XCurrency (XC) BlockNet community thread

[rdnkjdi]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like. 

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

I'm fairly certain it's not a delete bot as teka and syn immediately post following my posts being deleted.

Sadly being judged by random coin supporters/shills really doesn't bother me in the least.  Esp ones as rude as those from the XC camp.  You made an enemy for life when you and your longwinded wannabe smartass PR guy responded to the ASIC scandel.  By essentially calling me a moron and stating I had no proof.  And then even in your official press release you defend the guy who stole hundreds of thousands.  Largely by taking advantage of his connections in the crypto community to appear legit.

I raised highly valid points in the past only to be smeared by your PR team.

Maybe if they spent more time focusing on responding to content of critism rather than trying to force everyone to  have the proper "attitude" as you say - answers would have killed the "FUD"  But I see nothing in the way of content addressing the issues that have been brought to life.

Only statements about bad attitudes, FUD conspiracies, and "I don't have time for this I need to work on marketing, etc"

So stupid.  If they were innocent properly addressing the "FUD" would double the coins price overnight (assuming there were good answers)

But rather than do what's best for shareholders they attack the messengers, play up the victim and violate their promises.

So yeah ... dance in the rain that I lost money.  Just know the guys you are championing could actually be doing something to win back an iota of credibility if there actually are good answers to the questions laid out.  But instead they are encouraging you to put the focus on people like me while their total lack of integrity is ruining your coin.

So keep giving Dan, Syn and Teka tuggies.  Just know they don't have your back or they'd be responding to this debacle entirely differently.

P.S.  If you're a shining example of a "good attitude" then I think I'm doing just fine.  I've never gloated over XC hodlers losing money the way you guys have me.

I love seeing the truth come out so more people don't get suckered in.  But I don't gloat over people losing money.  Even assholes.

[mr_random]

Lolz. An asshole crying over his financial loss, this brings me great happiness.

So rather than pursue Jasin, the one who allegedly screwed you over, you obsessively smear Dan's projects. Makes sense.

[rdnkjdi]

Lolz. An asshole crying over his financial loss, this brings me great happiness.

So rather than pursue Jasin, the one who allegedly screwed you over, you obsessively smear Dan's projects. Makes sense.

I haven't smeared anything.   I followed his project.  And Dan smeared it himself.

I just ask questions people don't like.  

I don't have the power to screw XC over the way that associating with prom, being caughy in bold faced lies about creating a different competing coin, diluting XC with a new ICO that contains features on the future XC roadmap, dumping the premise and not following up on a promise to be transparent (after ignoring the last one)

I am not responsible for any of it.  I'm only responsible for not turning a blind eye

[ib88]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

+1000

[rdnkjdi]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

+1000

Classy bunch.

I'll just reply that I have no satisfaction in any of you losing money.  But immense satisfaction in the fact that it more people won't get sucked into this circlejerk closed source "anon coin"

It was Dan and Syn and Teka that sold you those cheap coins before moving on.  Not me.  I'm not to blame for your coins problems

[Come-In-Behind]

And the fact that the XC founders are INSTANTLY ONLINE to delete replies they don't like.  

It's a delete bot you fucking moron. Hahaha.

You've created many fake accounts on this forum to push your agenda of smearing Dan's projects. No-one cares what you think, you've lost all credibility.

Personally I'm glad you lost your money with the Scrypt ASICs. Usually I've got nothing against greedy idiots like you, but your attitude has been disgusting.

+1000

Classy bunch.

I'll just reply that I have no satisfaction in any of you losing money.  But immense satisfaction in the fact that it more people won't get sucked into this circlejerk closed source "anon coin"

It was Dan and Syn and Teka that sold you those cheap coins before moving on.  Not me.  I'm not to blame for your coins problems

rdnkjdi is right...I too invested a small amount in Blocknet shares(Less than $1000 usd), along with buying a bit of XC. I've sold out of it completely. Always invest what you have to lose...If you look at the Blocknet github, Dan has done absolutely nothing.

XC/Blocknet is a scam, plain and simple. The warning signs were there, XC's code not being open sourced, their mixer allegedly taken from fedoracoin, and I believe Dan having charges against him for not paying taxes.

[URSAY]

XC forum offline.  No more posts on btctalk.  Sweeping info under the rug.  Dan Metcalf doesn't want you to know the truth.  Dan, you out there?  Ready to discuss your federal tax lien and fraud with feds? 

[truth_]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=770801.msg9876490#msg9876490

[URSAY]

It's odd that I keep getting banned from the official Blocknet thread for trying to share publicly available information.

http://www.plymouthdeeds.org/

[UnicornFarts]

It's not odd at all to me.  

Transparency as a value is 100% shunned by Blocknet In favor of "nniceness" and tickled ears. 

Great find.  Lot of things make more sense.

[URSAY]

It's not odd at all to me.  

Transparency as a value is 100% shunned by Blocknet In favor of "nniceness" and tickled ears. 

Great find.  Lot of things make more sense.

http://www.irs.gov/irm/part5/irm_05-017-002.html#d0e454

5.17.2.6.5.1  (03-27-2012)
Securities

This "superpriority" protects the purchaser or the holder of a security interest in a "security" who at the time of purchase or at the time the security interest came into existence did not have actual notice or knowledge of the existence of the federal tax lien. IRC § 6323(b)(1). The Code defines securities to include money, stock, bonds, debentures, notes, negotiable instruments, and various other types of interests. IRC § 6323(h)(4) .

A subsequent holder of a security interest is also protected if the prior holder did not have actual notice or knowledge at the time the security interest came into existence. An illustration of the intent of this paragraph is the case where "P" , without actual notice or knowledge of the existence of a tax lien, purchases a security from "T" , the taxpayer, after a notice of lien has been filed. "P" is protected under the provisions of this paragraph. If "P" thereafter sells the security to "C" , who at the time of such sale has actual knowledge of the existence of the lien, "C" is also protected against the tax lien. See Treas. Reg. § 301.6323(b)-1(a)(2), Examples (1) and (2).

[URSAY]

Holes everywhere.

[adhitthana]

The thing about XC is that we know that talented developers are involved and that they are working an a very cool idea anonymity wise.
I have no doubt that the team is quite capable of providing groundbreaking mixer technology. Maybe they will maybe they wont.
M'eh...we will see

[adhitthana]

Is there any update on when it will be open sourced?

[illodin]

This one seems dead.

[Propulsion]

This one seems dead.

It does. RIP xc/blocknet (and all other scamcoins created by outsourcing from Dan M) January 27th, 2015.

[adhitthana]

This one seems dead.

Could be.
It will be pretty interesting if and when it gets open sourced though.

[00Smurf]

This one seems dead.

It does. RIP xc/blocknet (and all other scamcoins created by outsourcing from Dan M) January 27th, 2015.

People were warned, and all evidence was there, yet people ignored it and decided to slander the ones trying to help.

[URSAY]

If the "official" BlockNet thread is gonna get bumped then we bumpin' this one also.

How's the decentralized exchange coming along?

Anyone know the status of the decentralized exchange?

No news yet, other than that work is ongoing and progress has been made.

Please send out the detail plan.

[JakeThePanda]

This one seems dead.

It does. RIP xc/blocknet (and all other scamcoins created by outsourcing from Dan M) January 27th, 2015.

Luckily, I figured out XC was crap before it fell apart.  I was such a big supporter at the start.  I feel kind of stupid about it now.