KanoPool since 2014 🐈 - PPLNS and Solo 0.5% fee - Worldwide - 2436 blocks

[philipma1957]

Rn ita at 700hz or ghz idk. But its very inconsistent like anuwhere from 5.8 to 3.9?

you are short power  and you drop hash when short power.


the better psu may allow you to stay high and get closer to  the 5.8


or you may find  that   freq 687.5  and the titanium   are really good giving you 5.67  but solid.

[1715653726]

1715653726

[1715653726]

1715653726

[1715653726]

1715653726

[Jigor]

ok so the ax1500i and  687 freq will maby give me a good stable hash?

[beltsniffer]

Block by blockmines! Nice fat one with 2.6 in fees!

[blockchainmines]

Nice to see that mining is alive and well.

@Kano, have you considered signalling segwit in order to push it closer to activation? With SegWit activated your pool will be able to include more transactions per block which obviously translates to more fees for your miners. Right now the 1mb limit is forcing you to forfeit transactions to the next miner because you can only include 1mb per block you find atm.

No offense but you really do not understand Segwits at all.  In fact Segwits will do the exact opposite of what you just described.  All segwits does is softfork the bitcoin blockchain to allow developers such as the lightnting network to create and entire offchain psuedo validation service so people can use bitcoin without actually having their transaction validated on chain.  Yup you heard it right, your transaction would be in what is best described as an off chain time lock that the lightning network would then conduct as many transactions as possible (keeping all the fees to themselves) and at the end of the timelock they would get the entire blob of transactions validated on the blockchain as a single transaction with just the 1 fee going back to the miners. 

Don't let the news or Segwits propaganda sites tell you how it works.  Actually did in to the facts and read about it.  It is a horrible solution and one that could fuck bitcoin up big time once you once you open that hole start to let developers into the blockchain.  Bad idea. 

[Apprentice]

Is anyone running on the new T9 firmware (28 April)?

[philipma1957]

Nice to see that mining is alive and well.

@Kano, have you considered signalling segwit in order to push it closer to activation? With SegWit activated your pool will be able to include more transactions per block which obviously translates to more fees for your miners. Right now the 1mb limit is forcing you to forfeit transactions to the next miner because you can only include 1mb per block you find atm.

No offense but you really do not understand Segwits at all.  In fact Segwits will do the exact opposite of what you just described.  All segwits does is softfork the bitcoin blockchain to allow developers such as the lightnting network to create and entire offchain psuedo validation service so people can use bitcoin without actually having their transaction validated on chain.  Yup you heard it right, your transaction would be in what is best described as an off chain time lock that the lightning network would then conduct as many transactions as possible (keeping all the fees to themselves) and at the end of the timelock they would get the entire blob of transactions validated on the blockchain as a single transaction with just the 1 fee going back to the miners.  

Don't let the news or Segwits propaganda sites tell you how it works.  Actually did in to the facts and read about it.  It is a horrible solution and one that could fuck bitcoin up big time once you once you open that hole start to let developers into the blockchain.  Bad idea.  

I agree I see Segwit as death for BTC

In fact I see the rise of alt coin gpu mining as a reaction to segwit by big money miners.
Kano  does not say much about segwit as this thread suffered a lot of spam a while back due to pro segwit people angry that kana spoke against it.

@ kano fell free to delete this I don"t want to heat segwit up.
@ Jigor   finding your best freq   will give you good stable hash  you will know you got the right freq when your hard ware errors go to .0050 or less

[Jigor]

Where do i check the errors?

Its under the Diff1# and DiffA# right?

Ill prob raid the freq by 10 every time alet it run for a few mins.

[wmabern]

Where do i check the errors?

Its under the Diff1# and DiffA# right?

Ill prob raid the freq by 10 every time alet it run for a few mins.

You will need to let it run for much longer than a few minutes to get a real idea of how that freq. will behave.
Hours or more, IMHO.

[philipma1957]

Where do i check the errors?

Its under the Diff1# and DiffA# right?

Ill prob raid the freq by 10 every time alet it run for a few mins.

