Bitmark

[michaelwang33]

If anyone has coins outside poloniex pm me with a offer

[leigh2k14]

Does any pool works?

No pools work as one person has been mining the entire supply for well over a year.

[LeSmoke]

well played for him

[Nashamoto]

Does any pool works?

No pools work as one person has been mining the entire supply for well over a year.

The selfish miner is probably the original dev Nathan Rixham, who scammed people and stole their money, and never paid back his debts. Looks like vindictive sabotage going on to me, he's still around, and wants BTM to fail.

[leigh2k14]

Does any pool works?

No pools work as one person has been mining the entire supply for well over a year.

The selfish miner is probably the original dev Nathan Rixham, who scammed people and stole their money, and never paid back his debts. Looks like vindictive sabotage going on to me, he's still around, and wants BTM to fail.

Looks like polo have no reason to keep this coin listed anymore, I think they only put up with the selfish mining as they used the marking system in the troll box.

[fedexpress]

Does any pool works?

No pools work as one person has been mining the entire supply for well over a year.

The selfish miner is probably the original dev Nathan Rixham, who scammed people and stole their money, and never paid back his debts. Looks like vindictive sabotage going on to me, he's still around, and wants BTM to fail.

Looks like polo have no reason to keep this coin listed anymore, I think they only put up with the selfish mining as they used the marking system in the troll box.

Why is it that only 1 person can mine BTM? why can't any one else and why devs don't do anything about it?
if you have any real info about this person, can you please share it so we can try some other actions? some of us have a lot of BTM and I'm afraid actions of this guy might get BTM de-listed soon on polo

[LeSmoke]

Anyone can mine, but he might be the only person who does.

[Noolz39]

Does any pool works?

No pools work as one person has been mining the entire supply for well over a year.

The selfish miner is probably the original dev Nathan Rixham, who scammed people and stole their money, and never paid back his debts. Looks like vindictive sabotage going on to me, he's still around, and wants BTM to fail.

Looks like polo have no reason to keep this coin listed anymore, I think they only put up with the selfish mining as they used the marking system in the troll box.

Why is it that only 1 person can mine BTM? why can't any one else and why devs don't do anything about it?
if you have any real info about this person, can you please share it so we can try some other actions? some of us have a lot of BTM and I'm afraid actions of this guy might get BTM de-listed soon on polo

totally agree, good time for delist this shit from polo.
dev team an't working, no future plan. why do we need btm yet?

[Scrotum]

totally agree, good time for delist this shit from polo.
dev team an't working, no future plan. why do we need btm yet?

BTM is one of the few alt coins that is actually used as intended, every day. Marking on polo really works, and could take off on other sites. The backstory of the original scam dev nathan rixham ripping off early supporters does NOT alter the facts ... BTM is being used, and if you check out the slack chanel you'll see lots of activity.

[robbydweb]

totally agree, good time for delist this shit from polo.
dev team an't working, no future plan. why do we need btm yet?

BTM is one of the few alt coins that is actually used as intended, every day. Marking on polo really works, and could take off on other sites. The backstory of the original scam dev nathan rixham ripping off early supporters does NOT alter the facts ... BTM is being used, and if you check out the slack chanel you'll see lots of activity.

Is there a new slack I don't know about? The slack the website directs me to only has 3-4 ppl active at any given time.

[Israfel7]

If you bought at the top, you may be angry, I understand.
But if that happened, do not panic and just hold.  You will eventually get a high return after a while.  This is the market, this is crypto

[thiagvncs]

Can someone give me the updated blockchain? I can not think of anywhere to download. If it does not take long to sync!!!

[dbkeys]

Does any pool works?

No pools work as one person has been mining the entire supply for well over a year.

The selfish miner is probably the original dev Nathan Rixham, who scammed people and stole their money, and never paid back his debts. Looks like vindictive sabotage going on to me, he's still around, and wants BTM to fail.

Looks like polo have no reason to keep this coin listed anymore, I think they only put up with the selfish mining as they used the marking system in the troll box.

Why is it that only 1 person can mine BTM? why can't any one else and why devs don't do anything about it?
if you have any real info about this person, can you please share it so we can try some other actions? some of us have a lot of BTM and I'm afraid actions of this guy might get BTM de-listed soon on polo

If you take a look, BTM is being mined by several different miners/pools at the moment:
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btm/#!extraction
and the orphaning normal :
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btm/orphans.dws

One of the miners is my pool, which is going through initial tests. It'll be public when its fully set-up, and ready to suport mPoW.

