[ANN] SuperNET NXT asset 12071612744977229797, SUPERNET KMD assetchain in summer

[jl777]

add the following signals in addition to "ohlc":

    "firstbid", "firstask", "lowbid", "highask", "highbid", "lowask", "lowbid", "lastask",
    "arbbid", "arbask", "virtbid", "virtask", "avebid", "aveask", "median", "aveprice"

the arb and virt signals are not yet being calculated

[1715230265]

1715230265

[1715230265]

1715230265

[1715230265]

1715230265

[1715230265]

1715230265

[habraken]

While I think it's absolutely great (!) to have more devs onboard, it seems it's no longer about Supernet's original "only coins with unique features can join as core coins". It's not about coins, or even (future) coin-features. It seems to be about the people. And imo ideally devs should join voluntarily because they like the SuperNET idea, without getting a reward by having their 'coins' bought with SuperNET money.

Maybe James should officially state this change in SuperNET policy, and say he's paying devs to join SuperNET. Not a bad thing imo, times change.

(And please correct me if I'm mistaken, I frequently am!)

[jl777]

While I think it's absolutely great (!) to have more devs onboard, it seems it's no longer about Supernet's original "only coins with unique features can join as core coins". It's not about coins, or even (future) coin-features. It seems to be about the people. And imo ideally devs should join voluntarily because they like the SuperNET idea, without getting a reward by having their 'coins' bought with SuperNET money.

Maybe James should officially state this change in SuperNET policy, and say he's paying devs to join SuperNET. Not a bad thing imo, times change.

(And please correct me if I'm mistaken, I frequently am!)

The financial aspect has always been this way, it has not changed. Additionally coin communities will be getting revshare from SuperNET revenues, this also has not changed, it has always been that way.

James

[mxxxxxx]

Collaboration started at day one!

Great things ahead

Front end side of Fibre integration in Supernet wallet done

[criptix]

While I think it's absolutely great (!) to have more devs onboard, it seems it's no longer about Supernet's original "only coins with unique features can join as core coins". It's not about coins, or even (future) coin-features. It seems to be about the people. And imo ideally devs should join voluntarily because they like the SuperNET idea, without getting a reward by having their 'coins' bought with SuperNET money.

Maybe James should officially state this change in SuperNET policy, and say he's paying devs to join SuperNET. Not a bad thing imo, times change.

(And please correct me if I'm mistaken, I frequently am!)

imho you understood wrong.
supernet is not buying devs with ICO money.

the only thing which comes near is that there exist a fund which pays whoever distributes to supernet (bug bountys, development etc)

[speedy1987]

FIBRE is new in supernet?
If yes, price can jump easily.

[BootstrapCoinDev]

While I think it's absolutely great (!) to have more devs onboard, it seems it's no longer about Supernet's original "only coins with unique features can join as core coins". It's not about coins, or even (future) coin-features. It seems to be about the people. And imo ideally devs should join voluntarily because they like the SuperNET idea, without getting a reward by having their 'coins' bought with SuperNET money.

Maybe James should officially state this change in SuperNET policy, and say he's paying devs to join SuperNET. Not a bad thing imo, times change.

(And please correct me if I'm mistaken, I frequently am!)

If it's deemed a normality that coins with some unique advantageous features bring value to the supernet then consider that the top 1 of every "unique category" as a part of it becomes more valuable, thus draws much hype and thus every dev from the co-project team surely gets paid much. They can be money-motivated or have any other means to manage that sort of consolidation.

[Nxtblg]

FIBRE is new in supernet?
If yes, price can jump easily.

Already has, from my last look.

[Cassius]

There is one key difference that really stands out: the Blocknet is a fog computing service bus, whereas SuperNET is a cloud computing service bus. (Google those terms if you're not familiar.)

As our project develops, you will see increasing differentiation, which will be especially evident in three areas: the openness of our platform, our focus on microservices, and the markets we will be building for. http://blocknet.co outlines all this in broad strokes.

Anyone feel like addressing this in more detail?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg10725434#msg10725434

[Este Nuno]

There is one key difference that really stands out: the Blocknet is a fog computing service bus, whereas SuperNET is a cloud computing service bus. (Google those terms if you're not familiar.)

As our project develops, you will see increasing differentiation, which will be especially evident in three areas: the openness of our platform, our focus on microservices, and the markets we will be building for. http://blocknet.co outlines all this in broad strokes.

Anyone feel like addressing this in more detail?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg10725434#msg10725434

The only thing I can think of that might qualify as something that you could classify as 'cloud' is MGW, and that's only one element of a much bigger project. And it's distributed so it's kind of a stretch to call it a cloud. Doesn't sound like an accurate description to me.

[jl777]

There is one key difference that really stands out: the Blocknet is a fog computing service bus, whereas SuperNET is a cloud computing service bus. (Google those terms if you're not familiar.)

As our project develops, you will see increasing differentiation, which will be especially evident in three areas: the openness of our platform, our focus on microservices, and the markets we will be building for. http://blocknet.co outlines all this in broad strokes.

Anyone feel like addressing this in more detail?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg10725434#msg10725434

The only thing I can think of that might qualify as something that you could classify as 'cloud' is MGW, and that's only one element of a much bigger project. And it's distributed so it's kind of a stretch to call it a cloud. Doesn't sound like an accurate description to me.

fogs, clouds, buses

based on this it sounds like they are saying SuperNET is closed macro services without markets

I do not want to waste time to convince people if SuperNET is open, when the source is there for many months and over 65,000 lines of new code. micro/macro service I dont even know what these distinctions are supposed to mean.

I just make the InstantDEX for now and continue making more useful services. Pangea is also getting closer to release, that is a poker service, not sure if it is macro or micro.

Users are more interested in actual solutions than whatever buzzwords which are hard to understand. Also there seems to be FUD out there than InstantDEX is centralized with servers, but it is 100% decentralized peer to peer. InstantDEX trades assets, some of these assets happen to be MGW assets, but as far as InstantDEX is concerned, it is an asset.

InstantDEX <-> (assets) <-> MGW <-> native cryptos

Since the assets themselves are 100% decentralized and InstantDEX is also fully decentralized, InstantDEX is a fully decentralized exchange. no fogs or clouds or buses needed. Just trade peer to peer and it completes trades in seconds.

This is the core of InstantDEX. There have been some reports about some connectivity issues, so to address this I might add a speedup layer with nodes to help propagate orders. Not sure if that makes it foggy or cloudy and if it is a bad thing, but the effect will be to make things faster

James

[cloudboy]

Please remember to withdraw your SuperNET from Bter people!

I want my Jay dividend 

[crackfoo]

Please remember to withdraw your SuperNET from Bter people!

I want my Jay dividend 

++

Once they "open" back up, will there be perhaps a time limit before the jay assets are released? Assuming there are no issues with withdraws.

[habraken]

Vote needed: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985422.0

[pcjnjn]

Pangea is also getting closer, I am so exciting about it.

[mxxxxxx]

"Fibrecoin leaves Blocknet and joins SuperNET" by Cointelegraph

https://twitter.com/CoinTelegraph/status/575697211922644992

[DaiBoyCookie]

Pangea is also getting closer, I am so exciting about it.

I cannot wait for all the new assets such as Pangea and Instadex, Good times are a coming.

[JohnnyBTCSeed]

[mxxxxxx]

To find out how Fibre is a part of a balanced breakfast
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=985776.msg10741073#msg10741073

Cheers

[JohnnyBTCSeed]

seeing as how i can't post this on the veri page.....