MrTeal
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
 |
September 30, 2014, 12:46:34 AM |
|
Since the relevant posts got deleted for evading a ban, just an FYI that Marto, Bick and apparently a couple others got banned for their spam fest across the Hardware forum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Bitcoin network protocol was designed to be extremely flexible. It can be used to create timed transactions, escrow transactions, multi-signature transactions, etc. The current features of the client only hint at what will be possible in the future.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
macher
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2014, 10:14:32 AM |
|
so, status report of boards:
1 of 4 is rock stable, no problem at all
1 of 4 is working on 400G, but it is reseting:
[2014-09-30 11:45:32] HEXM 565 Chip[2] 16 consecutive HW errors reset
[2014-09-30 11:48:57] HEXM 565 Chip[3] last received nonce 6 secs ago reset
[2014-09-30 11:49:00] HEXM 565 failure, disabling!
2 of 4 has only half working chips - at 200G is unstable (reset few times in hour and then got to ZOMBIE). At 100G it is working relative ok, but only 1/4 power of 400G :-((
marto, do you want try the two bad boards with remote ssh? or should I sent it to you to RMA?
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorehammer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 01:40:30 PM |
|
I agree with kingcolex psu I'm running a 1000w and the hexaminer and a s1 of the same psu what are the amps on the rails
|
|
|
|
sokol815
Member
Offline
Activity: 76
Merit: 10
|
|
September 30, 2014, 03:13:13 PM |
|
so, status report of boards:
1 of 4 is rock stable, no problem at all
1 of 4 is working on 400G, but it is reseting:
[2014-09-30 11:45:32] HEXM 565 Chip[2] 16 consecutive HW errors reset
[2014-09-30 11:48:57] HEXM 565 Chip[3] last received nonce 6 secs ago reset
[2014-09-30 11:49:00] HEXM 565 failure, disabling!
2 of 4 has only half working chips - at 200G is unstable (reset few times in hour and then got to ZOMBIE). At 100G it is working relative ok, but only 1/4 power of 400G :-((
marto, do you want try the two bad boards with remote ssh? or should I sent it to you to RMA?
I was having the same problem with 1 of my boards. I tightened all the heat sinks and checked temperatures and it still didnt help. Then I lowered the clock without lowering the voltage and it stopped the resets. If I remember correctly, my boards are currently running at 860 clock with 780mV and are quite stable, but only doing about 340GH/s each. I just tell myself that it is more power efficient this way. |
BTC: 1DGoGCg93igczMttDQn5SAE9x6zn4KZ8bv
LTC: LiP6Pskxa5tdDAhdwYeqszRFBMQev2ndBr
FTC: 6efcHwHYG3rk8SP37odyCrKqdxWom8rsen
|
|
|
|
sorehammer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 03:36:06 PM |
|
I'm running at 1024mhz and 820mv with no issues.
|
|
|
|
|
Cortex7
|
|
September 30, 2014, 03:57:04 PM |
|
I'm running at 1024mhz and 820mv with no issues.
Are you covering your electricity costs? |
|
|
|
|
|
sorehammer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 04:23:45 PM |
|
in the uk most likely not lol
|
|
|
|
|
sorehammer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 07:03:52 PM |
|
About 20Oc will get better as winter comes won't need the heaters and will save money for mining  I can say it puts out so much heat in a morning when I come down it's nice and warm |
|
|
|
MrTeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
|
September 30, 2014, 07:12:31 PM |
|
About 20Oc will get better as winter comes won't need the heaters and will save money for mining I can say it puts out so much heat in a morning when I come down it's nice and warm Jesus. I hope you have AC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorehammer
|
|
September 30, 2014, 07:17:41 PM |
|
About 20Oc will get better as winter comes won't need the heaters and will save money for mining I can say it puts out so much heat in a morning when I come down it's nice and warm Jesus. I hope you have AC. there is always one lol |
|
|
|
|
Cortex7
|
|
September 30, 2014, 11:57:35 PM |
|
We'll probably acceleration in difficulty during northern hemisphere winter as miners turn on old rigs for discounted heating bills.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qeu
|
|
October 02, 2014, 07:45:55 PM |
|
The standard Intel 1150 sinks fit if you remove the pushpin and locker thing, it can be mounted by using the screws and plastic pipes that hold the brackets that only serve Arctic Coooling Freezers 7. They however don't touch the chips so I need to buy copper 15x15mm x 1mm spacers. Bummer, at least a week waiting.
