CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Stable 57 mh with 315 watt tdp ( from psu ) -i 26 sp-mod 4
P.P.S sp how can i help you to tune 1080 and 1080 ti cards?

57MHASH is a good result.
#3 was compiled with cuda 8.0 and I think the latest cuda version is producing faster code on the 1080ti.
I was a bit fast with the #5 release, I have some cpu usage that's not needed. Might send out another version later today.

[du44]

Stable 57 mh with 315 watt tdp ( from psu ) -i 26 sp-mod 4
P.P.S sp how can i help you to tune 1080 and 1080 ti cards?

57MHASH is a good result.
#3 was compiled with cuda 8.0 and I think the latest cuda version is producing faster code on the 1080ti.
I was a bit fast with the #5 release, I have some cpu usage that's not needed. Might send out another version later today.

Ok, i'll post results immediately when get a new version.

[btckvn]

sp_,

I'm getting the same result as e6ug.

skunk5 shows more hash on miner but less hash @ pool

The hash at pool is far less with skunk mod 5 (x64) using 1080 ti's. Hashrate at pool is 75% lower. I changed back to sp mod 1 and the pool immediately showed a more equal hashrate with miner

[mantor84]

Stable 57 mh with 315 watt tdp ( from psu ) -i 26 sp-mod 4
P.P.S sp how can i help you to tune 1080 and 1080 ti cards?

57MHASH is a good result.
#3 was compiled with cuda 8.0 and I think the latest cuda version is producing faster code on the 1080ti.
I was a bit fast with the #5 release, I have some cpu usage that's not needed. Might send out another version later today.

Glad you still keeping up your work and try to improve the miner. "Thumbs up!"

[HellMar]

sp_,

I'm getting the same result as e6ug.

skunk5 shows more hash on miner but less hash @ pool

The hash at pool is far less with skunk mod 5 (x64) using 1080 ti's. Hashrate at pool is 75% lower. I changed back to sp mod 1 and the pool immediately showed a more equal hashrate with miner

Same thing to me. Miner tells approx 149mh but on pool i see only 66mh. Now use sp#3.

[du44]

sp_,

I'm getting the same result as e6ug.

skunk5 shows more hash on miner but less hash @ pool

The hash at pool is far less with skunk mod 5 (x64) using 1080 ti's. Hashrate at pool is 75% lower. I changed back to sp mod 1 and the pool immediately showed a more equal hashrate with miner

Same thing to me. Miner tells approx 149mh but on pool i see only 66mh. Now use sp#3.

Can confirm hashrate issue... Only 50-60% of the miner hashrate with sp-mod5 ( geforce 1070 and 1060 rigs )

[sp_]

yes. I have found the bug. will send out a new version soon.

[dt8666]

skunk5 shows more hash on miner but less hash @ pool

same here..

@sp_

What is the reason? are we getting effective less hashrate so will get less share on pool?

[humpi]

I also have the same problem. Will test the new one when released.

are you making the miner optimized for lower tdp?

[strossuss]

sp_, any solution for P106-100 hashrate? im only getting 16mh, regular 1060 card gives me 20mh

[Haik]

Yes, i have switched to older version too.
Also, your number 5 still shows 4th version.  

[sp_]

Building now. will send out in 10 minutes.

[sp_]

file sendt.

signatum sp-mod #5 fixed

[dt8666]

Suprvnova now hitting almost 8000 workers!!! OMG!

[NameTaken]

Block over 25000 now so the reward will half in a few days.

[dt8666]

file sendt.

signatum sp-mod #5 fixed

We use ccminer or ccminer64?

Does it mean ccminer64 is for 64-bit os?

[HellMar]

file sendt.

signatum sp-mod #5 fixed

Seems it run normal.

[dt8666]

my 1080ti using the same oc setting was ok and smooth with SP3.

with sp5_fixed keep resetting!

with 1070 is ok

[pthatung]

I use sp#4 skunk 1080ti got 52mhs tdp 80 core 90 mem -500 better than sp#5

[fr4nkthetank]

damn that TDP sp, its hot enough outside please think of the planet   You guys maybe better off investing that 0.05btc in buying SIGT,this coin is going to the moon, my spidy-sense is telling me