Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 12:00:47 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: [Opinions] IF you could improve/add/remove 1 thing to bitcoin what would it be?  (Read 5702 times)
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
August 22, 2014, 07:06:55 PM
 #61

AND why?
Just 1 thing, for I it would be transaction times, cause waiting for those confirmations is wayy too long sometimes  Cry

A compressed full node
So that it doesn't take days to load the full blockchain client from scratch and by having more nodes taking less space have Bitcoin remain decentralized and accessible to all users.
Instead of the lightweight clients.

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
1714737647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714737647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714737647
Reply with quote  #2

1714737647
Report to moderator
1714737647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714737647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714737647
Reply with quote  #2

1714737647
Report to moderator
1714737647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714737647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714737647
Reply with quote  #2

1714737647
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714737647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714737647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714737647
Reply with quote  #2

1714737647
Report to moderator
1714737647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714737647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714737647
Reply with quote  #2

1714737647
Report to moderator
1714737647
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714737647

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714737647
Reply with quote  #2

1714737647
Report to moderator
drawingthesun
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1015


View Profile
August 23, 2014, 01:56:52 AM
 #62


Not 100% true, anyone can be traced with the slightest clues left behind.

Mix into Monero and then mix back out again a using a different exchange. Hopefully the liquidlty will keep increasing to make this viable for larger and larger amounts of Bitcoin.
moriartybitcoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 560
Merit: 500

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
August 23, 2014, 03:12:38 AM
 #63

improve the security of bitcoind itself obviously

marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
August 23, 2014, 08:35:43 AM
 #64

improve the security of bitcoind itself obviously

It is currently pretty secure if you use a well thought out passphrase encryption.
-ck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 1631


Ruu \o/


View Profile WWW
August 23, 2014, 10:30:19 AM
 #65

I would ban Luke-jr

Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel
2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org
-ck
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
August 23, 2014, 12:36:46 PM
 #66

I would ban Luke-jr

Who the hell is luke-jr Huh
freedomno1
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1090


Learning the troll avoidance button :)


View Profile
August 23, 2014, 11:59:19 PM
 #67

I would ban Luke-jr

Who the hell is luke-jr Huh

An important yet controversial developer on the forums with a bit of an ego and a battle with a few members on here now and then.
In D@T and Github mostly so you don't see him to much unless your trying to change or alter some part of the Bitcoin Protocol with Gavin.
Usually around blockchain compression sidechains those sort of areas.
Or mining as ckolivas is pointing out  Wink Cough BFL

Believing in Bitcoins and it's ability to change the world
iluvpie60
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 700
Merit: 500


View Profile
August 24, 2014, 12:02:01 AM
 #68

AND why?
Just 1 thing, for I it would be transaction times, cause waiting for those confirmations is wayy too long sometimes  Cry

i think there should be a 2 or possibly 3 step verification?? or something. maybe something that is always instant that automatically pushes everything through into a temp ledger, then eventually after enough time goes by it gets pushed to a larger collection then finally get passed on as solved when the block is found.

no idea if tha tmakes it better but tx transactions are soo small it doesnt matter iw ould think.
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
August 24, 2014, 01:08:16 PM
 #69

AND why?
Just 1 thing, for I it would be transaction times, cause waiting for those confirmations is wayy too long sometimes  Cry

i think there should be a 2 or possibly 3 step verification?? or something. maybe something that is always instant that automatically pushes everything through into a temp ledger, then eventually after enough time goes by it gets pushed to a larger collection then finally get passed on as solved when the block is found.

no idea if tha tmakes it better but tx transactions are soo small it doesnt matter iw ould think.

Multi sig exists which is somewhat like that
colinistheman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 872
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 24, 2014, 01:56:41 PM
 #70

Sorry, I don't get people asking for faster confirmations. I understand it's sometimes frustrating to wait, but faster confirmation times = less secure confirmations. If you changed the block target to 5 mins, then services waiting for, say, 3 confirmations would simply require 6. No difference.

^ I share this viewpoint.

But then I realized one factor that makes faster transaction times an actual improvement:  Once a bitcoin spend is actually confirmed in a block on the blockchain, this then prevents a double spend from occurring. So, the longer the block times (i.e. 10 minutes on average), the more opportunity for double spends. If block times were set to 60 seconds for example, then the potential criminal attemping to do a double spend would only have an average of 60 seconds to do so.

If it wasn't for this one factor then there would be no reason to speed up block times because what you said is true.

