Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 12:44:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
  Print  
Author Topic: BITMAIN Antminer S3 support and OverClocking thread  (Read 158113 times)
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4158
Merit: 8050


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2014, 02:04:21 PM
 #321



Keeping in mind that # is a comment only, wouldn't it be better to have the comment contain hashing speed and expected watts?

Doesn't something like this

#option 'freq_value'   '1406'     #513GH/s  420W
#option 'chip_freq'     '256.25'
#option 'timeout'       '15'

end up being more useful than a comment with the frequency, when its listed under chip_freq already?

#option 'freq_value'   '1406'     # freq 256.25M  gives 513gh/s uses 420watts
#option 'chip_freq'     '256.25'
#option 'timeout'       '15'

Comments should be useful, right?

see bolded  above

  may as well be fully clear with a comment ..  we forget that there are full newbies.

long windy but clear.

what I do like is we now have a lot to pick from

256.25
250
243.25
237.5
231.25
225
218.75
212.50
206.25
200

Are you still running at 256.25?
  no errors errors errors

my batch 4 run at 231.25
my batch 6 run at 237.5 and 237.5


▄▄███████▄▄
▄██████████████▄
▄██████████████████▄
▄████▀▀▀▀███▀▀▀▀█████▄
▄█████████████▄█▀████▄
███████████▄███████████
██████████▄█▀███████████
██████████▀████████████
▀█████▄█▀█████████████▀
▀████▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄████▀
▀██████████████████▀
▀███████████████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 MΞTAWIN  THE FIRST WEB3 CASINO   
.
.. PLAY NOW ..
JennaK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 02:59:27 PM
 #322

does the kernel version matter when trying to overclock an s3?
JennaK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 04:48:41 PM
 #323

http://s11.postimg.org/fddxw6pmb/myantminers3.png
yosscal
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 04:51:18 PM
Last edit: August 15, 2014, 05:07:34 PM by yosscal
 #324

Hi,
I just try to update S320140811 with frequency management.
The frequency 225 is not part of the option (I do not know why?), it goes directly from 218.75 to 237,5. Undecided
Can someone tell me which file to edit to add the 225 frequency in choice?
THX. Wink
JennaK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 05:44:51 PM
 #325

Hi,
I just try to update S320140811 with frequency management.
The frequency 225 is not part of the option (I do not know why?), it goes directly from 218.75 to 237,5. Undecided
Can someone tell me which file to edit to add the 225 frequency in choice?
THX. Wink
Where did you get S320140811
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
August 15, 2014, 05:55:19 PM
 #326

Hi,
I just try to update S320140811 with frequency management.
The frequency 225 is not part of the option (I do not know why?), it goes directly from 218.75 to 237,5. Undecided
Can someone tell me which file to edit to add the 225 frequency in choice?
THX. Wink
Where did you get S320140811

Its available on Bitmains site. Upgrade with caution, it adds an advanced tab on miner configuration to set frequency, and does not include 225 as mentioned.

After flashing 1 ant it came back up at 100GH/s and took some serious fiddling to get back to 440GHs...

Also the asic-freq file is no longer used in the new firmware, no idea where you would add 225.

Would sure be nice if they opened up the source as required by the CGMiner license...
JakeTri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 07:11:26 PM
 #327

Hi,
I just try to update S320140811 with frequency management.
The frequency 225 is not part of the option (I do not know why?), it goes directly from 218.75 to 237,5. Undecided
Can someone tell me which file to edit to add the 225 frequency in choice?
THX. Wink

The file with frequency values for the advanced page with miner settings is

Code:
/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/cgminer/cgminer.lua

Look at the end of the file for the frequency list.

Here are highlighted in red the lines with new frequency not included in the stock firmware.

Quote
pb:value("13:300:0b82", translate("300M"))
pb:value("14:293.75:1706", translate("293.75M"))
pb:value("14:287.5:0b02", translate("287.5M"))
pb:value("14:281.25:1606", translate("281.25M"))
pb:value("15:275:0a82", translate("275M"))
pb:value("15:268.75:1506", translate("268.75M"))
pb:value("15:262.5:0a02", translate("262.5M"))
pb:value("16:256.25:1406", translate("256.25M"))

pb:value("16:250:0982", translate("250M"))
pb:value("16:243.75:1306", translate("243.75M"))
pb:value("17:237.5:1286", translate("237.5M"))
pb:value("17:231.25:1206", translate("231.25M"))
pb:value("18:225:0882", translate("225M"))

pb:value("18:218.75:1106", translate("218.75M (default)"))
pb:value("18:212.5:1086", translate("212.5M"))
pb:value("19:206.25:1006", translate("206.25M"))
pb:value("20:200:0782", translate("200M"))
pb:value("20:196:1f07", translate("196M"))
pb:value("20:193:0f03", translate("193M"))
pb:value("23:175:0d83", translate("175M"))
pb:value("27:150:0b83", translate("150M"))
pb:value("33:125:0983", translate("125M"))
pb:value("40:100:0783", translate("100M"))

