"Capable" != stronger.
Without law and authority you get a wild west like thing, a place not quite known for its capabilities.
This implies there were no laws and authority in the wild west.
Is this true? Were there no laws or sherrifs in the wild west or are you talking out you arse again?
Law in the old west? What law? You can't fire someone in the back? The sheriff was someone with a good aim/fast trigger and/or low life expectancy.
This is the biggest flaw/ideology shortcut about libertarian ideas:
REQUIREMENT: People need to respect property by their own will
QUESTION: How
YOUR ANSWER: Errrmm... they will just because... is the right thing to do...
And here you've the Communist version:
MAIN OBJECTIVE: State will vanish
QUESTION: How
MARX's ANSWER: Errrmm... it will just because... is the right thing to do...
Like you never met a basic requirement, communists never met their main objective.
You see, for a thing to work all pieces have to work in synchrony. This is basically to create a car without a bunch of pieces in the engine and then expect it to work somehow.
And the "37 ninjas" isn't a fallacy, it's just an inconvenient statement for libertarians.
What law? I'm English, so the law of the colonies (
![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
jk) isn't my strong suit But I'll give it a go.
How about the constitution of the US?
Sheriffs were just private citizens? What about US Marshalls? What about Texas Rangers? What about the court system established by The Judiciary Act of 1789?
I wrote a derivation of property rights from the first principle that I own my self. Are you saying that my derivation is incorrect or are you saying that a person does not own themselves and you believe in slavery?
and here is a correction for you
REQUIREMENT: People need to respect property by their own will
QUESTION: How
YOUR ANSWER:
Errrmm... they will just because... is the right thing to do... Because we will economically ostracize anyone who does not comply with respect for private property. Do you have any idea what this means?!
If you violate anothers private property, you will be forced hide in your home as streets are private and you will be forcibly removed if you try to use them.
In you home you will in short order die, because your water and power will be shut off and you will run out of food and stave.
No one will bring supplies to you because they will suffer the same economic fate.
You could make a run for it into the wild and live like a cave man, but you will invariably contract and illness or bug and no one will treat you medically.
You could try run to another portion of society and start anew but cities will have reciprocal agreements with one another, you will be discovered.
Basically if you violate property rights, you forfeit the ability to economically interact with other free people, and this, is a death sentence.
Elegant solution isn't it?