CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

Here is a summary of the Bitcore coins mined on the yiimp.eu pool and their value in btc. 10 BTC a week. With a fee of 2%, thats almost 1 BTC in epsylons pocket every month on bitcore alone.

[sp_]

On yimp there are currently more than 5000 workers ( rigs) mining, and only 1000 of them are mining bitcore. So I guess he is collecting 3-5BTC every month on this pool on the fees alone.



All data is collected from yiimp.eu. Opensource pool financed by the fee of the miners.

[garytheasshole]

What's bitcore mods' speed on 1080ti?

[skdsw]

0.05btc donation to recieve the subscription.. Sp-mod #3 is soon ready with bugfixes, more hash, and pussy pool protection.

I purchased spmod from you
And I am mining bitcore on this pool
As for me I get there a little more coins than on yiimp
And this pool has more comfortable stats against yiimp
Please, do not block it - your customers are far away from your relationship with this person

By the way, anybody can mine sigt on this pool via your mod through MRR

[bensam1231]

and pussy pool protection

Care to explain what is this?

No sarcasm, no idea what it means.

THERE ARE RIVALRIES IN THE CRYPTOWORLD--

A rival of sp_ has a pool that is blocked in some of sp_'s miners.  Said rival has a software package that will mine only on his own pool, it is pool-locked.

It is, at best, an inside joke among crypto-trolls.  Also, best to ignore it.       --scryptr

tanx scryptr ...
we have been working diligently DEVELOPING - unlike the true copy pasta king ... and algos are one of those entities we have a good grasp of ...
hence why there wont be a copy of said algo floating around - due to the fact that it IS locked and private ...
tanx for clarifying - and not offending ...
#crysx

That's why you have a Xevan miner... or any other miner which doesn't closely resemble SPs. XD

without arguing with you OR getting into a shitfight with you ...
we dont have a 'xevan' miner at all ... we have our own mine - CWIgm - which WE have DEVELOPED ...
so so whatever algos we have in it - will be published for testing in good time ... we have struggled with one issue with the miner ( yes - because it is NOT a copy of the ripoff merchants publications ) - and when we fix this - we will release the next incarnation of it - CWIgm-0.9.9 ...
we have our new pool server ready - and all of next week we will be installing and testing the new pools ... hopefully by the time the new pool server is ready - so will the latest CWIgm ...
and anything we bring out - is solely for the miner - unlike runes pockets which incidentally has now amounted to more than $250kaud in total 'donations' ... and he is apparently 'broke' and cant afford a 1080ti from the 'pocketmoney' he gets donated? ... hehehe ... yup - an honest person there alright! ... and cant even code 'fixes' for the so called 'broken' algos - so he needs another dev that KNOWS how to code to kix them for him so rune can rip him off too? ...
anyway ... back to work on monday ... im only popping on a sunday to catch up on what ive missed ...
seems i havent missed much ... as the same crap seems to be circulating ...
CWIgm-0.9.9 will have only a few more algos for this revision - and bitcore is one of them ... tho we have a LOT more in store in the next revision after that ...
nice try mate ... but once again - you just prove how little you KNOW - and how much you guess ...
keep and eye here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1563601 - and here - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2054431 - if you want to know whats really going on ... no news is good news normally - so when news does break - its REAL news ...
#crysx

Yup, 'own mine' is a good algo. Good work on that. Bitcore on the other hand I guess is competing with what SP is doing again? Not sure why when there is plenty of fertile soil where you guys don't need to step on eachothers balls.

Been suggested countless times, sp is not budging on this.

Shutup Gary, people always have opportunity to change their mind.

And I can definitely afford the miner.

we have three algos being prepared ...
with the first finished ... so whether you like it or not - they will be implemented ...
as for steeping on anything at all ... we dont ... we create our own path - and you and rune like to tread all over it ... which brings us advertising we couldnt dream of paying for ... so kudos to that ... there is much fertile ground - so all is well ... in anycase - we will continue as we usually do - and make sure that the quarter of a million australian dollars that runes wallet shows he got 'donated' - is proved to be a complete waste soon enough ...
but again ... we will SHOW - rather than just talk ... like we did when we released the first CWIgm ... a small taste of what is yet to come ...
i also see some new 'higher' hash 'improvements' in spmod versions of the kernels ... hmmm ... lets just wait and see how all this actually pans out in the mining field when we have everything in place ...
building the new server this week ... and the new 25seednodes for our coins - partner coins - and supported coins ...
#crysx

Why would I not want them implemented? I simply said from a business perspective you could work on something SP isn't and not have to compete, which is a stupid idea if you can avoid it (unless you can win it's a waste of effort).

