Bitmark

[holylacross]

Hello does anyone know how to increase trading price?

1. Mine BTM
2. Talk about BTM, get the public's attention
3. Create more applications for BTM usage
4.
5. Profit

[j4y_naKomodo]

Greetings, friends at Bitmark!

As Komodo Platform has been working around the clock to fine-tune the multiple GUI's that are the face of our Agama multiwallet and BarterDEX atomic swap protocols, there have obviously been many bugs found and many debugged. However, one bug in particular was found not only in our Agama GUI wallet, but also in the zcash4mac GUI swing wallet. It is a simple bug, but it warrants your attention. This is a potential money cost bug, and as a Bitcoin-protocol cryptocurrency, your GUI wallet(s) may be susceptible. We are reaching out directly to the developers and communities of the 60+ coins featured on Agama and BarterDEX as the bug may have a direct impact on you (via your own wallet).

watchonly-GUI bug: 'watchonly' addresses appearing as your own in GUI wallet; users could potentially send funds to the address, unaware it is not theirs or available for withdrawal. You can import <any address> and it becomes a 'watchonly' address. The GUI will display the address as yours, add its funds to your balance, and accept deposits, but cannot be withdrawn. This could be a normal address, my address, a p2sh address, satoshi's address, etc. This can be confusing to an end-user and will lead to many headaches for the developer, as is always the case with misplaced funds.

FOUND: in Komodo Platform's Agama multiwallet (fixed) and zcash4mac GUI swing wallet (@jl777B: "newest QT wallet seems ok about watch only, but not sure of older and when it was fixed")

ex. @grewalsatinder found the bug in his zcash swing wallet: https://i.imgur.com/sVd0QTL.png

"satinder used zcash4mac, ie. the zcash osx GUI, not ours... the assumption is no GUI out there properly handles watch only addresses, until proven that they do... agama also had this bug, which we found and fixed, so it seems a very common bug to have"

SOLUTION: For the 'watchonly' address or any address not yours, the value 'ismine' returns false. Any such address gets filtered out.

QUESTIONS:

• How does your recommended GUI deal with watchonly addresses?
• Does your GUI display watchonly addresses as different than actual addresses in the wallet?

We need to experiment a bit to see which approach gets a better response triggering the bug. People WILL lose money if they send funds to a watchonly address.

"the t3 addresses in the 'Own Addresses' column! and they absolutely cant be as they are p2sh addresses. it is clear proof that the bug is very real and anybody that understands a p2sh address will understand it cant be something in your wallet. it is usually a multisig address, so only if it is a 1of1 multisig (possible but very silly) can you have a p2sh address that is spendable, but the wallet wont even know it... normal addresses can also be watchonly, which makes this even worse. in that case it would appear in the list of addresses just like all the others. even if you are able to spot p2sh addresses visually, it wont be enough"

We want to spread awareness and facilitate discussion of this bug to minimize the impact.

Of course - we can always talk about how you can use BarterDEX today to trade Bitmark via atomic swap directly with your peers, through our beta GUI and without downloading the entire blockchain ; ) That is how we found the bug, afterall.

Stay safe,
Jay

[OnTheMoon]

Hello does anyone know how to increase trading price?

You can buy many more Bitmark's and trading price will rise fast. Good chance to buy cheap Bitmarks and hold for some time. Hope than positive mowements will start here soon.

[dbkeys]

New Bitmark Wallets (v0.9.5 )

• Windows (64 bit / 32 bit)
• MacOS
• Linux
• Raspbian

Updated DNS Seeder Network ( Finds network peers quickly )
Abbreviations for RPC Client / Server commands
Tracks and Displays Total Bitmarks Emitted (Money Supply)

https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/releases/tag/v0.9.5

Code:

3f50ef94dbedea29a1be4fc0bbc13cdaf91b1b0a7ba9852310041112e2a82c6c  bitmark-v0.9.5-rc1-qt.dmg
671198e9d419d5863c8ef28eb6685fe754e9706ee347b8385af63e15d1ca2227  bitmark_0.9.5.1.master_armhf.deb
49a10a1240f2953a5519c83f944a0169a07986314e97e2e4e151ff607ae19ea3 bitmark-0.9.5-win32-rc1.setup.exe
76c0abb680ab867d6253c284cfcb0618d9c4e1e0039dd70da859d51006f137c7 bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup.exe

[holylacross]

New Bitmark Wallets (v0.9.5 )

