utahjohn
|
|
July 04, 2014, 01:52:55 AM |
|
I got out at .000039 Good luck to all however I'm done with this coin.
|
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2014, 05:30:09 AM |
|
I got out at .000039 Good luck to all however I'm done with this coin.
you will regret it .... 100 BTC volume in Bittrex
|
|
|
|
utahjohn
|
|
July 04, 2014, 05:43:38 AM |
|
I got out at .000039 Good luck to all however I'm done with this coin.
you will regret it .... 100 BTC volume in Bittrex 88 Perhaps but until block generation of other than 505 coins exactly is fixed it's too risky. If dev can prove this is fixed I might buy back in ...
|
|
|
|
aulonocara
|
|
July 04, 2014, 05:48:15 AM |
|
A huge thankyou to whoever just dumped into ALL of my buys orders (even the low low one)
|
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2014, 05:53:48 AM |
|
now only sell the multi-pools
whales ate more
|
|
|
|
silencesilence
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1120
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2014, 05:56:18 AM |
|
Sneak peak at the new wallet development! this is great expect a complete plan for the development of the coin by Foundation
|
|
|
|
spydud22
|
|
July 04, 2014, 06:38:13 AM |
|
Anyone have the settings for a 7950 and a 7870?
|
|
|
|
Frangomel
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 1000
FreshTheGame
|
|
July 04, 2014, 06:55:37 AM |
|
Anyone have the settings for a 7950 and a 7870?
7950 is on few back pages.
|
|
|
|
mammix2 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1004
|
|
July 04, 2014, 07:15:26 AM |
|
I got out at .000039 Good luck to all however I'm done with this coin.
you will regret it .... 100 BTC volume in Bittrex 88 Perhaps but until block generation of other than 505 coins exactly is fixed it's too risky. If dev can prove this is fixed I might buy back in ... utahjohn There is nothing wrong with the wallet coding. The 505 coins paid out is a fixed amount and cannot be manipulated, if someone tries to change the code on a single wallet, the coins generated will be rejected because all the other wallets on the network disagree with the amounts. Only Proof of Work blocks generate the 5 coins value to the foundation, Proof of Stake blocks do not: Look here for the PoW payout amount: https://github.com/mammix2/MaiaCoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L985Look here for the foundation amount: https://github.com/mammix2/MaiaCoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L54If you are referring to a certain pool not paying out the correct amount, that is different. In a pool, you don't receive your payment direct from the wallet daemon running on that pool. As with every client on the network, that pool's daemon will be generating the correct amount of coins and storing them in an address locally. Your payout from that wallet balance is determined by the pool itself and not the wallet codingMany of us have tried to contact Dedicated about the incorrect block value, but for whatever reason they havent replied. I have absolutely no control over how Dedicated run their business but one thing is guaranteed, and that's about 10GH/s on mining power on any new coin! If you don't like what they are doing go over to a different pool which is paying out the correct amount.
|
1HfpFYxBUpQ941mKd4DEjsyA22HN4Kerzu
|
|
|
dmfree88
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
July 04, 2014, 07:16:11 AM |
|
Anyone have the settings for a 7950 and a 7870?
7870 / 270x / 270 settings: http://redd.it/29mzytalso provides fix for 14.6 drivers and huge hashrate boost for almost every algo! not sure about 7950 though. If you find good settings send me a reply on the reddit post. I am trying to compile a list of the top notch from each gpu .
|
All donations Go directly to support my autistic son: VTC: VaDUVkbX5j83UsT5r7QFjfapcZFYbzQz9x / BTC: 1BNYqjN5Hm17im9CwD9jKc8nWX3Y68Kd4N / LTC: LfNsAfd5bxuCMggrq16V9XAmUkZWZ1h1eJ /
|
|
|
fwiucom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 07:39:54 AM |
|
I got out at .000039 Good luck to all however I'm done with this coin.
