[ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure

[MR1]

Paypal Skrill and prob other gateways to block buy and sell When this wallet downloads I will pay $1.25 per block Remember this will move with the bitcoin price.It will also help the price of block with a fiat gateway

Nice! Maybe you can also consider the following fiat gateways: SEPA, International wire, OKpay, Perfect Money, Payeer, Advcash, Coinpayments.net.

As for your offer $1.25 per block, I`m not sure anyone will sell at that price. This morning I paid $1.80 per block to donate BLOCKS to the dev fund.

[1714779559]

1714779559

[1714779559]

1714779559

[1714779559]

1714779559

[lowbander80]

To be honest, the price is about 1.34 then I have the fees to pay you, and PayPal skrill and bank transfer in the UK is fine Bittrex offers a price in bitcoin they don't haggle you want to sell you sell.If no takers here then we move on to another coin that is interested.

[BoldNinja]

How much blocks will it be needed to run MN?

[Mika92]

Sorry but is there a wallet for OSX? Apparently the file does not exist on the homepage.

[greyskies]

How much blocks will it be needed to run MN?

5000.

I think they're called service nodes not master nodes.

[greyskies]

Lots of development activity going on  

Sorry but is there a wallet for OSX? Apparently the file does not exist on the homepage.

The test one was removed yesterday from Github, not sure why. A new one will be coming soon.

[CORNEL]

Lots of development activity going on  

Sorry but is there a wallet for OSX? Apparently the file does not exist on the homepage.

The test one was removed yesterday from Github, not sure why. A new one will be coming soon.

New OP is on the plan maybe they are going to update this one with new links so this could be the reason.

[Ylle]

Hi all, I'm interested in the blocknet project. I see that ark also promises bridging between block chains, how does the blocknet bridging compare to theirs? Has Ark shown a working concept or is blocknet so far the only one with a working bridge?

Thereby what is the difference between cosmos and blocknet? So far it looks cosmos is a clone, it even has the same slogan. How does blocknet ensure to keep a lead in the race to launch a platform with bridging first?

[Piston Honda]

block. meh.

[greyskies]

Hi all, I'm interested in the blocknet project. I see that ark also promises bridging between block chains, how does the blocknet bridging compare to theirs? Has Ark shown a working concept or is blocknet so far the only one with a working bridge?

Thereby what is the difference between cosmos and blocknet? So far it looks cosmos is a clone, it even has the same slogan. How does blocknet ensure to keep a lead in the race to launch a platform with bridging first?

Blocknet has already released a working bridge - Xbridge. If you look at the Ark Github it all looks very busy but it's basically a clone of Lisk and I don't see anything released yet which is novel or revolutionary, just lite wallets and things like that. The key part is they don't have a bridge.

Note work started on Blocknet started over 2 years ago, Ark is a new project. Note also we introduced the bridge teminology with our Xbridge and Ark is calling it Smartbridge.

The main difference between Cosmos and Blocknet is Cosmos requires the inter-chain services to run on it's chain only. Blocknet is true inter-chain services. And of course Cosmos is relatively new and if you look at their Github they have no actual coin code released yet - https://github.com/cosmos just code about their website and fundraising. I'm sure Cosmos won't be a clone of our code. But it will have the same ideas.

Btw there is plenty of room for all projects.

Slack invite: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com

[Ylle]

Hi all, I'm interested in the blocknet project. I see that ark also promises bridging between block chains, how does the blocknet bridging compare to theirs? Has Ark shown a working concept or is blocknet so far the only one with a working bridge?

Thereby what is the difference between cosmos and blocknet? So far it looks cosmos is a clone, it even has the same slogan. How does blocknet ensure to keep a lead in the race to launch a platform with bridging first?

Blocknet has already released a working bridge - Xbridge. If you look at the Ark Github it all looks very busy but it's basically a clone of Lisk and I don't see anything released yet which is novel or revolutionary, just lite wallets and things like that. The key part is they don't have a bridge.

Note work started on Blocknet started over 2 years ago, Ark is a new project. Note also we introduced the bridge teminology with our Xbridge and Ark is calling it Smartbridge.

The main difference between Cosmos and Blocknet is Cosmos requires the inter-chain services to run on it's chain only. Blocknet is true inter-chain services. And of course Cosmos is relatively new and if you look at their Github they have no actual coin code released yet - https://github.com/cosmos just code about their website and fundraising. I'm sure Cosmos won't be a clone of our code. But it will have the same ideas.

Btw there is plenty of room for all projects.

Slack invite: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com

Thanks for your answer. So blocknet is ahead of the others with their code. I think the first to launch a fully functional platform with bridging will gain a lot in market share/cap. That's why I'm trying to figure out where all the project stand and how quickly they are developing.

[MR1]

Hi all, I'm interested in the blocknet project. I see that ark also promises bridging between block chains, how does the blocknet bridging compare to theirs? Has Ark shown a working concept or is blocknet so far the only one with a working bridge?

Thereby what is the difference between cosmos and blocknet? So far it looks cosmos is a clone, it even has the same slogan. How does blocknet ensure to keep a lead in the race to launch a platform with bridging first?

Blocknet has already released a working bridge - Xbridge. If you look at the Ark Github it all looks very busy but it's basically a clone of Lisk and I don't see anything released yet which is novel or revolutionary, just lite wallets and things like that. The key part is they don't have a bridge.

Note work started on Blocknet started over 2 years ago, Ark is a new project. Note also we introduced the bridge teminology with our Xbridge and Ark is calling it Smartbridge.

The main difference between Cosmos and Blocknet is Cosmos requires the inter-chain services to run on it's chain only. Blocknet is true inter-chain services. And of course Cosmos is relatively new and if you look at their Github they have no actual coin code released yet - https://github.com/cosmos just code about their website and fundraising. I'm sure Cosmos won't be a clone of our code. But it will have the same ideas.

