Travis9x
|
|
November 09, 2014, 02:21:36 AM |
|
@ECHO off setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 ccminer.exe -a x11 -o stratum+tcp://us1.coinking.io:6666 -u Travis9x.ASRockX11 -p x -D PAUSE SUCCESS: Specified value was saved. *** ccMiner for nVidia GPUs by Christian Buchner and Christian H. *** This is the forked version 1.4.7.SP (sp-hash@github) Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
based on pooler-cpuminer 2.3.2 (c) 2010 Jeff Garzik, 2012 pooler and HVC extension from http://hvc.1gh.com/
Cuda additions Copyright 2014 Christian Buchner, Christian H.
Include some of djm34 additions, cleaned by Tanguy Pruvot Optimized Kernals By SP^Cryptoburnes
[2014-11-08 19:18:16] 2 miner threads started, using 'x11' algorithm. [2014-11-08 19:18:16] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://us1.coinking.io:6666 [2014-11-08 19:18:16] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 [2014-11-08 19:18:16] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 [2014-11-08 19:18:17] Failed to get Stratum session id [2014-11-08 19:18:17] Stratum difficulty set to 0.004 [2014-11-08 19:18:17] DEBUG: job_id=45ecd6d dc92 xnonce2=00000000 time=19:11:57 [2014-11-08 19:18:17] us1.coinking.io:6666 sent x11 block 2849 [2014-11-08 19:18:17] sleeptime: 500 ms [2014-11-08 19:18:17] job 45ecd6d dc92 target change: f9ff060000 (1.0) [2014-11-08 19:18:17] sleeptime: 500 ms [2014-11-08 19:18:17] job 45ecd6d dc92 00000000 [2014-11-08 19:18:17] job 45ecd6d dc92 target change: f9ff060000 (1.0) [2014-11-08 19:18:17] job 45ecd6d dc92 7fffffff Cuda error in file 'C:/code/ccminer-sp/x11/cuda_x11_simd512.cu' in line 647 : in valid texture reference. Press any key to continue . . . Any thoughts about this texture reference error?
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 09, 2014, 07:51:51 AM |
|
You get this error if you try to run the compute52.exe on a 750ti. The 5.2 is for the 970 and 980 cards only.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 09, 2014, 07:54:10 AM |
|
perf is reduced on the 750Ti (linux), else i found the way to enhance a bit your groestl change (commited) EDIT: hmm in fact not exactly, but... its hard to compare
This version was tweaked to run fast on the 980. Launchbounds/threads/code. I think I will need to do a test for compute 50, and do seperate code for the 750ti some places.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 09, 2014, 08:02:51 AM Last edit: November 09, 2014, 08:23:29 AM by sp_ |
|
Of all the betas I have sendt out, version 6 seems to be the most stable. Been running stable all night with +150 on the gpu clock and no booos.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 09, 2014, 09:06:58 AM |
|
I found the way to enhance a bit your groestl change (commited) EDIT: hmm in fact not exactly, but... its hard to compare
I didn't get any speedups when testing your changes, but I improved my groestl now should be 2-3% faster. this: int andmask1 = ((~((threadIdx.x & 0x03) - 3)) & 0xffff0000); rewritten to this: uint32_t andmask1 =-((threadIdx.x & 0x03) == 3) & 0xffff0000; and some small other changes. The % operator (modulo) is more expensive than an and.
|
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 09, 2014, 10:10:17 PM |
|
This is nice. Note that also the throughput should be editable in the commandline as well. Quark is running 10% faster after I multiplied the througput by 10. (750ti/970/980) Same for NIST-5. The only problem is when mining with low diff.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 09, 2014, 10:13:11 PM |
|
Been working on Neoscrypt, so still at 9.6MH/s on my 290X. 980 hasn't caught up yet, though.
My checkins today improves the X11 hash another 50-100 KHASH on the stock clocked 980.(7850-7900 KHASH). With watercooling perhaps we can reach 9200 KHASH.
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 10, 2014, 12:01:56 AM |
|
This is nice. Note that also the throughput should be editable in the commandline as well. Quark is running 10% faster after I multiplied the througput by 10. (750ti/970/980) Same for NIST-5. The only problem is when mining with low diff. -i param = command line :/
|
|
|
|
th00ber
|
|
November 10, 2014, 11:52:56 AM |
|
what i parameter is the best for 750 ti ?
|
|
|
|
djm34
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050
|
|
November 10, 2014, 01:15:47 PM |
|
what i parameter is the best for 750 ti ?
the smallest value which gives you 99-100% gpu usage (I am speaking about the throughput not exactly the i parameter) also must be a multiple of 256.
|
djm34 facebook pageBTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
|
|
|
|
italeffect
|
|
November 10, 2014, 08:29:29 PM |
|
Thanks for this. Is there any difference between ccminer-50 and ccminer-50-52 when running on a 750ti?
|
Dash: Xdopotr3eAHpsSCMkUyU2YWP3WQWb5X3t8
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 10, 2014, 09:27:49 PM |
|
Thanks for this. Is there any difference between ccminer-50 and ccminer-50-52 when running on a 750ti?
Good question, test and tell me Seems to be variable against driver version, the 50 52 is for people with a 750Ti and a 9xx on the same Machine
|
|
|
|
italeffect
|
|
November 10, 2014, 10:52:03 PM |
|
Thanks for this. Is there any difference between ccminer-50 and ccminer-50-52 when running on a 750ti?
Good question, test and tell me Seems to be variable against driver version, the 50 52 is for people with a 750Ti and a 9xx on the same Machine Hash rate jumps around so much it's hard to tell. After a few hours on each I can't see any meaningful difference.
|
Dash: Xdopotr3eAHpsSCMkUyU2YWP3WQWb5X3t8
|
|
|
AliMan
|
|
November 11, 2014, 06:09:17 AM |
|
Thanks for this. Is there any difference between ccminer-50 and ccminer-50-52 when running on a 750ti?
Good question, test and tell me Seems to be variable against driver version, the 50 52 is for people with a 750Ti and a 9xx on the same Machine Yep, runs great with both, 750 ti and 970's together!
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
November 11, 2014, 06:55:09 AM Last edit: November 11, 2014, 11:43:01 AM by sp_ |
|
Looks like the wolf miner(?) (AMD) has been published too some ppl. 10MHASH on 290x. I will checkin some more kernals soon, hopefully the 980 will pass 10MHASH as well. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=854257.0
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 12, 2014, 01:19:53 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1114
|
|
November 12, 2014, 02:25:29 AM |
|
There is something wrong, it's not adding the 3 cards hash, it counts as one only. 3x980@9MH/s = 27MH/s Counts only 9MH/s with the 03 cards...
|
|
|
|
Epsylon3
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1082
ccminer/cpuminer developer
|
|
November 12, 2014, 07:13:42 AM |
|
yep, just fixed that :/ for this version just multiply by 3 will be in 1.4.8 (with a -N param to specify the number of samples for the average, if wanted) im starting the work on the network json interface (like cgminer, but read-only to report some important stats)
|
|
|
|
|