CCminer(SP-MOD) Modded GPU kernels.

[sp_]

If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.

[1714241759]

1714241759

[1714241759]

1714241759

[1714241759]

1714241759

[rednoW]

If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070.
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.

Ok, I made a test with my palit jetstream micron memory, 100 %tdp.
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64  3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs

So you can go and work further. You gain nothing.

[bakednblazed]

If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.

yeah, but all you're doing is relying on cuda9 to make your 'existing' *cough* code quicker.
no skill there.

[sp_]

I use cuda 7.5.

[sp_]

Ok, I made a test with my palit jetstream micron memory, 100 %tdp.
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64  3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs

On what clocks and config?

[rednoW]

Ok, I made a test with my palit jetstream micron memory, 100 %tdp.
My own compile cuda 7.5 x64  3.73mhs
palgin compile cuda 9 x86 3.86mhs

On what clocks and config?

The same as yours - 100% tdp

[thin]

but what about the 1070. 1060 6g and 1060 6gb?

Here are some preresults. xevan sp-mod 1 (100% tdp)

1. gtx 1070 g1 gaming  (3850 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 windforce 6gb (2550 KHASH)
2. gtx 1060 gainward 3gb (2420 KHASH)

Here are my result for an open source

[2017-10-08 23:05:06] GPU#2:MSI GTX 1060 6GB, 2572.14kH/s
[2017-10-08 23:05:06] [S/A/T]: 0/32/32, diff: 0.010, 15.59MH/s yes!

[2017-10-08 23:05:29] [S/A/T]: 0/41/41, diff: 0.016, 15.90MH/s yes!
[2017-10-08 23:05:29] GPU#1:MSI GTX 1070, 3524.05kH/s
[2017-10-08 23:05:29] [S/A/T]: 0/42/42, diff: 0.010, 15.93MH/s yes!

[2017-10-08 23:05:36] [S/A/T]: 0/46/46, diff: 0.023, 16.06MH/s yes!
[2017-10-08 23:05:42] GPU#5:MSI GTX 1060 6GB, 2510.43kH/s

You are pathetic, constantly lying about how bad is open source miner is.

If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.

How do you compute profit? Coin can not be sold yet

The Xevan miner was just released. Another alexei rippoff with some added new padding bytes.

if this was so easy, why you wasn't able add some padding?

[sp_]

Bitsend(XEVAN) can be sold, and profit is declining from day to day.

In the thread klrx started he said that the miner does 3.3MHASH on the 1070. I just ask you for some numbers, and I have got some answers. I am making a miner that does more than 4MHASH on the gtx 1070. This is the number you need to mine with a profit right now..



current profit 24hours of mining:

3.3Mhash =(0.08774*0.0033)=0,00026322btc= $1.2
4Mhash =(0.08774*0.004)=0,00035096btc= $1.6175



Here is the nicehashminer profit calculator 24 hours: $1.62

[spider703]

If you read the topic of the other thread, krlnx's version is doing 3.3MHASH on the gtx 1070(NOT profitable).
Mine is doing 3850 (+16.66%) (profitable). Thats why I ask the members of the forum to test and verify my assumptions.

I'm sorry, but you're really pathetic. Palgin has already released a faster version, and your overclocking will be able to give a maximum of $ 0.05 so the meaning pays you for the mod, when there is based on free software? Or you have lifted your nose to feel like a super developer, so I'll take care of you - there are much better developers who do not bug btc for their work, but accept free donat. Now if you wrote from scratch your own miner on any other code, then there would not be any questions, and so you just use someone else's labor to profit.

[danspasiva]

Hey SP u were asking about what speeds we were getting in the community.  I am getting around 3850 mh/s with gtx 1070 on Palgin miner. 

Regards,

Dan

[zijieli]

HSR looks good
Miner
https://github.com/1586220228/ccminer-hsr
http://111.231.72.116:8090/ccminer_HCash.rar
pool
http://hcash.globalpool.cc/
http://www.uupool.cn/

[boo50]

it was profitable from start, but at the moment with 7$ price and huge net hashrate it's waste of power.

[Dr_Victor]

I don't know why but both gtx 1080ti and gtx 1060*3 with 70-75% TDP make less on sp-mod 3 than mod-2

[sp_]

On the 1080ti run with 100% tdp and -i 25.15. oc memory and the coreclock.

On 1060 cards you get a 10% drop in the hashrate if you reduce the power 20%.

What do you get?

