CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[raghathol]

Keep it fee free for loyal donors, and make a free version with 3+% fees

[1714908145]

1714908145

[1714908145]

1714908145

[strannik951159]

Keep it fee free for loyal donors, and make a free version with 3+% fees

The Case Says Or disabling donate by special code or mail

[bensam1231]

Higher value cards depreciate more then lower value cards. They don't retain their price better. That's the way halo products work as they aren't a good deal when you buy them and they're even less of a good deal when you're buying them used as there are new products on the market which supersede them for cheaper. Sweet spot is always midrange for new and used from a consumer standpoint.

As far as mining goes, 1080/tis don't scale properly in a lot of algorithms and are crippled in memory hard algos such as Dagger from GDDR5 X. They have heat dissipation issues due to the size of the chips and will throttle a lot faster then a 1060/70 on algos they do work properly on. The size of the heatsinks required to cool them properly are in the three slot variety. They also consume more power which means you need to have a beefier power distribution system for each computer, which gets even more expensive the bigger the PSU.

Did I mention they can't really mine dagger? That's a pretty big deal. It wouldn't surprise me if we're back dual mining Eth again on Nvidia hardware. That already happened earlier this year. Also why AMD hardware is just outright better as far as investment goes for mining (if we could get it remotely around MSRP). For comparison a 580 is making $2.51 dual mining and a 1070 is making $2.35 mining Zcash. Actually looking at prices right now, you can get 580s for $350... So it still is a better deal. As hardware values come down from their bloated levels it'll become a even better deal.

It blows my mind people still can't compare Nvidia and AMD properly. Guess they just see the price tag for a 'mid-low end' card and they can't put it into context when it comes to mining, just playing games.

Other things in the crypto scene being more beneficial to do is outside the scope of buying hardware. We can discuss how much money Claymore is making and the fact he doesn't have competition or that we still don't have the equivalent of Claymore for Nvidia.

LUL AMD cards. With Nvidia you can mine a hole slew of other algorithms that AMD can't. It doesn't even matter if ETH isn't the best to mine.
You mine what's most profitable and convert it to whatever coin you want. SP is our Claymore equivalent for Nvidia. SP is even better than Claymore.
With his mods you have higher profitability than ETH or any of those coin listed on Whattomine.

Just like your picture you're a dumbass. What's the point of mining coins that have 10k in volume? Do you have any idea how fast low volume coins get saturated and destroyed by hashrate? Nvidia hashrate is already bloated, hence why we got all of maybe 3 days of good SIGT mining before that was done. Also why all the 'niche' algos are now equalizing around Equihash algos. Also why people in this thread are now complaining about ROI on their .05BTC investment in the miner. It doesn't matter how many algos you can mine if none of them have the volume to support the hardware mining it.

No shit. I'm the one that started the 'mine what's most profitable, invest in what you want to keep' rhetoric you're spouting after I got tired of people mindlessly mining crap coins as 'supporting the coin'. You can look through this thread to find that. Also in no way, shape, or form related to good hardware purchases or what we're talking about.

SP is not the equivalent of Claymore. He does what's easy and then doesn't give a shit when it gets hard. He doesn't offer improvements outside of basic miner functionality and some speed improvements. That's why a lot of people don't like SP as he only 'optimizes' and nothing else. He doesn't make algos from the ground up either, only if something already exists.

I've supported SP for years, but saying something like that is completely wrong. I understand you came in with the Ethereum boat and you thought Nvidia was a great 'investment', cause it's the underdog, but that would be incorrect. There is a reason like 80% of the hashrate in the GPU Crypto scene is AMD. Mining is all about long term, not short term 'oh I made $2000 in 3 days!' it's about what you make for the other 361 days in the year.

[Lindworm]

thank you very much for your work. I'm happy to use the fee version.

[strannik951159]

Higher value cards depreciate more then lower value cards. They don't retain their price better. That's the way halo products work as they aren't a good deal when you buy them and they're even less of a good deal when you're buying them used as there are new products on the market which supersede them for cheaper. Sweet spot is always midrange for new and used from a consumer standpoint.

