|
bitcoinnee
|
 |
November 17, 2014, 07:32:25 AM |
|
Looks like it would be possible to get around 500 kh/s out of amd r9 280x but I'm sure that by tuning some parameters you would be able to get more. Miner isn't ready yet, last missing piece is yet to be implemented, currently it generates invalid blocks. Will release it as soon as it is ready, probably 1-2 days. Does anyone know how long it is until we start voting for logos?
In fact voting was supposed to start today. But there are just two submissions even though I contacted everyone who was posting logos in this thread, maybe I didn't make it clear that voting should start today and people think that there is more time. I really need to sleep now, I was working on this miner for many hours today (and not only today), will decide tomorrow what to do with this situation, probably we should give people some more time to submit logos. Great news,I'll keep mining with AMD miner as soon as it released.  |
|
|
|
|
Rols
|
|
November 17, 2014, 07:55:20 AM |
|
Looks like it would be possible to get around 500 kh/s out of amd r9 280x but I'm sure that by tuning some parameters you would be able to get more. Miner isn't ready yet, last missing piece is yet to be implemented, currently it generates invalid blocks. Will release it as soon as it is ready, probably 1-2 days. Does anyone know how long it is until we start voting for logos?
In fact voting was supposed to start today. But there are just two submissions even though I contacted everyone who was posting logos in this thread, maybe I didn't make it clear that voting should start today and people think that there is more time. I really need to sleep now, I was working on this miner for many hours today (and not only today), will decide tomorrow what to do with this situation, probably we should give people some more time to submit logos. You are doing a great job. I was hoping for a pure cpu coin but if you have to go gpu then I understand. |
|
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 17, 2014, 09:37:27 AM |
|
Voting round finished. Winner is OrbitCoin with 324 votes! (0 BTC + 324 free).
we need to wait for the next round.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 17, 2014, 11:59:01 AM |
|
Voting round finished. Winner is OrbitCoin with 324 votes! (0 BTC + 324 free).
we need to wait for the next round.
Well you could have said it was for the exchange and not the logo contest! I almost had a heart attack.  don't worry ,we have a big chance to win the next round.  |
|
|
|
|
johnbrainless
|
|
November 17, 2014, 12:16:49 PM |
|
can i make the greek translation?
|
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 17, 2014, 01:02:13 PM |
|
can i make the greek translation?
YES,YOU CAN!there is bounty for you. |
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
November 17, 2014, 01:24:02 PM |
|
well, a small change might be something that requires huge amounts of memory, or even to use diskspace in order to be calculated, which makes the use of GPU so slow that CPU are still usable for mining. (take a look at the momentum algorithm used on protoshares, miners are only 2 or 3 times faster on GPU).
Requiring to use disc space is surely not a small change. Their whitepaper seems to be outdated, when reading it the first thing I thought was that you can use bloom filter to significantly reduce memory requirements. Some googling revealed that someone else already pointed to this and other vulnerabilities in the proposed scheme were found. They seem to fixed them to some extent but its not fast to find any definite information. This all will require time, I can't just copypaste some code into SpreadCoin without understanding it. GPU miner is my priority now. Bloom filter is actually slower than the currently used solutions, since false positives are quite costly. Some people have tried it already, and using a regular hashtable and ignoring collisions is way faster (up to twice as fast depending on the implementation). But still, due to the size of the search space (2^50) and the amount of data to be hashed (2^26), even bloom filters would use an amount of memory that would not fit in the local memory of any GPU in the near future. So, even with a hashing data structure way more efficient than bloom filters (say, something twice as fast as the current implementation), we'd still have GPU and CPU mining ration bellow 5:1, which is quite acceptable. But then, momentum is not the only way to abuse the use of memory, there might be simpler ways to do so (preferably something that can be used with hashcash PoW, which makes for a much simpler transition). But then, i'm not the one deciding the priorities. Yet, the fastest pts miner uses a kind of a bloom filter in LDS. |
|
|
|
|
|
goblynn
|
|
November 17, 2014, 02:43:58 PM |
|
im surprised more coins havent tried using spreadcoins "no pool" feature..its genius
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Spread (OP)
|
|
November 17, 2014, 08:46:39 PM |
|
can i make the greek translation?