As far as doing something about the selfish miner  (whoever he/she/they were):   We are !      If you look back at the posts you will find that we are working on a multiple-Proof-of-Work solution (mPoW) to the selfish mining, which is currently running as a testnet.   Everyone is more than welcome to examine the code, and in fact, it would be great to get feedback on it.

https://github.com/piratelinux/bitmark/tree/0.9.7

The philosophy for Bitmark has always been to be relatively stable, adopting tried-and-true solutions as much as possible in order to provide a bedrock, healthy blockchain on which to build Marking, its core reason for being. To this end, the proposed fork is adopting DGWv3 and mPoW, and, in a nod to investors like yourself who are concerned with defending the value of the coin, we are presenting something new: Coin Emission Modulation (CEM v0.1, ) to better match coin production with market demand. The basic idea of CEM is to assume hashrate equals demand, and, to a certain extent, proportionately reduce the block reward if the network hashrate is low compared to a recent peak hashrate.

You can read more about the proposed hardfork, the issues addressed and proposed solutions here:
https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/wiki/Hard_Fork_Criteria

Sync to the blockchain isn't too long and we are working on adopting headers-first synchronization which will mean even faster initial blockchain downloads.

[dbkeys]

Compiling Bitmark 0.9.5 from source took less than 12 minutes on a 6-core VM

Code:

root@m2:/usr/local/src/bitmark# time make -j 9
  . . . 

make[1]: Leaving directory '/usr/local/src/bitmark'

real    2m18.189s
user    11m41.304s
sys     0m49.628s

and initial download of the Bitmark blockchain took less than 18 minutes on the same machine.
Here is the beginning of ~/.bitmark/debug.log, and the relevant section after the last available block (the tip of the chain) was downloaded - it took 17 minutes, 41 seconds....

Code:

2017-07-05 13:40:00 Bitmark version v0.9.5.0-c481d43-beta (2016-12-24 18:34:00 +0100)

   . . . 
 
2017-07-05 13:57:41 UpdateTip: new best=f418f436c77c16d1b08236c97d5c19dd8af40eb87d175eaa3487d19ed251c4c8  height=285113  log2_work=57.322169  tx=907180  date=2017-07-05 13:56:52 progress=0.999998
2017-07-05 13:57:41 ProcessBlock: ACCEPTED

Here's a partial list of nodes, in case anybody has issues getting sync'd.
Taken from https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btm/#!network  (click on the "node list" button on the /Pfennig:0.9.5/ row) :

Code:

addnode=104.236.59.201
addnode=108.163.197.58
addnode=139.162.122.138
addnode=139.162.128.92
addnode=139.162.35.170
addnode=169.48.183.36
addnode=173.255.252.140
addnode=178.238.224.213
addnode=217.182.173.89
addnode=35.177.220.199
addnode=37.187.24.211
addnode=51.254.45.117
addnode=72.220.130.97
addnode=78.70.234.88
addnode=87.98.142.204

[Noolz39]

Where roadmap lazy devs? When y'll work? Bastard

[82ndabnmedic]

https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/wiki/Roadmap

Roadmap has been out for a few months


....I know it is easy to criticize, but lets try to keep comments constructive. Additionally, If you would like to hel, please feel free to contact us and lend a hand

[82ndabnmedic]

STATUS UPDATE

By the way....I looked into getting BTM listed on Cryptopia. The process is straight forward, but expensive. It would take between 8-10 BTC (2000000 to 2800000 DOT) to get Bitmark Listed on Cryptopia....

[82ndabnmedic]

Goals we are working towards

https://www.gitbook.com/book/project-bitmark/bitmark-storage/details

https://project-bitmark.gitbooks.io/bitmark-storage/content/bitmark-passport.html

[BitcoinOnFire]

STATUS UPDATE

By the way....I looked into getting BTM listed on Cryptopia. The process is straight forward, but expensive. It would take between 8-10 BTC (2000000 to 2800000 DOT) to get Bitmark Listed on Cryptopia....

Isn't cheaper+better to list on trex? 3BTC what I heard.

[OnTheMoon]

STATUS UPDATE

By the way....I looked into getting BTM listed on Cryptopia. The process is straight forward, but expensive. It would take between 8-10 BTC (2000000 to 2800000 DOT) to get Bitmark Listed on Cryptopia....

Isn't cheaper+better to list on trex? 3BTC what I heard.

Sure, i think more better to us all to be listed on bittrex. Cryptopia is a good to, but bittrex have more traders and volume. Bitmark needmore major exchanges.