[ANN][UPDATE][NEOS]Neos v2.1- Blowfish, 2FA, Theft Recovery, Decoy System

[twoturtles]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

[Altcoin4life]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

This right here is actually key to true anon in conjunction to Arbitrush, thanks again for this amazing creation. This coin is a phenom.

[TheCoinFinder]

SHA and X11 pool found no new block,no blake pool ,so hidden pool found new block

We offer a blake pool - and have been running one since about block 300 or so

[TheCoinFinder]

As: http://www.verters.com/mining-breakdown/neoscoin shows -

The breakdown is more blake slightly at the moment (41%).. and the pool distribution is pretty good

[crackfoo]

I'm talking about the timeframe for arbitrush to be working? I've read a some of this thread but don't have a clear answer.
How is this different from a centalized mixer?

Sorry about that I misunderstood!  It works now.  It's been since we released.  As far as it being different from a centralized mixer, I guess in the concept itself of having coins sent to another server, transactions broken up, and re-sent out to the desired recipient at random times it isn't.  It just works well and it's there for use within the wallet easily.  Let me know if you try it and what you think.

     Best regards,

syntaks

can you add www.hasher.ca (sha) to the pool list?

Thanks

[crackfoo]

is this the IPO address:

1   NXxN8rHg2qW4CPRFW9A3XfagmhYKqQ8J67   906409.85962799

[Automatic Monkey]

SHA and X11 pool found no new block,no blake pool ,so hidden pool found new block

If by "hidden pool" you mean "somebody's wallet or minerd" that makes perfect sense. 

[twoturtles]

I'm talking about the timeframe for arbitrush to be working? I've read a some of this thread but don't have a clear answer.
How is this different from a centalized mixer?

Sorry about that I misunderstood!  It works now.  It's been since we released.  As far as it being different from a centralized mixer, I guess in the concept itself of having coins sent to another server, transactions broken up, and re-sent out to the desired recipient at random times it isn't.  It just works well and it's there for use within the wallet easily.  Let me know if you try it and what you think.

     Best regards,

syntaks

can you add www.hasher.ca (sha) to the pool list?

Thanks

Sure I did it earlier on the site - www.neoscoin.com =)

     Regards,

syntaks

[crackfoo]

I'm talking about the timeframe for arbitrush to be working? I've read a some of this thread but don't have a clear answer.
How is this different from a centalized mixer?

Sorry about that I misunderstood!  It works now.  It's been since we released.  As far as it being different from a centralized mixer, I guess in the concept itself of having coins sent to another server, transactions broken up, and re-sent out to the desired recipient at random times it isn't.  It just works well and it's there for use within the wallet easily.  Let me know if you try it and what you think.

     Best regards,

syntaks

can you add www.hasher.ca (sha) to the pool list?

Thanks

Sure I did it earlier on the site - www.neoscoin.com =)

     Regards,

syntaks

ohhh I see. I was looking at the list on the OP...

[Chris001]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

This right here is actually key to true anon in conjunction to Arbitrush, thanks again for this amazing creation. This coin is a phenom.

I stated before Im not a real tech guy, I can't even figure out how to mine without a pool. I paid a guy .15 BTC to walk me through how to rent a miner and connect it to a pool if that tells you anything. I don't even know how to solo mine to give you more reference lol. i'm more of a trader.

Anyway, I don't quite understand the differences you guys just spoke of. All I know is this. Jl777 had some concerns/comments about the coin. I don't believe he was trying to cause any harm at all, i believe he was simply stating what he was thinking. He's definitely the type of guy that thinks out loud lol.

His whole overall concept about everything lately is that the community needs to work together, to take things to the next level, this is why I don't believe he was trying to talk bad about Neoscoin at all, just stating what was going though his mind.

Twoturtles, have you read what he said, and are you confident that anything he was thinking is covered? He is highly a respected dev in the crypto community. Are you confident that anything he is thinking that could cause an issue in the future is totally handled on your end?