Yes, we need translations, there is reward for that |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mr. Spread (OP)
|
|
November 18, 2014, 12:12:18 AM |
|
I still have only two submissions for logo contest. Voting for logo will start at 21 November; this date will not be moved again.
I will again contact everyone who posted logos in this thread and ask them to choose the final variant(s) that they want to submit for contest. If you posted 10 logos in this thread (which is great) then don't expect me to choose the logo(s) that you want to send to contest for you (to submit logo to contest just PM me).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit
Legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
November 18, 2014, 08:58:30 AM |
|
 Rough draft still doing some work on it let me know what ya'll think and if i need to keep on or give it up. Think it has potential, anyway to change the wording? not sure to what though. to the many? or something to do with decentralization 'plura' |
|
|
|
Mikolo
Member
Activity: 143
Merit: 12
|
|
November 18, 2014, 07:52:30 PM |
|
Don't forget about giveaway:http://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoCurrency/comments/2knolx/spreadcoin_giveaway/
|
|
|
|
|
|
grizscom
|
|
November 19, 2014, 04:20:13 AM |
|
... I see good future for SPR as the best CPU coin. When it will become true GPU coin I will quit  I will quit too. No needs GPU. Just protect from botnets. |
|
|
|
|
sparkster
|
|
November 19, 2014, 09:27:56 AM
Last edit: November 19, 2014, 10:56:26 AM by sparkster |
|
It's fixed now. Sorry again. I was too fussy about it. I cannot make spoiler for some reason, so I will just delete all my comment. It was about wrong balance.
|
|
|
|
|
Palmdetroit
Legendary
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
PHS 50% PoS - Stop mining start minting
|
|
November 19, 2014, 09:39:43 AM |
|
So, how exactly betasharex.com works. I cannot say it's a scam, but it's definitely has serious technical problems. I had about 0.0110 BTC:  Than I make order (for 2499 sat). It appeared but not executed. So I try to cancel it. Pending. So I make new order with my remaining coins (for 1802 sat). This new order doesn't ever appear, just pending. Both orders was in pending state about 12 hours. Than I got totally 186.72 SPR from my first order:  and it's dissapear (I got about 0.000107 BTC back though:(2499-2314)sat*58) So I now have 0.00571889 BTC and 186.72 SPR:  But for 2499 sat I should be able to buy 212.48, not 186.72 SPR. So about 64k satoshis gone nowhere. It's not trading fee, it's like some sort of glitch. sorry for broken english again It's a new exchange , so I would expect bugs here and there, did you report them? There has been a few times trading has been frozen too. |
|
|
|
|
sparkster
|
|
November 19, 2014, 11:03:14 AM |
|
It's a new exchange , so I would expect bugs here and there, did you report them? There has been a few times trading has been frozen too.
Yeah, I just was biased after reading some russian FUDsters in old Mr. Spread post. And loss was so small that I didn't care to use support. |
|
|
|
|
|
cointhinkers
|
|
November 19, 2014, 11:23:54 AM |
|
So, how exactly betasharex.com works. I cannot say it's a scam, but it's definitely has serious technical problems. I had about 0.0110 BTC: Than I make order (for 2499 sat). It appeared but not executed. So I try to cancel it. Pending. So I make new order with my remaining coins (for 1802 sat). This new order doesn't ever appear, just pending. Both orders was in pending state about 12 hours. Than I got totally 186.72 SPR from my first order: and it's dissapear (I got about 0.000107 BTC back though:(2499-2314)sat*58) So I now have 0.00571889 BTC and 186.72 SPR: But for 2499 sat I should be able to buy 212.48, not 186.72 SPR. So about 64k satoshis gone nowhere. It's not trading fee, it's like some sort of glitch. sorry for broken english again It's a new exchange , so I would expect bugs here and there, did you report them? There has been a few times trading has been frozen too. I have confidence to see SPR to be listed on C-CEX this round. |
|
|
|
|
