sp_ (OP)
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
 |
January 10, 2015, 04:35:35 PM |
|
I the hashrate is dropping, check the temps on the cards. My ti's are downclocked automaticly if they reach 70degrees(c). With windows and firestorm software you can overvolt the cards. Then they will accept temps up to 80 degrees(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
flipclip
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
January 10, 2015, 05:00:51 PM |
|
I the hashrate is dropping, check the temps on the cards. My ti's are downclocked automaticly if they reach 70degrees(c). With windows and firestorm software you can overvolt the cards. Then they will accept temps up to 80 degrees(c)
My cards stay between 55c - 60c during the day (I assume at night they get a little cooler when the house heat doesn't come on). Neither are overclocked (I run linux and never really delved into the overclocking aspect) by me (one is a SuperClocked EVGA 750Ti though). It might just be because I am using the computer (albeit only firefox to write this post), b/c I noticed when I sat down it was ~11180 and now it is ~11145. No change in temp, diff, pool, etc. None the less, great work. |
|
|
|
|
flipclip
Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 10
|
|
January 10, 2015, 05:14:22 PM |
|
I the hashrate is dropping, check the temps on the cards. My ti's are downclocked automaticly if they reach 70degrees(c). With windows and firestorm software you can overvolt the cards. Then they will accept temps up to 80 degrees(c)
My cards stay between 55c - 60c during the day (I assume at night they get a little cooler when the house heat doesn't come on). Neither are overclocked (I run linux and never really delved into the overclocking aspect) by me (one is a SuperClocked EVGA 750Ti though). It might just be because I am using the computer (albeit only firefox to write this post), b/c I noticed when I sat down it was ~11180 and now it is ~11145. No change in temp, diff, pool, etc. None the less, great work. Yeah, its from using the computer lightly... my bad. 2 750 Ti's v28= Quark ~11,160 kh/s v28.git = Quark ~11,185 kh/s |
|
|
|
|
Handofmidas
Member
Offline
Activity: 61
Merit: 10
|
|
January 10, 2015, 10:03:32 PM |
|
Here are my release28 stats for X11. GPU0 as seen in GPU-Z, GPU1 @ 1499 MHz.  |
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 10, 2015, 10:15:11 PM |
|
750 ti
About 6150kh/s 100kh/s + quark
X11 3,235kh/s on one of my cards.
|
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 11, 2015, 11:39:28 AM |
|
I expect couple of testing samples of GTX960 next week. Would be interesting what could they do  That card is what I have been waiting for. Where can I buy one please. |
|
|
|
|
go6ooo1212
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
quarkchain.io
|
|
January 11, 2015, 11:44:20 AM |
|
I expect couple of testing samples of GTX960 next week. Would be interesting what could they do That card is what I have been waiting for. Where can I buy one please. You couldt yet, because the official announce is at the end of January 😊 |
|
|
|
|
tbearhere
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3136
Merit: 1003
|
|
January 11, 2015, 11:48:40 AM |
|
I expect couple of testing samples of GTX960 next week. Would be interesting what could they do That card is what I have been waiting for. Where can I buy one please. You couldt yet, because the official announce is at the end of January 😊 Thanks...I missed the part where he said next week. :p |
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 11, 2015, 02:50:01 PM
Last edit: January 11, 2015, 08:09:25 PM by sp_ |
|
-Faster bmw,keccak, echo and jh512 Not much though. The 29th public beta(windows executable) is available here: (11-jan-2015) http://www.filedropper.com/release29The sourcecode is available here: https://github.com/sp-hash/ccminer |
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 11, 2015, 06:21:50 PM
Last edit: January 11, 2015, 07:34:53 PM by scryptr |
|
SP_ v29 RESULTS-- Initially, quark is +100kh/s on my faster rig, not much change on my slower rig. Its Sempron 145 compiles noticably more slowly than the AMD FX on my faster rig. If the CPU processing load is a factor in hashing speed, it may be a bottleneck on my slower rig. I now get 36.3-4mh/s on my faster rig, and 35.1-2mh/s on my slower rig. Version 28 pushed the slow rig to 35.1mh/s, and the fast rig to 36.2mh/s. --scryptr |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 11, 2015, 08:21:54 PM |
|
I corrected the link, it was pointing to the 28 release binary.
