[18 GH] Swepool.net 0% fee proportional, LP, API, SSL!

[dinox]

Found the issue, should be fixed now.

[1714165776]

1714165776

[1714165776]

1714165776

[1714165776]

1714165776

[innervisi0nn]

Found the issue, should be fixed now.

Yay thanks pal!

[timmmay]

Love your work mate!

[timmmay]

Hi Dinox

Got a small issue here mate.  One of my miners went offline briefly.  I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.

Cheers

[dinox]

Hi Dinox

Got a small issue here mate.  One of my miners went offline briefly.  I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.

Cheers

A glitch in the update of hashspeed script, should be fixed now! Thanks for notifying me that.

* I may also notify there is a new design of site coming up, more info will be available later.

[innervisi0nn]

Hi Dinox

Got a small issue here mate.  One of my miners went offline briefly.  I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.

Cheers

A glitch in the update of hashspeed script, should be fixed now! Thanks for notifying me that.

Ah so i wasnt crazy, thanks pal!

[timmmay]

Hi Dinox

Got a small issue here mate.  One of my miners went offline briefly.  I got it back up and the status in my swepool profile still says it's offline and at 0 MH/s but the share count is going up.

Cheers

A glitch in the update of hashspeed script, should be fixed now! Thanks for notifying me that.

That's ok, I knew you could fix it easily

Cheers

[Gui_0]

I have been getting plenty of errors lately, so I'm switching to another pool. Is it just me?

[dinox]

I have been getting plenty of errors lately, so I'm switching to another pool. Is it just me?

Plenty of errors? Can you please provide me with more information?

[DomeDan]

I think he's talking about these problems:

Code:

03/06/2011 12:11:04, 2882a9d6, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:16, f3b48590, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:29, 1ef726a4, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:50, 99b14500, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:02, d0ff0b1c, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:13, 0896e3b5, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:26, ffd770d1, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:33, eef97afa, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:12:45, 0be8f5fb, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:12:45, long poll: new block 0000055b133324da

I'm not sure, but I think this is some problem with the pool, i thought it was because of my overclocking but have adjust it back and forth and still get "accepted" only about 50% of the time

[dinox]

I think he's talking about these problems:

Code:

03/06/2011 12:11:04, 2882a9d6, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:16, f3b48590, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:29, 1ef726a4, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:11:50, 99b14500, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:02, d0ff0b1c, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:13, 0896e3b5, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:26, ffd770d1, accepted
03/06/2011 12:12:33, eef97afa, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:12:45, 0be8f5fb, invalid or stale
03/06/2011 12:12:45, long poll: new block 0000055b133324da

I'm not sure, but I think this is some problem with the pool, i thought it was because of my overclocking but have adjust it back and forth and still get "accepted" only about 50% of the time

Can you please ping swepool.net? You have a terribly stale-rate, I have neved seen anything like it. Its

Code:

ping swepool.net

in a console window.

[DomeDan]

Code:

PING swepool.net (213.180.92.21) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=3.55 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=3.36 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=3.27 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=3.57 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=3.48 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=3.34 ms

My speed is about 300Mhash/s and the statistics on the profile page shows 120-200 Mhash/s so I guess its about 50% stale.
haven't tried any other pool thought

[dinox]

Code:

PING swepool.net (213.180.92.21) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=1 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=2 ttl=58 time=3.55 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=3 ttl=58 time=3.36 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=4 ttl=58 time=3.27 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=5 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=6 ttl=58 time=3.57 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=7 ttl=58 time=3.47 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=8 ttl=58 time=3.48 ms
64 bytes from 213.180.92.21: icmp_seq=9 ttl=58 time=3.34 ms

My speed is about 300Mhash/s and the statistics on the profile page shows 120-200 Mhash/s so I guess its about 50% stale.
haven't tried any other pool thought

Okay, ping time seems good (actually very good). What miner are you using?

[DomeDan]

Yeah, I'm using poclbm.
Followed parts of this tutorial: http://www.backtrack-linux.org/forums/backtrack-howtos/39969-how-gpu-bitcoin-mine-backtrack-4-your-hardware-could-now-pay-rent.html

[kwaaak]

Nice pool, joined.

[dinox]

Yeah, I'm using poclbm.
Followed parts of this tutorial: http://www.backtrack-linux.org/forums/backtrack-howtos/39969-how-gpu-bitcoin-mine-backtrack-4-your-hardware-could-now-pay-rent.html

Okay.. You could try another miner, it seems like it is only you who have these problems. Can you try Phoenix/Diablominer and see if you get better stale rates there?

[aBitcoiner]

dinox: what does your pay per-share rate translate to as a fee?

deepbit's translates to 10% I heard. So if yours is 2.2% better is it equivalent to a 9.978% fee?

[kwaaak]

Could payout please not be cut off after 0.00x. It should pay out your whole balance.

[dinox]

dinox: what does your pay per-share rate translate to as a fee?

deepbit's translates to 10% I heard. So if yours is 2.2% better is it equivalent to a 9.978% fee?

Its compensation which is 2.2% better, thus swepool has a 8% fee.

Could payout please not be cut off after 0.00x. It should pay out your whole balance.

I have had people say the other way too. I'd prefer whole balance (rounded to 8 digits) like you so this is probably what we will see in future.

[JA37]

I've basically stopped mining since the reward is too low for me now. How do I get the "fractions" out from this pool?