dNote (OP)
|
|
September 21, 2014, 10:48:57 PM |
|
That is why my name is dNote, not duckNote. that is why we have dualism in our icon and that is why Bruce Lee is telling you "don't concentrate on the finger". With the new encrypted messenger features based on new cryptography the only way for duck was to go Dark.
Now you are talking. I still like you guys. Carry on. I don't think you ever explained the chess reference though, or did I miss that? We like you like. We appreciate your opinion. Byrne vs. Fischer 1956 Quote 1. Nf3 Nf6 2. c4 g6 3. Nc3 Bg7 4. d4 O-O 5. Bf4 d5 6. Qb3 dc4 7. Qc4 c6 8. e4 Nbd7 9. Rd1 Nb6 10. Qc5 Bg4 11. Bg5 11. Be2 followed by 12 O-O would have been more prudent. The bishop move played allows a sudden crescendo of tactical points to be uncovered by Fischer. -- Wade 11... Na4! 12. Qa3 On 12. Nxa4 Nxe4 and White faces considerable difficulties. 12... Nc3 At first glance, one might think that this move only helps White create a stronger pawn center; however, Fischer's plan is quite the opposite. By eliminating the Knight on c3, it becomes possible to sacrifice the exchange via Nxe4 and smash White's center, while the King remains trapped in the center. 13. bc3 Ne4 The natural continuation of Black's plan. 14. Be7 Qb6 15. Bc4 Nc3 16. Bc5 Rfe8 17. Kf1 Be6!! If this is the game of the century, then 17...Be6!! must be the counter of the century. Fischer offers his queen in exchange for a fierce attack with his minor pieces. Declining this offer is not so easy: 18. Bxe6 leads to a 'Philidor Mate' (smothered mate) with ...Qb5+ 19. Kg1 Ne2+ 20. Kf1 Ng3+ 21. Kg1 Qf1+ 22. Rxf1 Ne2#. Other ways to decline the queen also run into trouble: e.g., 18. Qxc3 Qxc5 18. Bb6 Bc4 19. Kg1 Ne2 20. Kf1 Nd4 This tactical scenario, where a king is repeatedly revealed to checks, is sometimes called a "windmill." 21. Kg1 Ne2 22. Kf1 Nc3 23. Kg1 ab6 24. Qb4 Ra4 25. Qb6 Nd1 26. h3 Ra2 27. Kh2 Nf2 28. Re1 Re1 29. Qd8 Bf8 30. Ne1 Bd5 31. Nf3 Ne4 32. Qb8 b5 Every piece and pawn of the black camp is defended. The white queen has nothing to do. 33. h4 h5 34. Ne5 Kg7 35. Kg1 Bc5 36. Kf1 Ng3 Now Byrne is hopelessly entangled in Fischer's mating net. 37. Ke1 Bb4 38. Kd1 Bb3 39. Kc1 Ne2 40. Kb1 Nc3 41. Kc1 Rc2# http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1008361Dark king wins sacrificing the queen, brilliant chess game. We made a reference, because of: (1) One of the most significant chess games where Black wins. (2) We sacrificing the queen (duck) to go ahead and "win the game" with the Dark king - DarkNote.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
smooth
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2968
Merit: 1198
|
|
September 21, 2014, 11:08:55 PM |
|
Dark king wins sacrificing the queen, brilliant chess game.
We made a reference, because of: (1) One of the most significant chess games where Black wins. (2) We sacrificing the queen (duck) to go ahead and "win the game" with the Dark king - DarkNote.
Brilliant to reference it that way! Thank you for explaining. Even several of us who figured out the game of the century reference had no idea why.
|
|
|
|
Rias
|
|
September 22, 2014, 07:40:03 AM |
|
The rebranding is quite surprising, but it seems like you really anticipated it. Great work! I'm waiting for the Mac version though.
|
|
|
|
joewills
|
|
September 22, 2014, 10:26:02 AM |
|
The New wallet work normal. But I can receive more than 500 000 XDN from poloniex but can't withdrawl more than 500 000XDN from my wallet to Hitbtc. And Had Dev connected with poloniex to add the paymentID in withdrawl address? Make the change easier,Thx.
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2014, 02:53:02 PM Last edit: September 22, 2014, 04:54:30 PM by dNote |
|
|
|
|
|
joewills
|
|
September 22, 2014, 02:58:13 PM |
|
souds good. Let me test it.
|
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2014, 05:02:32 PM |
|
With mining enabling, we fixed BIG sized transactions issue and we made a History linking to blockchain explorer. please, test new GUI Client. http://darknote.cc/download
|
|
|
|
|
dzust
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
|
September 22, 2014, 06:24:08 PM |
|
How many coins in the end?
|
|
|
|
kkraus69
|
|
September 22, 2014, 06:45:44 PM |
|
Total DarkNote after approximately 77 years: 8 589 869 056 XDN How many coins in the end?
|
|
|
|
innergy
|
|
September 22, 2014, 07:42:12 PM |
|
What a complete bullshit al this!! Rename coin to ride on the Darkcoin wave,no explanation how all this work in detail like Darkcoin is a complete fail,just a stupid hype,Darknote get real...
