|
powersup
|
 |
June 15, 2014, 06:39:25 AM |
|
any comment from dev or supporter of this coin? lol the dev caught red handed what about pool.mn is it scammy? I know a few pool operators who are also coin devs so I don't see what the big deal is. Regarding legitimacy of the pools, well Ive used that pool on a few occasion and never had any problems. But admittedly there is mixed feelings about that particular pool on these forums. Actually I find it somewhat refreshing that a pool operator (if he is) take a stance against big hashers and mining farms. Lets look at the fact though about the coin. launch was very smooth, there seems to be nice distribution, no forks, confirmation that there is a wallet, there is a block explorer, coins are transferable and tradable on an exchange, and finally there are no multi-pools dumping! |
|
|
|
|
bitwho
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:42:22 AM |
|
any comment from dev or supporter of this coin? lol the dev caught red handed what about pool.mn is it scammy? I know a few pool operators who are also coin devs so I don't see what the big deal is. Regarding legitimacy of the pools, well Ive used that pool on a few occasion and never had any problems. But admittedly there is mixed feelings about that particular pool on these forums. Actually I find it somewhat refreshing that a pool operator (if he is) take a stance against big hashers and mining farms. Lets look at the fact though about the coin. launch was very smooth, there seems to be nice distribution, no forks, confirmation that there is a wallet, there is a block explorer, coins are transferable and tradable on an exchange, and finally there are no multi-pools dumping! or the opposite. pool.mn literally centralized this coin to be the only ones controlling it. |
|
|
|
|
|
prix
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:51:43 AM |
|
For me it is better that we know who the developer, only I do not like that the developer has not confirmed this fact above, when someone asked him about it directly.
|
|
|
|
|
jc12345
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1013
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:53:43 AM |
|
Guys, please enlighten us what the issue is about pool.mn? Has pool.mn done something in the past that we have to be concerned about? What is the significance if the dev team is related to pool.mn?
Everything about minerals coin so far has been smooth and there is nothing really to complain about at this point. Yes the POW portion is closed, but the answer will always lie somewhere in-between centralised and decentralized, open and closed source. Exactly where in-between something needs to be depends on the risks one want to mitigate for a coin and the controls needed to be implemented to mitigate the risks.
So the alarmists about pool.mn please tell us why you are concerned and why I should rather move my resources elsewhere, although I have not had any issues with minerals coin so far?
|
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 15, 2014, 06:54:03 AM |
|
any comment from dev or supporter of this coin? lol the dev caught red handed what about pool.mn is it scammy? I know a few pool operators who are also coin devs so I don't see what the big deal is. Regarding legitimacy of the pools, well Ive used that pool on a few occasion and never had any problems. But admittedly there is mixed feelings about that particular pool on these forums. Actually I find it somewhat refreshing that a pool operator (if he is) take a stance against big hashers and mining farms. Lets look at the fact though about the coin. launch was very smooth, there seems to be nice distribution, no forks, confirmation that there is a wallet, there is a block explorer, coins are transferable and tradable on an exchange, and finally there are no multi-pools dumping! or the opposite. pool.mn literally centralized this coin to be the only ones controlling it. if you can propose an alternative way instead of this, would be welcome, but for now this is the only solution against farm centralization funny, to fight centralization you need centralization... |
|
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:18:36 AM |
|
I don't believe Pool.mn are scammers in any shape or form.
12000 minerals and counting here!
Bittrex after POW as Dev said.
The more FUD I see the easier it is for me to mine with my 50MHS
Bring it!
+1 The fact that coins are available for withdrawals and trade means that EACH miner is free to make their own choices. Mine, or don't. Withdraw, or leave in the pool. Sell, or hold on C-Cex Peace  |
|
|
|
|
helloweiwei
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:29:33 AM |
|
Great.The coin looks awesome.  |
|
|
|
|
john-wilson
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:32:14 AM |
|
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features  |
|
|
|
helloweiwei
Member
Offline
Activity: 119
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:32:27 AM |
|
I hope that the wallet is very beautiful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ZacharyComstock
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:47:23 AM |
|
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features I feel like Minerals provide great innovation! ASICs and multipools were raping and killing every coin. With minerals it is not possible. Wait for the bigger exchange and the price will skyrocket. Actually, why am I telling you this? The more weak hands now - the lower price for me to buy Minerals  |
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:50:05 AM |
|
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features isn't the price low enough for you fudders? fudders are so greedy nowadays |
|
|
|
|
|
komodovpn
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:51:00 AM |
|
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features isn't the price low enough for you fudders? fudders are so greedy nowadays most fudders have budget of 2 satoshi per coin, any coin |
|
|
|
|
ZacharyComstock
|
|
June 15, 2014, 07:53:29 AM |
|
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features isn't the price low enough for you fudders? fudders are so greedy nowadays most fudders have budget of 2 satoshi per coin, any coin I would LOVE to by Minerals for 2 satoshi per coin So untill the coin costs 1 satoshi FUD would be profitable |
|
|
|
twhh
Member
Offline
Activity: 75
Merit: 10
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:01:40 AM |
|
Why dev want bittrex added after POW end ? Any premeditated ? just let to small exchange added  |
|
|
|
|
ZacharyComstock
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:05:21 AM |
|
just clone coin, no innovations, no new features isn't the price low enough for you fudders? fudders are so greedy nowadays most fudders have budget of 2 satoshi per coin, any coin I would LOVE to by Minerals for 2 satoshi per coin So untill the coin costs 1 satoshi FUD would be profitable LOL FUD eh? you must have patience of a saint well, I don't  This is why I have to place my orders at ~330 and w8 for the weak souls to sell me their future profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:11:23 AM |
|
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast. |
|
|
|
|
|
ZacharyComstock
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:14:07 AM |
|
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast. so all the Satoshi Nakamoto stories aren't true?  |
|
|
|
|
ASICrefugee
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:29:58 AM |
|
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast. so all the Satoshi Nakamoto stories aren't true? It's still the wrong guy, allegedly |
|
|
|
|
|
ZacharyComstock
|
|
June 15, 2014, 08:33:59 AM |
|
We are all mining this coin to eventually swap it out for BTC - another coin where the identity of the dev is unknown The irony is so delicious I could have it for breakfast. so all the Satoshi Nakamoto stories aren't true? It's still the wrong guy, allegedly he isn't? coz here he's showing his ID which clearly states that he IS the inventor of bitcoin  |
|
|
|
|
Poll