The question is: what is the optimal block time, and does changing this figure actually offer enough benefit to make the change worthwhile. It would be a huge fork. block rewards would have to change too because they would happen every minute instead of every 10 minutes. So instead of getting 25BTC per block, you'd get only 2.5 BTC per block. Honestly, this kind of change seems too drastic to occur to me. I accept bitcoin for how it is now, and just understand how the technology works so I don't get screwed over. Education is always going to be a part of using any digital currency.



.
.BIG WINNER!.
[15.00000000 BTC]


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
Ayers
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 1023


Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform


View Profile
August 24, 2014, 02:49:51 PM
 #71

there are two things important, but i would certainly reduce the transaction time, and the reason is obvious we live in a world that aim to make everything always faster, bitcoin is no exception

.
SPIN

       ▄▄▄██████████▄▄▄
     ▄███████████████████▄
   ▄██████████▀▀███████████▄
   ██████████    ███████████
 ▄██████████      ▀█████████▄
▄██████████        ▀█████████▄
█████████▀▀   ▄▄    ▀▀▀███████
█████████▄▄  ████▄▄███████████
███████▀  ▀▀███▀      ▀███████
▀█████▀          ▄█▄   ▀█████▀
 ▀███▀   ▄▄▄  ▄█████▄   ▀███▀
   ██████████████████▄▄▄███
   ▀██████████████████████▀
     ▀▀████████████████▀▀
        ▀▀▀█████████▀▀▀
.
RIUM
.
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
SAFE GAMES
WITH WITHDRAWALS
       ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄
 ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄  ▀▀▄
█    ▄         █   ▀▌
█   █ █        █    ▌
█      ▄█▄     █   ▐
█     ▄███▄    █   ▌
█    ███████   █  ▐
█    ▀▀ █ ▀▀   █  ▌
█     ▄███▄    █ ▐
█              █▐▌
█        █ █   █▌
 ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄▀
       ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄▄▄
 ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄  ▀▀▄
█    ▄         █   ▀▌
█   █ █        █    ▌
█      ▄█▄     █   ▐
█     ▄███▄    █   ▌
█    ███████   █  ▐
█    ▀▀ █ ▀▀   █  ▌
█     ▄███▄    █ ▐
█              █▐▌
█        █ █   █▌
 ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▄▄▄▀
.
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
.
.SIGN UP.
gelar24
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 101


View Profile
August 24, 2014, 03:54:38 PM
 #72

Bitcoin ATM availability Cool Cool

BTC ATM's are popping up everywhere.  Cool

but not in all countries, there are still many who have not been there Smiley
example of my country as well not exist, the new plan would set up 2 pieces bitcoi ATM in the capital center Smiley
thehappybtc
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 24, 2014, 03:59:09 PM
 #73

The current system seems pretty perfect, even the confirmation times are not bad..10 mins , anyone can wait.

10 minutes are too long, I would modify the transaction time to 3-4 minutes.

♬-♬-♬-♬ ★ ☆ ★ ☆ Earn up to 0.05 btc/week by posting in the LTB forum!!! ☆ ★ ☆ ★ ♬-♬-♬-♬ --------->
<--------- LTB coin now traded on Poloniex!!!
itsAj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500



View Profile
August 24, 2014, 05:29:37 PM
 #74

The current system seems pretty perfect, even the confirmation times are not bad..10 mins , anyone can wait.

10 minutes are too long, I would modify the transaction time to 3-4 minutes.
The reason the block confirmation time is as long as it is now is because shorter confirmation times would mean there would be too many orphaned blocks and orphaned chains. Even if you had a 3 minute confirmation, having 4 of these confirmations would be much less secure then one 10 minute confirmation. Also for most smaller transactions, a 0/unconfirmed transaction is generally secure as long as it is properly propagated throughout the network and contains a sufficient TX fee.
marcotheminer (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1049


┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴


View Profile
August 24, 2014, 05:48:01 PM
 #75

The current system seems pretty perfect, even the confirmation times are not bad..10 mins , anyone can wait.

10 minutes are too long, I would modify the transaction time to 3-4 minutes.

But then most people would ask for at lest 3 or 4 confs. before accepting a transaction, so no big improvement.
colinistheman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 872
Merit: 1003



View Profile
August 24, 2014, 09:05:50 PM
 #76

What about shorter block times resulting in less time for double spends to occur? Isn't this an advantage? Once the transactions are confirmed in the blockchain, they are confirmed and no longer able to be double spent. Right? So, that would seem to be an advantage for a shorter block time.  (Even so, I am not advocating a change in the block times. I think Bitcoin is good enough the way it is. Leave shorter block times to alt coins.)



