|
Mineotaur
|
 |
June 30, 2016, 06:29:07 PM |
|
I bought and stashed a few XEM last year, can't remember exactly when. I have name.adb and name.wlt, as well as the password I used when creating the wallet. I do not have the private key. When I run the client, it sees the wallet, but when I type the password it tells me:
"Oops!
ERROR 123
NIS: ADDRESS BOOK COULD NOT BE READ"
Is all lost?
Your wallet seems to be fine. Your address book not so. You can try a few things. 1) You just needs to change the name of file. If it was more than one word and he used the back up wallet feature, it saved in the wrong format. Renaming the file will fix it. (but I forget the trick. I think it involves put a "_" in between the words) (Please make a back up copy to play with when doing things like this) 2) He can wait until the next Lightwallet comes out and import into it without the address book as long as it was a wallet with only one account. 3) If you know the password. Remove the two wallets from the NCC folder. Create a new wallet with the same name and same password. Deleted that wallet but leave the address book file in the NCC folder. Now paste in the original and good wallet. If it was just a problem with the address book file, then you will be able to log into your wallet just having lost all your address book contents only. If any of these work, please also back up the private key. Here is a tutorial about locating wallet files. http://blog.nem.io/how-to-find-export-or-delete-your-wallet-and-address-book-file/Thankyou, but none of these worked. I don't have a lot of spare time right now to dedicate to this, but I'll try again in the future and hope that perhaps that lightwallet works. I'm not the only person with this prob btw, I've received a PM from someone with the same issue. Fingers crossed for the future, don't want to lose those 45,000 coins! Will report back when I have more free time. Thanks. Edit: I do not think my files are corrupted. I had them backed up on 4 usb drives. None work, all were taken from the original, working files created by the wallet; not copies of potentially corrupted files. Also, 2nd April 2015 is the date on which these files were created. I'd have been using the most recent wallet on that date to create these files. Just including this info incase it's of any obvious consequence or might give any clues as to why the latest wallet doesn't seem to like my files. Thanks. Still struggling with this some months later. |
BTC: 37r8wbYRMPav3AU8w1D3FQmwtYenVzcbdX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
greentea
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1418
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 30, 2016, 06:33:03 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
XbladeX
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1002
|
|
June 30, 2016, 06:37:44 PM |
|
|
Request / 26th September / 2022 APP-06-22-4587
|
|
|
Nxtblg
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 30, 2016, 06:56:09 PM |
|
Why would this be good news for XEM?
This would add another direct fiat link to XEM. XEM/JPY In other words, more demand for XEM through Japanese folks who don't want to buy Bitcoin as an intermediary. |
|
|
|
svensel
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 58
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2016, 07:07:29 PM |
|
ride the whales  |
|
|
|
|
|
teletobi
|
|
June 30, 2016, 07:29:09 PM |
|
Why would this be good news for XEM?
This would add another direct fiat link to XEM. XEM/JPY In other words, more demand for XEM through Japanese folks who don't want to buy Bitcoin as an intermediary. Or maybe it´s a good Way for the Japanese to get their FIAT out of Crypto...;-) |
|
|
|
|
DIMKAZDS
|
|
June 30, 2016, 08:17:07 PM |
|
Why would this be good news for XEM?
This would add another direct fiat link to XEM. XEM/JPY In other words, more demand for XEM through Japanese folks who don't want to buy Bitcoin as an intermediary. Or maybe it´s a good Way for the Japanese to get their FIAT out of Crypto...;-)  no one think about it that way before) |
|
|
|
|
|
rtrtcrypto
|
|
June 30, 2016, 09:03:47 PM |
|
Hey guys, getting ERROR 601 in windows wallet... any advice? Just want to send XEM around.
|
|
|
|
|
nzminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 30, 2016, 09:35:44 PM |
|
last chance to buy cheap  |
NEM, THE SECURE, SCALABLE BLOCKCHAIN [NEM.IO] [T.ME/NEMRED]
|
|
|
amacar2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1007
CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!
|
|
June 30, 2016, 09:35:53 PM |
|
may be it will go well above 2500 satoshi atleast so that i can pull off some profit. I am holding XEM bought at 2500 satoshi range.  |
|
|
|
nzminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001
|
|
June 30, 2016, 09:48:54 PM |
|
may be it will go well above 2500 satoshi atleast so that i can pull off some profit. I am holding XEM bought at 2500 satoshi range. In 12 months we will be looking back when 2500 sats was dirt cheap! |
NEM, THE SECURE, SCALABLE BLOCKCHAIN [NEM.IO] [T.ME/NEMRED]
|
|
|
|
gsxrl3oi
|
|
June 30, 2016, 10:42:46 PM |
|
amazing how much XEM talk is going on polo now. |
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3013
Welt Am Draht
|
|
June 30, 2016, 10:47:06 PM |
|
It's officially out of the shadows. You can tell by the quality of the discourse there, or lack thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
luis77
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:23:17 PM |
|
What time is zaif going to include NEM $XEM ?
|
|
|
|
KevBon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:24:03 PM |
|
amazing how much XEM talk is going on polo now. Any idea why nemflash.com keeps going down? I keep dropping links to it in Polo and it looks bad when it isn't working.  |
|
|
|
|
|
gsxrl3oi
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:26:11 PM |
|
any chance we can lower the transaction fees. people are talking about how high our trans fees are?
any input on this devs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:29:47 PM |
|
We are still in correction mode, it can drop lower and (I hope) bounce from 1000-1300 level. We need a wave of new buyers to rise again. Currently there is more selling than buying pressure.
Both sell orders and buy orders on Poloniex became double than a week ago. Sell orders are almost 5 times bigger than few days ago, not double. a week ago : sell order 5xx..... buy order 3xx..... Now : sell order 11xx.... buy order 6xx.... "Both" became double! (Not only sell orders but also buy orders became double.) Selling pressure is not strong comparing with buying pressure.  |
|
|
|
|
|
DIMKAZDS
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:38:11 PM |
|
amazing how much XEM talk is going on polo now. Any idea why nemflash.com keeps going down? I keep dropping links to it in Polo and it looks bad when it isn't working. working perfectly for me |
|
|
|
|
KevBon
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 16
Merit: 0
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:44:10 PM |
|
amazing how much XEM talk is going on polo now. Any idea why nemflash.com keeps going down? I keep dropping links to it in Polo and it looks bad when it isn't working. working perfectly for me Just tried again. SORRY! If you are the owner of this website, please contact your hosting provider: webmaster@nemflash.comIt is possible you have reached this page because: The IP address has changed. The IP address for this domain may have changed recently. Check your DNS settings to verify that the domain is set up correctly. It may take 8-24 hours for DNS changes to propagate. It may be possible to restore access to this site by following these instructions for clearing your dns cache. There has been a server misconfiguration. You must verify that your hosting provider has the correct IP address configured for your Apache settings and DNS records. A restart of Apache may be required for new settings to take affect. The site may have moved to a different server. |
|
|
|
|
|
yshin365new
|
|
June 30, 2016, 11:46:34 PM |
|
NEM topped DAO again. But it feels like a common sense. |
|
|
|
|
|