• Windows (64 bit / 32 bit)
• MacOS
• Linux
• Raspbian

Updated DNS Seeder Network ( Finds network peers quickly )
Abbreviations for RPC Client / Server commands
Tracks and Displays Total Bitmarks Emitted (Money Supply)

https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/releases/tag/v0.9.5

Code:

3f50ef94dbedea29a1be4fc0bbc13cdaf91b1b0a7ba9852310041112e2a82c6c  bitmark-v0.9.5-rc1-qt.dmg
671198e9d419d5863c8ef28eb6685fe754e9706ee347b8385af63e15d1ca2227  bitmark_0.9.5.1.master_armhf.deb
49a10a1240f2953a5519c83f944a0169a07986314e97e2e4e151ff607ae19ea3 bitmark-0.9.5-win32-rc1.setup.exe
76c0abb680ab867d6253c284cfcb0618d9c4e1e0039dd70da859d51006f137c7 bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup.exe

Had a couple errors on Windows 10 64x, but was able to get through it. Thanks for the update

[dbkeys]

New Bitmark Wallets (v0.9.5 )

• Windows (64 bit / 32 bit)
• MacOS
• Linux
• Raspbian

Updated DNS Seeder Network ( Finds network peers quickly )
Abbreviations for RPC Client / Server commands
Tracks and Displays Total Bitmarks Emitted (Money Supply)

https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/releases/tag/v0.9.5

.....

Had a couple errors on Windows 10 64x, but was able to get through it. Thanks for the update

@holylacross:

Thanks for the report. Could you give us more detail on what the error was, etc., we would like to fix it .

Glad you were able to get it through though ...

[holylacross]

New Bitmark Wallets (v0.9.5 )

• Windows (64 bit / 32 bit)
• MacOS
• Linux
• Raspbian

Updated DNS Seeder Network ( Finds network peers quickly )
Abbreviations for RPC Client / Server commands
Tracks and Displays Total Bitmarks Emitted (Money Supply)

https://github.com/project-bitmark/bitmark/releases/tag/v0.9.5

.....

Had a couple errors on Windows 10 64x, but was able to get through it. Thanks for the update

@holylacross:

Thanks for the report. Could you give us more detail on what the error was, etc., we would like to fix it .

Glad you were able to get it through though ...

I actually had a few of them written down within a reply to your original post. But then I was able to abort a few of the prompts, which got the wallet to load successfully so I deleted the reply post XP

My bad, i'll see if I can't recreate them

[mccanderd]

Hello,

tried to install the new win64 wallet (bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup)

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\Bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_==&dummy_versions_   "


Maybe someone can help...

[psycodad]

EXCHANGE STATUS UPDATE

- The following "Exchange Listing Request" has been submitted to COINEXCHANGE.io

Hi,
 
I'm the Project Manager for Project Bitmark (BTM).
 
- My name is Victor (a.k.a Medic_007 on our Slack).
- Our Lead Developers are Melvin Carvalho & DBKeys

I understand that y'all have been oin contact with the team and perhaps are willing to negotiate the amount of BTC required for listing...We have BTC ready transfer as soon as we get the okay from y'all.
 
We would like to collaborate with the COINEXCHANGE.IO Team and continue moving forward with our developments. What are the necessary steps to get Bitmark Listed. Furthermore, we are looking to discuss opportunities where our teams can work together and continue the development of our unique online reputation system "Marking". Marking was largely successful when it was deployed within the Poloniex Trollbox, and our next updates will provide a framework & passport for our Marking system to scale as an online reputation system.

What requirements does the Bitmark Team need to meet, in-order to get the Bitmark Wallet Listed on COINEXCHANGE.io?

Lastly, what would y'all consider to be a reasonable timeline for this?

Cheers,
Project Bitmark Leadership Team:
Victor Alejandro - Project Manager
Melvin Carvalho - Lead Developer
DBKeys - Development Team Lead

Are there any news or even better an ETA regarding the coinexchange listing request that you could share with us?

Thanks and Merry Christmas btw to all Bitmarkers!

[holylacross]

Hello,

tried to install the new win64 wallet (bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup)

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\Bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_==&dummy_versions_   "


Maybe someone can help...

That was one of the errors I experienced as well. Just abort it and any other error similar to that one. The wallet should load and start building the blockchain

[holylacross]

Merry Christmas everyone. BTM to the moon! 

[mccanderd]

Hello,

tried to install the new win64 wallet (bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup)

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\Bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_==&dummy_versions_   "


Maybe someone can help...