Your credibility couldn't be any higher in my book, you say everything is ok, is all I need to know?

I believe you answered this question in tech terms.

What I could get out of the tech answer above is that everything is covered and ok, but in laymans terms, if you could explain what he meant, and how it's not an issue for us non tech guys, it would be very good for Neoscoin holders and traders like myself.

[twoturtles]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

This right here is actually key to true anon in conjunction to Arbitrush, thanks again for this amazing creation. This coin is a phenom.

I stated before Im not a real tech guy, I can't even figure out how to mine without a pool. I paid a guy .15 BTC to walk me through how to rent a miner and connect it to a pool if that tells you anything. I don't even know how to solo mine to give you more reference lol. i'm more of a trader.

Anyway, I don't quite understand the differences you guys just spoke of. All I know is this. Jl777 had some concerns/comments about the coin. I don't believe he was trying to cause any harm at all, i believe he was simply stating what he was thinking. He's definitely the type of guy that thinks out loud lol.

His whole overall concept about everything lately is that the community needs to work together, to take things to the next level, this is why I don't believe he was trying to talk bad about Neoscoin at all, just stating what was going though his mind.

Twoturtles, have you read what he said, and are you confident that anything he was thinking is covered? He is highly a respected dev in the crypto community. Are you confident that anything he is thinking that could cause an issue in the future is totally handled on your end?

Your credibility couldn't be any higher in my book, you say everything is ok, is all I need to know?

I believe you answered this question in tech terms.

What I could get out of the tech answer above is that everything is covered and ok, but in laymans terms, if you could explain what he meant, and how it's not an issue for us non tech guys, it would be very good for Neoscoin holders and traders like myself.

There isn't anything to cover really.  As I said in an earlier post, allowing someone to send Neos back and forth and not disclose they were the sender to another is the same as gifting anonymously.  We're not advocating illegal or immoral activity.  The case that was stated was applicable to an illegal operation homed in the US or country where it could be deemed so.  In short, if you're not doing anything illegal - it's not illegal. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

[Chris001]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

This right here is actually key to true anon in conjunction to Arbitrush, thanks again for this amazing creation. This coin is a phenom.

I stated before Im not a real tech guy, I can't even figure out how to mine without a pool. I paid a guy .15 BTC to walk me through how to rent a miner and connect it to a pool if that tells you anything. I don't even know how to solo mine to give you more reference lol. i'm more of a trader.

Anyway, I don't quite understand the differences you guys just spoke of. All I know is this. Jl777 had some concerns/comments about the coin. I don't believe he was trying to cause any harm at all, i believe he was simply stating what he was thinking. He's definitely the type of guy that thinks out loud lol.

His whole overall concept about everything lately is that the community needs to work together, to take things to the next level, this is why I don't believe he was trying to talk bad about Neoscoin at all, just stating what was going though his mind.

Twoturtles, have you read what he said, and are you confident that anything he was thinking is covered? He is highly a respected dev in the crypto community. Are you confident that anything he is thinking that could cause an issue in the future is totally handled on your end?

Your credibility couldn't be any higher in my book, you say everything is ok, is all I need to know?

I believe you answered this question in tech terms.

What I could get out of the tech answer above is that everything is covered and ok, but in laymans terms, if you could explain what he meant, and how it's not an issue for us non tech guys, it would be very good for Neoscoin holders and traders like myself.

There isn't anything to cover really.  As I said in an earlier post, allowing someone to send Neos back and forth and not disclose they were the sender to another is the same as gifting anonymously.  We're not advocating illegal or immoral activity.  The case that was stated was applicable to an illegal operation homed in the US or country where it could be deemed so.  In short, if you're not doing anything illegal - it's not illegal. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

That's all I needed to hear, thanks for the quick response.

I just wanted to make sure I was understanding what I was reading above correctly.

Thanks again for all your hard work and creating such an amazing system for all of us.

