|
|
|
|
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int
somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll
change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Littleshop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1003
|
|
March 13, 2014, 02:19:07 AM |
|
New free BTC Public P2Pool Node, Vancouver, WA, U.S.A o% fees stratum+tcp://67.189.82.137:9332 or http://67.189.82.137:9332Please use your bitcoin wallet address as user name and any password will work. If you enter anything other than your bitcoin wallet address for a user name you will not receive any payouts. Click on the Charts below to find your worker. Charts: http://67.189.82.137:9332/static/graphs.html?DayDonations: BTC 1MAmUEm28Sus7sZBSZYwUknTssnkB4VE9C Just dropped a new antminer on there. Will add more if this works out.
|
|
|
|
naplam
|
|
March 16, 2014, 08:50:14 AM |
|
We've added new public Bitcoin and Litecoin nodes at CrunchPool, as well as two SpainCoin nodes
|
|
|
|
dplusf
|
|
April 07, 2014, 08:30:32 AM |
|
We're hosting three Public Nodes. Choose from San Francisco, New York and Amsterdam. Currently we run with 6.6 TH/s. http://bitnode.io
|
|
|
|
Jakesor
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
April 07, 2014, 01:37:12 PM |
|
We've added new public Bitcoin and Litecoin nodes at CrunchPool, as well as two SpainCoin nodes Nice! That's really good that you've added nodes there
|
|
|
|
martinbeek
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 7
Merit: 0
|
|
April 22, 2014, 06:21:24 PM |
|
Hello all. New public node on dedicated server in Contabo's new datacentre in Muenchen (Germany): www.minehammer.com (Bitcoin) Muenchen::Germany::178.238.237.252:9332::0.5::Bitcoin::MineHammer::Martin Beek I'm currently working on a redundant server setup w. an Amsterdam mirror, so it's better to use the domain name instead of the IP address: http://minehammer.com:9332Cheers! Martin.
|
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 04, 2014, 10:31:24 PM |
|
In an effort to promote p2pool, I'm going to try something new, and afaik, something that hasn't been done before. I managed to snatch up a VPS for a ridiculously low price. I'm running a public p2pool node on it with 0% fee. I'm merge mining every single coin I'm aware of that merges with BTC: NMC, IXC, and DVC. (IXC is off at the moment to make sure I don't run out of resources.) All that's the same as many other nodes out there. What I'm doing different is not keeping the merged mine proceeds for myself. I'm not even using them to compensate for the VPS fee. Instead, I'll be donating the BTC equivalent back into p2pool, for all p2pool users to share. Every single satoshi. The VPS is located in Los Angles, CA, the opposite side of the country of me. Not ideal for me, but it was the one that was available, so I grabbed it. I'm pointing the majority of my hashpower there - a meager 1 TH/s. I hope to see a lot more from others soon. The pool address is 96.44.166.190:9332. I intend to find a domain name for it soon, but haven't got there yet. I also intend to put one of the newer front end web UIs on the node, but for now I'm just using the default. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
May 04, 2014, 11:04:44 PM |
|
It'll surely have problems once you have more than a couple of people on there... just look at p2pool.org, etc.. It's not designed well for multiple ppl with how it handles the work requests.... when I had 10+ ppl on my Bitcoin p2pool, it'd take around 50-100ms before it got to the last person and that's with having it set at 5000 maxblocksize (cutting out most of the transactions)... not to mention the i7-2700k, 32gb of RAM w/ blockchain in ramfs. Try using two different difficulty settings and check the log and see what the time difference is between the two work requests.. but while we're on the topic of VPS', wable.com (incero) option #3 is sweet for $8 a month. can mix and match how you like & swap between dallas and seattle at will.. http://www.speedtest.net/result/3480771499.png from the seattle location (it still resolves the IP to Dallas, re: Seattle being 1750mi away)
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 04, 2014, 11:12:25 PM |
|
It'll surely have problems once you have more than a couple of people on there... just look at p2pool.org, etc.. It's not designed well for multiple ppl with how it handles the work requests.... when I had 10+ ppl on my Bitcoin p2pool, it'd take around 50-100ms before it got to the last person and that's with having it set at 5000 maxblocksize (cutting out most of the transactions)... not to mention the i7-2700k, 32gb of RAM w/ blockchain in ramfs. Try using two different difficulty settings and check the log and see what the time difference is between the two work requests.. but while we're on the topic of VPS', wable.com (incero) option #3 is sweet for $8 a month. can mix and match how you like & swap between dallas and seattle at will.. http://www.speedtest.net/result/3480771499.png from the seattle location (it still resolves the IP to Dallas, re: Seattle being 1750mi away) If what you say is true, then I'll be disappointed. But I'm going to try it anyhow... and if nothing else, use it for myself. I'd be happy if I got too many users. BTW I got my VPS for $30 a year. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
May 04, 2014, 11:15:46 PM |
|
