Amph
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
 |
June 12, 2014, 07:23:47 AM |
|
where you have found it? there is no dl link in the website nor in the OP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
alphateam
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:24:34 AM |
|
Ok, i have a question about the 50mh/S limit.
If i understand, that's 50mh/s by worker, so if i create on the pool 10 different worker, i can have 500mh/s without limit.
Or i can rent multiple rig less then 50mh/s and make a worker for each.
If this, i think that's better to limit 50mh/s by account in the pool, that's finally the same result, we can make multiple account, but more boring to create multiple account than multiple worker imho
|
|
|
|
|
|
arz
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:29:35 AM |
|
DEV are you sure you will not delay the launch TODAY???
|
Crypto enthusiast/part-time trader, iOS Developer
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 12, 2014, 07:33:20 AM |
|
never seen those two flags before, seems suspicious, anyway wallet is useless(pos interest is too low) dump from the pool |
|
|
|
|
|
foxy
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:13:23 AM |
|
just wait for the topic OP to post a (clean) wallet. simple.
I don't think pool operators have the power to instruct exchanges not to list. if people are interested they will get behind it, and exchanges follow where the interest lies. these posts sound like a lot of sour grapes, sorry you're missing out on your 2% fees I guess. that said until there's a clean virus total no thanks.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:18:42 AM |
|
just wait for the topic OP to post a (clean) wallet. simple.
I don't think pool operators have the power to instruct exchanges not to list. if people are interested they will get behind it, and exchanges follow where the interest lies. these posts sound like a lot of sour grapes, sorry you're missing out on your 2% fees I guess. that said until there's a clean virus total no thanks.
 Much luck to you guys, if any other coin would only mineable by one pool (operator) everyone would scream "scam!, scam!, scam!" as there is no way to prove that the pool is legit and you get what you deserve, but if you like being controlled by one single instance here.. Go ahead and support the idea of socialism ;-) |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
n3rfherder
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:32:46 AM |
|
just wait for the topic OP to post a (clean) wallet. simple.
I don't think pool operators have the power to instruct exchanges not to list. if people are interested they will get behind it, and exchanges follow where the interest lies. these posts sound like a lot of sour grapes, sorry you're missing out on your 2% fees I guess. that said until there's a clean virus total no thanks.
Much luck to you guys, if any other coin would only mineable by one pool (operator) everyone would scream "scam!, scam!, scam!" as there is no way to prove that the pool is legit and you get what you deserve, but if you like being controlled by one single instance here.. Go ahead and support the idea of socialism ;-) All the countries with the highest standard of living are socialist leaning. |
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:39:49 AM |
|
just wait for the topic OP to post a (clean) wallet. simple.
I don't think pool operators have the power to instruct exchanges not to list. if people are interested they will get behind it, and exchanges follow where the interest lies. these posts sound like a lot of sour grapes, sorry you're missing out on your 2% fees I guess. that said until there's a clean virus total no thanks.
Much luck to you guys, if any other coin would only mineable by one pool (operator) everyone would scream "scam!, scam!, scam!" as there is no way to prove that the pool is legit and you get what you deserve, but if you like being controlled by one single instance here.. Go ahead and support the idea of socialism ;-) All the countries with the highest standard of living are socialist leaning. Oh yes.. 'Murica, Australia, half of Europe etc. are doin really bad and have damn bad standard of living.. not even hot water or ground transportation there.. lol :-)  |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
uray
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:42:12 AM |
|
actually this is good experiment,
no wallet on PoW period
no public operated pool
and after that (after PoW), it is all public, there will be open source wallet, block explorer and public exchange
there will be no early & huge dump of coin in PoW period, this will make good investment.
its fair enough, i am eager to see how it will goes, but in the PoW period i will join this !
hope it worked well !
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WestOstrich
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:51:38 AM |
|
What point is there in limiting the hashrate to 50, but allowing multiple workers??? How is this going to stop the big farms? If this is one of the main features of the coin to have wide distribution - there's a gaping hole in the plan.. Clearly the total needs to be capped to have any effect, not hashrate per worker? And you would know this. Seems odd...
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 12, 2014, 08:56:37 AM |
|
What point is there in limiting the hashrate to 50, but allowing multiple workers??? How is this going to stop the big farms? If this is one of the main features of the coin to have wide distribution - there's a gaping hole in the plan.. Clearly the total needs to be capped to have any effect, not hashrate per worker? And you would know this. Seems odd...
i think there is a limit per IP also, dunno if they removed that, otherwise seems pointless as you said |
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:02:08 AM |
|
What point is there in limiting the hashrate to 50, but allowing multiple workers??? How is this going to stop the big farms? If this is one of the main features of the coin to have wide distribution - there's a gaping hole in the plan.. Clearly the total needs to be capped to have any effect, not hashrate per worker? And you would know this. Seems odd...
i think there is a limit per IP also, dunno if they removed that, otherwise seems pointless as you said I think the base idea of the coin is not that bad, but they're just doin' it wrong.. Simply let the users vote which pools/pool op's they want from start, this way only trusted pools are set up and you can also use specialized stratums with per worker/per ip limitations etc. Also max hash limit should be voteable ... Make it democratic .. It's (should be) a community coin, no dictator coin  |
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools |
|
|
|
|
|
Starscream
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:16:05 AM |
|
Yeah, makes sense. Seemed suspicious the way he presented himself as GMT support considering you're mostly posting during normal GMT times  Well, I hope people heeded my warning when I posted to be cautious from downloading his file. |
|
|
|
|
|
uray
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:24:03 AM |
|
What point is there in limiting the hashrate to 50, but allowing multiple workers??? How is this going to stop the big farms? If this is one of the main features of the coin to have wide distribution - there's a gaping hole in the plan.. Clearly the total needs to be capped to have any effect, not hashrate per worker? And you would know this. Seems odd...
i think there is a limit per IP also, dunno if they removed that, otherwise seems pointless as you said I think the base idea of the coin is not that bad, but they're just doin' it wrong.. Simply let the users vote which pools/pool op's they want from start, this way only trusted pools are set up and you can also use specialized stratums with per worker/per ip limitations etc. Also max hash limit should be voteable ... Make it democratic .. It's (should be) a community coin, no dictator coin dev owned pool are to fund the development as there are no premine or IPO like another coin here. and max hash limit is indeed determined by voting |
|
|
|
|
Minerals (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Minerals Dev
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:25:26 AM |
|
You think these pools have DDOS protection? Think again.
We charge 2% because we are a premium pool where shit just works.
We'll see on launch :p
If there is no competition among pools DDoS just makes no sense. Why would anyone DDoS our pools if one cannot profit from it? Sorry, not going to work. Already contacted exchanges and gave them the heads up.
Nobody is going to host this coin on a major exchange.
If you mine this coin you are killing crypto. And in fact, since you won't be able to trade it, you're just wasting electricity.
But why are you doing this? We are trying to have some innovative way of distributing coins and you want to kill this idea because pool operators, like yourself, can't participate? We were going well in discussion with Bittrex of listing us from the launch but I am afraid that they might not do it given your reputation. This is just sad and makes no sense to me. |
MVNWT9QtaryFdzexcHNyiJa3hzZB5Ja85P
|
|
|
|
johndec2
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:33:36 AM |
|
If there is no competition among pools DDoS just makes no sense. Why would anyone DDoS our pools if one cannot profit from it?
The pool owners might piss in your sandbox just because you wouldn't let them play? Watch out for it. |
|
|
|
|
liuhou521
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
June 12, 2014, 09:33:55 AM |
|
准备开挖
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
