[ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure

[braxx]

how about making that right arrow a "B"

the "B" for Blocknet

not in a position to adjust the pic now to show what I mean

[Skatebird]

So, do we know if poloniex will have a nhz/block ?

[synechist]

how about making that right arrow a "B"

the "B" for Blocknet

not in a position to adjust the pic now to show what I mean

I reckon it's a 'B" already. :-)

[mxxxxxx]

[visual111]

Can I clarify what I think is a fundamental difference from SuperNET?
BlockNET is collecting money through the ITO for development. SuperNET ICO funds will be used to purchase shares in coins and revenue-generating assets. (It is also entering into revenue-share agreements, of course, without taking an equity stake.) BlockNET is presumably relying on revenue sharing with its partners?
If that's the case, then there is an obvious distinction in the type of organisations they are, reflected in the NAV, risk, reward and approach to growth of each (and consequently appealing to different demographics).
Is this correct?

i'd be interested in hearing thoughts on this..

[Sabretooth]

how about making that right arrow a "B"

the "B" for Blocknet

not in a position to adjust the pic now to show what I mean

I reckon it's a 'B" already. :-)

Just needs a thin line to make it a "B" otherwise it looks like a "D" and reminds me of another coin.

[AltCoinTroll]

Can I clarify what I think is a fundamental difference from SuperNET?
BlockNET is collecting money through the ITO for development. SuperNET ICO funds will be used to purchase shares in coins and revenue-generating assets. (It is also entering into revenue-share agreements, of course, without taking an equity stake.) BlockNET is presumably relying on revenue sharing with its partners?
If that's the case, then there is an obvious distinction in the type of organisations they are, reflected in the NAV, risk, reward and approach to growth of each (and consequently appealing to different demographics).
Is this correct?

i'd be interested in hearing thoughts on this..

Same here. Inquiring minds want to know.

[jibble]

Can I clarify what I think is a fundamental difference from SuperNET?
BlockNET is collecting money through the ITO for development. SuperNET ICO funds will be used to purchase shares in coins and revenue-generating assets. (It is also entering into revenue-share agreements, of course, without taking an equity stake.) BlockNET is presumably relying on revenue sharing with its partners?
If that's the case, then there is an obvious distinction in the type of organisations they are, reflected in the NAV, risk, reward and approach to growth of each (and consequently appealing to different demographics).
Is this correct?

i'd be interested in hearing thoughts on this..

Same here. Inquiring minds want to know.

"The Blocknet has its own token of value. However it is not a coin but a share that earns dividends on every payment for every service on the Blocknet.
Every time a service is rendered, the node(s) rendering the service receive payment directly from the node(s) that request it, and the Blocknet charges a micro-fee for supporting the service.
Shareholders are eligible for payouts in proportion to the number of shares they own - the accounting for which is of course done trustlessly and in the public domain."

[Skatebird]

So, do we know if poloniex will have a nhz/block ?

[Matthaggie]

How many tokens are people thinking about getting?

im getting 2

[Come-In-Behind]

How many tokens are people thinking about getting?

im getting 2

A few  thousand. If im correct one blocknet token/share cost .0002 btc and one XC is worth .0008 btc atm, so ill be buying XC to get 4 tokens per XC at this price atm.

[TaylorSwift]

I am buying more than the 2 ! 

[Conqueror]

it is like private ripple or what?
seems like another IPO scam...

[mxxxxxx]

2500 btc?  

For what?

+1

it is like private ripple or what?
seems like another IPO scam...

You can find more info here http://theblocknet.com/ and in Blocknet FAQ https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg9269808#msg9269808

Blocknet OP https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=829576.msg9269803#msg9269803

[CECVW]

Can I clarify what I think is a fundamental difference from SuperNET?
BlockNET is collecting money through the ITO for development. SuperNET ICO funds will be used to purchase shares in coins and revenue-generating assets. (It is also entering into revenue-share agreements, of course, without taking an equity stake.) BlockNET is presumably relying on revenue sharing with its partners?
If that's the case, then there is an obvious distinction in the type of organisations they are, reflected in the NAV, risk, reward and approach to growth of each (and consequently appealing to different demographics).
Is this correct?

I need a bit of clarity on this too. Can somebody help out.

Please can someone respond this, if this question is not clarify people will have great doubts in investing, We need serious answers here not trolls please.

Also, please remark here the difference between Supernet and Blocknet? the union makes us strong, why not all concentrate in one Universe of coins, stop dividing, friction, make races of coins, we are becoming like FIAT world, creating competition, fights who is the best, money , its all about money. Lets make a unique entity, lets join forces, if we are divided and create ghettos we are making crypto weaker and weaker, WE NEED UNION! I believe should be only one universe, city, country of coins. Look what happens in the actual world...too many countries, differences,religions, belief, create wars. Lets do not do the same with crypto! Please BlockNet join forces with SuperNet. Make only one country in one wolrd

Thanks

I don't like the fact people coming here to say Blocknet is a scam without explaining why and making silly stupid remarks.

