[ANN][UPDATE][NEOS]Neos v2.1- Blowfish, 2FA, Theft Recovery, Decoy System

[child_harold]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

How curious, and flattering I suppose, that James should have felt need to state the obvious. We know that in its current form Arbitrush is less decentralized than it ideally ought to be. Such improvements I expect to be included in future versions.

Let's not forget that DRK has been going months and is on RC4 or 5 by now(can't recall). Not to mention BTCD: it is true to say that there is no anon wallet yet released for BTCD, yes?

interesting tho, thanks for bringing it to our attention

[1715337928]

1715337928

[1715337928]

1715337928

[1715337928]

1715337928

[1715337928]

1715337928

[ereborltc]

a good floor right here would be nice... steady growth

a good exchange of hands and were ready to take it up a notch!

[Spratan]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

BTCD and Neos are competing with off blockchain anon, so we must be careful with competitors critics, even if James is totally reputable.
Do you have further links ?

[ereborltc]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

BTCD and Neos are competing with off blockchain anon, so we must be careful with competitors critics, even if James is totally reputable.
Do you have further links ?

arbitrush is unique anon... you should let twoturtles reply to this and theres no competing ...btcd is a great coin

[twoturtles]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

BTCD and Neos are competing with off blockchain anon, so we must be careful with competitors critics, even if James is totally reputable.
Do you have further links ?

arbitrush is unique anon... you should let twoturtles reply to this

Let me start by saying I've reached out to James to confirm this quote.  Arbitrush is a for-educational-purposes type of experiment first off; a proof-of-concept if you will.  Secondly, I don't see why there would be cause for any interest considering we're just allowing people that use Neos, to send Neos to others.  We're not allowing folks to exchange Neos <-> BTC, or Neos <-> Fiat and evade/avoid/disrupt anything.  Think of it in terms of a secret admirer sending flowers.

     Regards,

syntaks

[ereborltc]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

BTCD and Neos are competing with off blockchain anon, so we must be careful with competitors critics, even if James is totally reputable.
Do you have further links ?

arbitrush is unique anon... you should let twoturtles reply to this

Let me start by saying I've reached out to James to confirm this quote.  Arbitrush is a for-educational-purposes type of experiment first off; a proof-of-concept if you will.  Secondly, I don't see why there would be cause for any interest considering we're just allowing people that use Neos, to send Neos to others.  We're not allowing folks to exchange Neos <-> BTC, or Neos <-> Fiat and evade/avoid/disrupt anything.  Think of it in terms of a secret admirer sending flowers.

     Regards,

syntaks

well put ...

[studio1one]

I really dislike it when coin devs trash talk other coins. Massively unprofessional, sort out your own shit and talk about your own coin. Let others worry about theirs.

[child_harold]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

BTCD and Neos are competing with off blockchain anon, so we must be careful with competitors critics, even if James is totally reputable.
Do you have further links ?

arbitrush is unique anon... you should let twoturtles reply to this

Let me start by saying I've reached out to James to confirm this quote.  Arbitrush is a for-educational-purposes type of experiment first off; a proof-of-concept if you will.  Secondly, I don't see why there would be cause for any interest considering we're just allowing people that use Neos, to send Neos to others.  We're not allowing folks to exchange Neos <-> BTC, or Neos <-> Fiat and evade/avoid/disrupt anything.  Think of it in terms of a secret admirer sending flowers.

     Regards,

syntaks

well put ...

secret admirer sending flowers.

[ereborltc]

I really dislike it when coin devs trash talk other coins. Massively unprofessional, sort out your own shit and talk about your own coin. Let others worry about theirs.

? dev said nothing but positive things about other coins lol... what r u reading loll... twoturtles is humble no trash talk whatsoever

[ereborltc]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

BTCD and Neos are competing with off blockchain anon, so we must be careful with competitors critics, even if James is totally reputable.
Do you have further links ?

arbitrush is unique anon... you should let twoturtles reply to this

Let me start by saying I've reached out to James to confirm this quote.  Arbitrush is a for-educational-purposes type of experiment first off; a proof-of-concept if you will.  Secondly, I don't see why there would be cause for any interest considering we're just allowing people that use Neos, to send Neos to others.  We're not allowing folks to exchange Neos <-> BTC, or Neos <-> Fiat and evade/avoid/disrupt anything.  Think of it in terms of a secret admirer sending flowers.

     Regards,

syntaks

well put ...

secret admirer sending flowers.

+1 lol

[infazan]


{
"version" : 1000000,
"protocolversion" : 90000,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 0.00000000,
"blocks" : 2332,
"timeoffset" : 6,
"connections" : 6,
"proxy" : "",
"pow_algo_id" : 0,
"pow_algo" : "sha256d",
"difficulty" : 3580833.25373718,
"difficulty_sha256d" : 3580833.25373718,
"difficulty_x11" : 1472.34272398,
"difficulty_blake" : 16839.45014703,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1409306520,
"keypoolsize" : 101,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : ""
}


where is "moneysupply" ?
Now how many coins is mining and in circulation?

