|
PatrickHarnett
|
 |
May 19, 2012, 02:48:43 AM |
|
For anyone that's interested, I saw executions all the way down to around 1.085 (these don't all appear on the GLBSE twitter feed), then two asks of 300-400 shares around 1.18 go up, then some executions around 1.18 (twitter confirms these). Then GLBSE went down.
That's pretty much what I saw too - we think it's almost sorted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You get merit points when someone likes your post enough to give you some. And for every 2 merit points you receive, you can send 1 merit point to someone else!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Serge
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 19, 2012, 03:32:15 AM |
|
something isn't either adding up or being reported correctly
24hr. volume shows total 6841.199 BTC
while total volume shows only 3469.816 BTC
|
|
|
|
|
|
jackmaninov
|
|
May 19, 2012, 03:57:17 AM |
|
Hmm, a glitch that theoretically will double GLBSE's take in trade fees? I bet that will get fixed any second now... /s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nefario
|
|
May 19, 2012, 04:06:56 AM |
|
Hmm, a glitch that theoretically will double GLBSE's take in trade fees? I bet that will get fixed any second now... /s
Fixed already (see the announcement). It's an interesting bug and is forcing me to make some serious changes in GLBSE's backend to account for this. I actually consider this a very serious issue, the result of fixing though will be a much faster GLBSE. |
PGP key id at pgp.mit.edu 0xA68F4B7C To get help and support for GLBSE please email support@glbse.com |
|
|
|
Rygon
|
|
May 19, 2012, 04:17:22 AM |
|
Hmm, a glitch that theoretically will double GLBSE's take in trade fees? I bet that will get fixed any second now... /s
Fixed already (see the announcement). It's an interesting bug and is forcing me to make some serious changes in GLBSE's backend to account for this. I actually consider this a very serious issue, the result of fixing though will be a much faster GLBSE. GLBSE is STILL down. Pretty serious, IMO. EDIT: Just unavailable for me. Gotta figure that out... |
|
|
|
|
|
BinaryMage
|
|
May 19, 2012, 04:19:57 AM |
|
Hmm, a glitch that theoretically will double GLBSE's take in trade fees? I bet that will get fixed any second now... /s
Fixed already (see the announcement). It's an interesting bug and is forcing me to make some serious changes in GLBSE's backend to account for this. I actually consider this a very serious issue, the result of fixing though will be a much faster GLBSE. GLBSE is STILL down. Pretty serious, IMO. It's back up now. |
|
|
|
|
finkleshnorts
|
|
May 20, 2012, 12:46:53 AM |
|
Boom. Just saw the results today. I snagged some at the very bottom for 1.0851  This was my first time to actually use GLBSE, really cool. I love the new interface. |
|
|
|
|
|
brendio
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:14:10 AM |
|
Boom. Just saw the results today. I snagged some at the very bottom for 1.0851 This was my first time to actually use GLBSE, really cool. I love the new interface. I got in right at the very very bottom for 1.085001. My order was only partly filled. |
|
|
|
|
finkleshnorts
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:18:49 AM |
|
aren't those the ones i sold last night?
|
|
|
|
|
|
PatrickHarnett
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:35:32 AM |
|
Boom. Just saw the results today. I snagged some at the very bottom for 1.0851 This was my first time to actually use GLBSE, really cool. I love the new interface. I got in right at the very very bottom for 1.085001. My order was only partly filled. My brain hurts trying to work out how little a difference that is. 0.000999 So one tenth of a percent over a month - "score!" Worth having - well done being on the cusp  maybe we should have a prize. |
|
|
|
|
|
brendio
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:46:35 AM |
|
aren't those the ones i sold last night?
I dunno. I didn't check the time. I just noticed my bid order was only partially filled. So are you saying you sold at a loss? |
|
|
|
|
brendio
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:48:00 AM |
|
Boom. Just saw the results today. I snagged some at the very bottom for 1.0851 This was my first time to actually use GLBSE, really cool. I love the new interface. I got in right at the very very bottom for 1.085001. My order was only partly filled. My brain hurts trying to work out how little a difference that is. 0.000999 So one tenth of a percent over a month - "score!" Worth having - well done being on the cusp maybe we should have a prize. I would rather have paid the 100,000 satoshis and had my order completely filled. I was AFK over the weekend so just put a bid in beforehand and hoped for the best. |
|
|
|
|
finkleshnorts
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:57:10 AM |
|
aren't those the ones i sold last night?