[bensam1231]

Windows version of xevan has appeared ，when you release your optimization.

dont think it would matter, xevan is pretty small and profitability is already wayyyy down.  who would pay for it, I dont know.  I think krlnx did a good job.

Yeah the knee jerk mouth frothing over Xevan is completely misplaced. The network is way too small. It's already over saturated and that's with a basic miner.

When ppl spread my work for free, ppl won't donate anymore because they just use my stolen work to boost their profit. When I release #3, the stolen work is not profitable anymore, and the only option is to donate or steal my work again. If they steal again, I get 2% of the profit from everyone who mine with my stolen miner.

Why do you bitch about 2%.?

I release a faster miner, that will boost your profit, and my profit. It's a win win both for me and the honest donators, and loosing game for the scammers who stole and published my work.

It's funny you are complaining about stealing...

The problem it not that you are selling your mods (you can call i donating all day long, but you are just selling it). You are absolutely right, that you are able to sell your work.

The problem is, your work is based on code under the GPL license (because  it seems you are unable to start it from scratch), with require you to give access to your code if requested (which has been done multiple times). And you have to do this, even if you would give your code away for free. We can be sure you know that stuff, you just ignore it because you think nobody will ever get you.

So the "thieves" steal from someone who violated the GPL license for years.

This is just stupid fucking rhetoric to get things for free. You aren't going to 'force' him to release his work for free. If push comes to shove, he, just like a lot of other developers that make their own miners stop making them. Then big farms who can afford to hire actual developers get easy high performance miners with no competition.

You lose, public developers lose, and private farms win. Go educate yourself before you make fucking retarded knee jerk statements. GPL licensing has absolutely no baring what so ever here. No one is going to take SP to court, no one is losing lots of money because of this (except big farms), and at the end of the day it really doesn't matter.

People use whatever rational they want to justify their actions. Only thing GPL licensing is helping in this case is megafarms and I'm guessing your two rigs don't qualify for that status.

So you say it's ok to violate rules if enough people profit from it?
Why not rob a bank and give the money to the poor? Oh, because robbery is not allowed? But hey, if you don't do it, only a few rich people will profit from the money!
Just make sure you aren't seen while robbing the bank, so nobody will take you to court! It's so simple!

But i agree with you, people use whatever rational they want to justify their actions, you gave a good example.

It's alright to violate rules when they generally don't benefit the greater good. Furthermore no one gets hurt when people violate them in this case. It doesn't help the greater good and it doesn't hurt anyone except egos. You aren't murdering people for profit here. And those that would violate them regardless are the people that will profit behind the scenes.

This isn't robbing a bank. This isn't taking someone elses money. You can take your perceived moral high ground, eat a dick, and remain poor. As long as it helps you sleep at night. People don't put anything into context anymore, they just take it and run way out into left field. I'm guessing GPL violations means I'm dropping sacks of kittens into a river while laughing, right?

You can't even make a argument about morality here besides there being a rule in place. Moral high ground is actually taking the code, making the best miner possible, then distributing it to everyone possible (dev fee). Flat fee is the next closest thing. SP is literally helping you and all you want to do is bitch about it and then bitch about a fee, then bitch about a flat fee, then bitch about GPL. It's not going to make it free and it reduces the chances of him (or any developer) making a miner in the first place. People who can, once again, hire their own talent will do so and fuck you while you're pretending they don't exist and stay happy that no GPL violates are visible.

And who decides if it’s for the greater good? You? I? SP?

Have a look at a the real world: Extreme left-wingers will tell you it’s ok to throw rocks at the police, because it’s for a greater good! I think we agree it’s not, but in their opinion they do the right thing.
But because everyone has a different opinion, there are rules we have to follow. Don’t throw rocks at police, don’t sell worked based on gpl code without making the source available.
Violating the rules makes you a criminal, not a hero.

And btw, you said my bank example is wrong because this isn't taking someone elses money. Well, it is - you take the money of the big farms if the global hashrate rises.
Of course, I don’t like this too! But once again, because I don’t like something is a not enough reason to turn to crime.

lol... There is no 'deciding'. More people get to use it = greater good. Less people get to use it, for the select few. You don't distribute it, handful of people profit. There is no subjective reasoning here. This isn't a philosophical debate. More is better, less is not in this case.

LOL you're equating throwing rocks at police to using and selling GPL code 'without source'. XDDDD (I really can't facepalm and laugh anymore at this then what I just did, but there is really no way to convey that through the internet). You really do think GPL code violations are putting kittens in a bag and dumping them in a river!

