[ANN] [PMP] PreminePlus Launch ~ New Features! ~ Oct Signup Free Distribution!

[TheMightyX]

Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.

If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it!
Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate.

I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway.

[Benezivas]

Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.

If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it!
Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate.

I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway.

Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2...

[TheMightyX]

Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.

If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it!
Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate.

I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway.

Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2...

Don't give the chinese any ideas -_-
If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part.

[Benezivas]

Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.

If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it!
Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate.

I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway.

Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2...

Don't give the chinese any ideas -_-
If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part.

I am just saying - why loosen up the rules? We have so many participants by now already, why risk letting a horde of shill accounts in? Keeping the rule with the first of July registration is the only right thing to do IMO, if you are late then I am sorry, but you will still have the chance to swap PMC for PMP or buy PMP directly later. It's not like we are actively punishing people who came late, I mean, how much is the amount each individual gets going to be worth at the end of the day, anyway?

I am merely asking for you guys not to be guilt-trapped when the current rules are already pretty loose.

[TheMightyX]

Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.

If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it!
Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate.

I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway.

Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2...

Don't give the chinese any ideas -_-
If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part.

I am just saying - why loosen up the rules? We have so many participants by now already, why risk letting a horde of shill accounts in? Keeping the rule with the first of July registration is the only right thing to do IMO, if you are late then I am sorry, but you will still have the chance to swap PMC for PMP or buy PMP directly later. It's not like we are actively punishing people who came late, I mean, how much is the amount each individual gets going to be worth at the end of the day, anyway?

I am merely asking for you guys not to be guilt-trapped when the current rules are already pretty loose.

No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.

[MadCow]

Love this coin!!

What activity level for accounts is set for the giveaway?

[vhong]

Love this coin!!

What activity level for accounts is set for the giveaway?

I love it too.

20 activity or higher required for the giveaway. And you are highly qualified to take part if you will sign up.

[quasimodo]

Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.

If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it!
Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate.

I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway.

Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2...

Don't give the chinese any ideas -_-
If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part.

I'm sure you see a lot of new accounts in the registration for the august giveaway. 

[KickAzzDude]

Sent my address to that account and the quiz to the other account, is that all that is needed?

[qiuzhe]

Great！

[losk22]

What you do not like the Chinese? Many scams in any nationality.

[yogibaer]

Sent my address to that account and the quiz to the other account, is that all that is needed?

Correct! It's as easy as that Welcome you're in!!

[yogibaer]

No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.

I'd say there's always a risk that there will be some multiple accounts created over several months of time. But the number of people on the list is also increasing, which means that each one gets less PMP month after month. From this point of view I don't see a big risk of multiple accounts getting a lot of PMP after all.

[mirador17]

No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.

I'd say there's always a risk that there will be some multiple accounts created over several months of time. But the number of people on the list is also increasing, which means that each one gets less PMP month after month. From this point of view I don't see a big risk of multiple accounts getting a lot of PMP after all.

Maybe you're right, but 20 accounts with 50 PMP are also in 1000 PMP  monthly.

[maardein]

No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.

I'd say there's always a risk that there will be some multiple accounts created over several months of time. But the number of people on the list is also increasing, which means that each one gets less PMP month after month. From this point of view I don't see a big risk of multiple accounts getting a lot of PMP after all.

Maybe you're right, but 20 accounts with 50 PMP are also in 1000 PMP  monthly.

True. But I think it is impossible to make a foolproof system without asking for personal details like an address.

[losk22]

Many of my posts will be removed because of my bad English!

[losk22]

Hard to get even 20 posts.

[losk22]

Anonymity, so revered in the crypto world, and equitable distribution are not compatible!

[yogibaer]

Anonymity, so revered in the crypto world, and equitable distribution are not compatible!

What do you mean by this statement?

[ObscureBean]

A little birdy told me that the current high score on the quiz is held by one of our new members MoneroMooo with 80%

Can anyone dethrone him?

PreminePlus Crypto Quiz Round #1

Dammit! Here I was thinking I might have scored 100%  
There's only a couple of questions I had doubts about.
I don't suppose you could confirm if he's the only one with that score?  
On a brighter note, I should be definitely scoring above 5  

ObscureBean Crypto Quiz Round #1 score:   6/10     60%

Definitely above 5  

We now have a tie for 8/10  80%
Between MoneroMooo and orgi666!

Surely someone can defeat them?

Top winners will be entered into a draw for increased stakes and it looks like we will be doubling or tripling the quiz rewards!

Seriously? 6/10?  Wow I really suck at this.
Oh well I guess I should be happy I scored above 50% 
Awesome that you're doubling the rewards, I'll try and do better in the second round