Bitcoin Forum
May 05, 2024, 03:08:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 256 »
  Print  
Author Topic: rpietila Altcoin Observer  (Read 387448 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
smooth
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 07:28:40 AM
 #361

The first implementation was called Bytecoin but it was mined over two years (Ninja style) in secret with unchanging difficulty. Monero is our communities based fresh start.

It's not even clear it was two years. (No independent evidence whatsoever of its existence prior to late 2013 is available.) If it really were mined for two years with code implemented as was obviously intended by the design (using AES hardware in Intel CPUs), that would be less than 10 PCs mining it, which is somewhat implausible. It is entirely possible they gened the whole blockchain in a much shorter period of time on a server farm or cloud nodes. The whole thing is extremely shady and totally lacking even if the most basic transparency, which is why bytecoin is essentially dead now, and Monero is thriving.


How would you generate the blockchain without mining it properly? You mean faking the timestamps in the header or something?

Yeah you can put anything you want in the timestamps. Just scale them all by a factor of 100 and 2 years = 1 week.

1714878510
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714878510

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714878510
Reply with quote  #2

1714878510
Report to moderator
1714878510
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714878510

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714878510
Reply with quote  #2

1714878510
Report to moderator
There are several different types of Bitcoin clients. The most secure are full nodes like Bitcoin Core, which will follow the rules of the network no matter what miners do. Even if every miner decided to create 1000 bitcoins per block, full nodes would stick to the rules and reject those blocks.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714878510
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714878510

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714878510
Reply with quote  #2

1714878510
Report to moderator
1714878510
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714878510

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714878510
Reply with quote  #2

1714878510
Report to moderator
ShroomsKit_Disgrace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1000

Yeah! I hate ShroomsKit!


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 08:10:16 AM
 #362

The death of LTC is being slow and painful.

You can check the charts and watch his unstoppable hemorrhage.
rpietila (OP)
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 08:13:02 AM
 #363

Also worth posting this..

http://www.devtome.com/doku.php?id=a_massive_investigation_of_instamines_and_fastmines_for_the_top_alt_coins

They examined the initial blocks and rate of mining of a large collection of alt-coin currencies to look at how much of total supply was produced early in the coins life.

I picked it up from the monero currency twitter feed.  Monero gets rated as "passes the sniff test".

Thanks! I feel this is really important and confirms my OP. An important thing is that to find a subset of coins that fulfil the following two criteria:
- Fair launch ("economical" would be another word, because that is what matters, not "fairness" per se, but they are essentially the same thing)
- Relevant new features not implementable in Bitcoin

the set consists of exactly one coin: monero.

I could even go so far as to declare that I will buy the next alt that has actual relevant, new features not implementable in Bitcoin and Monero, and has a fair launch. By fair I mean that it must be less than 1% mined when brought to my attention, in addition to the other factors examined in your link. I promise to buy a minimum the same percentage of the eventual coins in circulation that I have of BTC.

I believe a big part in Bitcoin's success, the reason why it can consistently make higher highs, is the fact that all holders have paid the market price for their coins (scams notwithstanding). This ensures that the coin distribution is always optimal and the market action is the process by which it is tending towards more optimality.

It is notable that no coin can survive unless there are both large holders and small holders. But if the large holders have not paid the market price for their coins, their effectiveness is curtailed, "too big boots". If only a fraction of the market cap is actually valued by the market, there are also risks for disturbing and counterproductive market action (pump & especially dump).

I have paid the market price for all of my bitcoins (between $3 and $650) and also for my MROs (BTC0.0018...BTC0.0050). Therefore I am an example of a holder that is responsible, and will only dump the coins if there are declining fundamentals or the price clearly overshoots the level that I believe is medium-term supported by the market.

Quote
Of course, whether the fairness is any barrier/indicator of success remains to be seen.  A catchy name and herd behaviour can overcome a lot of skepticism  Cheesy

In a weekly or monthly scale, yes. But I am investing only in coins that have actual staying power. BTC is currently 99%+ of my holdings but even that 1%- is a significant holding.

