Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 07:20:04 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 256 »
  Print  
Author Topic: rpietila Altcoin Observer  (Read 387448 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:18:09 PM
 #1661

Given how on the ball this guy seems to be I wonder why BBR isn't doing a bit better than it is.

bbr is doing quite well.  cz set out to try some ideas.  bbr is the vehicle for those ideas.  By his choices he has made it clear that he is not seeking to dominate the dark liquidity market, and the market seems to believe this.  So far xmr is the only crypto which has made the choices which qualify it as a candidate for the dark liquidity monopoly leadership.  I expect bbr to continue to do well, and I don't expect it to enter the contest which interests me, because to my knowledge cz has never expressed an interest in reforming his project in the manner required.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714980004
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714980004

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714980004
Reply with quote  #2

1714980004
Report to moderator
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:19:00 PM
 #1662

We're talking about what's in the present. As you can see, DRK already failed and forked twice in just getting masternode payments alone...we can't debate based on "promises". Darksend +( plus) does not exist, therefore it can't be used as a argument.

Ok, presently the network would just seem stalled. Anonymity would NOT be destroyed. Happy?

Anonymity would be destroyed since Darkcoin NEEDS the Masternodes for it's coinjoin anonymity....


Just read what you wrote an hour ago (as you apparently already forgot):

No such thing like that^^^, can happen to Cryptonote coins. If one were to DDOS a node(they cant buy it), it would only be temporary as you cant DDOS forever, Plus it will not affect Cryptonote coins anonymity in any way.

If someone were to DDOS all the nodes for a Cryptonote coin, it would simply stall the network temporarily and it will have No affect on the Cryptonote coin's anonymity


So, the effect would be exactly the same.
darkota
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:23:08 PM
 #1663

We're talking about what's in the present. As you can see, DRK already failed and forked twice in just getting masternode payments alone...we can't debate based on "promises". Darksend +( plus) does not exist, therefore it can't be used as a argument.

Ok, presently the network would just seem stalled. Anonymity would NOT be destroyed. Happy?

Anonymity would be destroyed since Darkcoin NEEDS the Masternodes for it's coinjoin anonymity....


Just read what you wrote an hour ago (as you apparently already forgot):

No such thing like that^^^, can happen to Cryptonote coins. If one were to DDOS a node(they cant buy it), it would only be temporary as you cant DDOS forever, Plus it will not affect Cryptonote coins anonymity in any way.

If someone were to DDOS all the nodes for a Cryptonote coin, it would simply stall the network temporarily and it will have No affect on the Cryptonote coin's anonymity


So, the effect would be exactly the same.

Huh? In those two quotes you showed, I was talking about Cryptonote Coins, not Darkcoin.

If all Darkcoin masternodes were taken offline/DDOSed, it will destroy it's anonymity for the duration of the time the nodes are down.The masternodes are also extremely easy targets, since theres a list of all Masternodes that are offline and online along with their Ip addresses lol.  No such thing will happen with cryptonote coins.
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:23:57 PM
 #1664

Given how on the ball this guy seems to be I wonder why BBR isn't doing a bit better than it is.

bbr is doing quite well.

If one of the major turnoffs of bbr is its name, may I suggest you change it to iCoin. iCoin has the best name in the business, and its dev has left for good, so it's open for "community takeover". Destroy old iCoins for new iCoins with 10:1 ratio or something. Smiley
Okurkabinladin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 506



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:24:36 PM
 #1665

Recovery of monero starting. Rock bottom and (in relative terms) massive wall at 0.002.
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:30:38 PM
 #1666

Huh? In those two quotes you showed, I was talking about Cryptonote Coins, not Darkcoin.

Yes, exactly! And now the same thing is somehow worse if it's Darkcoin whose network is stalled?


If all Darkcoin masternodes were taken offline/DDOSed, it will destroy it's anonymity for the duration of the time the nodes are down.The masternodes are also extremely easy targets, since theres a list of all Masternodes that are offline and online along with their Ip addresses lol.  No such thing will happen with cryptonote coins.

And one last time, it will NOT destroy the anonymity, the sends would just not go through if the nodes are DOS'ed. And do you think Cryptonote's nodes are somehow hidden? How do you think clients will find them if they are lol.
rpietila (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:37:54 PM
 #1667

Recovery of monero starting. Rock bottom and (in relative terms) massive wall at 0.002.

How high is it going to go this time? Last top was 0.01, and the last bottom (assuming we are heading up) was higher than the previous bottom.

HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
darkota
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:38:14 PM
 #1668

Huh? In those two quotes you showed, I was talking about Cryptonote Coins, not Darkcoin.

Yes, exactly! And now the same thing is somehow worse if it's Darkcoin whose network is stalled?


If all Darkcoin masternodes were taken offline/DDOSed, it will destroy it's anonymity for the duration of the time the nodes are down.The masternodes are also extremely easy targets, since theres a list of all Masternodes that are offline and online along with their Ip addresses lol.  No such thing will happen with cryptonote coins.

And one last time, it will NOT destroy the anonymity, the sends would just not go through if the nodes are DOS'ed. And do you think Cryptonote's nodes are somehow hidden? How do you think clients will find them if they are lol.


Yes, exactly! And now the same thing is somehow worse if it's Darkcoin whose network is stalled?  Huh, Darkcoin Needs the Masternodes for it's anonymity...

Maybe I said it wrong...If a Cryptonote coin magically looses all or most it's nodes(over 4,000), it's network will be stalled or slowed down, but it's anonymity through Ring Signatures will/can never be comprosmied.

However, if Darkcoin looses all or most of it's nodes(around 500) through DDOS, taken offline by Amazon etc, it's network will be stalled or slowed down, and it's anonymity will be destroyed(if it looses most but not all of its nodes), since there wont be enough masternodes to do the mixing service(coinjoin).
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:43:34 PM
 #1669



I don't know what else to tell you, you're misunderstanding either intentionally or not, forgetting what you yourself have just previously said, tell people to read previous posts and fail to do it yourself, and call people liars without any evidence. I'm sure rpietila is happy to have you in his thread.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:43:54 PM
 #1670

I was never offered a satisfactory response to the following question I asked a couple of days ago: If Cryptonote is not NSA proof, what does it offer over coins like Darkcoin that also give non-NSA proof anonymity ?

NSA-proof is not well defined.  If you establish a goal which is undefined you establish one which is unattainable.  Since you appear to consider xmr an insurmountable competitive threat I can see why you would employ such a 'disingenuous' sophistry, but i cannot see why i should take your bait.

The current plan being implemented in xmr takes it one step closer to practical immunity from a large class of attacks on aspects of transactional privacy. It is already relatively easy to use xmr in a way which makes it practically immune to some classes of attack on transactional privacy which are of interest to me and to which darkcoin is now and likely will always remain susceptible:

Darkcoin is vulnerable to fungibility crisis, just like bitcoin.

Quote
Darkcoin will likely be ready about a year sooner than any CN coin.

It's done already.  Evan proved this: he stuck a fork in it - twice, so far.  There is no plan in evidence to transition drk to a technology which provides competitive privacy assurrances.  It seems clear that Evan is not competent to execute such a plan were it dropped in his lap.

You seem to think that by the sheer number of your words you can delude the markets into thinking drk is still a serious coin.  It isn't working.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:47:03 PM
 #1671


If I (or any one of us) had control of a botnet we would not be involved with Monero. Trust me. We would have much more profitable fish to fry (ransomware, for instance).

Uh, wow. lol.

I hope you forgot the quote the /s in that post or something.

Ilodin proved that he is a slandering troll with that post.  I think he should be banned. 

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
darkota
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 09:48:00 PM
Last edit: July 14, 2014, 12:01:00 AM by darkota
 #1672



I don't know what else to tell you, you're misunderstanding either intentionally or not, forgetting what you yourself have just previously said, tell people to read previous posts and fail to do it yourself, and call people liars without any evidence. I'm sure rpietila is happy to have you in his thread.

I explained everything to you...It seems like you're just saying anything you can to try and dispel what I've said, literally confusing yourself in the process...You're frankly not making any sense with your arguments, and you have yet to try and disprove mine....It's simply impossible to argue with the points I've made..I'm responding to you because while I may not have much $ in Cryptonote coins atm, I will Admit that they are way superior to coinjoin/masternode coins.

To Compare, how "Unbias" I'm trying to be with my points on Darkcoin and Cryptonotes.

I currently have 210 Darkcoin which is the most of any alt-coin I have, which I bought about a month ago. I used to be an avid Darkcoin supporter.

Then after a while, I actually looked into Cryptonote coins like Monero, instead of trying to slander them because they are a huge threat to Darkcoin..

I came to the conclusion that: Cryptonote coins simply are way superior. They do not have the flaws and bad past Darkcoin has concerning it's Masternode/coinjoin anonymity being compromised and unfair distribution etc. There Ring Signature anonymity is also truly superior and way beyond than what Darkcoin's/coinjoin could ever be..