[twoturtles]

Update: block explorer is up http://explorer.neoscoin.com/chain/NeosCoin

Total supply to-date: http://explorer.neoscoin.com/chain/NeosCoin/q/totalbc

[z38630610]

can't install linux 32 bit wallet

please help me

my system raspbeery pi RASPBIAN Debian Wheezy

display "Error 2 " look it

root@raspberrypi:/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src# make -f makefile.unix
Building LevelDB ...
/bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
Makefile:18: build_config.mk: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build_config.mk'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2

http://gyazo.com/73a8e32fea5d333bc4e5a5c720422559

[ereborltc]

Update: block explorer is up http://explorer.neoscoin.com/chain/NeosCoin

Total supply to-date: http://explorer.neoscoin.com/chain/NeosCoin/q/totalbc

thanx

[twoturtles]

can't install linux 32 bit wallet

please help me

my system raspbeery pi RASPBIAN Debian Wheezy

display "Error 2 " look it

root@raspberrypi:/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src# make -f makefile.unix
Building LevelDB ...
/bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
Makefile:18: build_config.mk: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build_config.mk'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2

http://gyazo.com/73a8e32fea5d333bc4e5a5c720422559

chmod 755 leveldb/build_detect_platform && make -f makefile.unix

try that please and let me know if you have any issues following.

     Regards,

syntaks

[z38630610]

can't install linux 32 bit wallet

please help me

my system raspbeery pi RASPBIAN Debian Wheezy

display "Error 2 " look it

root@raspberrypi:/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src# make -f makefile.unix
Building LevelDB ...
/bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
Makefile:18: build_config.mk: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build_config.mk'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2

http://gyazo.com/73a8e32fea5d333bc4e5a5c720422559

chmod 755 leveldb/build_detect_platform && make -f makefile.unix

try that please and let me know if you have any issues following.

     Regards,

syntaks

root@raspberrypi:/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src# chmod 755 leveldb/build_detect_platform && make -f makefile.unix
Building LevelDB ...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
g++ -I. -I./include -fn........................
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/alert.d -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:6:53: fatal error: boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1

help

[Altcoin4life]

At current price trends maybe we need to get serious about creating the neos in game payment

[BohemianStalker]

too quick of a growth, price will now inevitably plummet . It might soar again after a while.

[jl777]

James (jl777) from btcd has stated that arbitrush with neos is vulnerable to police raids seing as its centralized. A shame really, perhaps newer version of arbitrush would be decentralized

Please do not misinterpret what I say and then turn it into a definitive statement.
Maybe I was not clear as it has been very hectic few days, but I said that I could not find out the server topology, probably because I didnt look in the right place for the info. I guessed that maybe it is distributed, which is nothing at all like centralized. This is like saying multiply redundant is the same as single point of failure. So big change. I also said that a decentralized system would have vulnerabilities, but remember I said I was not sure about the topology, so this is a conditional.

So, I hope this is clear. I am not knowing of the actual server topology.
I made a guess that it is distributed
Then a general statement that distributed servers have a possible vulnerability. It is actually possible to create a distributed server topology that is not vulnerable to seizure and also possible to do it wrong.

So, conjecture + possibility + my lack of knowlege -> misquoting -> I apologize for any confusion this caused. I know the last thing that any coin needs is some seemingly credible statement that has the "c" word in it.

James

[twoturtles]

can't install linux 32 bit wallet

please help me

my system raspbeery pi RASPBIAN Debian Wheezy

display "Error 2 " look it

root@raspberrypi:/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src# make -f makefile.unix
Building LevelDB ...
/bin/sh: 1: ./build_detect_platform: Permission denied
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
Makefile:18: build_config.mk: No such file or directory
make[1]: *** No rule to make target `build_config.mk'.  Stop.
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
make: *** [leveldb/libleveldb.a] Error 2

http://gyazo.com/73a8e32fea5d333bc4e5a5c720422559

chmod 755 leveldb/build_detect_platform && make -f makefile.unix

try that please and let me know if you have any issues following.

     Regards,

syntaks

root@raspberrypi:/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src# chmod 755 leveldb/build_detect_platform && make -f makefile.unix
Building LevelDB ...
make[1]: Entering directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
g++ -I. -I./include -fn........................
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb'
g++ -c -O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter -g -DBOOST_SPIRIT_THREADSAFE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/obj -DUSE_UPNP=0 -DUSE_IPV6=1 -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb/include -I/home/pi/Desktop/Linux-32-bit/neoscoin/src/leveldb/helpers -DHAVE_BUILD_INFO -fno-stack-protector -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2  -MMD -MF obj/alert.d -o obj/alert.o alert.cpp
alert.cpp:6:53: fatal error: boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp: No such file or directory
compilation terminated.
make: *** [obj/alert.o] Error 1

help

As root (via sudo or su), please type this:

apt-get install libboost-all-dev

After that please go back and type:

make -f makefile.unix

Let me know if you have any further issues and we'll get things situated.

     Best regards,

syntaks