Bitcoin Forum
June 16, 2024, 12:49:04 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][SHC] ShinyCoin █First ever RAMHOG algo Pow/Pos █NO ASIC/GPU | Whitepaper  (Read 58385 times)
Bleeckerpub
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 03:25:47 AM
 #301

How do I join pool?  Had wallet open for more than a day now, no blocks.

Before primer propagandizes you into not wanting to mine just download standalone miner (link at top) and ask sandor111 how to point your hash power there.  The hash power on network is climbing so its getting tough.
Bleeckerpub
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 03:30:54 AM
 #302

i had mined for two days, get nothing just cost my money Cry

That's why a pool would be nice, but I don't think all the bugs have been worked out yet.
utrecht
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 03:33:34 AM
 #303

YAY Smiley Do you share my opinion about this being the new 'bitcoin' monero ? expecting monero like price once it hits polo or mint ! Smiley

Partly! Promising enough because it eliminates botnet mining and it has a proper algo, but the codebase is still Bitcoin.

Monero is a different story (with enough bugs to get fixed)

Anyway, this coin is far far away of being another shitclone Wink

Still have to read all background info before i can have a real opinion but so far no complaining

What was special about monero?
ljane
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 467
Merit: 100


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 03:34:12 AM
 #304

{
"blocks" : 1677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00003282,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespermin" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

I’m me
miramare
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1162
Merit: 568


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 08:06:23 AM
 #305

Although it's not displayed, the pool has found a total of 7 blocks to date. Payouts for these blocks will be processed ASAP (after they're confirmed) as I'm working on repairing the pool database.

who will get them?

I point my several miners to your pool for 1-2days... but get nothing.
the address is SYPu*************.
sandor111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2014, 08:32:29 AM
 #306

Although it's not displayed, the pool has found a total of 7 blocks to date. Payouts for these blocks will be processed ASAP (after they're confirmed) as I'm working on repairing the pool database.

who will get them?

I point my several miners to your pool for 1-2days... but get nothing.
the address is SYPu*************.

Blocks have been added, you will get paid if they are confirmed.

Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 01:40:51 PM
 #307

{
"blocks" : 1677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00003282,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespermin" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

how come the diff is still so low?
trand
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 252
Merit: 100


Streamity Decentralized cryptocurrency exchange


View Profile WWW
June 26, 2014, 01:44:55 PM
 #308

no pool that supports this coin? Why the front page only information but no promo and how mining it? or the use of solo mining?

primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 01:55:18 PM
 #309

{
"blocks" : 1677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00003282,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespermin" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

how come the diff is still so low?

You are joking right ? I have not hit a single block in hours (690 hashes/m)
utrecht
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 23
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 02:01:58 PM
 #310

no pool that supports this coin? Why the front page only information but no promo and how mining it? or the use of solo mining?

Theres a pool but couldnt figure out how to use it.  I finally got a block mining solo so it is possible.
sandor111
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 616
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
June 26, 2014, 02:12:15 PM
 #311

no pool that supports this coin? Why the front page only information but no promo and how mining it? or the use of solo mining?

Theres a pool but couldnt figure out how to use it.  I finally got a block mining solo so it is possible.

Download the standalone miner (link in OP).
Start the miner: ./shinyminer -o stratum+tcp://106.3.225.46:6666 -O SHINYADDRESS:x -t 1

Bleeckerpub
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 02:26:36 PM
 #312

{
"blocks" : 1677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00003282,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespermin" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

how come the diff is still so low?

You are joking right ? I have not hit a single block in hours (690 hashes/m)

Everyone should understand now that anything primer types in this thread is designed to discourage others from mining.  I'd bet my left testicle he's lying about not getting a block in however long.  I don't have too much hash power (nothing close to 690h/m) and it hasn't been bad.  Primer is a greedy mother f***er and doesn't understand that if you have all the coins its not worth anything, and that its better for as many people as possible to mine.
primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 02:35:47 PM
 #313

what's wrong?

