█║║▌║█[ANN] ROSCOIN [ROS] - X11 - BITSCOINSHOP.COM DEAL!!!, PROFIT SHARE ║█║▌║║█

[jc12345]

look like i will get refund -_- my transaction is still unconfirmed

should not have fel for the fud and just bought in earlier. Time enough.
Dont worry even at 200 sat this one is cheap

  I hope it will be worth a little more then just 200 sats.

If you can nail the anon features it will skyrocket.

[1715028881]

1715028881

[1715028881]

1715028881

[1715028881]

1715028881

[godivacoin]

When will I receive my refund?

Sent you a PM asking which address to refunds it.

[godivacoin]

look like i will get refund -_- my transaction is still unconfirmed

should not have fel for the fud and just bought in earlier. Time enough.
Dont worry even at 200 sat this one is cheap

  I hope it will be worth a little more then just 200 sats.

If you can nail the anon features it will skyrocket.

Anon features will be implemented, currently we are also trying to have a multipool on our side.

Few coins available, most likely huge hashrate, and then in the combination with a multipool...

PS: In talk with multipools doesn't mean that there is already a deal...

Contacted c-cex and allcoins if they want to add #ROSCOIN at launch, they are smaller exchanges but still this will give the smaller exchange some nice revenue too, when they add #ROSCOIN, as i believe based on the transactions in ICO and the activity lately, the volume should be pretty high, unless nobody want to sell his ICO coins

[jc12345]

The devs cant code... they need too buy features with your btc. A real dev can code himself  

If that is the plan, then there is nothing wrong with buying features if it is available as a package and have been developed elsewhere already. Compare it to a company that needs software - there is always the decision to code in-house or buy off-the-shelf which comes down to merits and a business decision on a case-by-case basis. Whatever is the most efficient for the company that increases shareholder value is the correct decision. Another example is whether to keep a function in-house or outsource it, which again comes down to a cost-benefit analysis - whatever makes the most business sense. Even if a company outsources 99% of its functions and use 99% off the shelf products, it does not necessarily mean that the company does not know how to set-up such functions themselves. It might just mean that it would have been more costly and take a longer time to do those functions in-house. You have to remember that the alt-coin environment is hostile where investors have a short attention span and FUD is rife from all directions. The quicker features are added the better and has to be taken into account when determining time-to-market. Delivery of features and short and regular time to market including continuous innovation is the number one priority to keep momentum. Certain features can be implemented quickly without re-inventing the wheel, where other features can be developed in-house over longer time periods, especially if it is something new. A lot can be done in a short timeframe with 13.8 BTC. Even if half of that is used to buy off-the-shelf anon with maintenance for example it is fine as that will provide a nice floor for further longer term development. If the devs are sincere and use the BTC wisely, it will function as a bootstrap to catapult the coin quite far very quickly compared to many other coins.

[barryzand]

This isnt a company mate.. This is crypto currency...

think about this for a minute... If the dev could code... He could go too github or something... copy the damn piece of code... implent it in his own coin... wich costs 0btc   And when youre a pro, you make something from scratch (this is very rare though these days )

Buying / copying features of other devs isnt innovation  


However, I wish you all the best of luck

And Placebo, Prove yourself a man, and dont leave this coin after 1 month / sad volume

I will keep watching this thread, And I might even throw some btc at it when you prove me and the others wrong  


Best of luck 

The devs cant code... they need too buy features with your btc. A real dev can code himself  

Nothing wrong with buying features if it is available as a package and have been developed elsewhere already. Compare it to a company that needs software - there is always the decision to code in-house or buy off-the-shelf which comes down to merits and a business decision on a case-by-case basis. Whatever is the most efficient for the company that increases shareholder value is the correct decision. Another example is whether to keep a function in-house or outsource it, which again comes down to a cost-benefit analysis - whatever makes the most business sense. Even if a company outsources 99% of its functions and use 99% off the shelf products, it does not mean that the company does not know how to set-up such functions themselves. It might just mean that it would have been more costly and take a longer time to do those functions in-house. You have to remember that the alt-coin environment is hostile where investors have a short attention span. The quicker features are added the better and has to be taken into account when determining time-to-market. Certain features can be implemented quickly without re-inventing the wheel, where other features can be developed in-house over longer time periods, especially if it is something new. A lot can be done in a short timeframe with 13.8 BTC. Even if half of that is used to buy off-the-shelf anon it is fine as that will provide a nice floor for further longer term development. If the devs are sincere and use the BTC wisely, it will function as a bootstrap to catapult the coin quite far very quickly.

