[ANN] [BBL] BitBlock-World's first X15 coin|Bittrex|Poloniex|Mandatory Update

[djm34]

Still working on GPU miner. Whirlpool may be slightly difficult...We'll figure it out though

Also will let you guys know if and when we hear from any other exchanges.

EDIT: Will also throw 5k out of our wallet to the first person to post a working GPU miner

5k  good luck forking

[1714690686]

1714690686

[1714690686]

1714690686

[BitBlock]

Like we said. We do not have a lot of coins left ourselves. most likely many many miners here have much more coins than we have now, or ever did have..heh, but anyhow, We are still working on forking and reconfiguring one, so if the 5k cannot buy some time from someone that wants to help the project succeed so be it, We can do it ourself

EDIT: Even if someone wants to help with the Whirlpool implementations for the bitblock.cpp we have everything else already finished.

[tiddy]

new algo？mark

[ocminer]

Anyone getting any confirmed/unconfirmed at @suprnova?
@ocminer, I don't get any at my balance:(

Hmm is your hashrate displayed correctly? Do you have accepted shares?

[Hodor_keeper_of_the_light]

Anyone getting any confirmed/unconfirmed at @suprnova?
@ocminer, I don't get any at my balance:(

Hmm is your hashrate displayed correctly? Do you have accepted shares?

Yes. Check "larin"

[baraba80]

Net Hashrate   149.66 MH/s  just on CPU mining   Curent Difficulty   2.00074105  Est. Next Difficulty   5.22697944

This will be big!

[Hodor_keeper_of_the_light]

Anyone getting any confirmed/unconfirmed at @suprnova?
@ocminer, I don't get any at my balance:(

Hmm is your hashrate displayed correctly? Do you have accepted shares?

Yes. Check "larin"

Never mind, just got payout. Seems like pool getting blocks not too fast.

[alphateam]

Here is the guide guys:


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666542.0


EDIT: This was just a quick "hack" as I'm @ work currently, so correct me if anything is wrong, I'll overlook it later again ! 

Dev could you add this to OP?

Block begin to confirm on your pool 

Yes, finally!

Did You get the payment from suprnova? Should be working fine

Yep working good, no problem

[DeCrypterManiac]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

[TheCoinFinder]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

Because my multiplications are different. Hashrate means nothing ultimately - its your accepted shares. You should get roughly the same payout from both pools.

[baraba80]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

on Hashharder you se hash in last 30 min m8!

[DeCrypterManiac]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

Because my multiplications are different. Hashrate means nothing ultimately - its your accepted shares. You should get roughly the same payout from both pools.

I stay your pool, more hash.

[majsta]

Compiled CPU miner for Win32 bit, it should work also on 64 bit machines:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ozxonmapi170ivr/BitBlock_miner_WIN32bit_by_Majsta.rar

If I helped be generous:
XdDEHCxhJmnuwW6NLMJRZWfECYWUq8kjVA

[ocminer]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

Because my multiplications are different. Hashrate means nothing ultimately - its your accepted shares. You should get roughly the same payout from both pools.

I stay your pool, more hash.

Compare the hashrate of your miner with the the hashrate of the frontend, even if the frontend shows 10 GH/s but you are only submitting with 5kh/s, you'll get paid the 5kh/s as everyone's hashrate is (probably) displayed too high.

This algo is new, I'm still not 100 % sure if the displayed hashrate on suprnova is correct, it at least matches with my miners.

This surely just needs some tweaking, but as TheCoinFinder already said, compare your shares/second and what your miner displays, don't rely on the frontend hashes yet.

After all, simply compare the payouts over time... should be the same.

[BitBlock]

True, Remember guys, also, its always good to spread some hash around as well. there is over 160m/s hashing power, should be spread around a bit if at all possible

EDIT: Exchanges we believe will be coming today, Thinking bittrex, cryptsy, and poloniex will add us, not sure right now about others. Would help also if the public send in some ticket requests for the add as well

[b3da]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

Because my multiplications are different. Hashrate means nothing ultimately - its your accepted shares. You should get roughly the same payout from both pools.

I stay your pool, more hash.

Compare the hashrate of your miner with the the hashrate of the frontend, even if the frontend shows 10 GH/s but you are only submitting with 5kh/s, you'll get paid the 5kh/s as everyone's hashrate is (probably) displayed too high.

This algo is new, I'm still not 100 % sure if the displayed hashrate on suprnova is correct, it at least matches with my miners.

This surely just needs some tweaking, but as TheCoinFinder already said, compare your shares/second and what your miner displays, don't rely on the frontend hashes yet.

After all, simply compare the payouts over time... should be the same.

yes, your pool is showing correct hashrate(i switched from hh to suprnova). we just need little bit more power..

[rayday11]

Exchange?

[ocminer]

Why do I have about 8 times more hash on Hashharder than on Supernova ?

I back to Hashharder

Because my multiplications are different. Hashrate means nothing ultimately - its your accepted shares. You should get roughly the same payout from both pools.

I stay your pool, more hash.

Compare the hashrate of your miner with the the hashrate of the frontend, even if the frontend shows 10 GH/s but you are only submitting with 5kh/s, you'll get paid the 5kh/s as everyone's hashrate is (probably) displayed too high.

This algo is new, I'm still not 100 % sure if the displayed hashrate on suprnova is correct, it at least matches with my miners.

This surely just needs some tweaking, but as TheCoinFinder already said, compare your shares/second and what your miner displays, don't rely on the frontend hashes yet.

After all, simply compare the payouts over time... should be the same.

yes, your pool is showing correct hashrate(i switched from hh to suprnova). we just need little bit more power..

first pool is always the biggest :-)

We probably have to wait a bit until more miners hop in, I hope it will even out.

[sft]

Too difficult, basically do not dig it.

[restless]

@HH I got 50 coins for 9 hours.
15 coins with first block in suprnova... same hashrate which was dispalyed as 3kh/s now is 600