★[ANN] [NAV] NAV COIN - Community Fund Live!!!

[DARKHOLDER]

Watching...holding...waiting  100K soon

Agree to You

[coinvest]

Is it real 1NAV = 1BTC in one month? Is it real with so many NAV?

Everything in crypto is possible, but before this price articles about Navajo must be in thousands of sites, blogs, forums. When price skyrocket it will be natural process. IMO real price for NAV is 1$ in one month.

[ca333]

Hi,

i have questions for developer. a friend asked here but nobody answered his questions.

1. Please list all subchain parameter and how you code sign data for the switch NAV-chain -> Anon-chain
and what HASHING algorithm you used for the 2nd blockchain system.

2. How you generate and parse 2nd blockchain parameters(subchain)? (see zerocoin problem)

3. What happened with this premine blocks?

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1006

Code:

if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 25232976 * COIN;
    }

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1010

Code:

    else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 141350 && pindexBest->nHeight < 141351)
    {
        nSubsidy = 2600000 * COIN;
    }

4. and this is more rethorical question: Why is so many bugs/issue in sourcecodes of NAVAJO?
example: parsing new blocks have issues, staking is broked (not working good)... and so and so..
(stake modifier must be fixed for health network because is vulnerable and staking parameters adapted)

this are most important questions but many other question in my head.....

thank you.

[hashforce101]

I am an Investor do not talking on behalf of anyone else - I personally DO NOT want Subchain algorithms to be broadcast to the world . This is what gives NavajoCoins its uniqueness and value. We aint going open source either which is a great decision to just give our technology away - that's my opinion anyway. This has all been announced in the past threads many times.

We will achieve ODA and we will be the first ANON to do so  

I am staking Perfect and any bugs for windows 8.1 are fixed in next wallet release.

The next release will be rock solid my friend and well tested as its a major release  

Everything you asking to reveal is months and months of work.

No leaks where found in the Beta system released to public !

[uszaty43]

THERE ARE 2 DAYS TO ANON RELEASE

[ca333]

I am an Investor do not talking on behalf of anyone else - I personally DO NOT want Subchain algorithms to be broadcast to the world . This is what gives NavajoCoins its uniqueness and value. We aint going open source either which is a great decision to just give our technology away - that's my opinion anyway. This has all been announced in the past threads many times.

We will achive ODA and we will be the first ANON to do so  

I am staking Perfect

if it s legit project then developer must say what hashings algorithm its for subchain so sha256 or cpu-hash algorithm?? when you understand. and if technology is REAL decentralized then only opensource can proofe, still nobody can copy technology when serverside scripts is not publish. otherwise everybody can draw own image.... dev must proof transparency.

this looks for me it s NOT subchain. it s normal tcp/udp communication for transfer of value through INTERNET. NOT through 2nd blockchain. and if it s so, then this must tell.

also BETA release proofe nothing. it s normal wallet. NO sourcecode, NOTHING. this is not good development. ALL anon-technics can be publish in sourcecode, but parts for subchain generating is not published. so it s useless but good developer can have confirmation if its true.

AND NO I NOT ASKING TO REVEAL ANYTHING. I ASK FOR PARAMETERS. it s mathematical answer! but you are investor you don't understand i think what this is all.

[hashforce101]

I am an Investor do not talking on behalf of anyone else - I personally DO NOT want Subchain algorithms to be broadcast to the world . This is what gives NavajoCoins its uniqueness and value. We aint going open source either which is a great decision to just give our technology away - that's my opinion anyway. This has all been announced in the past threads many times.

We will achive ODA and we will be the first ANON to do so  

I am staking Perfect

if it s legit project then developer must say what hashings algorithm its for subchain so sha256 or cpu-hash algorithm?? when you understand. and if technology is REAL decentralized then only opensource can proofe, still nobody can copy technology when serverside scripts is not publish. otherwise everybody can draw own image.... dev must proof transparency.

this looks for me it s NOT subchain. it s normal tcp/udp communication for transfer of value through INTERNET. NOT through 2nd blockchain. and if it s so, then this must tell.

also BETA release proofe nothing. it s normal wallet.

No many developers can do this - http://www.btcfeed.net/coins/navajocoin-introducing-anon-transfers-using-subchains/

& http://www.btcfeed.net/coins/navajocoin-state-art-anonymous-network-now-beta-testing/

[hashforce101]

Parameters is ok then. I do not want anything reveal that does not need to be

[shahim]

Hi,

i have questions for developer. a friend asked here but nobody answered his questions.

1. Please list all subchain parameter and how you code sign data for the switch NAV-chain -> Anon-chain
and what HASHING algorithm you used for the 2nd blockchain system.

2. How you generate and parse 2nd blockchain parameters(subchain)? (see zerocoin problem)

3. What happened with this premine blocks?

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1006

Code:

if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 25232976 * COIN;
    }

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1010

Code:

    else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 141350 && pindexBest->nHeight < 141351)
    {
        nSubsidy = 2600000 * COIN;
    }

4. and this is more rethorical question: Why is so many bugs/issue in sourcecodes of NAVAJO?
example: parsing new blocks have issues, staking is broked (not working good)... and so and so..
(stake modifier must be fixed for health network because is vulnerable and staking parameters adapted)

this are most important questions but many other question in my head.....

thank you.

Hi mate.

Just to point 3. The first is the swap from sum1 to sum2, you can also see on OP.  Second one has been generated to survive the double spend attack.

There will be more information about the subchain network in future. And ifncourse many bugs will be solved with the next release.

Regards
Shahim

[ca333]

Hi,

i have questions for developer. a friend asked here but nobody answered his questions.

