[ANN][RVC] / RevoCoin / POS - POW / 10,000kh miner limit / LAUNCH 22-07

[flyingdutchmen]

(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped

block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16

the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?

I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.

thx for the check, it seem there are something going on when i caught them
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.

[ocminer]

(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped

block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16

the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?

I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.

thx for the check, it seem there are something going on when i caught them
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.

we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore

[flyingdutchmen]

(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped

block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16

the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?

I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.

thx for the check, it seem there are something going on when i caught them
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.

we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore

thx, ocminer, for your time on the monitoring, it seems they see we caught them.
by the way, can you check the reward structure in the source? the op is very confusing.. ty

[ocminer]

(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped

block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16

the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?

I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.

thx for the check, it seem there are something going on when i caught them
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.

we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore

thx, ocminer, for your time on the monitoring, it seems they see we caught them.
by the way, can you check the reward structure in the source? the op is very confusing..

Sure:

Code:

/ miner's coin base reward
int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;

         if(pindexBest->nHeight ==  1)
     {
         nSubsidy = 2500000 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 120)
     {
         nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 720)
     {
         nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1440)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2160)
     {
         nSubsidy = 1500 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2880)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }

         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 3600)
     {
         nSubsidy = 10000 * COIN;
     }

         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 4320)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5040)
     {
         nSubsidy = 2000 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5760)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 6480)
     {
         nSubsidy = 2500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7200)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7920)
     {
         nSubsidy = 3000 * COIN;
     }

         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 8640)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }

[Bojcha]

Uploaded my miner if anyone need it. Included config file and kernel/bin for 280x. Just change pool/user/pass in config file and start run.bat.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500

http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html

edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.

[MinermanNC]

Uploaded my miner if anyone need it. Included config file and kernel/bin for 280x. Just change pool/user/pass in config file and start run.bat.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500

http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html

edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.

Hey thx bro, nice work! 

[holylacross]

Uploaded my miner if anyone need it. Included config file and kernel/bin for 280x. Just change pool/user/pass in config file and start run.bat.
You also need 14.6rc2 driver if you want to generate kernel yourself.
If you use 5xxx/6xxx cards use "algorithm" : "bitblockold",
i am getting 3MH/s with 280x at 1160/1500

http://www46.zippyshare.com/v/11324655/file.html

edit: config is for 4 diff cards. 1st parameter is for 280x other 3 can be deleted.

I thank you as well

[JakeThePanda]

What does this mean?

You have exceeded the pools configured REVO warning threshold. Please initiate a transfer!

[yellowduck2]

What does this mean?

You have exceeded the pools configured REVO warning threshold. Please initiate a transfer!

means pool will keep your coin if u leave there too long.

Pool: "Don't say i never tell you to move your coin  "

[Bojcha]

says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.

edit: now 4

[SecondsOld]

says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.

Whoa, net hash is taking off now.  Over 4GH/s.

[ocminer]

says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.

edit: now 4

hmm indeed strange..

watch the blocks..

[Bojcha]

says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.

edit: now 4

hmm indeed strange..

watch the blocks..

seems all there.

[mycryptocoin]

(not) surprisingly, after the "missing" blocks were pointed out the difficulty dropped

block 277 = diff 28
block 285 = diff 16

the 3 pool hash rate is very stable at around 1.3 GH, how do the diff change by 80%?

I checked the net hash right when the missing blocks were posted and there was about 800 MH/s not account for in the pools.

thx for the check, it seem there are something going on when i caught them
I believe ocminer is honest, not sure about others.

we will see with the block explorer where they are, i'm still monitoring the blocks and did not see anything suspicious anymore

thx, ocminer, for your time on the monitoring, it seems they see we caught them.
by the way, can you check the reward structure in the source? the op is very confusing..

Sure:

Code:

/ miner's coin base reward
int64_t GetProofOfWorkReward(int64_t nFees)
{
    int64_t nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;

         if(pindexBest->nHeight ==  1)
     {
         nSubsidy = 2500000 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 120)
     {
         nSubsidy = 0 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 720)
     {
         nSubsidy = 1000 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 1440)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2160)
     {
         nSubsidy = 1500 * COIN;
     }
         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 2880)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }

         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 3600)
     {
         nSubsidy = 10000 * COIN;
     }

         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 4320)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5040)
     {
         nSubsidy = 2000 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 5760)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 6480)
     {
         nSubsidy = 2500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7200)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }


         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 7920)
     {
         nSubsidy = 3000 * COIN;
     }

         else if(pindexBest->nHeight < 8640)
     {
         nSubsidy = 500 * COIN;
     }

Hm, what happened with



from the ANN? -.- And how do you plan to achieve changing the PoW timeframe after mining has started? (the market demand condition)

[ocminer]

says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.

edit: now 4

hmm indeed strange..

watch the blocks..

seems all there.

The daemon is probably just a bit unsure about nethashrate itself ;-)

[MinermanNC]

says 3.4GH/s nethashrate and i am counting ~1.7.

edit: now 4

hmm indeed strange..

watch the blocks..

seems all there.

The daemon is probably just a bit unsure about nethashrate itself ;-)

lol, that's a vey high tech analysis  j/k ya know,,, keep up the good work

[Coinler]

any pointers would be appreciated. my gpu does not do anything beyond this point.

setx GPU_USE_SYNC_OBJECTS 1

setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100

sgminer --algorithm bitblock -o stratum+tcp://revo.suprnova.cc:3777 -u revo1.1 -p x -I 17 -d 1-3 --gpu-platform 0

just heat and no shares

not sure if this is the difference? :  --pool-algorithm bitblock

that made it worse.. now it wont even run.

hey coinler, you get your miner all squared away? I had a bit of a time with a few mining software's this is what finally worked good,,, for me anyways lol

sgminer-5.0-pre-release-2014-07-08-win32.zip
Found here:

https://nicehash.com/software/  

as it turns out.. not entirely no. for some reason only my integrated gpu is gaining shares. i have 5xxx cards and neither of them on 2 separate machines gain accepted shares.

[@scambuster]

This one seems like a fair launch.Worth a shoot.

Sgminer5's config is not accpeting "devices" parameter
I add "devices" : "0,1,2" to the config.But only first card is mining while others are off.

[Coinler]

This one seems like a fair launch.Worth a shoot.

Sgminer5's config is not accpeting "devices" parameter
I add "devices" : "0,1,2" to the config.But only first card is mining while others are off.

pretty much the same here. in my case all the cards are mining and i cant turn any off.

[Brembomix]

Next Network Block    585    (Current: 584)

for which has now been launched?