That was one of the errors I experienced as well. Just abort it and any other error similar to that one. The wallet should load and start building the blockchain

...works not for me. After abort assertion failed screen the program closes itself. Where is the wallet.dat stored ? Same place as old version?

[marvin_70]

Hi,
i have set up an node runs fine till block 48.900
now stops syncing... any idea whats wrong? i run the latest version....

[holylacross]

Hi,
i have set up an node runs fine till block 48.900
now stops syncing... any idea whats wrong? i run the latest version....

Try adding some more nodes.

Open the wallet, click 'Help', select 'Debug Window', go to the 'Console' tab

The console tab is like command prompt.

Now go to any bitmark block explorer, https://chainz.cryptoid.info/btm/ for example. Head to their 'Network' section. There will be a list of all the public nodes you can add.

So click the node list of the first Sub-version, you can add all those nodes if you want.

The command you would input in console for the first one is "addnode 104.236.59.201 add"

Just keep adding them until you have connections on the network. If that doesn't work, which I've experienced, you might want to backup the wallet and do a fresh reinstall

[Xamito]

EXCHANGE STATUS UPDATE

- The following "Exchange Listing Request" has been submitted to COINEXCHANGE.io

Hi,
 
I'm the Project Manager for Project Bitmark (BTM).
 
- My name is Victor (a.k.a Medic_007 on our Slack).
- Our Lead Developers are Melvin Carvalho & DBKeys

I understand that y'all have been oin contact with the team and perhaps are willing to negotiate the amount of BTC required for listing...We have BTC ready transfer as soon as we get the okay from y'all.
 
We would like to collaborate with the COINEXCHANGE.IO Team and continue moving forward with our developments. What are the necessary steps to get Bitmark Listed. Furthermore, we are looking to discuss opportunities where our teams can work together and continue the development of our unique online reputation system "Marking". Marking was largely successful when it was deployed within the Poloniex Trollbox, and our next updates will provide a framework & passport for our Marking system to scale as an online reputation system.

What requirements does the Bitmark Team need to meet, in-order to get the Bitmark Wallet Listed on COINEXCHANGE.io?

Lastly, what would y'all consider to be a reasonable timeline for this?

Cheers,
Project Bitmark Leadership Team:
Victor Alejandro - Project Manager
Melvin Carvalho - Lead Developer
DBKeys - Development Team Lead

Are there any news or even better an ETA regarding the coinexchange listing request that you could share with us?

Thanks and Merry Christmas btw to all Bitmarkers!

Anyone ? Depending on the answer I would invest in BTM.

Cheers

[holylacross]

Hello,

tried to install the new win64 wallet (bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup)

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\Bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_==&dummy_versions_   "


Maybe someone can help...

That was one of the errors I experienced as well. Just abort it and any other error similar to that one. The wallet should load and start building the blockchain

...works not for me. After abort assertion failed screen the program closes itself. Where is the wallet.dat stored ? Same place as old version?

My bad, I was responded off of memory. I forgot there was a third option "Ignore", that is the option you need to select.

I attempted to install the new wallet on my Windows 10 64x machine. Ran into the same errors

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!
Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_ = = &dummy_versions_

Abort  Retry  Ignore"

I hit ignore. Next error:

"Assertion Failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\bitmark-qt.exe
Files: util/cache.cc, Line 180

Expression: e- >refs = = 1

Abort  Retry  Ignore"

Selected ignore again

The same error keeps popping up and I just hit ignore until they no longer are popping up. Now the wallet appears to be updating 'Reindexing blocks on disk'

Ill report back if it doesn't complete, still has 3 years to go

[holylacross]

EXCHANGE STATUS UPDATE

- The following "Exchange Listing Request" has been submitted to COINEXCHANGE.io

Hi,
 
I'm the Project Manager for Project Bitmark (BTM).
 
- My name is Victor (a.k.a Medic_007 on our Slack).
- Our Lead Developers are Melvin Carvalho & DBKeys

I understand that y'all have been oin contact with the team and perhaps are willing to negotiate the amount of BTC required for listing...We have BTC ready transfer as soon as we get the okay from y'all.
 
We would like to collaborate with the COINEXCHANGE.IO Team and continue moving forward with our developments. What are the necessary steps to get Bitmark Listed. Furthermore, we are looking to discuss opportunities where our teams can work together and continue the development of our unique online reputation system "Marking". Marking was largely successful when it was deployed within the Poloniex Trollbox, and our next updates will provide a framework & passport for our Marking system to scale as an online reputation system.