HIM TVA Dragon, AOK-GM, Emperor of the Earth, Creator of the World, King of Crypto Kingdom, Lord of Malla, AOD-GEN, SA-GEN5, Ministry of Plenty (Join NOW!), Professor of Economics and Theology, Ph.D, AM, Chairman, Treasurer, Founder, CEO, 3*MG-2, 82*OHK, NKP, WTF, FFF, etc(x3)
bitdig
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 208
Merit: 101



View Profile WWW
June 03, 2014, 12:35:38 PM
 #364

Anyone has an opinion on boolberry coin? it seems to be based on bytecoin as well, but it would be a good idea for someone who study other similar coins to compare and it was launched on 17 of may... The price is pretty high in my opinion for less then a month coin, but again I don't really understand pros/cons here...

SlipperySlope
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 501

Stephen Reed


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:17:33 PM
 #365

The death of LTC is being slow and painful.

You can check the charts and watch his unstoppable hemorrhage.

It looks to me that Litecoin could follow Bitcoin in the next bubble.

A rise from $11.253 to its previous peak at $48.48 would be a gain of 4.3x. Bitcoin in contrast is at $658 and a rise from here to its previous peak at $1163 would be a gain of 1.76x. Speculators understand that when Litecoin joins the rally, it can appreciate at a faster rate than Bitcoin.

Probably the same circumstances hold for other altcoins.

Here is the one-week resolution chart for Litecoin illustrating that its price has broken through the resistance trendline that I drew from the November peak . . .

nakaone
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:39:06 PM
 #366

Anyone has an opinion on boolberry coin? it seems to be based on bytecoin as well, but it would be a good idea for someone who study other similar coins to compare and it was launched on 17 of may... The price is pretty high in my opinion for less then a month coin, but again I don't really understand pros/cons here...

it is not exactly a clone - bought the same amount of bool pre exchange as I did with monero.

the developer is given credit by the monero developers.

in case two ring signature projects succeed, for me it is likely that it is monero and boolberry.
dnaleor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000


Want privacy? Use Monero!


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:50:42 PM
 #367

Maybe a bottom is forming in dollar terms, but I'm pretty sure LTC will continue to go down in BTC terms in the next weeks.
I will buy back some LTC below 12.5 mBTC
orinoco
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 81
Merit: 10

<3 big picture


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 01:52:19 PM
 #368


Excuse my ignorance but what is a "MRO" or "Monero"?

I realise this was answered.. but also should bring to attention that its not "MRO" any more.

Changed to XMR a short while ago, for ISO Compliance reasons apparently (who knew?)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=583449.msg7098497#msg7098497

Quote
4. In order to maintain ISO 4217 compliance, we are changing our ticker symbol from MRO to XMR effective immediately. This change primarily effects exchanges at this early stage, as we are sure that MRO will continue to be used colloquially and in general discussion. We are aware that this may cause a little confusion, but we feel it necessary to make this change early on rather than later when Monero is more widely spread.

My first thought was "this is bullshit".. but then I read a bit on the X-currencies with reference to the standard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_4217#X_currencies

So I went and checked the reserved codes list for MR and found its Mauritania.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1

This actually shows a bit of forward thinking.. for integration with existing infrastructure and networks (e.g. forex trading), its pretty much mandatory that a currency conform to the standards.  The flip side is a philosophical one.. do we (the people) want that integration?

Twitter: Omnipreneur
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 02:27:23 PM
Last edit: June 03, 2014, 02:37:27 PM by Anotheranonlol
 #369

Anyone has an opinion on boolberry coin? it seems to be based on bytecoin as well, but it would be a good idea for someone who study other similar coins to compare and it was launched on 17 of may... The price is pretty high in my opinion for less then a month coin, but again I don't really understand pros/cons here...



Pros (compared with MRO)

- More rational emission curve
- Innovative bloat reduction features
- Increased anonymity
- algo seems (at first glance) to be improvement in comparison to MRO in a number of ways

Cons

- Awful name
- No pool infrastructure as yet, at last check mining was more profitable, and people are ready to dump at small profit
- Community nowhere near as strong as MRO.
- Lacks first mover advantage
- Many users do not like devs 1% 'premine' < heard multiple times
- dismissed as 'clone' < again, heard this many times

It seems it will mostly be a battle of perception. For now MRO has emerged as the leader looking like it's gone straight to being the LTC whilst BCN's TBX, but who knows, BBR or another cryptonote coin could come out as the LTC whilst MRO's the FBX

Its About Sharing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000


Antifragile


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 02:35:05 PM
 #370

Are there any paper wallets available for MRO? I can't find anything and hate keeping them long term on the smaller exchanges.