You will need to let it run for much longer than a few minutes to get a real idea of how that freq. will behave.
Hours or more, IMHO.

I agree 2 hours on each test maybe 3 or 4

[Jigor]

Ok

[philipma1957]

Ok

yeah setup can take time  but once you have it at a good freq they can run 30 or 60 days or more with nothing to do but look on the screen to check hash rate.

[Jigor]

Do you have some s7's? If so what th/s do you get.

[blockchainmines]

Nice to see that mining is alive and well.

@Kano, have you considered signalling segwit in order to push it closer to activation? With SegWit activated your pool will be able to include more transactions per block which obviously translates to more fees for your miners. Right now the 1mb limit is forcing you to forfeit transactions to the next miner because you can only include 1mb per block you find atm.

No offense but you really do not understand Segwits at all.  In fact Segwits will do the exact opposite of what you just described.  All segwits does is softfork the bitcoin blockchain to allow developers such as the lightnting network to create and entire offchain psuedo validation service so people can use bitcoin without actually having their transaction validated on chain.  Yup you heard it right, your transaction would be in what is best described as an off chain time lock that the lightning network would then conduct as many transactions as possible (keeping all the fees to themselves) and at the end of the timelock they would get the entire blob of transactions validated on the blockchain as a single transaction with just the 1 fee going back to the miners.  

Don't let the news or Segwits propaganda sites tell you how it works.  Actually did in to the facts and read about it.  It is a horrible solution and one that could fuck bitcoin up big time once you once you open that hole start to let developers into the blockchain.  Bad idea.  

I agree I see Segwit as death for BTC

In fact I see the rise of alt coin gpu mining as a reaction to segwit by big money miners.
Kano  does not say much about segwit as this thread suffered a lot of spam a while back due to pro segwit people angry that kana spoke against it.

@ kano fell free to delete this I don"t want to heat segwit up.
@ Jigor   finding your best freq   will give you good stable hash  you will know you got the right freq when your hard ware errors go to .0050 or less

To sum it up Segwits, is it is not about the miners at all.  It is about turning bitcoin transactions and confirmations into Third Party Programs that have no business even talking about our currency.  Yes, I  say ours because every miner has dumped a significant amount of money to become part of a great peer to peer network.  They pay for their miner, their power bill, their internet bill to support the greatest thing to happen to currency with minimal returns up front.  I am constantly amazed when I read the ridiculous articles online and then you get the comments believing that if we adopted segwits the block size automatically increases.  HUH??  Some people you just cannot explain it too no matter how much you try.  Does our block size need to increase? Yes, but Segwits is not even an option for increasing block size, it is off chain mining, I repeat off chain mining or in an other term it is a way for greedy developers to profit from bitcoin off the back off the miners while preaching to the masses bitcoin is not about the miners.  Plus opening a hole in the code that allows for developers who never owned a miner in their life to come in and start making money on our currency using our blockchain.  There are so many things wrong with it.    

[philipma1957]

Do you have some s7's? If so what th/s do you get.

I had them 2 years ago.

 Some did  freq 675 Some did freq 612

there were at least 5 different speeds in those batches.

My power is a bit high so I moved to avalon 721 and Bitmain s-9

[Jigor]

My power here is $0.10. Per kw
Is that high or low.

Im thinking about getting a s9. If my dad would loan me more money.

[wmabern]

To sum it up Segwits, is it is not about the miners at all.  It is about turning bitcoin transactions and confirmations into Third Party Programs that have no business even talking about our currency.  Yes, I  say ours because every miner has dumped a significant amount of money to become part of a great peer to peer network.  They pay for their miner, their power bill, their internet bill to support the greatest thing to happen to currency with minimal returns up front.  I am constantly amazed when I read the ridiculous articles online and then you get the comments believing that if we adopted segwits the block size automatically increases.  HUH??  Some people you just cannot explain it too no matter how much you try.  Does our block size need to increase? Yes, but Segwits is not even an option for increasing block size, it is off chain mining, I repeat off chain mining or in an other term it is a way for greedy developers to profit from bitcoin off the back off the miners while preaching to the masses bitcoin is not about the miners.  Plus opening a hole in the code that allows for developers who never owned a miner in their life to come in and start making money on our currency using our blockchain.  There are so many things wrong with it.    