It'll surely have problems once you have more than a couple of people on there... just look at p2pool.org, etc.. It's not designed well for multiple ppl with how it handles the work requests.... when I had 10+ ppl on my Bitcoin p2pool, it'd take around 50-100ms before it got to the last person and that's with having it set at 5000 maxblocksize (cutting out most of the transactions)... not to mention the i7-2700k, 32gb of RAM w/ blockchain in ramfs. Try using two different difficulty settings and check the log and see what the time difference is between the two work requests.. but while we're on the topic of VPS', wable.com (incero) option #3 is sweet for $8 a month. can mix and match how you like & swap between dallas and seattle at will.. http://www.speedtest.net/result/3480771499.png from the seattle location (it still resolves the IP to Dallas, re: Seattle being 1750mi away) If what you say is true, then I'll be disappointed. But I'm going to try it anyhow... and if nothing else, use it for myself. I'd be happy if I got too many users. BTW I got my VPS for $30 a year. M Yeah, I have seen some for that cheap... like that ramnode thing or whatever I posted here earlier. You can find lots on lowendtalk or lowendbox.com... but I haven't found one where you can move it between Seattle and Dallas whenever you want I'm damn near certain it'll be too slow if you allow all the transactions... I'd think w/ $30 a year it's probably just 2 or 3 cores? If you cut out all the transactions it might be OK
|
|
|
|
mdude77
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001
|
|
May 04, 2014, 11:20:01 PM |
|
It'll surely have problems once you have more than a couple of people on there... just look at p2pool.org, etc.. It's not designed well for multiple ppl with how it handles the work requests.... when I had 10+ ppl on my Bitcoin p2pool, it'd take around 50-100ms before it got to the last person and that's with having it set at 5000 maxblocksize (cutting out most of the transactions)... not to mention the i7-2700k, 32gb of RAM w/ blockchain in ramfs. Try using two different difficulty settings and check the log and see what the time difference is between the two work requests.. but while we're on the topic of VPS', wable.com (incero) option #3 is sweet for $8 a month. can mix and match how you like & swap between dallas and seattle at will.. http://www.speedtest.net/result/3480771499.png from the seattle location (it still resolves the IP to Dallas, re: Seattle being 1750mi away) If what you say is true, then I'll be disappointed. But I'm going to try it anyhow... and if nothing else, use it for myself. I'd be happy if I got too many users. BTW I got my VPS for $30 a year. M Yeah, I have seen some for that cheap... like that ramnode thing or whatever I posted here earlier. You can find lots on lowendtalk or lowendbox.com... but I haven't found one where you can move it between Seattle and Dallas whenever you want I'm damn near certain it'll be too slow if you allow all the transactions... I'd think w/ $30 a year it's probably just 2 or 3 cores? If you cut out all the transactions it might be OK My box is showing Xeon L5520 @ 2.267GHz 8 cores. I'm using the recommendations in the "p2pool FUD" thread to limit transactions. I'm not allowing all in. I tweaked things a bit to get it to be stable. The alt coins will use way too many connections and hence resources if I let them, I had to lock them down quite a bit. M
|
I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent! Come join me!
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 05, 2014, 05:53:48 PM |
|
Coin Cadence P2Pool Public Node: Fast and Reliable. 0% Feehttp://mining.CoinCadence.comPool URL: stratum+tcp://mining.CoinCadence.com:9332 OR http://mining.CoinCadence.com:9332Username: [Your Bitcoin Address For Payment] Password: Not required Server Info:Virginia USA Multiple Redundancy: Power, Cooling, Connectivity 100% RAID 10 SSD Drives Quad Core Processor 4 GB RAM 800 MB/s Network Optimized Bitcoind and P2Pool Very Low Latency - Give us a ping We have a decent looking custom dashboard, will be adding more data and per-miner info shortly
|
|
|
|
sciack
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
May 05, 2014, 10:17:04 PM |
|
P2PoolThailand - The first Thai p2pool node
stratum+tcp://p2poolthailand.com:9332 or stratum+tcp://p2pool.asia:9332
0% fee
Very low latency in asia, specially in Thailand.
I am running 1.5TH/s with my miners, waiting for others to join.
|
|
|
|
norgan
|
|
May 06, 2014, 04:07:49 AM Last edit: May 13, 2014, 01:26:52 AM by norgan |
|
Singapore::pool.norgzpool.net.au:9332::0%::BTC::Norgz Pool::Norgan Norgz Pool is now open for business. http://www.norgzpool.net.auDeets above, server is a quad core 7gb ram beast and running on the Microsoft Azure cloud. The server will be moved to Australia when the DC is up but for now Singapore is about as close as I can get to Australia with minimal investment. Mine with your Bitcoin wallet address and it'll pay you direct. Merged mining is in the pipeline where you'll be able to collect NMC, IXC and DVC along with the BTC you mine. Always being updated and will be closely monitored and maintained.
|
|
|
|
bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
May 06, 2014, 07:50:59 AM |
|
Coin Cadence P2Pool Public Node: Fast and Reliable. 0% Feehttp://mining.CoinCadence.comPool URL: stratum+tcp://mining.CoinCadence.com:9332 OR http://mining.CoinCadence.com:9332Username: [Your Bitcoin Address For Payment] Password: Not required Server Info:Virginia USA Multiple Redundancy: Power, Cooling, Connectivity 100% RAID 10 SSD Drives Quad Core Processor 4 GB RAM 800 MB/s Network Optimized Bitcoind and P2Pool Very Low Latency - Give us a ping We have a decent looking custom dashboard, will be adding more data and per-miner info shortly How did you add http?