I dunno. I didn't check the time. I just noticed my bid order was only partially filled. So are you saying you sold at a loss? well last night i partially filled an order at that price. I think the order was for 40 and I sold 5 or 6. yeah i cashed out, i'm just depositing in btcst through another forum member. makes more sense to me, weekly payouts etc. I still made a profit overall by selling my ppt shares to the other order above yours. enjoy! |
|
|
|
|
|
finkleshnorts
|
|
May 21, 2012, 05:58:55 AM |
|
Boom. Just saw the results today. I snagged some at the very bottom for 1.0851 This was my first time to actually use GLBSE, really cool. I love the new interface. I got in right at the very very bottom for 1.085001. My order was only partly filled. My brain hurts trying to work out how little a difference that is. 0.000999 So one tenth of a percent over a month - "score!" Worth having - well done being on the cusp maybe we should have a prize. I would rather have paid the 100,000 satoshis and had my order completely filled. I was AFK over the weekend so just put a bid in beforehand and hoped for the best. me too, i bid on like tuesday lol |
|
|
|
|
Sukrim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006
|
|
May 21, 2012, 08:52:47 AM |
|
Well, congratulations to the mathematically challenged people that are buying PPT.DIV shares for above 1 BTC now - seems like quite a run away from PPT.E at the moment...  |
|
|
|
|
unclescrooge
|
|
May 21, 2012, 09:46:11 AM |
|
I don't know if it's all these pirate pass trough offers of this week-end, but men, the PPT bonds are heading down :/
Just like when I wanted to cash in :/
|
|
|
|
|
|
REF
|
|
May 21, 2012, 02:50:34 PM |
|
I don't know if it's all these pirate pass trough offers of this week-end, but men, the PPT bonds are heading down :/
Just like when I wanted to cash in :/
its the all the new pirate pass offers and that they sold 6000bonds by mistake flooding the market. |
|
|
|
|
imsaguy
General failure and former
VIP
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
Don't send me a pm unless you gpg encrypt it.
|
|
May 21, 2012, 04:07:34 PM |
|
I don't know if it's all these pirate pass trough offers of this week-end, but men, the PPT bonds are heading down :/
Just like when I wanted to cash in :/
its the all the new pirate pass offers and that they sold 6000bonds by mistake flooding the market. They are heading down back closer to where their market price probably should be. .E is funds that are invested, so their market price should follow the time remaining on the bond. The .A bonds aren't available yet, so a person can't really see true market sentiment yet. |
|
|
|
Sukrim
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2618
Merit: 1006
|
|
May 25, 2012, 07:41:46 AM |
|
Interesting that people still seem to want to throw money at you - for 1.08 offers you only get ~18% per month, where other offers pay weekly and pay out over 28% compounded per month or 26% uncompounded. This would mean that everyone who bids more than 1.02 would be better off elsewhere. The only difference is the "insurance" - but this can basically be overcome by simply investing less in pirate and keeping some BTC for yourself.
Considering the competition, do you plan on changing your contracts soon (e.g. weekly payouts, no limit on share amount issued) or will you keep running like this?
|
|
|
|
wachtwoord
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2324
Merit: 1125
|
|
May 25, 2012, 08:22:34 AM |
|
The only difference is the "insurance" - but this can basically be overcome by simply investing less in pirate and keeping some BTC for yourself.
I hope you understand keeping some of the Bitcoins yourself to cover your insurance will lower your effective rate. If you can get 28% per month, keeping the same money back (32%) will lead to a yield of .68*.28=0.1904 (19.04%). So yes, if that is available the price might drop a little as 1.08 yields a 1.28/1.08=1.185 (18.5%) but it's really not that different though. The difference could also be explained by higher trust in this borrower than the competitor. |
|
|
|
|
|
