D8V1D
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 01:31:28 AM Last edit: August 08, 2017, 02:26:33 AM by D8V1D |
|
Wow rude. SP has done great work for us. He has mods with significant improvements for almost every algorithm. Sigt and Spreadcoin have been the most profitable coins to mine for almost a month now, but hey keep mining your ETH. Nvidia gpus are still the best, they beat AMD in both the Ethash (32MH/s 1070) and Equihash (740 H/s 1080 Ti) algorithms. Until we see the performance of RX Vega, Nvidia is still king.
|
|
|
|
du44
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 03:34:33 AM |
|
Some words about 1080 and 1080 ti for sp... I have tried to compile some miners, including krnlx signatum version. x32 gives best perfomance with CUDA 7.5 for this gpu's
|
hello
|
|
|
zijieli
Member

Offline
Activity: 91
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 04:52:12 AM |
|
Bitcore sp-mod # 2 seems to be a problem, a lot of 'b00000' do not know the problem of the pool or the software Today's rejection rate is very high, I have been using the same bat file, has been very good, but today refused to rate, please tell me how to do
=========================== 17-08-08 12:50:29] [S/A/T]: 3/8166/9197, diff: 0.697, 77.44MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:50:59] [S/A/T]: 3/8167/9198, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:50:59] [S/A/T]: 3/8168/9199, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:50:59] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9200, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9201, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo [2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id [2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9202, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo [2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id [2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9203, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo [2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id [2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9204, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo [2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id [2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9205, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo [2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id [2017-08-08 12:51:44] [S/A/T]: 3/8170/9206, diff: 0.719, 77.41MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:51:53] [S/A/T]: 3/8171/9207, diff: 11.077, 77.41MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:51:57] [S/A/T]: 3/8172/9208, diff: 0.888, 77.41MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:52:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8173/9209, diff: 0.284, 77.41MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:52:03] [S/A/T]: 3/8174/9210, diff: 0.388, 77.41MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:52:10] [S/A/T]: 3/8175/9211, diff: 0.515, 77.41MH/s yes! [2017-08-08 12:52:23] [S/A/T]: 3/8176/9212, diff: 0.267, 77.41MH/s
|
|
|
|
wajiminer
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 05:11:35 AM |
|
Sp you should start a paid service to offer advice where to point miners/what coin to mine 
|
|
|
|
HeroKung
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 07:38:36 AM |
|
waiting for version mod 6 > with fee 1-2%
^^"
|
|
|
|
fhakenzz
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 08:15:29 AM |
|
is spreadcoin profitable right now?
|
|
|
|
kryztoval
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 08:30:20 AM |
|
sp_ do you have a linux version of the skunk mod for signatum? Sp you should start a paid service to offer advice where to point miners/what coin to mine  I have a beta bot that does what nicehash does, with any miners you tell it to use, in windows and linux, as services or batch files.  It depends on whattomine to do the calculations right now. and you can totally make a nicehash only version for linux if you change the configuration file to only use nicehash pools. It currently does NOT support: splitting of cards (unless you run multiple copies) dual mining algos (not listed in whattomine, so can't calculate that) status of the miner (it starts and stops them, but can't figure out if they are running or not as of now).
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 09:19:49 AM |
|
Liar. Alexis78 ccminer whose work you use in most of your miners had nist5 algo from the beginning more than a year ago.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 09:26:11 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
|
|
|
|
shadowhlohavec
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 207
Merit: 100
NoizChain
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 09:37:17 AM |
|
hey guys how are you doing with your nexus mining? I'm mining with 800mhs using private miner and intensity 6 to prevent crashing but I didn't find any blocks for 48 hours  my wallet is synced and has 8 connections, do you think it can be because of lowered intensity? thanks
|
|
|
|
miner32342
Full Member
 
Offline
Activity: 599
Merit: 100
PointPay.io
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 09:46:46 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
http://rgho.st/8qms9tygbnist5 It gives an acceleration of 53.3 mh
|
|
|
|
alexis78
Member

Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 09:53:05 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
So... Why you sell my fork and not yours then? I've just 1 commit... I'm sure you can do yours 1001 commits and merge those "tiny" differences between our forks
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 09:58:29 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
I understand that. And anyway you make good job. I just noticed that lie is not good thing. You are the last person to tell that no gpu miner for nist5 exist. Also with the pools. CXT&CTIC2 were already on popular pools for some time (sorry for my bad sequence of tenses).
|
|
|
|
Amph
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3276
Merit: 1072
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 10:02:40 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
this is hilarious, because your work were also based on alexis work
|
|
|
|
rednoW
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1510
Merit: 1003
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 10:12:52 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.
Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
Lie! Alexis was the first to implement shared mem technique that gives the significant boost
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 10:20:59 AM |
|
Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash. Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.
Lie! Alexis was the first to implement shared mem technique that gives the significant boost In nist5? nope. Alexis improved AES by moving some of the precalc tables from shared mem to the level 1 cache. This give a significant boost in most of the X algos. (x11,x13,x15,x17) The nist 5 isn't using AES.
|
|
|
|
Q_R_V
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 428
Merit: 250
Inactivity: 8963
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 10:37:29 AM |
|
The nist 5 isn't using AES.
Can't argue with that.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 10:42:11 AM |
|
You are the last person to tell that no gpu miner for nist5 exist.
Gpu miners exist, but most of the new coins you see today doesn't support mining with the JSON-RPC html protocol (getwork()) in the wallet. This meens that without a pool, you cannot use ccminer or sgminer to solo-mine. I linked 2 new coins and asked for pools, and it turned out that they had pools already. Here is my original mesage.
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 11:30:09 AM |
|
You are the last person to tell that no gpu miner for nist5 exist.
Gpu miners exist, but most of the new coins you see today doesn't support mining with the JSON-RPC html protocol (getwork()) in the wallet. This meens that without a pool, you cannot use ccminer or sgminer to solo-mine. I linked 2 new coins and asked for pools, and it turned out that they had pools already. Here is my original mesage. And that is what I pointed on. It is lie. Because Gpu miners exist (for at least a year and you definitely knew that as far as you uses best of them as the basis), pools exist (CTIC2 had the pool from the beginning).
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
August 08, 2017, 01:37:58 PM Last edit: August 08, 2017, 01:51:09 PM by sp_ |
|
No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).
I didn't lie. I didn't find a pool, there are no pools on the announcement thread. Check for yourself in the first post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966621Gpu miners exist, but most of the new coins you see today doesn't support mining with the JSON-RPC html protocol (getwork()) in the wallet. This meens that without a pool, you cannot use ccminer or sgminer to solo-mine. I linked 2 new coins and asked for pools, and it turned out that they had pools already.
|
|
|
|
|