you will regret it .... 100 BTC volume in Bittrex 88 Perhaps but until block generation of other than 505 coins exactly is fixed it's too risky. If dev can prove this is fixed I might buy back in ... utahjohn There is nothing wrong with the wallet coding. The 505 coins paid out is a fixed amount and cannot be manipulated, if someone tries to change the code on a single wallet, the coins generated will be rejected because all the other wallets on the network disagree with the amounts. Only Proof of Work blocks generate the 5 coins value to the foundation, Proof of Stake blocks do not: Look here for the PoW payout amount: https://github.com/mammix2/MaiaCoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L985Look here for the foundation amount: https://github.com/mammix2/MaiaCoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L54If you are referring to a certain pool not paying out the correct amount, that is different. In a pool, you don't receive your payment direct from the wallet daemon running on that pool. As with every client on the network, that pool's daemon will be generating the correct amount of coins and storing them in an address locally. Your payout from that wallet balance is determined by the pool itself and not the wallet codingMany of us have tried to contact Dedicated about the incorrect block value, but for whatever reason they havent replied. I have absolutely no control over how Dedicated run their business but one thing is guaranteed, and that's about 10GH/s on mining power on any new coin! If you don't like what they are doing go over to a different pool which is paying out the correct amount. It seems investors need you to give a huge confidence
|
|
|
|
utahjohn
|
|
July 04, 2014, 07:45:38 AM Last edit: July 04, 2014, 08:01:08 AM by utahjohn |
|
@mammix2
Please explain this and many other blocks in blockchain explorer:
01:43:51  getblock 00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6
01:43:51  { "hash" : "00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6", "confirmations" : 12137, "size" : 782, "height" : 968, "version" : 6, "merkleroot" : "7db1a0b1f8da138291c5964fad56fe962a37c699416412cf8b929578f976b9bd", "mint" : 500.00010000, "time" : 1404038374, "nonce" : 2037310, "bits" : "1c010d00", "difficulty" : 243.62453532, "blocktrust" : "f3a0d52cba", "chaintrust" : "1ef32610d8030", "previousblockhash" : "00000000009b9450a26eb3c1a473516f3f26d10be006e270771c6e1837ecae63", "nextblockhash" : "0000000000acace3dd17d85f240306609408bf806afb80331718a79777d52d34", "flags" : "proof-of-work", "proofhash" : "00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6", "entropybit" : 0, "modifier" : "90f49c32fc73a952", "modifierchecksum" : "9d5358e7", "tx" : [ "2ad76f79eb8f4eb10cee57b5fe3c96523c75f24220aaf4052b5781017d378e71", "05a6b33a3b3a79b9c10fdfaf059804d40cbf81aa53029f3384848b98b0e470d8" ] }