I am so excited about this project, and the most amazing thing is that it is only the beginning. Thank you

[twoturtles]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

This right here is actually key to true anon in conjunction to Arbitrush, thanks again for this amazing creation. This coin is a phenom.

I stated before Im not a real tech guy, I can't even figure out how to mine without a pool. I paid a guy .15 BTC to walk me through how to rent a miner and connect it to a pool if that tells you anything. I don't even know how to solo mine to give you more reference lol. i'm more of a trader.

Anyway, I don't quite understand the differences you guys just spoke of. All I know is this. Jl777 had some concerns/comments about the coin. I don't believe he was trying to cause any harm at all, i believe he was simply stating what he was thinking. He's definitely the type of guy that thinks out loud lol.

His whole overall concept about everything lately is that the community needs to work together, to take things to the next level, this is why I don't believe he was trying to talk bad about Neoscoin at all, just stating what was going though his mind.

Twoturtles, have you read what he said, and are you confident that anything he was thinking is covered? He is highly a respected dev in the crypto community. Are you confident that anything he is thinking that could cause an issue in the future is totally handled on your end?

Your credibility couldn't be any higher in my book, you say everything is ok, is all I need to know?

I believe you answered this question in tech terms.

What I could get out of the tech answer above is that everything is covered and ok, but in laymans terms, if you could explain what he meant, and how it's not an issue for us non tech guys, it would be very good for Neoscoin holders and traders like myself.

There isn't anything to cover really.  As I said in an earlier post, allowing someone to send Neos back and forth and not disclose they were the sender to another is the same as gifting anonymously.  We're not advocating illegal or immoral activity.  The case that was stated was applicable to an illegal operation homed in the US or country where it could be deemed so.  In short, if you're not doing anything illegal - it's not illegal. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

That's all I needed to hear, thanks for the quick response.

I just wanted to make sure I was understanding what I was reading above correctly.

Thanks again for all your hard work and creating such an amazing system for all of us.

I am so excited about this project, and the most amazing thing is that it is only the beginning. Thank you

You're welcome man.  I never claimed our approach was the be-all-end-all and definitely not intended for any illegal/immoral use.  It's just a concept that was fleshed out and proven to work and provided optionally.  There are a lot of features being added into the upcoming release.  This was just one of them that we released with v1.  If anyone has other feature requests, please don't hesitate to request.  We'll do our best to get them in there.

      Regards,

syntaks

[b00s624]

Is there any sha256 black pool?

[RedZeppelin]

Is there any sha256 black pool?

I sure hope there aint gonna be one but im abit suprised someone aint put on up yet i guess we see one soon..
Still i doubt there is anything smarter to mine and hold then NEOS at the moment. 
What a stupid situation it would be, other multipools mine NEOS to sell while NEOS multipool mine other coins to buy NEOS, well it sure adds trade volume but it feels like crossing a river to search for water.. Only the exchanges really like the multipools.

[ereborltc]

twoturtles!!! your doing a beyond great job ! i can't express it in words ppl need to just watch you..most other devs especially ,this is how u keep a community informed and make them feel like they are part of something not just people looking in from the outside... thanks buddy , looking forward to V2 !!! like i said we ride together we die together , I'm with you to the top or bottom as long as your doing your thing!

chart is looking amazing ,that whale stocked up big from 20-33k and now we been going sideways for a good 12hrs , a good exchange of hands is taking place and then ... buckle up! its gonna be one hell of a ride!

keep it up turtle!!

[mrs_snow]

http://explorah.net/static/explorahlogo.png

Hello!

I have temporarily made Neoscoin a block explorer at Explorah. It will be there for 3 days.
Check it out and if you like it, the price is only 0.06 BTC for me to keep it there.
If you don't like it, let me know and I'll remove it.

Looks nice...

[tempus]

Each transaction uses a unique address also, every time.