I used win wallet and can't sync. It stunck at block 0.
In debug.log:

Quote
Moving 54.88.102.163:7801 to tried
version message: version 60004, blocks=1801
ProcessSyncCheckpoint: pending for sync-checkpoint 2fc63155ca0dc6573169609516e390c1c5758316362ca08da0b91008baff7afc
askfor block 2fc63155ca0dc6573169   0
sending getdata: block 2fc63155ca0dc6573169
trying connection 202.141.176.12:7801 lastseen=-389942.5hrs
trying connection 54.88.102.57:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.88.102.57:7801
received block 2fc63155ca0dc6573169
trying connection 54.88.102.35:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.88.102.35:7801
trying connection 54.88.101.190:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.88.101.190:7801
trying connection 54.88.101.195:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.88.101.195:7801
GetMyExternalIP() received [129.16.208.229] 129.16.208.229:0
GetMyExternalIP() returned 129.16.208.229
trying connection 54.187.80.137:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.187.80.137:7801
trying connection 54.187.134.211:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.187.134.211:7801
connection timeout
trying connection 54.187.180.103:7801 lastseen=-362164.7hrs
connected 54.187.180.103:7801
No valid UPnP IGDs found

inetnum:        129.16.0.0 - 129.16.255.255
netname:        CTH-NET
descr:          Chalmers University Network
descr:          Chalmers University of Technology
descr:          Gothenburg, Sweden
country:        SE

Dont use uni servers for coin mining!!
Amph
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 1069



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 02:39:37 PM
 #314

{
"blocks" : 1677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00003282,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespermin" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

how come the diff is still so low?

You are joking right ? I have not hit a single block in hours (690 hashes/m)

so that diff "0.00003282" is high? or maybe you are the one that is joking...
xlcus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1009


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 02:40:55 PM
 #315

Dont use uni servers for coin mining!!

That's not good, bro.
I don't as I used vpn address to connect.
laxori666
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 71
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 04:51:22 PM
 #316

{
"blocks" : 1677,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.00003282,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespermin" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

how come the diff is still so low?

You are joking right ? I have not hit a single block in hours (690 hashes/m)

so that diff "0.00003282" is high? or maybe you are the one that is joking...

It is high... the hardware requirements are high, and even with 32 cores and 244 GB of RAM you get only 1.8 hashes/second. Not kilohashes or megahashes, just hashes.

Gib ShinyCoins: STGsZtHw4DRUby8aYCKjiGReFt3JU94YnT
Skarfur
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:37:19 PM
 #317

Shinyminer source: https://github.com/siklon/shinyminer

Code:
git clone https://github.com/siklon/shinyminer
cd shinyminer
./autogen.sh
./configure CFLAGS="-Ofast -funroll-loops"
make
./minerd -o stratum+tcp://106.3.225.46:6666 -O SWVcv2ByWmriwD4X97bEUhnooHww6qR2at:x -t 1

That's cool! Have you tested it or is this a call for testing?

If you mine to a wallet instance instead of that IP, does it work?


No its not working. He is working with the dev to fix it.

Compiled the source with: "-Ofast -funroll-loops"

On an EC2 r3.8xlarge instance (32 cpu vcores, 244GB ram), mines with 15 ramhog threads at ~110 hashes/min (7.3 hashes/min/thread):

Code:
[2014-06-26 16:03:31] accepted: 1/1 (100.00%), 109.20 hash/m (yay!!!)

Is it good or bad hashrate compared to the boxes you have tried?


I have been doing some testing on the EC2 and I found that the smaller Memory optimized instances are more efficient than the larger ones.

The r3.8xlarge gives between 107-110 hash/m and costs around 0.256$
The r3.4xlarge gives between 62-65 hash/m and costs around 0.128$
The r3.2xlarge gives between 36-40 hash/m and costs around 0.064$

I didn't check the r3.xlarge as you are limited to 5 instances in each region when you are using spot instances but my guess is that it is even more efficient. You would just need a lot of them to match the larger servers.

So clearly 4 x r3.2xlarge would be a better option than 1 x r3.8xlarge in relation to hash per $ as for the same cost you would get 144-160 hash/m while the single r3.8xlarge would only give you 107-110 hash/m

Hope this helps Smiley


primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:43:57 PM
 #318

We need moooooooore amazon cloud suckers mining this coin so once it hits an exchange they dont dump for peanuts!  Grin
Skarfur
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 258
Merit: 250


View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:46:07 PM
 #319

Another thing I have noticed is that even if you lower down the amout of threads running on the EC2's you still keep the same amount of hashrate. You just get more hash/m on each thread instead.

Like on the r3.8xlarge. I got the same amount of hash/m if I was using 8 or 10 threads as when I was using 15 threads.

primer-
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 26, 2014, 11:48:38 PM
 #320

Another thing I have noticed is that even if you lower down the amout of threads running on the EC2's you still keep the same amount of hashrate. You just get more hash/m on each thread instead.

Like on the r3.8xlarge. I got the same amount of hash/m if I was using 8 or 10 threads as when I was using 15 threads.



CPU power... I am maxing out 8 core i7 4770 with only two threads.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 [16] 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!