I'm just a little in MRO and even less in NXT but I want to see where that one goes as well.

Thx in advance,
IAS

BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
Its About Sharing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000


Antifragile


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 02:38:16 PM
 #371

The death of LTC is being slow and painful.

You can check the charts and watch his unstoppable hemorrhage.

It looks to me that Litecoin could follow Bitcoin in the next bubble.

A rise from $11.253 to its previous peak at $48.48 would be a gain of 4.3x. Bitcoin in contrast is at $658 and a rise from here to its previous peak at $1163 would be a gain of 1.76x. Speculators understand that when Litecoin joins the rally, it can appreciate at a faster rate than Bitcoin.

Probably the same circumstances hold for other altcoins.

Here is the one-week resolution chart for Litecoin illustrating that its price has broken through the resistance trendline that I drew from the November peak . . .



I'm still in LTC but don't like the chart. Your line coming down pierces the wicks yet starts on a wick. To keep it consistent I'd lay it across the top and then you can see it hasn't broken out yet.
I do think LTC will become Wall Street's #2 darling due to the Network growth once those ASIC's come out. The worry is that KNC didn't sell out so I wonder about the overall health going forward.

IAS

BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
SlipperySlope
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 501

Stephen Reed


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 02:57:31 PM
 #372

I'm still in LTC but don't like the chart. Your line coming down pierces the wicks yet starts on a wick. To keep it consistent I'd lay it across the top and then you can see it hasn't broken out yet.

Here is a line drawn by me on BitcoinWisdom with more care - that still suggests a LTC breakout from the downtrend . . .



Here is a line drawn using the tips of the candle wicks, that suggests LTC will breakout this week . . .

Its About Sharing
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1442
Merit: 1000


Antifragile


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 03:27:33 PM
 #373

I'm still in LTC but don't like the chart. Your line coming down pierces the wicks yet starts on a wick. To keep it consistent I'd lay it across the top and then you can see it hasn't broken out yet.

Here is a line drawn by me on BitcoinWisdom with more care - that still suggests a LTC breakout from the downtrend . . .



Here is a line drawn using the tips of the candle wicks, that suggests LTC will breakout this week . . .



I like the 2nd chart, I generally prefer the higher wicks as tops and not bodies. It does look like a breakout, but if you remember with BTC, the breakout occurred up long after it occurred sideways (almost 2 weeks later)
.
I will have to keep an eye on LTC now. I just sold out 2/3rds at .2...


BTC = Black Swan.
BTC = Antifragile - "Some things benefit from shocks; they thrive and grow when exposed to volatility, randomness, disorder, and stressors and love adventure, risk, and uncertainty. Robust is not the opposite of fragile.
tacotime
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 03:33:13 PM
 #374

Anyone has an opinion on boolberry coin? it seems to be based on bytecoin as well, but it would be a good idea for someone who study other similar coins to compare and it was launched on 17 of may... The price is pretty high in my opinion for less then a month coin, but again I don't really understand pros/cons here...



Pros (compared with MRO)

- More rational emission curve
- Innovative bloat reduction features
- Increased anonymity
- algo seems (at first glance) to be improvement in comparison to MRO in a number of ways

The emissions curve is a matter of debate, but I'm not sure your reduction claim is true. By having transaction outputs that require mandatory mixin levels to spend them, it's more likely that you'll increase bloat in the block chain.

Wild-keccak is actually very GPU friendly from the couple of people I've talked to who do opencl coding, so there's that issue as well. That can go either way, but it could mean that whales have hugely unfair early advantages.