Proof of Work: 500 coins generated Hash: 00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6 Previous Block: 00000000009b9450a26eb3c1a473516f3f26d10be006e270771c6e1837ecae63 Next Block: 0000000000acace3dd17d85f240306609408bf806afb80331718a79777d52d34 Height: 968 Version: 6 Transaction Merkle Root: 7db1a0b1f8da138291c5964fad56fe962a37c699416412cf8b929578f976b9bd Time: 1404038374 (2014-06-29 10:39:34) Difficulty: 243.628 (Bits: 1c010d00) Cumulative Difficulty: 126 770.379 Nonce: 2037310 Transactions: 2 Value out: 834.97285844 Transaction Fees: 0.0001 Average Coin Age: 0.334763 days Coin-days Destroyed: 1.1708542 Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed: 28.4991% Transactions Transaction Fee Size (kB) From (amount) To (amount) 2ad76f79eb... 0 0.164 Generation: 500 + 0.0001 total fees MNq44J5eU1QUZZpXRKDgtxBidFyiETz5WX: 495.000099 MBKVCNHtGHdtxA5jfpYnaibCeYR25UpwUY: 5.000001 05a6b33a3b... 0.0001 0.536 MVxZSJCaLN4wE4fd7DDWjc8KFCNTCPyBwG: 334.97285844 MAdUA9h7xVfy4KPAeRv9eM8Kb7QDursRZY: 20.48530498 M96g1S3e55aRzQmj392awPKGUrvJD3CiJm: 33.39513878 MFDKjr298QE34T2QpCQ1FfnhTZL4WPGMCq: 16.73654719 MQcGvo66Mddcj1BDVm4RMLQw6KKYiFL6Pa: 1.31924081 MSuR9g7X3VVCcNcesbs7toCmpDFoNPTHMu: 65.6199627 MQiMx1ayRH65YpYSMNwQJHckqBajhvL1vd: 11.81137317 MPRaYFpf9sn8ZqYaGWJLygfbwEdQFPLjsd: 16.78185354 MBqKVaPXUAZ1W6yVBuUmGq5Y7JMEbLPUMq: 31.4444738 MSsRQCYpkgZxCtFUdDFZ5Xuw6Vx6tZNuKA: 2.06310535 MEWatD9k3zHYRPxqfkYi33971M1JpGfm1f: 5.77030774 MJtQZ6aGZQcPk82bmGc1ibwxwSnCeTNbRQ: 129.54545038
This block should have been rejected along with all the other "500 blocks" ...
|
|
|
|
utahjohn
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:21:43 AM |
|
Your coins are losing their glitter and rusting ... soon to be dust.
|
|
|
|
fwiucom
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 22
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:51:53 AM |
|
@mammix2
Please explain this and many other blocks in blockchain explorer:
01:43:51  getblock 00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6
01:43:51  { "hash" : "00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6", "confirmations" : 12137, "size" : 782, "height" : 968, "version" : 6, "merkleroot" : "7db1a0b1f8da138291c5964fad56fe962a37c699416412cf8b929578f976b9bd", "mint" : 500.00010000, "time" : 1404038374, "nonce" : 2037310, "bits" : "1c010d00", "difficulty" : 243.62453532, "blocktrust" : "f3a0d52cba", "chaintrust" : "1ef32610d8030", "previousblockhash" : "00000000009b9450a26eb3c1a473516f3f26d10be006e270771c6e1837ecae63", "nextblockhash" : "0000000000acace3dd17d85f240306609408bf806afb80331718a79777d52d34", "flags" : "proof-of-work", "proofhash" : "00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6", "entropybit" : 0, "modifier" : "90f49c32fc73a952", "modifierchecksum" : "9d5358e7", "tx" : [ "2ad76f79eb8f4eb10cee57b5fe3c96523c75f24220aaf4052b5781017d378e71", "05a6b33a3b3a79b9c10fdfaf059804d40cbf81aa53029f3384848b98b0e470d8" ] }
Proof of Work: 500 coins generated Hash: 00000000002f9df1cec3be3d336d6379eb94c6b3e09a01211b468467d40cb6a6 Previous Block: 00000000009b9450a26eb3c1a473516f3f26d10be006e270771c6e1837ecae63 Next Block: 0000000000acace3dd17d85f240306609408bf806afb80331718a79777d52d34 Height: 968 Version: 6 Transaction Merkle Root: 7db1a0b1f8da138291c5964fad56fe962a37c699416412cf8b929578f976b9bd Time: 1404038374 (2014-06-29 10:39:34) Difficulty: 243.628 (Bits: 1c010d00) Cumulative Difficulty: 126 770.379 Nonce: 2037310 Transactions: 2 Value out: 834.97285844 Transaction Fees: 0.0001 Average Coin Age: 0.334763 days Coin-days Destroyed: 1.1708542 Cumulative Coin-days Destroyed: 28.4991% Transactions Transaction Fee Size (kB) From (amount) To (amount) 2ad76f79eb... 0 0.164 Generation: 500 + 0.0001 total fees MNq44J5eU1QUZZpXRKDgtxBidFyiETz5WX: 