Mr. Blockchainmines, that's is just about exactly how I see it. I don't have a fraction of the hash that you or many other people have, but I have still put in a lot of time, effort, sweat, money, and babying to keep my miners up and running and as happy as they can be running in a small spare bedroom.

Call me greedy, but I call it getting the best return that I can on my investments and the hard work I have put into it. I see no reason (or benefit) to help some clowns make large quantities of cash on my hard work. The "off-chain" transactions that these people support are ridiculous as they want to leave the miner out of most (all) of the benefits of their scheme. And yes, it is a scheme. It is only beneficial to the developers of LN and segwit. All of these half-assed proposals like BU and the like are just as worthless and dangerous.

Without us miners there would be no Bitcoin. But there can certainly be Bitcoin without LN or segwit. And that's the way it will continue. Until someone offers up a workable, fair, and secure method of scaling that benefits more people than it hurts, I'm content right where we are for the present time.

MINE ON!!! COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!   

[Jigor]

more blockss plz

[kano]

I added an (automatic) 'tooltip' to all the graphs - hope you all find it useful

On touch screens/tablets/phones you tap on the graph and on a PC you just move the mouse over it.
It selects the closest point, of all graph lines, less than 100 pixels away.

[firetreeactual]

To sum it up Segwits, is it is not about the miners at all.  It is about turning bitcoin transactions and confirmations into Third Party Programs that have no business even talking about our currency.  Yes, I  say ours because every miner has dumped a significant amount of money to become part of a great peer to peer network.  They pay for their miner, their power bill, their internet bill to support the greatest thing to happen to currency with minimal returns up front.  I am constantly amazed when I read the ridiculous articles online and then you get the comments believing that if we adopted segwits the block size automatically increases.  HUH??  Some people you just cannot explain it too no matter how much you try.  Does our block size need to increase? Yes, but Segwits is not even an option for increasing block size, it is off chain mining, I repeat off chain mining or in an other term it is a way for greedy developers to profit from bitcoin off the back off the miners while preaching to the masses bitcoin is not about the miners.  Plus opening a hole in the code that allows for developers who never owned a miner in their life to come in and start making money on our currency using our blockchain.  There are so many things wrong with it.    

Mr. Blockchainmines, that's is just about exactly how I see it. I don't have a fraction of the hash that you or many other people have, but I have still put in a lot of time, effort, sweat, money, and babying to keep my miners up and running and as happy as they can be running in a small spare bedroom.

Call me greedy, but I call it getting the best return that I can on my investments and the hard work I have put into it. I see no reason (or benefit) to help some clowns make large quantities of cash on my hard work. The "off-chain" transactions that these people support are ridiculous as they want to leave the miner out of most (all) of the benefits of their scheme. And yes, it is a scheme. It is only beneficial to the developers of LN and segwit. All of these half-assed proposals like BU and the like are just as worthless and dangerous.

Without us miners there would be no Bitcoin. But there can certainly be Bitcoin without LN or segwit. And that's the way it will continue. Until someone offers up a workable, fair, and secure method of scaling that benefits more people than it hurts, I'm content right where we are for the present time.

MINE ON!!! COMEONBLOCKSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!   

I have to add my 25 Satoshi's worth...you're both right on, in my humble low-hash opinion. I've worked in high-end banking (investigations), and I've been in IT since they were steel chassis and vacuum tubes (yes, I have actually put my hands on a real Turing machine).

All that said, my last (and longest) profession in behavioral science (and yes, I occasionally like to refer to some forms of it as BS) has me both giggling and shaking my head at some of the "logic" I see in the arguments. Most are based on plain and simple greed, peppered with a really clear NON-understanding of the blockchain, or even of basic currency dynamics. A big reason why I mine here is that us "little folks" can commiserate with a whale or two in pure equality, share our data and experience, and try to build a better blockchain for the planet...not just ourselves. This is way beyond who has the most fiat. 

[kano]

Block! by recline
S9v2
1.87BTC txn fees