KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks

[kano]

I moved to Kanopool at the end of April. When I saw 2 blocks daily and 0.0007 BTC per THs per day. Since then the number is reducing steadily, In April, there were 2 blocks daily on average. Now the pool size is increased by 50%+ (from 40-60PH) but the number of blocks is not increased by proportion. Actually BTC per THs per day is 0.0005 now. I know some is due to difficulty. But the difficulty does not increase that much. Maybe Kanopool was very lucky in April.

Firstly, and most importantly, no pools can expect to get better than 100% luck. That's a fact.

If we get better than 100% one month, there's no reason the next month will be the same.
It may be better, it may be 100%, or it may be worse.

There's a table on the Blocks page VRobb linked for you to look at.
That shows the PPS% reward the pool has paid in total each month.
Use that as a guide to see what you are getting approximately, and compare that to other pools.

As for BTC per TH per day - it's currently expected to be 0.00044904696 BTC at 100% PPS.
You can see the BTC per hour per THs on my "Pool BTC Calculator" http://tradebtc.net/bitcalc.php

However, this is a PPLNS pool, not a PPS pool.
So your rewards will vary with pool luck, but should average out long term to be better than pretty much every other pool.

[1714910952]

1714910952

[1714910952]

1714910952

[1714910952]

1714910952

[ComputerGenie]

I very much doubt any of the core devs would take any interest in that idea I had years ago - it's a hard fork ... ....

I very much doubt that they would be interested in any idea that didn't include 100% support for segwit. I get the impression that even if a "perfect" solution presented itself, and that solution didn't include segwit, they still would not be interested in hearing the merits of such a solution.

[os2sam]

I very much doubt any of the core devs would take any interest in that idea I had years ago - it's a hard fork ... ....

I very much doubt that they would be interested in any idea that didn't include 100% support for segwit. I get the impression that even if a "perfect" solution presented itself, and that solution didn't include segwit, they still would not be interested in hearing the merits of such a solution.

The perfect solution to SegWit would be to remove P2SH which caused the problem in the first place.

Kano's solution does sound really cool, but it is a bit radical, but less radical than the other *solutions*.

[kano]

kano, what is your thought on developing a tx accelerator feature on your pool? I see a lot of positive needs on this feature nowadays while this could bring a bit more revenue on miners here. I understand this pool is still small but there are tons of people out there getting stuck for 24 hours+ easily these days.

EDIT:
Also, would you consider adding paid service to allow user leaving custom message onto the block? yes I understand with current BTC/byte this is not much practical but one never knows. Maybe there are some special events or meanings for someone like today?

A TX accelerator means the pool gets lower txn fees.
The point of an accelerator is to include transactions that are being ignored, due to the fact the user paid transaction fees lower than other transactions.

The solution is to pay fees that relate to how quickly you want a transaction confirmed.

If this is in any way related to payouts, then as I've mentioned a few times, this will change once I get around to adding 'accounting' to KDB
(which will mean I can add to how the payouts work)

[clgrissom3]

Block! by mikese
A7v2

A good start to BLOCK FRIDAY!

[overcon]

WoW 

Last    Block
Pool:     57m (467036)
Network:     41m 23s (467038)

[huynhdat1989]

Block! by mikese
A7v2

Another FAT one with 3.73 in fees!

Thanks Wanna Cry, that guy help us get a lot of transaction fee )

[SA Bitcoin Brothers]

BLOCK Friday guys and girls! One already, lets make it FIVE!!

[kano]

Block! by blockmines
S9v2
4.3BTC Txn Fees

[DarKSm0ke]

wow mining fees are skyrocketing!
I bet that a lot of people are trying to move money around to catch up with btc price rise

[kano]

wow mining fees are skyrocketing!
I bet that a lot of people are trying to move money around to catch up with btc price rise

Well it's finally gone over $2k USD (on bitfinex) so maybe that's why

[clgrissom3]

Block! by blockmines
S9v2
4.3BTC Txn Fees

Wow, love the fees...amd BLOCK FRIDAY continues with our 2nd of the day!

[GWhisper]

I think it's time we stopped slacking off and made a run for the bright green blocks, much like we did in April. What do you say guys - are you with me?

[overcon]

I have two USB ASIC miners, is it possible to add them to my meager hashrate, since they are just sitting around? It's another 600GHz or so. Anyone know a miner software that works with them and this pool?

[notabeliever]

What are the called? Because I use Cgminer for some and BFgminer for the compacs. Multiminer worked at one point however its just easier to launch it from a batch file using cgminer. http://www.multiminerapp.com/

[overcon]

I am not really sure they have a brand. Both of them look identical other than one is gold with a B (bitcoin) symbol on it and a small heat sink and the other is black. I have tried cgminer, but it doesn't detect them. No matter what driver I install using zdag. I had them working once using the client from bitminer, but I don't mine there so seems a waste. i think I might have 0.000034 accumulated, but that was before I got my Antminers.
i just keep seeing them around and think, I could run those and add a bit

[kano]

I have two USB ASIC miners, is it possible to add them to my meager hashrate, since they are just sitting around? It's another 600GHz or so. Anyone know a miner software that works with them and this pool?

I'd expect you mean 60GHs?

The main issue will be that you'll have to wait until they find a few high diff shares (2052) before they'll switch to a slightly lower diff (242) that will still be quite high for them.
The starting diff here is (as I said) 2052 - but even that's a little low these days for new miners.
The lower limit (242) is in place to stop miners from ddosing the server with low diff shares - which is very easy to do if the lower limit is too low.

At the moment we get about 1600 shares per second for the entire 65PHs, but you can make a single miner do that easily enough if the pool allows a low enough limit.

[clgrissom3]

I have two USB ASIC miners, is it possible to add them to my meager hashrate, since they are just sitting around? It's another 600GHz or so. Anyone know a miner software that works with them and this pool?

I'd expect you mean 60GHs?

The main issue will be that you'll have to wait until they find a few high diff shares (2052) before they'll switch to a slightly lower diff (242) that will still be quite high for them.
The starting diff here is (as I said) 2052 - but even that's a little low these days for new miners.
The lower limit (242) is in place to stop miners from ddosing the server with low diff shares - which is very easy to do if the lower limit is too low.

At the moment we get about 1600 shares per second for the entire 65PHs, but you can make a single miner do that easily enough if the pool allows a low enough limit.

It depends how you want to use them...if you just want to have a cmd cgminer window open to see notices directly from CKPool it's pretty cool.  If you want to add to your reward they will not do much...you may be better off doing one of the BTC drip faucets every hour.

[wmabern]

Jerry Cat says, "Meooowwww".

Translated, that means COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!

CRACK BABY, CRACKKKKK on this HOT Block Friday!!!!!  

[firetreeactual]

Wowzers...200+K unconfirmed transactions in the mempool...my full node is running over 100 connections.

And...CEX just now listed BTC at USD$2K.

Yowza...