Advertisement is you pooping in SPs thread. You're doing that. -_-

[Epsylon3]

you should return to school learning maths sp... and you forget all the payout tx fees. 2% of 10 BTC = 0.2 BTC and bitcore was at 1/3 of the current price the last month

[Dr_Victor]

Are you going to send this mod today?

[pr0ximus]

you should return to school learning maths sp... and you forget all the payout tx fees. 2% of 10 BTC = 0.2 BTC and bitcore was at 1/3 of the current price the last month

I like that response, but, oh, Well, the most apt answer would be showing him (with your version of miner) he hasn't done it any better than you can (if you could reconsider your decision)

And @sp, I know you would have been asked multiple times before but you could make more than what you make by just changing your strategy (by adding fee into your miner and removing this 0.5 or 0.05 BTC or whatever mess) .

[sp_]

2% of 10 BTC = 0.2 BTC and bitcore was at 1/3 of the current price the last month

0.2BTC a week. There are 4.4 weeks in 1 month(31 days). So will get around 0.88 BTC this month.

Bitcore was peaking at $10 a coin one month ago, and today the price is around $6.5. If you hold and wait for $10 you can get more than 1 BTC.

[Amph]

Here is a summary of the Bitcore coins mined on the yiimp.eu pool and their value in btc. 10 BTC a week. With a fee of 2%, thats almost 1 BTC in epsylons pocket every month on bitcore alone.

drunk again sp? 2% of 10 btc is 0.2 not almost 1 btc...

edit i see now you said a week... was misleading...

[sp_]

0.2 btc per week.

1.44 btc worth of bitcore mined in 24hours.

2% of 1.44 = 0.0288btc. Multilply by 31 days. Epsylon gets 0.8928 BTC a month in fees on bitcore alone. 70% of the hashrate on yiimp is sp-modded. Faster kernels, more hash, more profit for epsylon.

[pallas]

0.2 btc per week.

1.44 btc worth of bitcore mined in 24hours.

2% of 1.44 = 0.0288btc. Multilply by 31 days. Epsylon gets 0.8928 BTC a month in fees on bitcore alone. 70% of the hashrate on yiimp is sp-modded. Faster kernels, more hash, more profit for epsylon.

you are not counting for the increase in difficulty, which almost negates the benefit and hurts all the small miners the most.

[sp_]

you are not counting for the increase in difficulty, which almost negates the benefit and hurts all the small miners the most.

I am not talking about the miners, but the pool owners. There is another pool that is making a a miner that is locked to a single pool.
If I was greedy, I could lock all my sp-modded kernels to only be able to mine on my own pool. Then I would get all the fees myself.

[pr0ximus]

you are not counting for the increase in difficulty, which almost negates the benefit and hurts all the small miners the most.

I am not talking about the miners, but the pool owners. There is another pool that is making a a miner that is locked to a single pool.
If I was greedy, I could lock all my sp-modded kernels to only be able to mine on my own pool. Then I would get all the fees myself.

His miner is free though. If you have a better miner than others and if you declare it for free, You could as well lock it to your own pool with certain percentage fee (like 0.7% in his pool) and I am sure nobody would complain (just like how they did not complain about his miner/pool and its fees).

[sp_]

His miner is free though. 

Do you have a link?

[pr0ximus]

His miner is free though. 

Do you have a link?

Link to what? Miner?

[sp_]

His miner is free though. 

Do you have a link?

Link to what? Miner?

yes, to his free bitcore miner.

[pr0ximus]

His miner is free though. 

Do you have a link?

Link to what? Miner?

yes, to his free bitcore miner.

Why does it have to be bitcore alone? is that the only crypto in the whole world? Did he not do it with any other crypto (SIGT, etc)? Besides that, he has already informed it would be available in the next version of his miner.

[zijieli]

His miner is free though. 

Do you have a link?

Link to what? Miner?

yes, to his free bitcore miner.

Have found spmod3 # work in the pool, will I ask when I can receive

ccminer / BitcoreSPmod3   3   -   3   0.63％   100.1 MH / s   33.4 MH / s

[Amph]

His miner is free though. 

Do you have a link?

Link to what? Miner?

yes, to his free bitcore miner.

he mean ccminer 2.2.1...