.
.BIG WINNER!.
[15.00000000 BTC]


▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
██████████▀▀██████████
█████████░░░░█████████
██████████▄▄██████████
███████▀▀████▀▀███████
██████░░░░██░░░░██████
███████▄▄████▄▄███████
████▀▀████▀▀████▀▀████
███░░░░██░░░░██░░░░███
████▄▄████▄▄████▄▄████
██████████████████████

▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
██████████████████████
█████▀▀█▀▀▀▀▀▀██▀▀████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░░████
█████░░░░░░░░░░░░▄████
█████░░▄███▄░░░░██████
█████▄▄███▀░░░░▄██████
█████████░░░░░░███████
████████░░░░░░░███████
███████░░░░░░░░███████
███████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███████

██████████████████████
▀████████████████████▀
▄████████████████████▄
███████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀
███████████▀▀▄▄█░░░░░█
█████████▀░░█████░░░░█
███████▀░░░░░████▀░░░▀
██████░░░░░░░░▀▄▄█████
█████░▄░░░░░▄██████▀▀█
████░████▄░███████░░░░
███░█████░█████████░░█
███░░░▀█░██████████░░█
███░░░░░░████▀▀██▀░░░░
███░░░░░░███░░░░░░░░░░

██░▄▄▄▄░████▄▄██▄░░░░
████████████▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██
█████████████░█▀▀▀█░███
██████████▀▀░█▀░░░▀█░▀▀
███████▀░▄▄█░█░░░░░█░█▄
████▀░▄▄████░▀█░░░█▀░██
███░▄████▀▀░▄░▀█░█▀░▄░▀
█▀░███▀▀▀░░███░▀█▀░███░
▀░███▀░░░░░████▄░▄████░
░███▀░░░░░░░█████████░░
░███░░░░░░░░░███████░░░
███▀░██░░░░░░▀░▄▄▄░▀░░░
███░██████▄▄░▄█████▄░▄▄

██░████████░███████░█
▄████████████████████▄
████████▀▀░░░▀▀███████
███▀▀░░░░░▄▄▄░░░░▀▀▀██
██░▀▀▄▄░░░▀▀▀░░░▄▄▀▀██
██░▄▄░░▀▀▄▄░▄▄▀▀░░░░██
██░▀▀░░░░░░█░░░░░██░██
██░░░▄▄░░░░█░██░░░░░██
██░░░▀▀░░░░█░░░░░░░░██
██░░░░░▄▄░░█░░░░░██░██
██▄░░░░▀▀░░█░██░░░░░██
█████▄▄░░░░█░░░░▄▄████
█████████▄▄█▄▄████████

▀████████████████████▀




Rainbot
Daily Quests
Faucet
wasserman99
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 24, 2014, 10:50:43 PM
 #77

The current system seems pretty perfect, even the confirmation times are not bad..10 mins , anyone can wait.

10 minutes are too long, I would modify the transaction time to 3-4 minutes.

But then most people would ask for at lest 3 or 4 confs. before accepting a transaction, so no big improvement.
This would also make a 0/unconfirmed transaction much less secure. Now with the network hashrate as high as it is today it would take a lot of resources to mine the next block with any kind of certainty so the chances of a nefarious party mining to launch a double spend attack is low for most smaller to mid sized transactions as long as the TX fee is sufficient. However if the block time was less then the cost to potential reward ratio would be much greater for a potential attacker. 

betterangels
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250



View Profile
August 25, 2014, 12:19:33 AM
 #78

would probably change the fees so that even smaller amounts can be sent without large fees. If bitcoin gets more expensive, you could have to pay several dollars to send one dollar of bitcoin.
pythonista
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
August 25, 2014, 12:40:41 AM
 #79

Here is my suggestion:

Replace mining with DPOS, thereby relieving us of the need to inflate the coin supply at 10%/annum in order to pay for miners.

I want to be rewarded for holding an asset, not penalized with inflation. BTSX has got the right idea.
the joint
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1834
Merit: 1020



View Profile
August 25, 2014, 01:16:18 AM
 #80

I would decrease the time for difficulty adjustments.  I don't have a specific duration in mind, but maybe something like every 1-3 days.

My reasoning for this is that I think it could have interesting effects on price stability due to reduced effects of difficulty manipulation and speculation by miners.  I think there's a likelihood that it could help stabilize the rate at which miners sell BTC to recoup investment costs.

For the record, I kind of have no idea what I'm talking about here.
Pages: « 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!