This right here is actually key to true anon in conjunction to Arbitrush, thanks again for this amazing creation. This coin is a phenom.

I stated before Im not a real tech guy, I can't even figure out how to mine without a pool. I paid a guy .15 BTC to walk me through how to rent a miner and connect it to a pool if that tells you anything. I don't even know how to solo mine to give you more reference lol. i'm more of a trader.

Anyway, I don't quite understand the differences you guys just spoke of. All I know is this. Jl777 had some concerns/comments about the coin. I don't believe he was trying to cause any harm at all, i believe he was simply stating what he was thinking. He's definitely the type of guy that thinks out loud lol.

His whole overall concept about everything lately is that the community needs to work together, to take things to the next level, this is why I don't believe he was trying to talk bad about Neoscoin at all, just stating what was going though his mind.

Twoturtles, have you read what he said, and are you confident that anything he was thinking is covered? He is highly a respected dev in the crypto community. Are you confident that anything he is thinking that could cause an issue in the future is totally handled on your end?

Your credibility couldn't be any higher in my book, you say everything is ok, is all I need to know?

I believe you answered this question in tech terms.

What I could get out of the tech answer above is that everything is covered and ok, but in laymans terms, if you could explain what he meant, and how it's not an issue for us non tech guys, it would be very good for Neoscoin holders and traders like myself.

There isn't anything to cover really.  As I said in an earlier post, allowing someone to send Neos back and forth and not disclose they were the sender to another is the same as gifting anonymously.  We're not advocating illegal or immoral activity.  The case that was stated was applicable to an illegal operation homed in the US or country where it could be deemed so.  In short, if you're not doing anything illegal - it's not illegal. =)

     Best regards,

syntaks

That's all I needed to hear, thanks for the quick response.

I just wanted to make sure I was understanding what I was reading above correctly.

Thanks again for all your hard work and creating such an amazing system for all of us.

I am so excited about this project, and the most amazing thing is that it is only the beginning. Thank you

You're welcome man.  I never claimed our approach was the be-all-end-all and definitely not intended for any illegal/immoral use.  It's just a concept that was fleshed out and proven to work and provided optionally.  There are a lot of features being added into the upcoming release.  This was just one of them that we released with v1.  If anyone has other feature requests, please don't hesitate to request.  We'll do our best to get them in there.

      Regards,

syntaks

I personally give not that much about anon. I think, there will be a Crypto that will make that Feature (anon) nearly perfect, maybe even hard to track for the NSA, and such a Crypto will find its market, but it won`t be a Crypto for Mainstream-Attraction.

What I think generally about Crypto: It will become a serious part of the financial system and it will change the financial system and also the thinking about finances and Currencies. For me, the main-aspects for Success of a Crypto is:

- decentralized.
- stability of the system
- stable functionality
- distribution

- easy to use/intuitiveness
- design (extremely underestimated)
- mobile
- communication

I believe, a very successfull Crypto should/will be like "Apple". I know, many hate Apple and their politics. I mean it just with regard on their products. They leave off everything that is not really important. But everything that is important, works stable and even a child or a grandfather can use it. I want to say: I would like to see a Crypto that is concentrated to some really important features with focus on perfection these features. And perfection is never complicated. More precise: The most perfect solution is the simplest solution - and that is hard to find. ;-) And: Design and functionality belongs together if it helps the User to act intuitiv. In my eyes, thats a Key-aspect for a greater adoption.

What I want to say is: In my opinion, not too many features. Smartphone-Apps... Chat... But all as perfect as possible. Anon-Feature is good, but I don`t think it is that necessary, because all who will need it will use Cryptos that are really specialized on that.

[Altcoin4life]

The good news is, the anon is just a nice thing to have for those who need it and isn't mandatory. The fact that neos has so much to offer and the continued development of these devs is the biggest advantage.

[mrs_snow]

How can I open the new NEOS interface?
The wallet, I've compiled, looks like the wallet of any other coins...