+100
|
|
|
|
Digithusiast
|
|
September 22, 2014, 08:40:53 PM |
|
long time ago, some people had the courage to sail to the edge of the world and risk to fall off, only to discover it is round
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2014, 09:49:06 PM |
|
long time ago, some people had the courage to sail to the edge of the world and risk to fall off, only to discover it is round
Some of us has that courage and inspiration now. We pay a lot of time and attention to make DarkNote the best cryptocurrency ever.
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2014, 10:05:06 PM |
|
Users should notice that we moved blockchain out of RAM. Now any user can launch his own DarkNoted daemon on any hardware.
|
|
|
|
matrix961
|
|
September 22, 2014, 10:53:43 PM |
|
Users should notice that we moved blockchain out of RAM. Now any user can launch his own DarkNoted daemon on any hardware.
So you moved it from memory to db or something like that when running a local daemon? When using the remote option it's connecting to a remote daemon instance correct? So it's like a lightweight wallet right? So if that's right then a mobile wallet could be possible at some point?
|
|
|
|
akula999
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:24:07 PM |
|
Any chance you can add a feature which will update the client without downloading it manually. create an "Update" button which will automatically update the wallet?
|
Bitcoin: 1FzZehkiwfeeUmfmBrym8VvXX7gUj3miHe XMR: 4AqrzGPfEKeZrVXyPDNXUrNeKZZGNYiXMDoY49PvdffKNTRg6xp2Qz74SZ72gT5F9HH8Vaic99ndRg6 UBGcVijaNStQjwwf
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:48:13 PM |
|
Users should notice that we moved blockchain out of RAM. Now any user can launch his own DarkNoted daemon on any hardware.
So you moved it from memory to db or something like that when running a local daemon? When using the remote option it's connecting to a remote daemon instance correct? So it's like a lightweight wallet right? So if that's right then a mobile wallet could be possible at some point? We moved blockchain our of RAM. Now any daemon keeps full blockchain on hardrive, like Bitcoin. So any user can run the whole XDN instance. Light client (wallet) do not store blockchain, but interact with remote daemon - blockchain-keeper. You can use DarkNote client in both "light" and "heavy" mode. Heavy mode means, that you should run your local DarkNoted daemon and connect to it with "Connections - Connect to local DarkNoted". Sure, mobile wallet is possible, with High Level API! And we got it in roadmap, we are working on it too!
|
|
|
|
dNote (OP)
|
|
September 22, 2014, 11:49:20 PM |
|
Any chance you can add a feature which will update the client without downloading it manually. create an "Update" button which will automatically update the wallet? Interesting suggestion, thank you, we will think about.
|
|
|
|
tricass
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 394
Merit: 250
Crypto enthusiast
|
|
September 23, 2014, 02:13:35 AM |
|
I've sent money from my simplewallet Then it appeared on blockchain, waited for a long time to be confirmed But then it's not seen on the chain Also the coins are gone wtf dude? Have you seen your transaction included in blockchain or in transaction pool. Probably you have seen it in tx pool and you transaction was too big sized, so it was rejected by miners and you receive your XDN back. All users you should understand the logic of XDN and any other CryptoNote coin: There is a tx median. XDN default tx median size = 32kb. So each block that is below that size (sum of all transactions in it) will have BASE_BLOCK_REWARD and transactions in that block will be included in blockchain any way. Sometimes blocks can be bigger than 32kb, in that case BASE_BLOCK_REWARD will be decreased to protect network and blockchain. Usually biggest size of transaction that can be included in blockchain = 1.3*current_effective_median_size, or +30%. Some "hero pools", sometimes can include bogger transactions, but block rewards will be under big penalty. By some reasons (E.G. structure of inputs/outputs of your "mining" transactions) you may produce BIG sized transaction. If you transaction if 2x time > than current tx median size, you transaction will never be included in blockchain, and will be rejected by all miners. Next week we will solve that problem, by rejecting all BIG transaction on wallet-client level. As for now, you should just produce smaller sized transactions, by lowering coins amount or lowering mixin count. sometimes even 1000XDN amount can cause Big transactions, if your mining transactions was too small E.G. if you receive this 1000XDN with 10000 small 0.1 XDN transactions. That sounds progressive. thanks for the explanation. this was causing me real problems for a long while. whilst it's a pain to issue multiple transfer it's a lot less of a pain than waiting around to see if it makes it on a blockchain and if not having to restore your wallet from a point before sending those transactions! more of an issue now that i get smaller amounts from pool mining. gone are the days when you get like 10,000+ coins at a time from the pool.
|
|
|
|
|