TheMightyX (OP)
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Vires in Numeris
|
 |
July 14, 2014, 08:46:05 PM |
|
Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.
If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it! Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate. I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
Benezivas
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:00:03 PM |
|
Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.
If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it! Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate. I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway. Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2... |
|
|
|
|
TheMightyX (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Vires in Numeris
|
|
July 14, 2014, 10:59:13 PM |
|
Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.
If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it! Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate. I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway. Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2... Don't give the chinese any ideas -_- If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part. |
|
|
|
|
|
Benezivas
|
|
July 14, 2014, 11:02:56 PM |
|
Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.
If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it! Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate. I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway. Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2... Don't give the chinese any ideas -_- If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part. I am just saying - why loosen up the rules? We have so many participants by now already, why risk letting a horde of shill accounts in? Keeping the rule with the first of July registration is the only right thing to do IMO, if you are late then I am sorry, but you will still have the chance to swap PMC for PMP or buy PMP directly later. It's not like we are actively punishing people who came late, I mean, how much is the amount each individual gets going to be worth at the end of the day, anyway? I am merely asking for you guys not to be guilt-trapped when the current rules are already pretty loose. |
|
|
|
|
TheMightyX (OP)
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
Vires in Numeris
|
|
July 15, 2014, 02:49:34 AM |
|
Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.
If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it! Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate. I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway. Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2... Don't give the chinese any ideas -_- If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part. I am just saying - why loosen up the rules? We have so many participants by now already, why risk letting a horde of shill accounts in? Keeping the rule with the first of July registration is the only right thing to do IMO, if you are late then I am sorry, but you will still have the chance to swap PMC for PMP or buy PMP directly later. It's not like we are actively punishing people who came late, I mean, how much is the amount each individual gets going to be worth at the end of the day, anyway? I am merely asking for you guys not to be guilt-trapped when the current rules are already pretty loose. No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months? I'm willing to listen to feedback on this. Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion. |
|
|
|
|
|
MadCow
|
|
July 15, 2014, 03:33:55 AM |
|
Love this coin!!
What activity level for accounts is set for the giveaway?
|
|
|
|
|
|
vhong
|
|
July 15, 2014, 04:01:51 AM |
|
Love this coin!!
What activity level for accounts is set for the giveaway?
I love it too. 20 activity or higher required for the giveaway. And you are highly qualified to take part if you will sign up. |
|
|
|
|
quasimodo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2692
Merit: 1175
Reflinks und User die solche posten sind Scheisse
|
|
July 15, 2014, 04:13:55 AM |
|
Limit by date of registration is also not the right approach. In my example I will say that I do not like to talk, and prefer to do business, and therefore not registered before.
If you don't meet the requirements, you are not qualified. That's it! Otherwise there are millions of fresh accounts who will participate. I will have to agree, all though it is unfortunate that we will be denying these people entrance into the first months giveaway. It is still better that we protect the majority of users from scammers, rather than open our doors to scammers to protect a minority of users. If you create your account after July 1st you are welcome to enter into month 2 of the giveaway. Hang on, creating multiple accounts for month 2... Don't give the chinese any ideas -_- If we start seeing an usual amount of accounts created in july signing up for the august giveaway we can always ban them from taking part. I'm sure you see a lot of new accounts in the registration for the august giveaway.  |
|
|
|
|
|
KickAzzDude
|
|
July 15, 2014, 04:21:19 AM |
|
Sent my address to that account and the quiz to the other account, is that all that is needed?
|
|
|
|
qiuzhe
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 10
|
|
July 15, 2014, 06:17:30 AM |
|
Great！
|
QORA | 2ND GEN | NEW SOURCE CODE (http://coinia.net/Q) | QQn8fNv4dfbu52SjJWhCoty4EDrVgUwPt3
|
|
|
losk22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 15, 2014, 06:49:12 AM |
|
What you do not like the Chinese? Many scams in any nationality.
|
|
|
|
|
yogibaer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 15, 2014, 07:05:50 AM |
|
Sent my address to that account and the quiz to the other account, is that all that is needed?
Correct! It's as easy as that  Welcome you're in!! |
|
|
|
|
yogibaer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 15, 2014, 07:50:08 AM |
|
No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.
I'd say there's always a risk that there will be some multiple accounts created over several months of time. But the number of people on the list is also increasing, which means that each one gets less PMP month after month. From this point of view I don't see a big risk of multiple accounts getting a lot of PMP after all. |
|
|
|
|
|
mirador17
|
|
July 15, 2014, 08:35:05 AM |
|
No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.
I'd say there's always a risk that there will be some multiple accounts created over several months of time. But the number of people on the list is also increasing, which means that each one gets less PMP month after month. From this point of view I don't see a big risk of multiple accounts getting a lot of PMP after all. Maybe you're right, but 20 accounts with 50 PMP are also in 1000 PMP monthly. |
|
|
|
|
|
maardein
|
|
July 15, 2014, 08:42:07 AM |
|
No one is changing the current rules, but can we really bar accounts created in July from taking part in the December giveaway in 5 months?
I'm willing to listen to feedback on this.
Just seems like the right thing to do in my opinion.
I'd say there's always a risk that there will be some multiple accounts created over several months of time. But the number of people on the list is also increasing, which means that each one gets less PMP month after month. From this point of view I don't see a big risk of multiple accounts getting a lot of PMP after all. Maybe you're right, but 20 accounts with 50 PMP are also in 1000 PMP monthly. True. But I think it is impossible to make a foolproof system without asking for personal details like an address. |
BTC: 1788UegKXGXXicfPcbZ1bmSUJ99ZWRCF7p
LTC: LZ2rCcoxK4X8wRRynqdxoimd4d3TDNk7Lk
PMP: PApSSdorQds5tQysymwDXPAN3viJLFTUs8
|
|
|
losk22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 15, 2014, 08:59:00 AM |
|
Many of my posts will be removed because of my bad English!
|
|
|
|
|
losk22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 15, 2014, 09:01:49 AM |
|
Hard to get even 20 posts.
|
|
|
|
|
losk22
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 15, 2014, 09:06:27 AM |
|
Anonymity, so revered in the crypto world, and equitable distribution are not compatible!
|
|
|
|
|
yogibaer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1131
Merit: 1001
|
|
July 15, 2014, 09:10:33 AM |
|
Anonymity, so revered in the crypto world, and equitable distribution are not compatible!
What do you mean by this statement? |
|
|
|
|
ObscureBean
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 15, 2014, 09:27:10 AM |
|
Dammit! Here I was thinking I might have scored 100%  There's only a couple of questions I had doubts about. I don't suppose you could confirm if he's the only one with that score?  On a brighter note, I should be definitely scoring above 5  Definitely above 5  We now have a tie for 8/10 80%
Between MoneroMooo and orgi666!
Surely someone can defeat them?
Top winners will be entered into a draw for increased stakes and it looks like we will be doubling or tripling the quiz rewards! Seriously? 6/10? Wow I really suck at this. Oh well I guess I should be happy I scored above 50% Awesome that you're doubling the rewards, I'll try and do better in the second round |
|
|
|
|
|