We need to whether we like it or not to explain what we say!

My question has not been answered and its very simple.

I will explain my question in a different easy way.

We all know or we think we know but for some  there is only one GOD but for this GOD there are different religions praying for this same GOD in different ways and form but still these religions does not go a long with each others even if they are praying the same GOD. So are we doing  exactly the same here?

SuperNetwork is the first and the one that came with the idea and I think is not right to copy or clone the idea of someone brain, but to join the same idea instead of creating the same idea again (religion) the more clones the more discrepancies, fights, wars , intolerance. One of the idea of SuperNetwork was to get a league where the best coins or coins that can add something new not just the 90 per cent of rubbish coins that come out everyday. We want a serious Crypto world with serious technology not wanna be developers or crypto coins that are merely clones with fancy names to pump and dump and then disappear and the end!

What I believe is that you should talk with the owner of Supernetwork and discuss your idea instead of stealing his idea..with all my respect that's my personal opinion. Second but not the least is that you can do something great with Blocknet just use your imagination instead of creating a clone of Supernetwork, and this is my clever suggestion, be like a second layer of Supernetwork, like a filter. That a coin before joining Supernetwork has to pass first through Blocknet. Same league but different division like in football. Example where Supernetwork is Premier league and Blocknet second division. That way create levels of technology and encourage dev to improve their tech to go to the premier league but also to join Blocknet to be able to get to the Premier league, that way people will know where to invest and give them the peace of mind that if they invest in coins located in Blocknet or Supernetwork has a least a guaranty that there is somekind of value or real technology behind this coins. Do I make sense? Work together, Be in the same Project with same religion, do not crealte different religions, these create desputes and confusions!  I hope you listen to my advice and talk and communicate to make a project in common. Only one country in one world, only one religion for the same GOD, only one crypto world for its own credibility. The union makes us strong

[Cassius]

Can I clarify what I think is a fundamental difference from SuperNET?
BlockNET is collecting money through the ITO for development. SuperNET ICO funds will be used to purchase shares in coins and revenue-generating assets. (It is also entering into revenue-share agreements, of course, without taking an equity stake.) BlockNET is presumably relying on revenue sharing with its partners?
If that's the case, then there is an obvious distinction in the type of organisations they are, reflected in the NAV, risk, reward and approach to growth of each (and consequently appealing to different demographics).
Is this correct?

i'd be interested in hearing thoughts on this..

Same here. Inquiring minds want to know.

"The Blocknet has its own token of value. However it is not a coin but a share that earns dividends on every payment for every service on the Blocknet.
Every time a service is rendered, the node(s) rendering the service receive payment directly from the node(s) that request it, and the Blocknet charges a micro-fee for supporting the service.
Shareholders are eligible for payouts in proportion to the number of shares they own - the accounting for which is of course done trustlessly and in the public domain."

Thank you, but this still does not answer the question. This is how, not what.
From what I can tell, there are very different business models at work. This might be a useful way of distinguishing them to different investors. It appears to come down to risk and return to me; simplistically SuperNET might be thought of as a Venture Capital fund, whilst BlockNET is more like a services company or bank.
This isn't about tech, it's about economics.

[xizmax]

Blocknet got some press on Coindesk

http://www.coindesk.com/all-things-alt-syscoin-team-emergency-injunction-moolah/

I am still hinging on whether being featured next to Moolah is a good or a bad thing

[mxxxxxx]

how about making that right arrow a "B"

the "B" for Blocknet

not in a position to adjust the pic now to show what I mean

I reckon it's a 'B" already. :-)

Just needs a thin line to make it a "B" otherwise it looks like a "D" and reminds me of another coin.

+1

personaly I like the thick line more...
It give's the illusion of a cube (block) again and the "B" is clear

I like the one with thick line

[StealthCoin1]

I see CoinGateway is already prepared for the ITO on the 29th.

Yes, good!
There is no account needed there either

really nice to see that, apart from the fact that the logo is a rip off from Nintendo's Gamecube

How about this then?

why the fuck you always got something wrong with XST stealthcoin? are you afraid of XST might take all the innovation/investment from all your other shit coins? it's XST and not SXT. you also left out stealthcoin hyperlink on purpose but now already fixed

[llildur]

Sounds promising i'm in, i already hold some supernet shares but at the end the best win or rather find ways to join forces, the two projects are very young and indeed interesting. The competition is good after all promotes the creativity in favour of customers, we are in a very early stages to ask not competition, but surrender, at the end we as investors have always take risks, best regards.