderful idea. I have started voting in it for the addition of CasinoCoin. Join me and together we can move the price up. |
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
January 12, 2016, 12:17:04 AM |
|
BTW, some people were complaining to me that there aren't enough coins for sale and they are having difficulty accumulating meaningful quantities at current prices. So, if you have <200k, please try to sell them during the next two weeks.
Maybe thats why I see hashrate is rising on https://csc.suprnova.cc |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
GoldSeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 12, 2016, 02:34:11 AM |
|
BTW, some people were complaining to me that there aren't enough coins for sale and they are having difficulty accumulating meaningful quantities at current prices. So, if you have <200k, please try to sell them during the next two weeks.
Is that why the price has gone lower now? It is now at $0.019 per coin right now (according to Coinmarketcap) Perhaps it is time for CSC to be added to other exchanges to increase trading activity. Getting added to Poloniex will be a wonderful idea. I have started voting in it for the addition of CasinoCoin. Join me and together we can move the price up. coinmarketcap is not happy about Cryptsy's current problems. So, they stopped taking prices from cryptsy and de-listed them from the exchange list until they get their act together. The lower price reflects the prices taken from alterdice or alcurex. Cryptsy is an absolute shambles right now. |
Moving to Puerto Rico...
|
|
|
|
KickAzzDude
|
|
January 12, 2016, 03:49:53 AM |
|
Its so annoying withdrawing from cryptsy right now , I withdraw 20k and only get 10k to the wallet
|
|
|
|
GoldSeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002
|
|
January 12, 2016, 06:28:16 AM |
|
Its so annoying withdrawing from cryptsy right now , I withdraw 20k and only get 10k to the wallet
That happens when cryptsy hasn't merged inputs. What's the transaction ID? If you check it on the explorer, it's probably made up of a lot of tiny inputs. |
Moving to Puerto Rico...
|
|
|
|
Marec4
|
|
January 12, 2016, 06:59:19 AM |
|
BTW, some people were complaining to me that there aren't enough coins for sale and they are having difficulty accumulating meaningful quantities at current prices. So, if you have <200k, please try to sell them during the next two weeks.
yeah, let's give all of our coins away, no point in holding them for a longer term |
|
|
|
|
|
