|
SkyValeey
|
 |
August 24, 2014, 12:40:14 AM |
|
Anyone know good chart for SDC with indicators like btcwisdom?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 12:47:30 AM |
|
thanks for clearing that up battbot, appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
00Smurf
|
|
August 24, 2014, 05:53:46 AM |
|
Hello, For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread). Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned. As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code. Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened. Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin. battbot Also posted on Cinni's thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8506287#msg8506287Thank you very much battbot. |
|
|
|
|
|
Honeypot
|
|
August 24, 2014, 06:45:11 AM |
|
Hello, For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread). Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned. As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code. Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened. Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin. battbot Also posted on Cinni's thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8506287#msg8506287Good to clear that up. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoines
|
|
August 24, 2014, 06:58:01 AM |
|
Hello, For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread). Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned. As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code. Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened. Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin. battbot Also posted on Cinni's thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8506287#msg8506287I was a cinni investor and have some still, i can confirm battbot writing, Ryno helped with more than he was hired for, he is one of the best developers. |
"[Virtual Currencies] may hold long-term promise, particularly if the innovations promote a faster, more secure and more efficient payment system." ~Ben Bernanke
|
|
|
|
georgeandy
|
|
August 24, 2014, 10:43:07 AM |
|
SDC at 18000 now,good!!!
|
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 10:51:48 AM |
|
Good to see the price recovering, has a long way to go to get to the price it deserves but.
|
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 10:59:53 AM |
|
Hello, For those who remember, I was a former volunteer dev / proj mgr / comm mgr for Cinni. Please allow me to clear the FUD on rynomster's name (as this was brought to my attention by trolls posting in XC's thread). Rynomster came to help Cinni with it's encrypted messaging system (per a bounty). After this work was finished, he himself decided to not continue on with Cinni (for his own reasons, which frankly should not matter). His contribution towards the Cinni project started on good terms, and he left Cinni project on good terms -- as far as the dev team was concerned. As for the issue related to Cinni PoS, I can verify that rynomster did indeed email fixes to the PoS code to cinnidev. And to my knowledge, cinnidev committed them (however, if cinnidev truly committed them will need to be verified by cinnidev / rynomster). Now, whether or not rynomsters fixes corrected absolutely every issue with Cinni's PoS, I cannot answer -- but I do know that rynomster emailed fixes on the PoS code. Nevertheless -- why are we attacking rynomster? If you are going to call him a liar, then you will have to call both myself and cinnidev liars. But let me ask you -- who else would know the facts better than the dev team? Cinnidev likewise can and should confirm everything that I have said. Anyone who says anything contrary to the facts that I have just stated is a liar, or is ignorant to what actually happened. Again, rynomster was offered a bounty to build encrypted messaging for Cinni -- this he did in a successful and timely manner. Once this work was completed, he was by no means obligated to continue developing for Cinni. Even Cinni's PoS issue he was not obligated to look at or fix, but he was kind enough to. Please refrain from attacking him, his character, or his new coin. battbot Also posted on Cinni's thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=573232.msg8506287#msg8506287I was a cinni investor and have some still, i can confirm battbot writing, Ryno helped with more than he was hired for, he is one of the best developers. thank you! |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 12:20:53 PM |
|
someone is manipulating the price on bittrex hard  |
|
|
|
|
|
georgeandy
|
|
August 24, 2014, 12:35:25 PM |
|
someone is manipulating the price on bittrex hard Yes.....It's down to 12K now. |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 12:40:01 PM |
|
someone is manipulating the price on bittrex hard Yes.....It's down to 12K now. there just trying to shake out weak hands and buy em up, will be back to 15-18k in no time, i'm still 100% sure within 30 days we will be at or just under 100k. |
|
|
|
|
RoyalTY64
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
August 24, 2014, 12:54:41 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 12:59:04 PM |
|
Go away FFS! don't you have a gf is this seriously how you spend your time..your fucking sad |
|
|
|
|
|
HEISENAIR
|
|
August 24, 2014, 02:10:06 PM |
|
Go away FFS! don't you have a gf is this seriously how you spend your time..your fucking sad And you spend your time in Cinnicoin doing exactly the same thing. I don't like posting in others threads, so how about you stay the fuck out of ours!! Two faced prick! Goes for you too Battbot! |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 02:54:43 PM |
|
Go away FFS! don't you have a gf is this seriously how you spend your time..your fucking sad And you spend your time in Cinnicoin doing exactly the same thing. I don't like posting in others threads, so how about you stay the fuck out of ours!! Two faced prick! Goes for you too Battbot! no i don't i never spread FUD about Cinni ever, and have commented like 3 times ever in your thread, and the first time i ever went there was yesterday after people kept coming in here spreading FUD, i just think your a real sad bunch over there, because instead of fixing the problems your having you all whine and spread FUD in other coins threads..so sad. |
|
|
|
|
Manipulator
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 130
Merit: 100
Moving markets!
|
|
August 24, 2014, 03:08:52 PM |
|
So is there an ETA for zk-snarks (zerocash) ?  Is there an eta on this? Will you have ZeroCash integrated? |
|
|
|
|
dadon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1002
Pecvniate obedivnt omnia.
|
|
August 24, 2014, 03:14:09 PM |
|
So is there an ETA for zk-snarks (zerocash) ? Is there an eta on this? Will you have ZeroCash integrated? I know what your doing because i have seen you countless times in here spreading FUD..but i will answer your question, I have spoken in IRC to our dev i was mistaken zk-snarks is not zero-cash but based on the idea and yes after the lite wallet is released it will be released shortly after. |
|
|
|
|
|
battbot
|
|
August 24, 2014, 06:00:04 PM |
|
Lies battbot
The cinnicoin dev even came on today and confirmed everything that I wrote. What more do you want? |
|
|
|
|
|
Coolstoryteller
|
|
August 24, 2014, 06:15:45 PM |
|
Lies battbot
The cinnicoin dev even came on today and confirmed everything that I wrote. What more do you want? Hey battbot, There's no sense in trying to use logic with this guy. Obviously, 2 + 2 = 5. |
|
|
|
|
