satoshin@gmx.com is compromised

[1986]

Thank you for sharing. Satoshi accounts will be the main target for hackers to gain access and information. I am pretty sure he is not stupid enough to re use his old accounts with his name!

Cheers

Well, you could argue he was stupid enough to use a email account that could be hacked so easy. While I don't doubt his intelligence it's easy to slip up somewhere and very hard to remain 100% safe and secure and anoymous.

[Cryddit]

Thank you for sharing. Satoshi accounts will be the main target for hackers to gain access and information. I am pretty sure he is not stupid enough to re use his old accounts with his name!

Cheers

I'm pretty sure he's not going to be defending those old usernames either.  If he did, someone could use his actions to track him down.  If you want to be anonymous, you have to just walk away from your old points of contact and abandon them to whatever happens.

So at this point, it's his old ISP's that control the user names, and they will do whatever's their policy with 'em.  Satoshi would have to be insane to try to hang onto them or prevent others from getting them. 

[AGD]

This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.

[Cryddit]

This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.

Why should he give anyone a reason to think otherwise, if he wants to remain anonymous?

[roslinpl]

This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.

Well for his own safety he will be happy if the world will believe in it

IMO - everything is possible. .

[Skatebird]

Its bad we cant know who he is !! Dont understand why he want so much to stay anonymous :/

[Cryddit]

Look, "Satoshi" was a construction made explicitly for the purpose of launching Bitcoin.

That purpose is fulfilled.  The person who created "Satoshi" has no further need for him.  Thus ends the story.

[AGD]

Look, "Satoshi" was a construction made explicitly for the purpose of launching Bitcoin.

That purpose is fulfilled.  The person who created "Satoshi" has no further need for him.  Thus ends the story.

If not there wasn't these 1 million bitcoins in his wallets, which are untouched since his disappearance. There are many ways to spend bitcoins and still be anonymous. Did you know that?
Oh and btw: if he really wanted to stay hidden, why is he letting random hackers have access to 11000 of his private emails instead of simply deleting all content before he vanishes?

[bithound]

This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.

He is not dead. I think SN is not 1 person, he is a big company.

[doubleredrolex]

Prob a group of people.. waiting for BTC to hit $10,000 before they cash out. They prob have another million BTC in other random wallets.

[AGD]

This story only makes sense when I suppose that SN is dead.

He is not dead. I think SN is not 1 person, he is a big company.

A "big company" would have certanly cashed out their 1Mio BTC when the price was over 1000USD.

[NewLiberty]

To imagine one knows the minds or motivations of others is the height of hubris.

[Gyrsur]

so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again?

so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever!

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     satoshin@gmx.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable

but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com

not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out.

[Gleb Gamow]

so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again?

so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever!

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     satoshin@gmx.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable

but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com

not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamoto

He used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org.

[Gyrsur]

so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again?

so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever!

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     satoshin@gmx.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable

but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com

not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamoto

He used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org.

so his vistomail.com Email address still works. 

[NewLiberty]

so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again?

so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever!

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     satoshin@gmx.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable

but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com

not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamoto

He used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org.

so his vistomail.com Email address still works. 

Folks, when you burn an identity, it doesn't matter whether an account remains activated.  This speculation is a waste of your time.
Its even better for anonymity when one of these gets hacked because then there are multiple trails from multiple people touching it.
If someone tried to link the real "satoshi" to any of these accounts, it might not even be our dear friend, it could end up being just the first person to have hacked it after he left it empty and open.

Yes, Satoshi is dead, long live Satoshi.

Move along, nothing to see here.

[Gyrsur]

so what is the end of this story? was the hacker paid to be silence again?

so, it seems GMX decided to remove the account. he is gone forever!

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     satoshin@gmx.com

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain gmx.com by mx01.gmx.com. [74.208.5.27].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable

but we have an other email address: s******@v********.com which is probably satoshi@v********.com

not so difficult to try every email address between satoshi@vaaaaaaaa.com and satoshi@vzzzzzzzz.com and send an email out.

http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/5319/what-is-the-email-of-satoshi-nakamoto

He used satoshin@gmx.com (from original Bitcoin whitepaper) and satoshi@vistomail.com (from email logs). gmx.com is a free email service that may or may not have had location based restrictions on registration at the time. vistomail.com is an email service from anonymousspeech, the domain registrar proxy he used to register bitcoin.org.

so his vistomail.com Email address still works.  

Folks, when you burn an identity, it doesn't matter whether an account remains activated.  This speculation is a waste of your time.
Its even better for anonymity when one of these gets hacked because then there are multiple trails from multiple people touching it.
If someone tried to link the real "satoshi" to any of these accounts, it might not even be our dear friend, it could end up being just the first person to have hacked it after he left it empty and open.

Yes, Satoshi is dead, long live Satoshi.

Move along, nothing to see here.

he is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.

[Cryddit]

He is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.

Not.  Satoshi was never a human.  Satoshi was a pseudonym.  It got used to do something important, and that thing is done.  That is the beginning and end of Satoshi's "pure nature." 

There would be no benefit and great potential for harm to the creator of Bitcoin if he were to ever use "Satoshi" again, and he is not stupid.  Therefore he will never use it again.

[Lazlo]

He is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.

Not.  Satoshi was never a human.  Satoshi was a pseudonym.  It got used to do something important, and that thing is done.  That is the beginning and end of Satoshi's "pure nature." 

There would be no benefit and great potential for harm to the creator of Bitcoin if he were to ever use "Satoshi" again, and he is not stupid.  Therefore he will never use it again.

Who would want to harm satoshi?

[NewLiberty]

He is a human, or not? tag him with his pure nature like 84 percent of all of us here on this stinky place.

Not.  Satoshi was never a human.  Satoshi was a pseudonym.  It got used to do something important, and that thing is done.  That is the beginning and end of Satoshi's "pure nature." 

There would be no benefit and great potential for harm to the creator of Bitcoin if he were to ever use "Satoshi" again, and he is not stupid.  Therefore he will never use it again.

Who would want to harm satoshi?

It matters not.
No one wanted to harm Princess Diana, but that didn't save her from the negative effects of notoriety.
Let it go.