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
May 06, 2014, 02:30:57 PM |
|
Coin Cadence P2Pool Public Node: Fast and Reliable. 0% Feehttp://mining.CoinCadence.comPool URL: stratum+tcp://mining.CoinCadence.com:9332 OR http://mining.CoinCadence.com:9332Username: [Your Bitcoin Address For Payment] Password: Not required Server Info:Virginia USA Multiple Redundancy: Power, Cooling, Connectivity 100% RAID 10 SSD Drives Quad Core Processor 4 GB RAM 800 MB/s Network Optimized Bitcoind and P2Pool Very Low Latency - Give us a ping We have a decent looking custom dashboard, will be adding more data and per-miner info shortly How did you add http? It's supported by default....
|
|
|
|
norgan
|
|
May 07, 2014, 01:00:36 AM |
|
Singapore::pool.norgzpool.net.au:9332::0%::BTC::Norgz Pool::Norgan
Norgz Pool is now open for business.
Deets above, server is a quad core 7gb ram beast and running on the Microsoft Azure cloud.
The server will be moved to Australia when the DC is up but for now Singapore is about as close as I can get to Australia with minimal investment.
Mine with your Bitcoin wallet address and it'll pay you direct. Merged mining is in the pipeline where you'll be able to collect NMC, IXC and DVC along with the BTC you mine.
Always being updated and will be closely monitored and maintained.
added a litecoin pool now also and have done a fair bit of work on the dashboards. http://pool.norgzpool.net.au:9332 for BTC http://pool.norgzpool.net.au:9327 for LTC Both in Singapore.
|
|
|
|
zvs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1680
Merit: 1000
https://web.archive.org/web/*/nogleg.com
|
|
May 08, 2014, 03:35:34 PM |
|
It'll surely have problems once you have more than a couple of people on there... just look at p2pool.org, etc.. It's not designed well for multiple ppl with how it handles the work requests.... when I had 10+ ppl on my Bitcoin p2pool, it'd take around 50-100ms before it got to the last person and that's with having it set at 5000 maxblocksize (cutting out most of the transactions)... not to mention the i7-2700k, 32gb of RAM w/ blockchain in ramfs. Try using two different difficulty settings and check the log and see what the time difference is between the two work requests.. but while we're on the topic of VPS', wable.com (incero) option #3 is sweet for $8 a month. can mix and match how you like & swap between dallas and seattle at will.. http://www.speedtest.net/result/3480771499.png from the seattle location (it still resolves the IP to Dallas, re: Seattle being 1750mi away) If what you say is true, then I'll be disappointed. But I'm going to try it anyhow... and if nothing else, use it for myself. I'd be happy if I got too many users. BTW I got my VPS for $30 a year. M Yeah, I have seen some for that cheap... like that ramnode thing or whatever I posted here earlier. You can find lots on lowendtalk or lowendbox.com... but I haven't found one where you can move it between Seattle and Dallas whenever you want I'm damn near certain it'll be too slow if you allow all the transactions... I'd think w/ $30 a year it's probably just 2 or 3 cores? If you cut out all the transactions it might be OK My box is showing Xeon L5520 @ 2.267GHz 8 cores. I'm using the recommendations in the "p2pool FUD" thread to limit transactions. I'm not allowing all in. I tweaked things a bit to get it to be stable. The alt coins will use way too many connections and hence resources if I let them, I had to lock them down quite a bit. M Hm, I'm guessing those are shared cores, though? You'll be alright though if you limit the transactions a lot, from my experience that's essentially what causes those huge delays on work being distributed... & the slower your computer is going & the more people on it, the worse it gets.. (uh... see p2pool.org, *cough*) I did finally figure out what was messing up my bitcoin pool. I was one of the reserve pools for MacMiner (?) or something like that.... so even tho those people may not have ever hit my pool, it was still pulling work requests (probably shouldn't have been doing that, but maybe some flaw in the software)
|
|
|
|
Acejam
|
|
May 08, 2014, 06:17:53 PM |
|
Can we add p2pool.io? See my thread here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=422242.0tl:dr = I have a cluster of P2Pool instances that are load balanced all behind the same domain. This means higher availability for the end user. New York, NY::USA::http://p2pool.io:9332::0%::BTC::p2pool.io::Acejam
|
|
|
|
|