BTC donations always welcome: 1JakeTriwbahMYp1rSfJbTn7Afd1w62p2q
JennaK
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 07:14:45 PM
 #328

So when I put the freq to 250 I get 1 x so I decided to tame it down to 237.5 and its doing fine..
My hash rate on ghash is jumping from 200GH/s to 400GH/s is that normal?
bobsav2121
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 317
Merit: 104


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 09:58:43 PM
 #329

So when I put the freq to 250 I get 1 x so I decided to tame it down to 237.5 and its doing fine..
My hash rate on ghash is jumping from 200GH/s to 400GH/s is that normal?

NO ~!!!
JakeTri
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 15, 2014, 11:54:17 PM
 #330

Would sure be nice if they opened up the source as required by the CGMiner license...

I hope they do it soon .. I'm waiting for this to be able to play with code and see if it is possible to set frequency for each board from the miner.

BTC donations always welcome: 1JakeTriwbahMYp1rSfJbTn7Afd1w62p2q
squashpile
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 125
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2014, 04:04:24 AM
 #331

Just flashed.. good to go so far.
Thanks JakeTri for the info

I like it

SquashPool - 0% Fee - Dedicated P2Pool VPS - Atlanta, GA - SSD - Gig uplink
orviwan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 09:51:52 AM
 #332

Does cgminer run at 100% cpu for anyone else?
orviwan
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 10:38:14 AM
 #333

Does cgminer run at 100% cpu for anyone else?

Ah, it might be this bug:

"There is a problem, when run cgminer as a daemon, it will use 100% cpu. Hope anybody can revise this."

https://github.com/alzhao/openwrt-cgminer-antminer
yosscal
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 11:48:42 AM
 #334



The file with frequency values for the advanced page with miner settings is

Code:
/usr/lib/lua/luci/model/cbi/cgminer/cgminer.lua

Look at the end of the file for the frequency list.



ok,
I edit and add the missing lines and it works perfectly .  Grin
thank you again. Wink
breich
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 04:13:23 PM
 #335

I'm running two batch 5's off of one thermaltake smart 800W, 4 PCI-E connectors.

How significant of a risk do I run by overclocking my batch 5's to 250MHz? Temperature of the S3's are fine (44/43) but I'm not sure how real the risk of burning out the PCI-E cords is.
CHAOSiTEC
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 04:56:01 PM
 #336

I'm running two batch 5's off of one thermaltake smart 800W, 4 PCI-E connectors.

How significant of a risk do I run by overclocking my batch 5's to 250MHz? Temperature of the S3's are fine (44/43) but I'm not sure how real the risk of burning out the PCI-E cords is.

since your using 4 connectors, none..

it is more if you only use 2 connectors, then its something to do with the quality of the cables..

with 4 connectors your inside of specs for the cables in regard to pcie specs

in your case, you have to look at your psu.. it might be pushing it to overclock your antminers...

node-vps.com - Tron / Masternode hosting services
finlof
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 07:38:22 PM
 #337

oops.i just turned the PSU off and back on.

that's actually the easiest way to do it
dankefoss
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 16, 2014, 10:27:37 PM
 #338

Status update:
I used the latest (3rd) software update and both my miners performed poorly compared to performance with the second release. In addition, one miner that had been very stable, and while it never pulled 504 GHs on250 other than momentarily, did deliver ~480. Now with this release it would consistently drop an ASIC at 250 and 235 as well. My average at any frequency dropped to sub-430. I tried reflashing, and no change in performance. So I decided to go back to release two and now performance is back to being stable at 480-482 GHs. No ASIC are being dropped. That was about 8 hours ago, but I saw ASIC drops within the first few minute and now even the hash averages are consistent with prior performance.

I am hesitant to change back my other miner, since performance is at least consistent with the prior release.

Anyone else experiencing the same?
omnik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 569
Merit: 250


View Profile
August 18, 2014, 08:34:26 AM
Last edit: August 18, 2014, 09:04:48 AM by omnik
 #339

Hi,

Does this all look OK, this is my 1st asic miner?
Latest firmware...



Thanks.
pekatete
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
August 18, 2014, 09:22:42 AM
 #340

omnik, Yes that looks OK.
My only concern is the DiffR number of 37,000+ though for nearly 2 days that may be OK. This could mean your latency to the ghash servers is high as I have come to find out that this number represents the stale shares (at least on ghash), but since ghash only shows the last 24 hrs then you will not be able to compare now.
Otherwise, looks good! What batch was this S3 if you know?

Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [17] 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!