I've also looked at Zerocoin, it looked promising Until I saw that you have to place your trust in a entity to destroy a key, or theyll otherwise be able to see every transaction as clear as day. It frankly goes against everything Satoshi wanted, to have a trustless application.
-"doublespend" without anyone ever knowing
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:00:02 PM
 #1673

The conception of DRK was illegitimate, I will not buy it for this reason alone.

It is very unfortunate the launch happened as it happened. I was pissed off at the start too. The market has probably priced it in by now however.

The market will continue to discount drk as a premine scam until it ceases to be a premine scam, forever.

If there were not the alternative of superior cryptography with a fair launch and open development, drk might have surpassed ltc by now.  That ship has sailed, however, and nothing will bring it back.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:05:06 PM
 #1674


If I (or any one of us) had control of a botnet we would not be involved with Monero. Trust me. We would have much more profitable fish to fry (ransomware, for instance).

Uh, wow. lol.

I hope you forgot the quote the /s in that post or something.

Ilodin proved that he is a slandering troll with that post.  I think he should be banned. 

I just quoted what he said. Stop trolling.
illodin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1003


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:08:52 PM
 #1675

I came to the conclusion that: Cryptonote coins simply are way superior.

premine scam
superior cryptography

And back to square one. Do you really need another round? I don't. Maybe next week.
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:13:49 PM
 #1676


If I (or any one of us) had control of a botnet we would not be involved with Monero. Trust me. We would have much more profitable fish to fry (ransomware, for instance).

Uh, wow. lol.

I hope you forgot the quote the /s in that post or something.

Ilodin proved that he is a slandering troll with that post.  I think he should be banned. 

I just quoted what he said. Stop trolling.

You intentionally, with knowing deception and malice aforethought, created an inference that fluffypony has criminal intentions.

This doesn't surprise me. It seems characteristic of drk advocates.  It does give me certainty that you are a liability to honest discourse.  Please feel free to prove me wrong by your behaviour.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:20:53 PM
 #1677

I've also looked at Zerocoin, it looked promising Until I saw that you have to place your trust in a entity to destroy a key, or theyll otherwise be able to see every transaction as clear as day. It frankly goes against everything Satoshi wanted, to have a trustless application.

This is not my understanding. They can't see the transactions but they can create fake transactions (i.e. create coins out of thin air) in a way that can't ever be detected.

dnaleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000


Want privacy? Use Monero!


View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:29:51 PM
 #1678

Recovery of monero starting. Rock bottom and (in relative terms) massive wall at 0.002.

How high is it going to go this time? Last top was 0.01, and the last bottom (assuming we are heading up) was higher than the previous bottom.

I guess we'll see a lot of selling pressure between 8 and 10 mBTC...
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 10:33:38 PM
 #1679


If I (or any one of us) had control of a botnet we would not be involved with Monero. Trust me. We would have much more profitable fish to fry (ransomware, for instance).

Uh, wow. lol.

I hope you forgot the quote the /s in that post or something.

Ilodin proved that he is a slandering troll with that post.  I think he should be banned. 

I just quoted what he said. Stop trolling.

You intentionally, with knowing deception and malice aforethought, created an inference that fluffypony has criminal intentions.

This doesn't surprise me. It seems characteristic of drk advocates.  It does give me certainty that you are a liability to honest discourse.  Please feel free to prove me wrong by your behaviour.

I didn't follow the whole chain here, but the original accusation/innuendo came from this post by "openyourmind" https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7802635#msg7802635

If you look at the posting history for "openyourmind," especially the first page or so, you will see exactly the same pattern of one line light-on-content posts made to bump up the post count that you see with every single one of the troll/sock puppet accounts that have been relentlessly attacking Monero from day one.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=304231;sa=showPosts;start=20

It is all quite amateurish to the point where I now find it amusing.

 
Okurkabinladin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 506



View Profile
July 13, 2014, 11:00:30 PM
 #1680

Recovery of monero starting. Rock bottom and (in relative terms) massive wall at 0.002.

How high is it going to go this time? Last top was 0.01, and the last bottom (assuming we are heading up) was higher than the previous bottom.

I am actually calculating with your previous prediction of 0.02 as maximum this year. It is well thought prediction. I will start selling only after we pass 0.01 (previous ATH).
Pages: « 1 ... 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 [84] 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 ... 256 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!