Unmasking BTC-E.com

[btcusury]

If you don't want to participate in unmasking them, fine. But your not going to stop it!

Why would you want to persist in this idea when your reasons for doing so have been shown to be bogus?

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

interested to give warn people about btc-e now . because we dont know if they has done under of hacker activity it will be really easy to crack or get a lot of money in there .
thanks op your thread . great warn to look at more good exchange .
nice update..

[Hippie Tech]

Those bastards ! They keep flipping my damn screen !

[bitcoincup]

So many btc-e warning here and on the web  

I am not surprised, we've got into trouble with them too this week https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711986.msg8042696#msg8042696

Anonymity and using Third parties are their best practice, my hats off to them, but that doesn't help them stay off the radar when it comes to legal action and authorities tracking them down.

They are using perfect third parties too I must admit - Mayzus group of companies again run by Russians which has its own avail for them - what are friends for huh? but these third parties are well regulated by FCA UK and CySEC Cyprus and are required to write down/certify all clients profiles and documents and pass to these regulatory bodies, these third parties will be fucked up too when the day comes with btc-e/serious authorities will be involved.

For the time being, good luck to everyone.

[theonewhowaskazu]

So many btc-e warning here and on the web  

I am not surprised, we've got into trouble with them too this week https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711986.msg8042696#msg8042696

Anonymity and using Third parties are their best practice, my hats off to them, but that doesn't help them stay off the radar when it comes to legal action and authorities tracking them down.

They are using perfect third parties too I must admit - Mayzus group of companies again run by Russians which has its own avail for them - what are friends for huh? but these third parties are well regulated by FCA UK and CySEC Cyprus and are required to write down/certify all clients profiles and documents and pass to these regulatory bodies, these third parties will be fucked up too when the day comes with btc-e/serious authorities will be involved.

For the time being, good luck to everyone.

The FCA and CySEC are BS. The CySEC might be perfectly good at helping shutting down the perfectly solvent and honest Liberty Reserve but when it comes to their own insolvent and dishonest banks they're nowhere to be seen ... 

If they don't approve of BTC-E, then all the better I say.

[bitcoincup]

So many btc-e warning here and on the web  

I am not surprised, we've got into trouble with them too this week https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711986.msg8042696#msg8042696

Anonymity and using Third parties are their best practice, my hats off to them, but that doesn't help them stay off the radar when it comes to legal action and authorities tracking them down.

They are using perfect third parties too I must admit - Mayzus group of companies again run by Russians which has its own avail for them - what are friends for huh? but these third parties are well regulated by FCA UK and CySEC Cyprus and are required to write down/certify all clients profiles and documents and pass to these regulatory bodies, these third parties will be fucked up too when the day comes with btc-e/serious authorities will be involved.

For the time being, good luck to everyone.

The FCA and CySEC are BS. The CySEC might be perfectly good at helping shutting down the perfectly solvent and honest Liberty Reserve but when it comes to their own insolvent and dishonest banks they're nowhere to be seen ...  

If they don't approve of BTC-E, then all the better I say.

I know, all regulatory bodies are BS and many scams even among themselves, but they screw among themselves too at the same time. that's the least one/we can do, to report all the obvious scam evidences to the big boys at the upper regulatory bodies.

You think FCA cares about Mayzus existence? sure not and if there are frauds, they easily cut them off.

I am wondering about what Mayzus doing for BTC-E, accepting wires on behalf of them, is totally legal, third party acceptance is one of the money laundering methodologies actually. esp for an organization such an btc-e that is operating completely anonymous.

Mayzus FS has no such service stated on their official website.

[theonewhowaskazu]

So many btc-e warning here and on the web  

I am not surprised, we've got into trouble with them too this week https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=711986.msg8042696#msg8042696

Anonymity and using Third parties are their best practice, my hats off to them, but that doesn't help them stay off the radar when it comes to legal action and authorities tracking them down.

They are using perfect third parties too I must admit - Mayzus group of companies again run by Russians which has its own avail for them - what are friends for huh? but these third parties are well regulated by FCA UK and CySEC Cyprus and are required to write down/certify all clients profiles and documents and pass to these regulatory bodies, these third parties will be fucked up too when the day comes with btc-e/serious authorities will be involved.

For the time being, good luck to everyone.

The FCA and CySEC are BS. The CySEC might be perfectly good at helping shutting down the perfectly solvent and honest Liberty Reserve but when it comes to their own insolvent and dishonest banks they're nowhere to be seen ...  

If they don't approve of BTC-E, then all the better I say.

I know, all regulatory bodies are BS and many scams even among themselves, but they screw among themselves too at the same time. that's the least one/we can do, to report all the obvious scam evidences to the big boys at the upper regulatory bodies.

You think FCA cares about Mayzus existence? sure not and if there are frauds, they easily cut them off.

I am wondering about what Mayzus doing for BTC-E, accepting wires on behalf of them, is totally legal, third party acceptance is one of the money laundering methodologies actually. esp for an organization such an btc-e that is operating completely anonymous.

Mayzus FS has no such service stated on their official website.

Its mayzus the moneypolo provider that's accepting the wires. The same way I can have you send money to my bitstamp address, thereby having "bitstamp accept transfers on behalf of me."

There is no "scam evidences" in BTC-E. They're a legitimate business that has been operating successfully for many years. They're providing a service to the community. By reporting them to any regulatory entity all you're doing is removing that service from the community, stealing wealth from the world.

[mayax]

I knew that Mayzus bank account was with Deutsche bank. Are they banking with Komercni banka now?