In release 22 and up I increased the cpu usage abit. In benchmark mode, my rig with 4 cards does 600KHASH bether than mining on a pool I think it is connected to the increased cpu usage.
|
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 12, 2015, 09:11:28 AM |
|
SP_ v29 RESULTS-- Initially, quark is +100kh/s on my faster rig, not much change on my slower rig. Its Sempron 145 compiles noticably more slowly than the AMD FX on my faster rig. If the CPU processing load is a factor in hashing speed, it may be a bottleneck on my slower rig. I now get 36.3-4mh/s on my faster rig, and 35.1-2mh/s on my slower rig. Version 28 pushed the slow rig to 35.1mh/s, and the fast rig to 36.2mh/s. --scryptr why dont you make the sempron machine faster by changing the cpu scryptr? ... or are you not in a position to get that done? ... i have most of my machines upgraded to the 4300 cpu for the same reason ... now i compile once and distribute it - rather than compile on every machine due to the different cpu's that were in them ... although now im changing over to the h81-pro-btc boards and intel chips ... couldnt go any other way with those boards ... quark is running more stable though i havent seen a lift in hashrate ... maybe need to recompile with the latest 29 ... do that after i build the next machine ... #crysx |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 12, 2015, 09:20:50 AM |
|
The latest (29) should give a small boost in x11,x13,x14,x15
x14 has been more profitable than quark the last 24 hours. 0.4 BTC for 1GHASH.
x11 on nicehash has paid 0.3816 BTC/GH/Day the last 24hours.
All my rigs are using profit switching software. Miner control (1.6). Windows only.
|
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 12, 2015, 09:35:56 AM |
|
On windows ccminer is faster when compiled and run in 32bit mode(x86). Linux rigs should probobly run with 32 bit installation/drivers for a boost. Has anyone tried?
|
|
|
|
jpouza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1109
|
|
January 12, 2015, 09:39:17 AM |
|
The latest (29) should give a small boost in x11,x13,x14,x15
x14 has been more profitable than quark the last 24 hours. 0.4 BTC for 1GHASH.
x11 on nicehash has paid 0.3816 BTC/GH/Day the last 24hours.
All my rigs are using profit switching software. Miner control (1.6). Windows only.
The only true profitable coin at the moment is SpreadCoin, it uses SpreadX11 algo and no pools are allowed, only solo mining, I think you know that...is there a way to improve tsiv´s miner to increase Maxwell hash rates in SpreadX11? At the moment I get 5.5MH/s per 980 Oced card and 1.7MH/s per 750Ti Oced. Cheers |
|
|
|
|
scryptr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1793
Merit: 1028
|
|
January 12, 2015, 09:46:13 AM |
|
SP_ v29 RESULTS-- Initially, quark is +100kh/s on my faster rig, not much change on my slower rig. Its Sempron 145 compiles noticably more slowly than the AMD FX on my faster rig. If the CPU processing load is a factor in hashing speed, it may be a bottleneck on my slower rig. I now get 36.3-4mh/s on my faster rig, and 35.1-2mh/s on my slower rig. Version 28 pushed the slow rig to 35.1mh/s, and the fast rig to 36.2mh/s. --scryptr why dont you make the sempron machine faster by changing the cpu scryptr? ... or are you not in a position to get that done? ... i have most of my machines upgraded to the 4300 cpu for the same reason ... now i compile once and distribute it - rather than compile on every machine due to the different cpu's that were in them ... although now im changing over to the h81-pro-btc boards and intel chips ... couldnt go any other way with those boards ... quark is running more stable though i havent seen a lift in hashrate ... maybe need to recompile with the latest 29 ... do that after i build the next machine ... #crysx CryptoBadger-- CryptoBadger touted the Sempron 145 as as good enough to mine, and cheap. I followed his advice, but also had some better AMD CPUs around when building my rigs. However, last night I remembered some conflicting notes online as to whether the Sempron 145 was a 1- or 2-core CPU and did some research. I found that the Sempron 145 was an "unlockable" CPU, that frequently could be enabled as a 2-core CPU via BIOS. My motherboards had this built-in capability (they are identical), and I cycled through my rigs. In less than 10 minutes, I had an "AMD II X2 4450e" dual-core capable of 2800MHz, rather than my Sempron 145 single-core. The other rigs were already at max cores. The stock AMD II X2 4450e chips were clocked at 2300MHz, by the way. I had unlocked my Sempron! The rig is running steady for several hours now. It runs at least 50kh/s faster than before being unlocked. --scryptr |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 12, 2015, 10:58:08 AM |
