P2Pool Server List

[Smoovious]

São Paulo/SP::Brazil::200.204.161.215:9332::0.5::BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DVC::Electra Bitcoin P2Pool Node::ThiagoCMC

How are you handling the payouts to your guest miners, for the merged mining that you are doing?

-- Smoov

[1714948249]

1714948249

[1714948249]

1714948249

[ThiagoCMC]

São Paulo/SP::Brazil::200.204.161.215:9332::0.5::BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DVC::Electra Bitcoin P2Pool Node::ThiagoCMC

How are you handling the payouts to your guest miners, for the merged mining that you are doing?

-- Smoov

Hi Smoov!

 As you can see, I am not hidding anything but, I have no idea how to do this accounting... So, I'm keeping it for me.

 Maybe dropping the fee to 0 can be a good idea... Since I'm keeping extra alt-coins for me... What do you guys think about something like this? Not a big deal, right!?

 I would like to setup the same system of p2pmining.com but, again, I don't know how...

Cheers!
Thiago

[zvs]

São Paulo/SP::Brazil::200.204.161.215:9332::0.5::BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DVC::Electra Bitcoin P2Pool Node::ThiagoCMC

How are you handling the payouts to your guest miners, for the merged mining that you are doing?

-- Smoov

i turned off merge mining, it seems likely that it increases the # of DOA/stales, since it generates more polling?

[Smoovious]

Hi Smoov!

 As you can see, I am not hidding anything but, I have no idea how to do this accounting... So, I'm keeping it for me.

 Maybe dropping the fee to 0 can be a good idea... Since I'm keeping extra alt-coins for me... What do you guys think about something like this? Not a big deal, right!?

IMHO, it isn't a big deal, as long as it is clearly disclosed up front, giving miners the opportunity to choose to agree to the terms or not.

I would say yes, set your fee to 0%, since your merge mining will compensate you for your effort.

I would also not include the NMC/I0C/IXC/DVC in with your entry, as it implies people would be mining to get those coin also, so you should just be showing BTC as the currency you're doing public mining on, with a note at the end of your entry saying you're merge mining those coin, in lieu of charging a fee. This should eliminate misunderstandings.

i turned off merge mining, it seems likely that it increases the # of DOA/stales, since it generates more polling?

Merged mining via p2pool should have no effect on your DOA/stale rate.

BTC will always take priority, and you'd only be exerting mining effort for that. The coin you are merge mining, do not generate their own polling.

Your mining efforts, just get passed onto the other coin you're merge mining after the BTC mining is dealt with. If you would see more DOA/stales due to merged mining, it would be on the coin you're merge mining, not on BTC. [edit: unless your computer isn't handling having all of the daemons running, gracefully, say, not enough free memory or CPU power, or too much diskio for smooth operation. then your merge mining, may affect your BTC mining.]

-- Smoov

[ThiagoCMC]

São Paulo/SP::Brazil::200.204.161.215:9332::0.5::BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DVC::Electra Bitcoin P2Pool Node::ThiagoCMC

How are you handling the payouts to your guest miners, for the merged mining that you are doing?

-- Smoov

i turned off merge mining, it seems likely that it increases the # of DOA/stales, since it generates more polling?

How to disable LP of alt-coins?

I'm planning to stay at least with BTC/NMC...

[ThiagoCMC]

São Paulo/SP::Brazil::200.204.161.215:9332::0.5::BTC/NMC/IXC/I0C/DVC::Electra Bitcoin P2Pool Node::ThiagoCMC

How are you handling the payouts to your guest miners, for the merged mining that you are doing?

-- Smoov

i turned off merge mining, it seems likely that it increases the # of DOA/stales, since it generates more polling?

How to disable LP of alt-coins?

I'm planning to stay at least with BTC/NMC...

Smoovious answer above...   

[Smoovious]

How to disable LP of alt-coins?

I'm planning to stay at least with BTC/NMC...

Smoovious answer above...   

There is no LP for the alt-coins. You only get 1 LP for the primary coin. The rest of the compatible coinage is merged into the same work your miner is doing for the primary coin.