As far as mining goes, 1080/tis don't scale properly in a lot of algorithms and are crippled in memory hard algos such as Dagger from GDDR5 X. They have heat dissipation issues due to the size of the chips and will throttle a lot faster then a 1060/70 on algos they do work properly on. The size of the heatsinks required to cool them properly are in the three slot variety. They also consume more power which means you need to have a beefier power distribution system for each computer, which gets even more expensive the bigger the PSU.

Did I mention they can't really mine dagger? That's a pretty big deal. It wouldn't surprise me if we're back dual mining Eth again on Nvidia hardware. That already happened earlier this year. Also why AMD hardware is just outright better as far as investment goes for mining (if we could get it remotely around MSRP). For comparison a 580 is making $2.51 dual mining and a 1070 is making $2.35 mining Zcash. Actually looking at prices right now, you can get 580s for $350... So it still is a better deal. As hardware values come down from their bloated levels it'll become a even better deal.

It blows my mind people still can't compare Nvidia and AMD properly. Guess they just see the price tag for a 'mid-low end' card and they can't put it into context when it comes to mining, just playing games.

Other things in the crypto scene being more beneficial to do is outside the scope of buying hardware. We can discuss how much money Claymore is making and the fact he doesn't have competition or that we still don't have the equivalent of Claymore for Nvidia.

LUL AMD cards. With Nvidia you can mine a hole slew of other algorithms that AMD can't. It doesn't even matter if ETH isn't the best to mine.
You mine what's most profitable and convert it to whatever coin you want. SP is our Claymore equivalent for Nvidia. SP is even better than Claymore.
With his mods you have higher profitability than ETH or any of those coin listed on Whattomine.

Just like your picture you're a dumbass. What's the point of mining coins that have 10k in volume? Do you have any idea how fast low volume coins get saturated and destroyed by hashrate? Nvidia hashrate is already bloated, hence why we got all of maybe 3 days of good SIGT mining before that was done. Also why all the 'niche' algos are now equalizing around Equihash algos. Also why people in this thread are now complaining about ROI on their .05BTC investment in the miner. It doesn't matter how many algos you can mine if none of them have the volume to support the hardware mining it.

No shit. I'm the one that started the 'mine what's most profitable, invest in what you want to keep' rhetoric you're spouting after I got tired of people mindlessly mining crap coins as 'supporting the coin'. You can look through this thread to find that. Also in no way, shape, or form related to good hardware purchases or what we're talking about.

SP is not the equivalent of Claymore. He does what's easy and then doesn't give a shit when it gets hard. He doesn't offer improvements outside of basic miner functionality and some speed improvements. That's why a lot of people don't like SP as he only 'optimizes' and nothing else. He doesn't make algos from the ground up either, only if something already exists.

I've supported SP for years, but saying something like that is completely wrong. I understand you came in with the Ethereum boat and you thought Nvidia was a great 'investment', cause it's the underdog, but that would be incorrect. There is a reason like 80% of the hashrate in the GPU Crypto scene is AMD. Mining is all about long term, not short term 'oh I made $2000 in 3 days!' it's about what you make for the other 361 days in the year.

Nvidia is ahead of amd already almost everywhere. Even on eth, AMD began to lose speed, unlike nvidia. amd Soon amd will die.

[D8V1D]

Wow rude. SP has done great work for us. He has mods with significant improvements for almost every algorithm.
Sigt and Spreadcoin have been the most profitable coins to mine for almost a month now, but hey keep mining your ETH.
Nvidia gpus are still the best, they beat AMD in both the Ethash (32MH/s 1070) and Equihash (740 H/s 1080 Ti) algorithms.
Until we see the performance of RX Vega, Nvidia is still king.

