1. BTC is too slow - ordinary folk are not interested in waiting any longer than their debit card takes. They expect and demand a faster technology, not a slower one.
I've never had a bitcoin transaction take me longer than a credit card. I think you are mistaken.
2. The general population is completely oblivious to the fact that the central banks/governments are fleecing them. It's simply too complicated a swindle for them to realise what's going on. The schmucks.
True, but bitcoin provides some significant benefits for both merchants and consumers. In the end, those tangible and valued benefits are what will drive adoption, not some altruistic idealism.
3. The BTC economy now is NOT as Satoshi intended. He intended millions of individual CPU's to do the mining
You are mistaken. While he may (or may not) have understood the likelihood of GPU, FPGA, and ASIC mining, he certainly understood the likelihood of large scale mining operations.
See these quotes from Satoshi:
- snip -
most users should start running client-only software and only the specialist server farms keep running full network nodes
- snip -
- snip -
Bitcoin generation should end up where it's cheapest.
- snip -
Some places where generation will gravitate to:
1) places where it's cheapest or free
- snip -
- snip -
Pool operators can modify their getwork to take one additional parameter, the address to send your share to.
- snip -
New users wouldn't really even need the Bitcoin software. They could download a miner, create an account on mtgox or mybitcoin, enter their deposit address into the miner and point it at anyone's pool server. When the miner says it found something, a while later a few coins show up in their account.
- snip -
4. The much-anticipated remittance opportunity is a dead duck at the moment - it can only work P2P if there is an easy way for people to directly spend their BTC after receiving them. Otherwise, the path is Fiat->BTC->Fiat->delivery (all via a third party, and all using conventional laws covering remittances)
Conventional laws and third parties do not make the remittance opportunity a "dead duck". Regardless, as bitcoin gains usage, the "directly spending" opportunities will increase. There are already many options to "directly spend" bitcoins, and those opportunities will only increase in the future.
5. The media (MSM) have correctly identified BTC as a threat to government power. As the slaves to the elite political class that they are, they have jumped all over the Mt Gox disaster and deliberately terrified the population. Ordinary people are now SCARED to use BTC, thanks to these manipulative MSM bastards.
There once was a time when the
only source of information about current events that people had available to them was what was spoon fed to them from the "mainstream media".
In more modern times, the development of self publishing (social networks, blogs, vlogs, desktop publishing, etc) has resulted in people turning to multiple non-mainstream sources for their information.
6. The big investors - The City, Wall st - they are not fucking interested.
They appear to be beginning to develop some interest. Old, fiscally conservative, institutions are slow to adjust to new paradigms, but they always do eventually.
They can see that cryptos are fully transparent - that's the last thing these criminals want.
Cryptos are not fully transparent. There are many opportunities for obfuscation. MtGox taught that lesson to many people.
7. Many governments are going to squash BTC under their heels (using state laws) under the fake reasoning of combating terrorism/gangsters. (The real reason is that cryptos would hemorrhage power from governments).
Sure. Just like they squashed alchohol, drugs, violent crime, organized crime, and terrorism. I'll believe that they can be successful at that when I see it.
All in all, the picture looks very bleak to me.
And quite rosy to me.
Most of the rise in BTC was due to enthusiastic investors, not enthusiastic users.
Perhaps. Perhaps not. I'm not sure that it matters either way. There clearly are users, and the number of users (as well as the opportunities for use) appear to be continuously increasing.
Now I believe there is going to be a prolonged decline in price.
Perhaps. Perhaps not. I'm not sure that it matters either way. Bitcoin is just as useful at $0.01 per bitcoin as it is at $10,000 per bitcoin.
And I think a different cryptocurrency will eventually take hold.
I don't see any reason for that to happen. It seems highly unlikely to me. Can you explain why you think that way, or is it just something that you hope will happen?
Eventually, there will come a breakout crypto, and it won't be BTC. So place your bets, Ladies and Gentlemen...
I have. I'm pretty certain that Bitcoin
IS the breakout crypto.