Ahh, it becomes clear now. You are here to make yourself feel better about placing an order for a different device. It's called "buyers remorse," look it up. Makes sense why you spouted a bunch of misinformation, outright falsehoods and were (and still are, presumably)
unable to answer even a single question posed to you with regards to your claims. Seriously, answer just one of the questions posed to you so far. Just one... go on, I dare ya.
So lets recap your argument:
1. Dubious company registration.
2. Next to no contact.
3. Outright lies regarding delivery times (and has continued to lie regarding delivery times for 6+ months).
4. Extremely few seen out in the wild (enough that you could simply pay someone for a false review to help out the long con).
5. 0 information on chips used (this is the only thing that does not bother me).
6. Constant spamming of BFL.
7. The person assuring us its not a con has answered 0 questions of substance, instead selling you on the "I trust them, you should to".
1. Legitimate complaint
2. Outright lie
3. Legitimate complaint
4. Outright lie
5. Immaterial, they are under no obligation to tell you.
6. Outright lie
7. Outright lie
So out of 7 claims, 4 are outright lies, 2 are legitimate and 1 is irrelevant. You have, apparently, two beefs. 1 the shipping date, which you have harped on incessently. And two, the "dubious company registration." I'm not sure how that exactly effects hardware production, but hey, it is a fact and you brought it up, so you can have it.
You then whined my statement that I confirmed the existence of more people owrking at BFL than just Sonny and Ninja Lady. You called me several names as well as hurled a bunch of insults. You started out being an asshole and now you are whining because I give back to you in kind? Heh... Anyway, in response to your whining, I asked you what would be acceptable confirmation. You failed to answer, but instead chose to continue to insult me.
Then two posts later, you make the claim (which you continue to spew, I presume in the hopes that people will start to believe it) that:
We have a few key members here adamant that it is legit (and I hope it is) but the same members absolutely refuse to provide any substantial evidence.
Even though you can't seem to answer what would constitute substantial evidence. I again ask you what would be good enough for your delicate sensibilities, but again you failed to answer.
You then proceed to produce a wall of text + quotes trying to pick apart my post line by line, since you apparently can't actually address the topics in the post, instead you start typing unrelated and seemingly random responses to lines of text. One of the gems was this:
What is adequate for you?
A unit being demonstrated on a video for a group of people known to the community.
Again you do not seem to understand the difference being a logical conclusion and faith.
To which I responded that it's already been done. Oopsie on your part there, so you completely ignore this subsequently.
You then go on to "challenge me to do 2 things."
1) produce 1 fact regarding BFL that can be verified and carries some weight.
2) Grow the fuck up, stop screeching and swearing on the forums because people dared to question your claims. Frankly any respect you may have earned from me is lost due to the extremely childish and unprofessional way you handle yourself.
I wouldnt enter into business with someone that throws tantrums when people do not blindly agree with their unfounded claims.
3rd optional challenge:
3) Attempt a civil debate, respond with founded claims or STFU. I suggest you familiarize yourself with the definition of a debate so you know to keep your assumptions out if it.
Which I then proceed to provide you with your #1 challenge, which is difficult, since you never really answered what would "carry some weight."
Your #2 challenge is actually an insult, not really a challenge.
Your #3 challenge is just a rehash of #2. All the while, you conveniently ignore the fact that it was you who started the uncivil communication.
I then ask you yet AGAIN, what is adequate proof. You yet AGAIN fail to answer.
You then state that my claims mean nothing without proof. Yet you can't seem to articulate what, exactly, that proof would be. You then go on to spout out more names and insults.
You then ask for "citations" when I ask you how someone is suppose to establish that they are an authority in a particular subject area. You seem to fail to understand exactly what a citation is, so this argument falls flat and is subsequently ignored by you.
This is where you start to repeatedly harp on the "They lied about shipping times" mantra you are so fond of. You restate it several times amidst your name calling and insults and your self aggrandization about how you are an awesome Senior Unix Systems Administrator for ~14 years and that you can "verify this with anyone that requires my services." Which is funny, because a few lines up, you were just saying how this is meaningless and it requires "citations" to be legitimate. But I understand, when I say it, it's meaningless, but when you do it, it carries weight.
Then we have a wonderful gem:
Unlike BFL I have not lied in this entire discussion.
A lie about lying! Totally Meta Dude! Far out.
And we have more insults and avoiding any of the questions for the rest of your posts. Which brings us here. I hope this recap has helped you understand why you have zero credibility and why you look so stupid. I suspect it does not, but I had fun going over it again, so I don't really care.
Good luck to you. Next time you try to troll a thread, at least have something of substance to spread, instead of ignoring, virtually every single question posed to you. You just look stupid otherwise. Maybe you'll use this as a learning lesson, but I doubt it.
PS - Go look up the definition of "assume." Once again, you are using a word incorrectly.