[du44]

Some words about 1080 and 1080 ti for sp...
I have tried to compile some miners, including krnlx signatum version. x32 gives best perfomance with CUDA 7.5 for this gpu's

[zijieli]

Bitcore sp-mod # 2 seems to be a problem, a lot of 'b00000' do not know the problem of the pool or the software
Today's rejection rate is very high, I have been using the same bat file, has been very good, but today refused to rate, please tell me how to do

===========================
17-08-08 12:50:29] [S/A/T]: 3/8166/9197, diff: 0.697, 77.44MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:50:59] [S/A/T]: 3/8167/9198, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:50:59] [S/A/T]: 3/8168/9199, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:50:59] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9200, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9201, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9202, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9203, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9204, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8169/9205, diff: 2.104, 77.42MH/s booooo
[2017-08-08 12:51:00] reject reason: Invalid job id
[2017-08-08 12:51:44] [S/A/T]: 3/8170/9206, diff: 0.719, 77.41MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:51:53] [S/A/T]: 3/8171/9207, diff: 11.077, 77.41MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:51:57] [S/A/T]: 3/8172/9208, diff: 0.888, 77.41MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:52:00] [S/A/T]: 3/8173/9209, diff: 0.284, 77.41MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:52:03] [S/A/T]: 3/8174/9210, diff: 0.388, 77.41MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:52:10] [S/A/T]: 3/8175/9211, diff: 0.515, 77.41MH/s yes!
[2017-08-08 12:52:23] [S/A/T]: 3/8176/9212, diff: 0.267, 77.41MH/s

[wajiminer]

Gtx 1070 single card:

Profit nicehashminer 24hours: $1.89
Profit Signatum sp-mod #3 (0.05btc) 24 hours : $3.06

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc

Sp you should start a paid service to offer advice where to point miners/what coin to mine 

[HeroKung]

waiting for version mod 6 > with fee 1-2%

^^"

[fhakenzz]

is spreadcoin profitable right now?

[kryztoval]

sp_ do you have a linux version of the skunk mod for signatum?

Gtx 1070 single card:

Profit nicehashminer 24hours: $1.89
Profit Signatum sp-mod #3 (0.05btc) 24 hours : $3.06

https://www.nicehash.com/?p=calc

http://i65.tinypic.com/2qjlu15.png

Sp you should start a paid service to offer advice where to point miners/what coin to mine 

I have a beta bot that does what nicehash does, with any miners you tell it to use, in windows and linux, as services or batch files.
It depends on whattomine to do the calculations right now. and you can totally make a nicehash only version for linux if you change the configuration file to only use nicehash pools.

It currently does NOT support:
splitting of cards (unless you run multiple copies)
dual mining algos (not listed in whattomine, so can't calculate that)
status of the miner (it starts and stops them, but can't figure out if they are running or not as of now).

[abudfv2008]

These are new coins here are the announcement threads. New coins are a bit risky, but with abit of luck you can make $30 per card per day.

No pools , and no gpu miner (that I know of).

virta-unique-coin:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1966621

coimatic-2:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1961830.0

Liar. Alexis78 ccminer whose work you use in most of your miners had nist5 algo from the beginning more than a year ago.

[sp_]

Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.

Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.

[shadowhlohavec]

hey guys how are you doing with your nexus mining? I'm mining with 800mhs using private miner and intensity 6 to prevent crashing but I didn't find any blocks for 48 hours   my wallet is synced and has 8 connections, do you think it can be because of lowered intensity? thanks

[miner32342]

Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.

Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.

http://rgho.st/8qms9tygb
nist5  It gives an acceleration of 53.3 mh

[alexis78]

Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.

Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.

So... Why you sell my fork and not yours then? I've just 1 commit... I'm sure you can do yours 1001 commits and merge those "tiny" differences between our forks

[abudfv2008]

Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.

Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.

I understand that. And anyway you make good job. I just noticed that lie is not good thing. You are the last person to tell that no gpu miner for nist5 exist. Also with the pools. CXT&CTIC2 were already on popular pools for some time (sorry for my bad sequence of tenses).

[Amph]

Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.

Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.

this is hilarious, because your work were also based on alexis work

[rednoW]

Most of alexis work is based on my opensource optimized maxwell ccminer kernels. I have more than 1000 commits to github. Don't forget this... Anyway, the unreleased nist5 private is doing 55mhash. Ccminer 2.1 45 mhash and alexis 1.0.0 48mhash.

Gtx 1070 same clocks and launch config.

Lie!
Alexis was the first to implement shared mem technique that gives the significant boost