[ANN][XFC] Finercoin丨X11丨POW+POS丨First Working Anonymous Coin丨Launched June 26

[traumschiff]

Not sure if anyone noticed already, but there is a different person replying now on the OP's account than at start. He had terribly broken english and broken sentences unlike now where it's far better.

Edit: Someone was hired to deal with the community and it is probably not someone who makes the decisions or gets to know about them beforehand.

[traumschiff]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

[solstice]

Not sure if anyone noticed already, but there is a different person replying now on the OP's account than at start. He had terribly broken english and broken sentences unlike now where it's far better.

Edit: Someone was hired to deal with the community and it is probably not someone who makes the decisions or gets to know about them beforehand.

The original dev hired someone and abandoned this coin just like what he did with Coffeecoin. He now holds significant amount of premine.

CoffeeCoin's former "dev"

Our former dev released another coin called "Finercoin". Take from that what you will, but most of all, trade with care...

[flyingdutchmen]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

[flyingdutchmen]

Not sure if anyone noticed already, but there is a different person replying now on the OP's account than at start. He had terribly broken english and broken sentences unlike now where it's far better.

Edit: Someone was hired to deal with the community and it is probably not someone who makes the decisions or gets to know about them beforehand.

The original dev hired someone and abandoned this coin just like what he did with Coffeecoin. He now holds significant amount of premine.

CoffeeCoin's former "dev"

Our former dev released another coin called "Finercoin". Take from that what you will, but most of all, trade with care...

I don't know what happened between them, but it is clear XFC have working anon while coffeecoin don't.
This reminds me that during the XC pump, DRK developer posted FUD on their twitter account.

[traumschiff]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

[traumschiff]

Not sure if anyone noticed already, but there is a different person replying now on the OP's account than at start. He had terribly broken english and broken sentences unlike now where it's far better.

Edit: Someone was hired to deal with the community and it is probably not someone who makes the decisions or gets to know about them beforehand.

The original dev hired someone and abandoned this coin just like what he did with Coffeecoin. He now holds significant amount of premine.

CoffeeCoin's former "dev"

Our former dev released another coin called "Finercoin". Take from that what you will, but most of all, trade with care...

I don't know what happened between them, but it is clear XFC have working anon while coffeecoin don't.
This reminds me that during the XC pump, DRK developer posted FUD on their twitter account.

CoinJoin isn't ANON.

It is good try and it's ANON to the non-technical eye but in the term's straight meaning it isn't.

[finerpay]

Not sure if anyone noticed already, but there is a different person replying now on the OP's account than at start. He had terribly broken english and broken sentences unlike now where it's far better.

Edit: Someone was hired to deal with the community and it is probably not someone who makes the decisions or gets to know about them beforehand.

The original dev hired someone and abandoned this coin just like what he did with Coffeecoin. He now holds significant amount of premine.

CoffeeCoin's former "dev"

Our former dev released another coin called "Finercoin". Take from that what you will, but most of all, trade with care...

wtf is coffeecoin?

Oh I get it, this is a smear campain. It was only a matter of time, I suppose.

Good riddance. We don't have time for playground games. Back to work!

[flyingdutchmen]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

[traumschiff]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.

Also this is still not ANON.

It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?

What do you call an ANON?

Edit: First time really? Anyone can just fetch the code of a finished CoinJoin and put it into a wallet. It's a finished code for a centralised mixer. I am not here to troll, you are obviously new here and straight out avoid my questions.

[flyingdutchmen]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.

Also this is still not ANON.

It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?

What do you call an ANON?

All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.

[flyingdutchmen]

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

You are being trolled.

what he said doesn't make sense, that is why i want to correct him.

[traumschiff]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.

Also this is still not ANON.

It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?

What do you call an ANON?

All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.

This is by far the weakest way to do anon and everyone can implement CoinJoin.

You are being terribly stupid.

[flyingdutchmen]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.

Also this is still not ANON.

It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?

What do you call an ANON?

All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.

This is by far the weakest way to do anone and everyone can implement CoinJoin.

You are being terribly stupid.

I dont want to get personal attack, but remember:
those who name others stupid, he is more stupid than others

[traumschiff]

Also please let's get things straight. DRK and XC have thousands of hours of developing behind them, they are not simple CoinJoin implementations, look at their testnets. Do NOT compare them to this way of dealing with "anon". Pump your coin freely and trust in the dev but please... wtf.

where do you get the so called thousands of hours?

If you would follow the DRK thread from start, the discussion till like a thousand pages was purely technical with edu mostly participating there. Not PND hype discussions. Also he quit his job (we could say because he is a huge DRK holder) to be a full-time dev. He never lied or stated that something is working which is not, also he revealed his identity. The amount of work which he did alone is pretty exemplary. Obviously I have no round number on how much work he did. XC's dev is active on a daily basis in technical discussions and has a straight technical background.


But this isn't the topic to discuss these tho if it bothers you.

This is the only thing bothering you? The fact thas this is the simplest CoinJoin implementation called to be ANON doesn't?

As far as i know, writing codes requires talent
Some ppl are good at writing codes, some aren't
XC developer finished his work in one or two weeks, while DRK takes months.

What I care is XFC launched with a working and user friendly anon, this is the first time.

XC's work isn't finished, DRK's is far more advanced atm even tho it took a longer time. Read their topic's and developement diary's and do your homework.

Also this is still not ANON.

It's a centralised CoinJoin. Care to tell me why I am wrong?

What do you call an ANON?

All anons are relative, there is no absolute anon.
Ring signature is also far more advanced atm than what you named.

This is by far the weakest way to do anone and everyone can implement CoinJoin.

You are being terribly stupid.

I dont want to get personal attack, but remember:
those who name others stupid, he is more stupid than others

You are literally arguing about anon with someone who is checking on anon coins and their implementations on a daily basis because I am terribly interested in them.

You are a fresh account which invested in a coin you are defending. You couldn't defend yourself vs any of the claims I made because I am not trolling.

Please open your eyes.

[traumschiff]

CoinJoin is a ready to implement system which loljosh can implement into any of the coins you pay him for.

And you are masturbating here that this coin has a finished "anon" by start. Really.

[scorpio18]

Coinminers NOMP Pool Hosted in US

Finercoin NOMP Pool
No  registration needed

Support at #COINMINERS freenode channel : https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#COINMINERS

http://coin-miners.info:8080/getting_started

URL (difficulty Vardiff):   stratum+tcp://coin-miners.info:3990

Username: your Finercoin wallet address
Password: anything

./sgminer --kernel darkcoin -o stratum+tcp://coin-miners.info:3990 -u your Finercoin wallet address -p anything

You can check the total blocks found at http://coin-miners.info:8080/tbs under the Finercoin Total Blocks column and the block confirmed under the Finercoin Confirmed column

Payments:
1% fee.
Note: Payments every 60 sec after the coins get confirmed.Minimum payment 0.01 XFC


Rent some x11 hash power at

http://www.miningrigrentals.com/

[bigeliphant]

how do i get mature coins to start minting or how much coins do you need for it?

[dminer69]

how do i get mature coins to start minting or how much coins do you need for it?

pos begins after block 10001

[airise]

Has anonymous，very cheap