dinox (OP)
|
|
May 31, 2011, 11:48:49 PM |
|
Found the issue, should be fixed now.
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
innervisi0nn
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Tutorials, guidelines, optimizations for all!
|
|
May 31, 2011, 11:54:54 PM |
|
Found the issue, should be fixed now.
Yay thanks pal!
|
|
|
|
timmmay
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
May 31, 2011, 11:57:32 PM |
|
Love your work mate!
|
|
|
|
timmmay
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 02, 2011, 02:29:38 AM |
|
Hi Dinox
Got a small issue here mate. One of my miners went offline briefly. I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.
Cheers
|
|
|
|
dinox (OP)
|
|
June 02, 2011, 02:35:42 AM |
|
Hi Dinox
Got a small issue here mate. One of my miners went offline briefly. I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.
Cheers
A glitch in the update of hashspeed script, should be fixed now! Thanks for notifying me that. * I may also notify there is a new design of site coming up, more info will be available later.
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
innervisi0nn
Member
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
Tutorials, guidelines, optimizations for all!
|
|
June 02, 2011, 02:36:48 AM |
|
Hi Dinox
Got a small issue here mate. One of my miners went offline briefly. I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.
Cheers
A glitch in the update of hashspeed script, should be fixed now! Thanks for notifying me that. Ah so i wasnt crazy, thanks pal!
|
|
|
|
timmmay
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
June 02, 2011, 02:38:13 AM |
|
Hi Dinox
Got a small issue here mate. One of my miners went offline briefly. I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.
Cheers
A glitch in the update of hashspeed script, should be fixed now! Thanks for notifying me that. That's ok, I knew you could fix it easily Cheers
|
|
|
|
Gui_0
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
|
|
June 02, 2011, 05:51:09 PM |
|
I have been getting plenty of errors lately, so I'm switching to another pool. Is it just me?
|
|
|
|
dinox (OP)
|
|
June 02, 2011, 05:54:37 PM |
|
I have been getting plenty of errors lately, so I'm switching to another pool. Is it just me?
Plenty of errors? Can you please provide me with more information?
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
DomeDan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 03, 2011, 10:19:43 AM |
|
I think he's talking about these problems: 03/06/2011 12:11:04, 2882a9d6, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:11:16, f3b48590, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:11:29, 1ef726a4, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:11:50, 99b14500, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:02, d0ff0b1c, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:13, 0896e3b5, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:26, ffd770d1, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:33, eef97afa, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:12:45, 0be8f5fb, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:12:45, long poll: new block 0000055b133324da
I'm not sure, but I think this is some problem with the pool, i thought it was because of my overclocking but have adjust it back and forth and still get "accepted" only about 50% of the time
|
|
|
|
dinox (OP)
|
|
June 03, 2011, 05:56:56 PM |
|
I think he's talking about these problems: 03/06/2011 12:11:04, 2882a9d6, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:11:16, f3b48590, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:11:29, 1ef726a4, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:11:50, 99b14500, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:02, d0ff0b1c, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:13, 0896e3b5, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:26, ffd770d1, accepted 03/06/2011 12:12:33, eef97afa, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:12:45, 0be8f5fb, invalid or stale 03/06/2011 12:12:45, long poll: new block 0000055b133324da
I'm not sure, but I think this is some problem with the pool, i thought it was because of my overclocking but have adjust it back and forth and still get "accepted" only about 50% of the time Can you please ping swepool.net? You have a terribly stale-rate, I have neved seen anything like it. Its in a console window.
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
DomeDan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 05, 2011, 01:13:09 AM |
|
PING swepool.net (213.180.92.21) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=3.55 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=3.36 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=3.27 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=3.57 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=3.48 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=3.34 ms My speed is about 300Mhash/s and the statistics on the profile page shows 120-200 Mhash/s so I guess its about 50% stale. haven't tried any other pool thought
|
|
|
|
dinox (OP)
|
|
June 05, 2011, 01:54:58 AM Last edit: June 05, 2011, 02:05:40 AM by dinox |
|
PING swepool.net (213.180.92.21) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=3.55 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=3.36 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=3.27 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=3.57 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=3.48 ms 64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=3.34 ms My speed is about 300Mhash/s and the statistics on the profile page shows 120-200 Mhash/s so I guess its about 50% stale. haven't tried any other pool thought Okay, ping time seems good (actually very good). What miner are you using?
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
DomeDan
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 05, 2011, 05:49:34 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
kwaaak
|
|
June 05, 2011, 09:10:19 AM |
|
Nice pool, joined.
|
|
|
|
dinox (OP)
|
|
June 05, 2011, 09:31:55 AM |
|
Okay.. You could try another miner, it seems like it is only you who have these problems. Can you try Phoenix/Diablominer and see if you get better stale rates there?
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
aBitcoiner
Member
Offline
Activity: 108
Merit: 10
|
|
June 05, 2011, 11:42:33 AM |
|
dinox: what does your pay per-share rate translate to as a fee?
deepbit's translates to 10% I heard. So if yours is 2.2% better is it equivalent to a 9.978% fee?
|
|
|
|
kwaaak
|
|
June 05, 2011, 12:32:55 PM |
|
Could payout please not be cut off after 0.00x. It should pay out your whole balance.
|
|
|
|
dinox (OP)
|
|
June 05, 2011, 01:58:01 PM |
|
dinox: what does your pay per-share rate translate to as a fee?
deepbit's translates to 10% I heard. So if yours is 2.2% better is it equivalent to a 9.978% fee?
Its compensation which is 2.2% better, thus swepool has a 8% fee. Could payout please not be cut off after 0.00x. It should pay out your whole balance.
I have had people say the other way too. I'd prefer whole balance (rounded to 8 digits) like you so this is probably what we will see in future.
|
blockchain.info/fb/1dinox - 1Dinox3mFw8yykpAZXFGEKeH4VX1Mzbcxe Active trader on #bitcoin-otc - See here - Proof that my nick is dinox here
|
|
|
JA37
|
|
June 05, 2011, 02:13:34 PM |
|
I've basically stopped mining since the reward is too low for me now. How do I get the "fractions" out from this pool?
|
|
|
|
|