Code:
XMR: 44GBHzv6ZyQdJkjqZje6KLZ3xSyN1hBSFAnLP6EAqJtCRVzMzZmeXTC2AHKDS9aEDTRKmo6a6o9r9j86pYfhCWDkKjbtcns
dreamspark
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 03:57:11 PM
 #375

Only just seen this thread so reserving my spot rpielta Wink

Some good points have been made so far, hopefully this thread can prevent the clusterfuck that normally ensues on an alt thread.

aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1029


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 06:39:56 PM
 #376

I have argued elsewhere that currency is a natural monopoly within a given market.  The privacy-oriented global instant liquidity market seems well-defined.   Whether to build a currency or to fork it an compete against the original is strongly analogous to a prisoner's dilemma:  Forking is defection.   I consider much of rationally self-interested pro-social morality to be derived from the iterated prisoner's dilemma.  Pro-social moral self-interested action results in win-win conditions.  Forking is anti-social immoral and irrational, unless the fork is substantially superior.  Forking over minor factors is defection.  Defectors must be shot.  The pro-social, morally correct, and rationally self-interested thing to do is to adhere to the leading coin in a given niche, as it is the most likely to attain monopoly over time, and mutual adherence to the coin assures a win-win outcome which much higher confidence.  If the fork adds watershed features which are crucial to fulfilling the niche, or substantially expand the niche, then and only then is it suitable to defect, and switch to the fork.

Give a man a fish and he eats for a day.  Give a man a Poisson distribution and he eats at random times independent of one another, at a constant known rate.
Anotheranonlol
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 504


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 07:18:20 PM
 #377

Anyone has an opinion on boolberry coin? it seems to be based on bytecoin as well, but it would be a good idea for someone who study other similar coins to compare and it was launched on 17 of may... The price is pretty high in my opinion for less then a month coin, but again I don't really understand pros/cons here...



Pros (compared with MRO)

- More rational emission curve
- Innovative bloat reduction features
- Increased anonymity
- algo seems (at first glance) to be improvement in comparison to MRO in a number of ways

The emissions curve is a matter of debate, but I'm not sure your reduction claim is true. By having transaction outputs that require mandatory mixin levels to spend them, it's more likely that you'll increase bloat in the block chain.

Wild-keccak is actually very GPU friendly from the couple of people I've talked to who do opencl coding, so there's that issue as well. That can go either way, but it could mean that whales have hugely unfair early advantages.

Actually for now about the GPU friendly I think you are right, with scratchpad now.
About the bloat too also fair point.
I do think the emission curve of BBR is preferable, but people have other opinions like you say

Moving on from CryptoNote coins

I'd be open to listening to any esteemed altcoin speculator or cryptocurrency veteran in this thread who could
debate why CounterParty is not undervalued at this time. With the exception of the argument
that coins aren't being dribbled out by CPU,GPU,FPGA,ASIC or a combination of those over the next 1-25 years
and therefore it's automatically discounted.

So as not to clutter up this thread with what seems like biased promotion, I've given some of my views  on
 why I believe it is indeed undervalued here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=637645.msg7114290

mmitech
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1001


things you own end up owning you


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 07:33:27 PM
 #378

one rule I followed about investing in the "right" alts and I can confirm it always worked with me.... read as much as yo can about the alt, understand and investigate its market, if it scares you (supposedly you are a BTC holder)invest in it.
JakeThePanda
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 644
Merit: 500



View Profile
June 03, 2014, 07:42:17 PM
 #379

Is X11 coin doing anything right, or is it a premine pump?

It's a PoS/PoW hybrid. PoW coins have already been mined, now it went into PoS mode.

The anonymity method is "unorthodox" as nodes are trusted to forward the money instead of stealing them - which will be a nightmare to enforce.

Thank you for all the information I needed  Tongue

You seem like a smart man, so you would be wise to at least get an explanation directly from the XC developer.  The XC developer's identity is publicly known, unlike 99% of the coins.  AlexGR, although knowledgable, is a big Darkcoin holder and known to troll the XC thread constantly.  the fact is that XC developer, Dan Metcalf, has made quicker progress than any other "anon" coin. XC plans go way beyond just being an anon coin.  Here is the thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=630547.20
msdogey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 03, 2014, 08:12:16 PM
 #380

Anyone here care to take a stab at reading the DOGE tea leaves?  Down about 80% off the ATH currently but still over double the ATL.  I would expect it to rebound eventually but I am wondering if we will see it make it all the way down (or continue to fall below) the ATL again before the big bounce.  The high volume of mining rewards makes predicting this tricky for me since there are about 5x as many coins in circulation now than there were the last time we saw these prices.  The reddit community is still strong but the growth has definitely slowed over the months. The last I heard they were talking about twitch integration for tipping streamers.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 [19] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 ... 256 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!