-- Smoov

[zvs]

How to disable LP of alt-coins?

I'm planning to stay at least with BTC/NMC...

Smoovious answer above...  

There is no LP for the alt-coins. You only get 1 LP for the primary coin. The rest of the compatible coinage is merged into the same work your miner is doing for the primary coin.

-- Smoov

ah, nice.  

i think I'll still leave 'em all off though, just cause my bitcoind has over 1000 connections and i don't want more load on my server =p

and it's still @ 5.9.24.81 port 9332

[freshzive]

Mine can go on the list:

San Francisco, California::USA::http://tonic.dnsd.info:9332/::0%::BTC::FRESH::freshzive

Node uptime: 10.958 days Peers: 10 out, 13 in

[Smoovious]

ah, nice.  

i think I'll still leave 'em all off though, just cause my bitcoind has over 1000 connections and i don't want more load on my server =p

and it's still @ 5.9.24.81 port 9332

1000 connections?!

If you don't mind my asking, what is your upstream for that? If your upstream isn't thick enough when bitcoind spikes to send a new block, having that many could be counter-productive.

-- Smoov

[racerguy]

If zvs found a block would his bitcoind try to upload it to all 1000 connections at once or do it one by one?

[Ed]

who mined at my BTC p2pool by user 1EZBPJnbPF15UKoeL9erYiLVeDxBpbMHx5
you generate only DEAD shares, please check your miner options or PM me for support

[zvs]

If zvs found a block would his bitcoind try to upload it to all 1000 connections at once or do it one by one?

it would send as they asked for it, but that wouldn't be all at once.. and it wouldn't be all of them, since by the time some "found" it, it would have spread to other ppl in their peer list..  i'm thinking that's how it is, anyway.  it says i've solved like 20 or so blocks on blockexplorer, and i don't get 1000 asks all at once

it doesn't send that much data, anyway.  here's a traffic snapshot:




i did drop it from 1000 to 500, though... so this shows ~600 connections.  i'll probably raise it again to 700 or 800 next time I compile (it was bogging down my CPU a bit at 1000)

(ed:  it's on dedicated connection with plenty of bandwidth, feel free to addnode=5.9.24.81 if you need to DL block chain)

[check_status]

List updated.
It does a heart good to see the bitcoin growth. 

[ThiagoCMC]

Hi!

 I just upgrade the Electra Litecoin P2Pool node.

 I update the Litecoin and the P2Pool softwares.

 Since the Litecoin daemon uses the same TCP port of P2Pool for Bitcoin, I'll move it (Electra Litecoin P2Pool node) to another IP soon. This will help the Litecoin network, since my Litecoin Daemon doesn't accept incoming connections right now.

Cheers!
Thiago

[bitpop]

try mine in my sig

[ThiagoCMC]

Hi!

 I just update Electra Bitcoin and Litecoin P2Pool nodes.

 Now, there are two VPS, one for each type of P2Pool node (VPS1 for BTC/NMC/IXC & VPS2 for LTC).

 Each VPS have its own internet connection (fiber-optic).

 Now, the Litecoin daemon is running on its default ports, more than 15 connections.

 Double-re-checking all firewall rules...

 The Electra Bitcoin P2Pool node have a new IP: 200.204.162.44 - Fee down from 0.5% to 0.3%.

 Please, update the first post of this thread!

Cheers!
Thiago

[randomguy7]

I have a new one for the list.

Germany::http://78.47.74.211:10332/::0.5%::BTC::randomguy7::randomguy7

[check_status]

I have a new one for the list.

Germany::http://78.47.74.211:10332/::0.5%::BTC::randomguy7::randomguy7

c'est fin.

[vedalken254]

Gots a new server for you guys:

Dallas, Texas::USA::http://caldari.lksmith.me:9332/::0%::BTC::Ael's Pool::vedalken254 (Ael)

Ael

EDIT:
Fee is dissolved already however i still don't have certain things in place for p2pmining.com to work off my vps. Will update as time goes on.