What requirements does the Bitmark Team need to meet, in-order to get the Bitmark Wallet Listed on COINEXCHANGE.io?

Lastly, what would y'all consider to be a reasonable timeline for this?

Cheers,
Project Bitmark Leadership Team:
Victor Alejandro - Project Manager
Melvin Carvalho - Lead Developer
DBKeys - Development Team Lead

Are there any news or even better an ETA regarding the coinexchange listing request that you could share with us?

Thanks and Merry Christmas btw to all Bitmarkers!

Anyone ? Depending on the answer I would invest in BTM.

Cheers

No man, unfortunately there really isn't a lot of news to provide at this time. The coin has been through a lot but it is now being worked on by a smaller dedicated team. They are pretty limited on their updates, but they do provide them when they are ready. I know getting the coin onto a exchange is a high priority for them. All i can say is invest if you have the capital, and wait for updates from the dev team.
"A delayed game(coin) is eventually a good game (coin), but a rushed game (coin) is forever bad - Shigeru Miyamoto 

[holylacross]

Hello,

tried to install the new win64 wallet (bitmark-0.9.5-win64-rc1.setup)

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\Bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_==&dummy_versions_   "


Maybe someone can help...

That was one of the errors I experienced as well. Just abort it and any other error similar to that one. The wallet should load and start building the blockchain

...works not for me. After abort assertion failed screen the program closes itself. Where is the wallet.dat stored ? Same place as old version?

My bad, I was responded off of memory. I forgot there was a third option "Ignore", that is the option you need to select.

I attempted to install the new wallet on my Windows 10 64x machine. Ran into the same errors

"MinGW Runtime Assertion

Assertion failed!
Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\bitmark-qt.exe
File: db/version_set.cc, Line 789

Expression: dummy_versions_.next_ = = &dummy_versions_

Abort  Retry  Ignore"

I hit ignore. Next error:

"Assertion Failed!

Program: C:\Program Files\Bitmark\bitmark-qt.exe
Files: util/cache.cc, Line 180

Expression: e- >refs = = 1

Abort  Retry  Ignore"

Selected ignore again

The same error keeps popping up and I just hit ignore until they no longer are popping up. Now the wallet appears to be updating 'Reindexing blocks on disk'

Ill report back if it doesn't complete, still has 3 years to go

Experienced a C++ runtime error that closed the bitmark application, had to actually kill the process to reopen the wallet. Appears to be back on track

[Xamito]

I have sent a PM to the dev in order to get a slack invitation few days ago. Still no answer.
I have asked if there was some progress about exchange listing, no answers.

Communication is the key to that kind of project. Communication id DUE to investors...

I a not considering investing anymore as my questions have not been replied.

Nethertheless, I wish team and investors good luck with the project.

[dbkeys]

EXCHANGE STATUS UPDATE

- The following "Exchange Listing Request" has been submitted to COINEXCHANGE.io

Hi,
 
I'm the Project Manager for Project Bitmark (BTM).
 
- My name is Victor (a.k.a Medic_007 on our Slack).
- Our Lead Developers are Melvin Carvalho & DBKeys

I understand that y'all have been oin contact with the team and perhaps are willing to negotiate the amount of BTC required for listing...We have BTC ready transfer as soon as we get the okay from y'all.
 
We would like to collaborate with the COINEXCHANGE.IO Team and continue moving forward with our developments. What are the necessary steps to get Bitmark Listed. Furthermore, we are looking to discuss opportunities where our teams can work together and continue the development of our unique online reputation system "Marking". Marking was largely successful when it was deployed within the Poloniex Trollbox, and our next updates will provide a framework & passport for our Marking system to scale as an online reputation system.

What requirements does the Bitmark Team need to meet, in-order to get the Bitmark Wallet Listed on COINEXCHANGE.io?

Lastly, what would y'all consider to be a reasonable timeline for this?

Cheers,
Project Bitmark Leadership Team:
Victor Alejandro - Project Manager
Melvin Carvalho - Lead Developer
DBKeys - Development Team Lead

Are there any news or even better an ETA regarding the coinexchange listing request that you could share with us?

Thanks and Merry Christmas btw to all Bitmarkers!

Anyone ? Depending on the answer I would invest in BTM.

Cheers

I think a better option for us at this time is Cryptopia. It's a much larger, better established exchange, and they have a similar listing fee for coins that are now listed on NovaExchange (which is going through some type of ownership transition).

The listing fee at Cryptopia is 2,500,000 DOT (their own coin), which at the moment is a bit less than 2.4 BTC