1. Please list all subchain parameter and how you code sign data for the switch NAV-chain -> Anon-chain
and what HASHING algorithm you used for the 2nd blockchain system.

2. How you generate and parse 2nd blockchain parameters(subchain)? (see zerocoin problem)

3. What happened with this premine blocks?

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1006

Code:

if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 25232976 * COIN;
    }

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1010

Code:

    else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 141350 && pindexBest->nHeight < 141351)
    {
        nSubsidy = 2600000 * COIN;
    }

4. and this is more rethorical question: Why is so many bugs/issue in sourcecodes of NAVAJO?
example: parsing new blocks have issues, staking is broked (not working good)... and so and so..
(stake modifier must be fixed for health network because is vulnerable and staking parameters adapted)

this are most important questions but many other question in my head.....

thank you.

Hi mate.

Just to point 3. The first is the swap from sum1 to sum2.  Second one has been generated to survive the double spend attack.

There will be more information about the subchain network in future. And ifncourse many bugs will be solved with the next release.

Regards
Shahim

thank you much for fast answer. ok i understand and then it was SUM2 this blockchain and rename to NAVAJO?
where is it recorded the swap for sum1->sum2. so example: the list of amount(TXID: SUM1) ==> amount(TXID:SUM2)?
and what double spending attack? can you explain please for what this 2.6 mio navajo?? my friends often lost money in cryptosscene so i want only ask and make sure its not to much risky for investing from my personal opinion. this is only reason i asked this.

and thank you very much time to answer.

[shahim]

Hi,

i have questions for developer. a friend asked here but nobody answered his questions.

1. Please list all subchain parameter and how you code sign data for the switch NAV-chain -> Anon-chain
and what HASHING algorithm you used for the 2nd blockchain system.

2. How you generate and parse 2nd blockchain parameters(subchain)? (see zerocoin problem)

3. What happened with this premine blocks?

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1006

Code:

if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1)
    {
        nSubsidy = 25232976 * COIN;
    }

https://github.com/sherlockcoin/navajocoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp#L1010

Code:

    else if(pindexBest->nHeight >= 141350 && pindexBest->nHeight < 141351)
    {
        nSubsidy = 2600000 * COIN;
    }

4. and this is more rethorical question: Why is so many bugs/issue in sourcecodes of NAVAJO?
example: parsing new blocks have issues, staking is broked (not working good)... and so and so..
(stake modifier must be fixed for health network because is vulnerable and staking parameters adapted)

this are most important questions but many other question in my head.....

thank you.

Hi mate.

Just to point 3. The first is the swap from sum1 to sum2.  Second one has been generated to survive the double spend attack.

There will be more information about the subchain network in future. And ifncourse many bugs will be solved with the next release.

Regards
Shahim

thank you much for fast answer. ok i understand and then it was SUM2 this blockchain and rename to NAVAJO?
where is it recorded the swap for sum1->sum2. so example: the list of amount(TXID: SUM1) ==> amount(TXID:SUM2)?
and what double spending attack? can you explain please for what this 2.6 mio navajo?? my friends often lost money in cryptosscene so i want only ask and make sure its not to much risky for investing from my personal opinion. this is only reason i asked this.

and thank you very much time to answer.

No problem Mate!

Last year in summertime the coin suffered under a double spend attack. Soopy,  the core dev,  managed to regulate this and the community decided to go the way of generating the amount of coins that where used in this attack to pay everybody on the exchange. That is the 2.6 million... It was the first time a coin survived a double spend attack and went back to the exchanges so fast. Also the coin staking specs has been modified to pretend further attacks and secure the network,  which is working well. 

You are welcome

[hashforce101]

That would be on the original forum. You will see there. I not near a PC to link it.

[hashforce101]

No worries brother. With a a major release coming our resources are stretched. Full commitment to the upcoming release of Anon on the 9th so very tight whohooo and exciting Thanks for the +1
Good Night all.

[victoryboy]

No worries brother. With a a major release coming our resources are stretched. Full commitment to the upcoming release of Anon on the 9th so very tight whohooo and exciting Thanks for the +1
Good Night all.

Good night and sleep tight ! Navajo's anon tech is coming to be true innovation and unique with upcoming release on 9th March.

[vince232]

im thinking can nav really go to 0.01 range given that it has unlimited supply. one of the advantages of btc,drk,ltc is that it has max number of supply.
so it is inevitable that price will increase because it is limited. Unlike nav which everyone knows it will never run out like fiat.
given that you have 10k nav and you stake 24 hours a day with a stable price at 0.01 i think you wouldnt need to work already if you live a simple life. I think it is too good to be true.

well anyways i hope im wrong on this one.

[ninjaboon]

To the moon, I see some buys around 37xx sats now.

https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_nav

[david1365]

There is only ~10 BTC on poloniex to reach 0.0099
C'mon guys let's do this earlier

[LiteBit]

To the moon, I see some buys around 37xx sats now.

https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_nav

I wouldn't get too excited just yet. That isn't even .1 BTC worth of volume. New entrants will only go so high on such low sell offerings before more substantial market share is placed for sale. This makes me think the debut of the new Anonymity tech is already priced in to the current price somewhat.

We may not see a HUGE jump until the double encryption subchain is truly decentralized. I'm not sure investors want to trust 1 person with 100% of the stake proceeds and 100% of the anonymity encryption chain power. For now, after talking with Pakage, that's where we're at right now. The subchains are controlled by the foundation, they are Proof of Stake and they get all the rewards.

It'll be interesting to see come Monday!

[navtalk]

It’s a train that’s on the move – and we shouldn’t miss it.

are you ready?

[lab rat hoax]

i have no bias at all      but i gotta say this is looking REALLY GOOD