Bobsag3, please work on the shipping refund.
|
|
|
|
|
|
y_boonstra
|
|
October 03, 2014, 07:31:06 AM |
|
Martin,
It would be nice to give us your contact / username on wich we can reach you !
|
|
|
|
|
technobitVesi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
October 03, 2014, 08:13:37 AM |
|
Hi, I'm Vesi from technobit. Martin will not be able to post in the forum for some time So I'll do my best to answer your questions You still can contact us here on PM or e-mail office@technobit.euRegards: Vesi |
|
|
|
|
MoneyMuscles
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
October 03, 2014, 11:19:30 AM |
|
What Is my status update vesi?
Martin told me last week that shipping was for this past Monday.
What is my update?
|
|
|
|
|
|
y_boonstra
|
|
October 03, 2014, 10:00:32 PM |
|
What got changed on the boards we are getting and the one user 2good received ? For one im seeing a lot less capacitors on the board  and im tsting the board now on all diff kind of clock setings and voltage settings.. but im not nearly getting the "Good" efficientcy number as 2good was getting with undervolting!! Marto did you reduce your BOM to save money with a result a less efficient miner.. the most efficient im getting now is 1,08 W/GH and thats 660mV 400Mhz or 1,13W/GH 760mV 700MHz that no where near the 0,78 2good was getting !!! |
|
|
|
|
technobitVesi
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
October 04, 2014, 01:00:01 AM |
|
What got changed on the boards we are getting and the one user 2good received ? For one im seeing a lot less capacitors on the board and im tsting the board now on all diff kind of clock setings and voltage settings.. but im not nearly getting the "Good" efficientcy number as 2good was getting with undervolting!! Marto did you reduce your BOM to save money with a result a less efficient miner.. the most efficient im getting now is 1,08 W/GH and thats 660mV 400Mhz or 1,13W/GH 760mV 700MHz that no where near the 0,78 2good was getting !!! Hi, There is no difference in terms of power efficiency between the bom with a lot of caps ( it was intended for 8 chip version) and this one . IF you use bigger PSU you can see about 15% difference. Als check again 2 good measurements @ the wall . Best Vesi |
|
|
|
|
MrTeal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:29:39 AM |
|
What got changed on the boards we are getting and the one user 2good received ? For one im seeing a lot less capacitors on the board and im tsting the board now on all diff kind of clock setings and voltage settings.. but im not nearly getting the "Good" efficientcy number as 2good was getting with undervolting!! Marto did you reduce your BOM to save money with a result a less efficient miner.. the most efficient im getting now is 1,08 W/GH and thats 660mV 400Mhz or 1,13W/GH 760mV 700MHz that no where near the 0,78 2good was getting !!! Hi, There is no difference in terms of power efficiency between the bom with a lot of caps ( it was intended for 8 chip version) and this one . IF you use bigger PSU you can see about 15% difference. Als check again 2 good measurements @ the wall . Best Vesi You would have to be using a pretty shitty PSU to see a 15% difference between even a Platinum PSU operating in its most efficient zone (92-93%) and a crap PSU fully loaded. You're talking about <80% efficiency. |
|
|
|
|
MoneyMuscles
Member
Offline
Activity: 94
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 09:36:08 PM |
|
What got changed on the boards we are getting and the one user 2good received ? For one im seeing a lot less capacitors on the board and im tsting the board now on all diff kind of clock setings and voltage settings.. but im not nearly getting the "Good" efficientcy number as 2good was getting with undervolting!! Marto did you reduce your BOM to save money with a result a less efficient miner.. the most efficient im getting now is 1,08 W/GH and thats 660mV 400Mhz or 1,13W/GH 760mV 700MHz that no where near the 0,78 2good was getting !!! Hi, There is no difference in terms of power efficiency between the bom with a lot of caps ( it was intended for 8 chip version) and this one . IF you use bigger PSU you can see about 15% difference. Als check again 2 good measurements @ the wall . Best Vesi You would have to be using a pretty shitty PSU to see a 15% difference between even a Platinum PSU operating in its most efficient zone (92-93%) and a crap PSU fully loaded. You're talking about <80% efficiency. Vesi please check your pm from me. Please update the status of my boards. |
|
|
|
|
|