This is beyond silly. People don't work for free and those that do you can only take what you can get. You know who understands that? Big farms. You know what they do? They hire a programmer, they take GPL code off of github, they improve it, and they put you and your shitty two ass rigs on the street.

This isn't rocket science, this is extremely easy to understand. Private miners aren't going to go away, matter of a fact it gets worse if people like SP don't improve the publicly available miners. He is, indeed, working for the greater good... IE the people, IE a lot of people, IE not a rich fucker in a backroom smoking a cigar.

LOL! It's wrong for small miners wanting to compete with big farms? Yeah, there is no ulterior motive here at all... I wonder... hmmm...

This isn't a life of crime, no one gets hurt, it helps everyone else out, as I mentioned before the only people that lose are big farms and they are simply just earning as much as the rest of us at that point.

You really are in the wrong line of work if you think Cryptos are this warm and fuzzy place where everyone sits down together and sings around a campire while earning free monopoly money. I'm going to keep buying SPs miner, you can sell your two rigs on eBay to me when you're no longer profitable 'for some reason'. This is literally the wild west and you get hung up because someone said it's 'not right'. It's only going to get worse the more profits dip.

The Xevan miner was just released. Another alexei rippoff with some added new padding bytes. The miner was profitable for 6 hours. and when the windows binary was released, there was no profit left. So the opensorce miner is noaw worth nothing.
Krlx got his bounty of 0.5btc, and with your logic,  he should share the bounty with the real developers of the ccminer right? 99% of the code is written by me and the other devs, he just changed a few lines of code to claim the bounty. 2-3 days of work. 0.5btc. Nice inside job..

YOU MAY BE RIGHT ABOUT PROFITABILTY--

I mined for months with CPUminer-OPT, and quietly stacked BitSend away.  Occasionally, I would mine with the SGminer for Xevan, on 4 x RX 470 cards.  That would calculate at about 5+ MH/s, total.  BitSend would peak every so often, and my BitSend would sell at 2-3 x the normal market price.

My 1080ti is now doing almost as much hash as my RX 470 4-card rig, about 4.9MH/s at "-i 23".  Most of the hash on YIIMP is now from KRNLX's code, and I think the market will suffer.  If the "mine and dump" strategy is employed by the majority of the miners, it may be a long time before another price peak.

My 1080ti does fine with KRNLX's code, but my 960 cards kept crashing.  If I set the intensity for those cards to "-i 16", they were stable for ~10 minutes, but still crashed.  I hope that KRNLX will refine his work.       --scryptr

It doesn't matter if all the miners dump if the coin has a strong market. BTC has tons of miners dumping constantly on it, but still manages to succeed. If miners are the only thing holding the market up it's beyond fragile and just waiting to fall apart.

[thin]

On Oct 7, 7 miners were mining new XLR with xevan, with a total hashrate below. That's the speed paid miner should produce. See https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1831629.msg22683126#msg22683126 . I don't know what kind of hardware it was, but I doubt any rig could achieve such a speed with an SP miner

ccminer/alexis-1.0   7   7   14.35%   355.4 MH/s   50.8 MH/s

later on  other pool it showed even more, see https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1831629.msg22690235#msg22690235

ccminer/alexis-1.0   7   0   7   53.7%   435.9 Mh/s   average 62MH/s  Undecided

[Dr_Victor]

On the 1080ti run with 100% tdp and -i 25.15. oc memory and the coreclock.

On 1060 cards you get a 10% drop in the hashrate if you reduce the power 20%.

What do you get?

11.4 for gtx 1060-3G with PL 75%

[Amph]

HSR looks good
Miner
https://github.com/1586220228/ccminer-hsr
http://111.231.72.116:8090/ccminer_HCash.rar
pool
http://hcash.globalpool.cc/
http://www.uupool.cn/

i can't find info about the algo? what algo is used?

[santan]

[/quote]

i can't find info about the algo? what algo is used?
[/quote]

Amph ......... HSR Algo is ..... x14

[Victorio]

HSR - X14 algo
miner - ccminer 2.0 downloaded from globalpool.cc
VGA - GTX 1060 3GB Hynix mem, 1557 MHz GPU Clock, 2002 MHz Mem Clock
OC - none
6.15-6.35 MH/s

Been mining for 15 min, got 0.0005 unconfirmed HSR. That equates (gross approximation) 0.002 HSR/h, 0.048 HSR/day.

Does anyone mine it?