|
atcsecure
|
 |
June 16, 2014, 02:43:10 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
Mwalshe89
|
|
June 16, 2014, 02:55:07 AM |
|
Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go
Whats going to happen? Think about it. |
|
|
|
|
|
Kuriso
|
|
June 16, 2014, 02:56:44 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread  would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address.  |
|
|
|
|
benthach
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:00:02 AM |
|
XC
|
reddit btcwriter1 - twitter kingpininvestor
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:00:21 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Lets set the record straight #1. XC is not a scam coin. #2. XC's XNode technology is still under development #3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code. #4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
pookielax31
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:03:48 AM |
|
ATC...... we are not worthy... hahaha KEEP the goodshsit up my man.. ur one of the best devs... always deliverign despite the Bullshit you have to deal with that no other DEV oes... keep it up XC FTW
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:08:50 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Funny...considering I see a cinni dev in here who has invested some into XC... |
|
|
|
|
|
brother3
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:09:52 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Lets set the record straight #1. XC is not a scam coin. #2. XC's XNode technology is still under development #3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code. #4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins I don't know how you put up with all this but I am glad you can rise above and steadily deliver stellar work! Hats off and thank you  |
|
|
|
|
|
shockstar
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:10:23 AM |
|
I can't believe these FUDers are at it again. Sigh. ATC Keep up the good work.
|
|
|
|
|
fourdegrees11
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:12:11 AM |
|
Every time this coin is on the move a new pile of FUD is delivered. We need this rise to be slow and steady.
|
|
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:16:31 AM |
|
Every time this coin is on the move a new pile of FUD is delivered. We need this rise to be slow and steady.
they feel the need to protect their precious from the XC..its a good thing we are looked at as a strong competitor. |
|
|
|
|
ForReal
Member
Offline
Activity: 87
Merit: 10
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:21:52 AM |
|
this should be the background for the website or the reddit at least  + 1000 |
|
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:26:10 AM |
|
Put that as Twitter wallpaper
|
|
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:34:06 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Lets set the record straight #1. XC is not a scam coin. #2. XC's XNode technology is still under development #3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code. #4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coins So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional. So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen. |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:35:18 AM |
|
I don't see the whole "multipath" idea yet, but at least mixer outputs come from the 550XC masternode input rather than the senders inputs.
Can some further details or source code be provided for how the signatures for multipath/mixed transactions work for this release? It still doesn't look like there is any multisignature going on between the wallet and mixer wallet so in theory mixers can still steal coins in rev2?.
Not in rev2.. You cant steal coins Can you address this with technical details or some proof. I keep seeing people say that these coins will get stolen. They are even talking about it in CINNI thread. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg7335393#msg7335393XC is in the near DUMP or a Pump-n-Dump right now. They released their new wallet. Anyone know if it is better than ours??My feeling it's a scam coin. Thoughts, comments? thnx.
~darylluke.
its a scam and not worth of mention in Cinni thread would you want a hold a coin that can stolen/lost because of xnode? its completely experimental, people should able to expect that when they send coins somewhere it ends up at their intended destination, not someplace else because of malfunction or a bad xnode stealing coins. Its unacceptable for your coins to be at risk because of experimental features. Imagine you sent anon 100k XC somewhere and a bad xnode hijacks and sends it to their own address. Lets set the record straight #1. XC is not a scam coin. #2. XC's XNode technology is still under development #3. You can't send more than 10 XC's through the XNODE system, plus you have to use the debug console, so clearly it is Beta feature that is being tested to demonstrate the progress[and provide PROOF] and provide testing for the code. #4. REV2 Will use multisig to prevent stolen coinsThis is the thing that the DRK fudster kept on harping about. How can people not EMPHASIZE this point!!! #4... is the key to shut all the DRK fudster up all together. |
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:36:49 AM |
|
So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.
So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.
ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...? |
|
|
|
stealth923
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:40:11 AM |
|
So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.
So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.
ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...? DRK multi-sig IS working...only masternode payments. And before you say fork...XC had to be check-pointed and a new wallet released a few weeks ago from an unplanned fork! Just to highlight to investors - everyone has been screaming that XC is flawed and now after all this development the Dev announces that he is going to COPY darkcoin's multi-sig architecture to get around the bad actor and coin stealing problem........what a waste of time... |
|
|
|
|
|
bitcad4u
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:40:35 AM |
|
this should be the background for the website or the reddit at least + 1000 this is a great looking wallpaper..although I do not like the looks of the one lil floaty thingy over the X that kinda looks like it might be a sperm...remove the tail looking thing from that round circle plz.. else we have sperm on our wallpaper. Other than that, phenominal ! |
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:43:43 AM |
|
Be careful guys, we all know whats going to happen once those walls go
Whats going to happen? Think about it. It will dump? my brain hurts from reading all of this...
Now I have to decide if I want to buy back in at a loss from yesterdays attempt to capitalize on the swing. Or cross my fingers and hope I can at least buy back at my selling price of yesterday. decisions decisions
Let me guess.... you sold and you want back in?  |
|
|
|
evtrmm
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
So much for "Community"
|
|
June 16, 2014, 03:47:16 AM
Last edit: June 16, 2014, 03:58:27 AM by evtrmm |
|
So what you are saying is you are going to throw the existing XNode architecture out the window and use Multi-Sig instead of transferring the ACTUAL coins through the mixers. What Darkcoin has and is already functional.
So basically this means that XC architecture 1.5 is STILL flawed and there is bad actor scenario's where coins can be stolen.
ya... as if DRk is completely working now right? RC3 still isnt' out where the masternode actually can pay the operators and not fork like mad. Why don't you come back when DRK is actually fully working first...? DRK multi-sig IS working...only masternode payments. And before you say fork...XC had to be check-pointed and a new wallet released a few weeks ago from an unplanned fork! Just to highlight to investors - everyone has been screaming that XC is flawed and now after all this development the Dev announces that he is going to COPY darkcoin's multi-sig architecture to get around the bad actor and coin stealing problem........what a waste of time... So what your saying is XC will copy #dorks closed source code? I see.  Edit: just so everyone knows, this is the first peak that ATC has given into any Rev 2 specifics. |
|
|
|
|
|