[longyenthanh]

i missed ico so I will hire some hash to mine 

[jc12345]

This isnt a company mate.. This is crypto currency...

I know a crypto-coin is not a company however, a crypto-coin can best be compared to a company. The match in principles and characteristics is very high. The quicker the alt-coin community realises that, the more coins will be successful. Run a coin as a well funded "company" using the same principles as you would for a company and chances of success is high. Coins become nothing more than highly liquid shares that can be used as tender. Crypto currency is quite far removed from fiat currency and very few principles match. Lets not hijack this thread though for an in-depth discussion on this.

[johnnyrocket]

This isnt a company mate.. This is crypto currency...

I know a crypto-coin is not a company however, a crypto-coin can best be compared to a company. The match in principles and characteristics is very high. The quicker the alt-coin community realises that, the more coins will be successful. Run a coin as a well funded "company" using the same principles as you would for a company and chances of success is high. Crypto currency is quite far removed from fiat currency and very few principles match. Lets not hijack this thread though for an in-depth discussion on this.

Substitute "startup" for "company" and you'll be closer to the truth for most coins.

[barryzand]

This isnt a company mate.. This is crypto currency...

 Lets not hijack this thread though for an in-depth discussion on this.

fair enough   Like I said I will keep watching and thats it...  

[Coinard]

Hey ROS !

I'm new & and I'm not sure how ICO works. Is it safe ?

[godivacoin]

Hey ROS !

I'm new & and I'm not sure how ICO works. Is it safe ?

ICO was safe, it is already finished...so you are too late, unless you deposit 5 BTC

Some people are always too late

[jc12345]

Hey ROS !

I'm new & and I'm not sure how ICO works. Is it safe ?

An ICO is as safe as the dev team's integrity and business skills. Having said that, If you look to the right, those afterburners you see is the plane that took off that you've missed. ICO ended a few hours back. Mining starts tomorrow though.

[SamWalters]

Great job here.

[mrbenjie]

How many coins are not sold during ico?
around 8 milj?

[Coinard]

Hey ROS !

I'm new & and I'm not sure how ICO works. Is it safe ?

ICO was safe, it is already finished...so you are too late, unless you deposit 5 BTC

Some people are always too late

Not the first time

[jc12345]

How many coins are not sold during ico?
around 8 milj?

As far as I understand it, in essence all ICO coins have been sold, just at a lower average price. 5m at 20 sats and 35m at somewhere between 36-39 sats. Had more money been invested, all ICO coins would still have been sold, just at a higher average price up to a max of 50 sats.

[mrbenjie]

OK.

But 40.000.000 coins in ico x let say 39 sat= 15.63900000 BTC but we had 12.6 btc?

[jc12345]

OK.

But 40.000.000 coins in ico x let say 39 sat= 15.63900000 BTC but we had 12.6 btc?

The first BTC was guaranteed a price of 20 sats. So you have to first calculate that which is 5m coins. Then the remaining 35m was sold at around just under 37 sats to get to 12.82 BTC. The 1 BTC  + 12.82 BTC = 13.82 BTC.

Unless I misunderstood, allocation will probably then be:

1 BTC / 0.00000020 = 5,000,000.00000000
12.82092461 / 0.00000050 =  25,641,849.22000000
Total bought at advertised price = 30,641,849.22000000
Remaining = 9,358,150.78000000.

Your share of remaining = your investment / total investment * remaining = your investment / 13.82092461 * 9,358,150.78000000.
Your total allocation = Your purchase at 20 or 50 sats + your share of remaining.

[mrbenjie]

OK.

But 40.000.000 coins in ico x let say 39 sat= 15.63900000 BTC but we had 12.6 btc?

The first BTC was guaranteed a price of 20 sats. So you have to first calculate that which is 5m coins. Then the remaining 35m was sold at around just under 37 sats to get to 12.82 BTC. The 1 BTC  + 12.82 BTC = 13.82 BTC.

Very nice:-)

So we can say that the ICO was a succes!!

[jc12345]

OK.

But 40.000.000 coins in ico x let say 39 sat= 15.63900000 BTC but we had 12.6 btc?

The first BTC was guaranteed a price of 20 sats. So you have to first calculate that which is 5m coins. Then the remaining 35m was sold at around just under 37 sats to get to 12.82 BTC. The 1 BTC  + 12.82 BTC = 13.82 BTC.

Very nice:-)

So we can say that the ICO was a succes!!

That assessment is for the devs to make, but if enough money was raised to implement features and carry the coin through for the next while, then the answer is probably yes.