Btw there is plenty of room for all projects.

Slack invite: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com

Thanks for your answer. So blocknet is ahead of the others with their code. I think the first to launch a fully functional platform with bridging will gain a lot in market share/cap. That's why I'm trying to figure out where all the project stand and how quickly they are developing.

Yes, BLOCK is very ahead of its competitors. Also note that BLOCK is truly decentralized while Cosmos requires validators.

For more information, please refer to the BLOCK FAQ here: https://www.reddit.com/r/theblocknet/comments/676buj/ask_anything_about_blocknet_qa/

[Ylle]

Hi all, I'm interested in the blocknet project. I see that ark also promises bridging between block chains, how does the blocknet bridging compare to theirs? Has Ark shown a working concept or is blocknet so far the only one with a working bridge?

Thereby what is the difference between cosmos and blocknet? So far it looks cosmos is a clone, it even has the same slogan. How does blocknet ensure to keep a lead in the race to launch a platform with bridging first?

Blocknet has already released a working bridge - Xbridge. If you look at the Ark Github it all looks very busy but it's basically a clone of Lisk and I don't see anything released yet which is novel or revolutionary, just lite wallets and things like that. The key part is they don't have a bridge.

Note work started on Blocknet started over 2 years ago, Ark is a new project. Note also we introduced the bridge teminology with our Xbridge and Ark is calling it Smartbridge.

The main difference between Cosmos and Blocknet is Cosmos requires the inter-chain services to run on it's chain only. Blocknet is true inter-chain services. And of course Cosmos is relatively new and if you look at their Github they have no actual coin code released yet - https://github.com/cosmos just code about their website and fundraising. I'm sure Cosmos won't be a clone of our code. But it will have the same ideas.

Btw there is plenty of room for all projects.

Slack invite: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com

Thanks for your answer. So blocknet is ahead of the others with their code. I think the first to launch a fully functional platform with bridging will gain a lot in market share/cap. That's why I'm trying to figure out where all the project stand and how quickly they are developing.

Yes, BLOCK is very ahead of its competitors. Also note that BLOCK is truly decentralized while Cosmos requires validators.

For more information, please refer to the BLOCK FAQ here: https://www.reddit.com/r/theblocknet/comments/676buj/ask_anything_about_blocknet_qa/

Thanks, I'll have a look. Are there any other applications block will launch with the bridging functionality?

[greyskies]

Thanks, I'll have a look. Are there any other applications block will launch with the bridging functionality?

The idea is that long term any kind of DAPP can be serviced through Blocknet. For example a decentralised Bitcoin mixer using Zcash or any kinds of ETH smart contracts. The Zcash dev on twitter tweeted about Blocknet last week and joined our Slack to have a look.

Short and medium term the focus is on the decentralised exchange, it's UI and enhancements to make things as user friendly as possible - SPV for the decentralised exchange rather than having to download the blockchains.

[commenter]

Hi all, I'm interested in the blocknet project. I see that ark also promises bridging between block chains, how does the blocknet bridging compare to theirs? Has Ark shown a working concept or is blocknet so far the only one with a working bridge?

Thereby what is the difference between cosmos and blocknet? So far it looks cosmos is a clone, it even has the same slogan. How does blocknet ensure to keep a lead in the race to launch a platform with bridging first?

Blocknet has already released a working bridge - Xbridge. If you look at the Ark Github it all looks very busy but it's basically a clone of Lisk and I don't see anything released yet which is novel or revolutionary, just lite wallets and things like that. The key part is they don't have a bridge.

Note work started on Blocknet started over 2 years ago, Ark is a new project. Note also we introduced the bridge teminology with our Xbridge and Ark is calling it Smartbridge.

The main difference between Cosmos and Blocknet is Cosmos requires the inter-chain services to run on it's chain only. Blocknet is true inter-chain services. And of course Cosmos is relatively new and if you look at their Github they have no actual coin code released yet - https://github.com/cosmos just code about their website and fundraising. I'm sure Cosmos won't be a clone of our code. But it will have the same ideas.

Btw there is plenty of room for all projects.

Slack invite: https://blocknet.herokuapp.com

Thanks for your answer. So blocknet is ahead of the others with their code. I think the first to launch a fully functional platform with bridging will gain a lot in market share/cap. That's why I'm trying to figure out where all the project stand and how quickly they are developing.

Yes, BLOCK is very ahead of its competitors. Also note that BLOCK is truly decentralized while Cosmos requires validators.

For more information, please refer to the BLOCK FAQ here: https://www.reddit.com/r/theblocknet/comments/676buj/ask_anything_about_blocknet_qa/

Thanks, I'll have a look. Are there any other applications block will launch with the bridging functionality?

    Question, so basically what your saying is block's interoperability feature works and it's the only working version of its kind ?

[BrotherJ]

Blocknet's future is very promising. If you hesitate too long, you may find yourself FOMO buying.

[CORNEL]

Blocknet's future is very promising. If you hesitate too long, you may find yourself FOMO buying.

Agreed with you soon #FOMO buying will happen the progress is moving forward with super fast speed. Still very cheap to buy for exchange nodes.

[RAGEmond]

Blocknet's future is very promising. If you hesitate too long, you may find yourself FOMO buying.

Agreed with you soon #FOMO buying will happen the progress is moving forward with super fast speed. Still very cheap to buy for exchange nodes.

how much do you need?

[Wildbike13]

Blocknet's future is very promising. If you hesitate too long, you may find yourself FOMO buying.

Agreed with you soon #FOMO buying will happen the progress is moving forward with super fast speed. Still very cheap to buy for exchange nodes.

how much do you need?

5000 Blocks

[danielwwt]

Keep up the nice work!