495.000099 MBKVCNHtGHdtxA5jfpYnaibCeYR25UpwUY: 5.000001 05a6b33a3b... 0.0001 0.536 MVxZSJCaLN4wE4fd7DDWjc8KFCNTCPyBwG: 334.97285844 MAdUA9h7xVfy4KPAeRv9eM8Kb7QDursRZY: 20.48530498 M96g1S3e55aRzQmj392awPKGUrvJD3CiJm: 33.39513878 MFDKjr298QE34T2QpCQ1FfnhTZL4WPGMCq: 16.73654719 MQcGvo66Mddcj1BDVm4RMLQw6KKYiFL6Pa: 1.31924081 MSuR9g7X3VVCcNcesbs7toCmpDFoNPTHMu: 65.6199627 MQiMx1ayRH65YpYSMNwQJHckqBajhvL1vd: 11.81137317 MPRaYFpf9sn8ZqYaGWJLygfbwEdQFPLjsd: 16.78185354 MBqKVaPXUAZ1W6yVBuUmGq5Y7JMEbLPUMq: 31.4444738 MSsRQCYpkgZxCtFUdDFZ5Xuw6Vx6tZNuKA: 2.06310535 MEWatD9k3zHYRPxqfkYi33971M1JpGfm1f: 5.77030774 MJtQZ6aGZQcPk82bmGc1ibwxwSnCeTNbRQ: 129.54545038
This block should have been rejected along with all the other "500 blocks" ...
Dev??!? What do you mean? Please explain
|
|
|
|
utahjohn
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:57:45 AM |
|
Look again the amount generated was 495+5
|
|
|
|
murraypaul
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:57:51 AM Last edit: July 04, 2014, 10:10:58 AM by murraypaul |
|
The block payout is clearly 500, not 505: Proof of Work: 500 coins generated [...] 2ad76f79eb... 0 0.164 Generation: 500 + 0.0001 total fees MNq44J5eU1QUZZpXRKDgtxBidFyiETz5WX: 495.000099 MBKVCNHtGHdtxA5jfpYnaibCeYR25UpwUY: 5.000001
Edit: It appears that the code allows you to create blocks with less than the maximum reward, it only checks that you don't create more: if (IsProofOfWork()) { int64_t nReward = GetProofOfWorkReward(nFees); // Check coinbase reward if (vtx[0].GetValueOut() > nReward) return DoS(50, error("ConnectBlock() : coinbase reward exceeded (actual=%"PRId64" vs calculated=%"PRId64")", vtx[0].GetValueOut(), nReward)); }
if(IsProofOfWork()) { CBitcoinAddress address(!fTestNet ? FOUNDATION : FOUNDATION_TEST); CScript scriptPubKey; scriptPubKey.SetDestination(address.Get()); if (vtx[0].vout[1].scriptPubKey != scriptPubKey) return error("ConnectBlock() : coinbase does not pay to the dev address)"); if (vtx[0].vout[1].nValue < devCoin) return error("ConnectBlock() : coinbase does not pay enough to dev addresss"); } So this bug only allows a miner to give themselves fewer coins that they should have earned, not more. Similarly, it allows for more to be sent to the dev address, but not fewer. Hard to see that as a real problem for the coin. Conclusion is that there is a badly configured pool which is earning 1% less for its miners that it should be.
|
BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
|
|
|
Sehae
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 09:59:08 AM |
|
seems all right to me, don't know what is this panic all about - in the OP it is said that from every block of POW 5 coins are extracted for development
|
|
|
|
Jupiter84
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:01:09 AM |
|
Panic dump is over. Congratulations for all who bought cheap MAIA coins
|
|
|
|
jrich76
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:01:33 AM |
|
seems all right to me, don't know what is this panic all about - in the OP it is said that from every block of POW 5 coins are extracted for development
some people just bought up a LOT of cheap coins, dumpers, noobs..sheesh.
|
|
|
|
Burninj
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2014, 10:03:15 AM |
|
Yup seems we've reached the bottom
|
|
|
|
|