|
SP_ v29 RESULTS-- Initially, quark is +100kh/s on my faster rig, not much change on my slower rig. Its Sempron 145 compiles noticably more slowly than the AMD FX on my faster rig. If the CPU processing load is a factor in hashing speed, it may be a bottleneck on my slower rig. I now get 36.3-4mh/s on my faster rig, and 35.1-2mh/s on my slower rig. Version 28 pushed the slow rig to 35.1mh/s, and the fast rig to 36.2mh/s. --scryptr why dont you make the sempron machine faster by changing the cpu scryptr? ... or are you not in a position to get that done? ... i have most of my machines upgraded to the 4300 cpu for the same reason ... now i compile once and distribute it - rather than compile on every machine due to the different cpu's that were in them ... although now im changing over to the h81-pro-btc boards and intel chips ... couldnt go any other way with those boards ... quark is running more stable though i havent seen a lift in hashrate ... maybe need to recompile with the latest 29 ... do that after i build the next machine ... #crysx CryptoBadger-- CryptoBadger touted the Sempron 145 as as good enough to mine, and cheap. I followed his advice, but also had some better AMD CPUs around when building my rigs. However, last night I remembered some conflicting notes online as to whether the Sempron 145 was a 1- or 2-core CPU and did some research. I found that the Sempron 145 was an "unlockable" CPU, that frequently could be enabled as a 2-core CPU via BIOS. My motherboards had this built-in capability (they are identical), and I cycled through my rigs. In less than 10 minutes, I had an "AMD II X2 4450e" dual-core capable of 2800MHz, rather than my Sempron 145 single-core. The other rigs were already at max cores. The stock AMD II X2 4450e chips were clocked at 2300MHz, by the way. I had unlocked my Sempron! The rig is running steady for several hours now. It runs at least 50kh/s faster than before being unlocked. --scryptr awesome ... it seems that there are ways around getting things like that for free ...  good work mate ... #crysx |
|
|
|
sp_ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1087
Team Black developer
|
|
January 12, 2015, 10:59:46 AM |
|
The latest (29) should give a small boost in x11,x13,x14,x15
x14 has been more profitable than quark the last 24 hours. 0.4 BTC for 1GHASH.
x11 on nicehash has paid 0.3816 BTC/GH/Day the last 24hours.
All my rigs are using profit switching software. Miner control (1.6). Windows only.
The only true profitable coin at the moment is SpreadCoin, it uses SpreadX11 algo and no pools are allowed, only solo mining, I think you know that...is there a way to improve tsiv´s miner to increase Maxwell hash rates in SpreadX11? At the moment I get 5.5MH/s per 980 Oced card and 1.7MH/s per 750Ti Oced. Cheers I am working on a spreadcoin miner. Fork from tsivs work. x11 is profitiable now. The payout is 300% higher today than it was last week. |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 12, 2015, 11:03:34 AM |
|
On windows ccminer is faster when compiled and run in 32bit mode(x86). Linux rigs should probobly run with 32 bit installation/drivers for a boost. Has anyone tried?
i only compile in x64 fedora 19 ( for the moment ) ... tomorrow i am building a x32 intel based fedora 21 system ... ill install all the libraries and compile 29 on that to see if there is indeed any boost ... i have an extra 750ti from the shipment due to a dodgy pcie port on one of the older motherboards - so ill mine with that and let you know ... that is - if there is enough time tomorrow ... otherwise it will be the day after ... #crysx |
|
|
|
chrysophylax
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1091
--- ChainWorks Industries ---
|
|
January 12, 2015, 11:04:22 AM |
|
The latest (29) should give a small boost in x11,x13,x14,x15
x14 has been more profitable than quark the last 24 hours. 0.4 BTC for 1GHASH.
x11 on nicehash has paid 0.3816 BTC/GH/Day the last 24hours.
All my rigs are using profit switching software. Miner control (1.6). Windows only.
The only true profitable coin at the moment is SpreadCoin, it uses SpreadX11 algo and no pools are allowed, only solo mining, I think you know that...is there a way to improve tsiv´s miner to increase Maxwell hash rates in SpreadX11? At the moment I get 5.5MH/s per 980 Oced card and 1.7MH/s per 750Ti Oced. Cheers I am working on a spreadcoin miner. Fork from tsivs work. x11 is profitiable now. The payout is 300% higher today than it was last week. can the algorithm be implemented within ccminer - or does it need a new miner altogether? #crsyx |
|
|
|
|
