XCurrency (XC) BlockNet community thread

[gameonbitches]

Tell it to the SEC http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

I've been following XC.  I was a hodler for a long period and have been one of the ones dumping after announcement of the blocknet.  Luckily for XC - it only represented about 1% of my bitcoin holdings.

After seeing them offering this ICO it was too much to bear.  I'm so fucking sick of closed source and Dan the Pumper man pumping shitcoins.  Then their public IPO idea to raise MORE money than what they got from the premine.  And now this alliance with outright scammers.  It's just too much.

I will be reporting to the SEC with the original verbage that literally promised returns along with a list of the exchanges it will be listed on.

Can someone confirm that it will be happening on Poloniex?  I would prefer to catch them doing their IPO / ICO on a US based exchange.

[rdnkjdi]

[mav137]

its one thing to pull out your own funds, it's another to ruin the party for the rest of the investors.

Thats actually a real bitchmove

[NewWorldCoiner]

It is funny to see the XC PR machine abuse terms associated with BTC like decentralized, trustless etc etc and try to apply to this garbage bullshit scamcoin called XC. From Day 1 these clowns are all about trying to be me-too about everything and anything in crypto.

This coin is mined-out piece of shit. There is nothing more centralized than trying to sell mined out piece of shit and going door to door like the witnesses. You have a garbage closed source system and there is nothing trustless about it, even if you get it reviewed from any external source. CVEs come into play in 20-30 year code bases, only no one will even bother with this piece of crap because it doesn't deserve any.

This isn't what satoshi had envisioned. You will see it once you understand that getting your own heads out of your assess is a pre-requirement to understand these things. The "developer" of this scam coin hires off beat unknown coders to develop crap that can be sold to noobs who then make a fool out of themselves with their retardation in the self moderated thread. He had to fucking donate to loljosh to even launch the scam for crying out. If you believed them there were ASICs and FPGAs because of which they had to shut down PoW. Yah Satoshi envisioned all this   Bunch of scammy people associated behind the scenes with this as well as up front who will go underground in the coming days once the final tricks are pulled off from this latest scam and the idiot bagholders are what the rest of BTCTalk will have to endure listening to sorry sob stories.

Web 3.0? Decentralized? Trustless? BlockNET 2500 BTC IPO? Content serving from nodes? Code review pump and dumps? These clowns are all over the place. It is amazing to me that a crap coin like this is valued at 70K. Just dump it out and get it over.

Also why is Busoni all of a sudden allowing this? His lawyers are suddenly fine with this crap given they did the right thing by not allowing SuperNET ICO?

You know, no-one ever claimed the Rev1 bounty to discover a senders address from the blockchain.

Funny isn't it. A scam coin as you say, that has such a level of anonymity? How can this be I hear you ask?

Well, it just is. Because Dan was writing code when you were still in nappies. And it's closed source for now so no fucker rips it off.

Lets see what you're saying when Rev3 drops. I'll be laughing all the way to the bank, and you'll all be saying "Shit! I thought it was a scam!"

[NewWorldCoiner]

Tell it to the SEC http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

I have more than 1 bitcointalk account.

I would never have guessed if you hadn't told me!

[URSAY]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

[slapper]

It is funny to see the XC PR machine abuse terms associated with BTC like decentralized, trustless etc etc and try to apply to this garbage bullshit scamcoin called XC. From Day 1 these clowns are all about trying to be me-too about everything and anything in crypto.

This coin is mined-out piece of shit. There is nothing more centralized than trying to sell mined out piece of shit and going door to door like the witnesses. You have a garbage closed source system and there is nothing trustless about it, even if you get it reviewed from any external source. CVEs come into play in 20-30 year code bases, only no one will even bother with this piece of crap because it doesn't deserve any.

This isn't what satoshi had envisioned. You will see it once you understand that getting your own heads out of your assess is a pre-requirement to understand these things. The "developer" of this scam coin hires off beat unknown coders to develop crap that can be sold to noobs who then make a fool out of themselves with their retardation in the self moderated thread. He had to fucking donate to loljosh to even launch the scam for crying out. If you believed them there were ASICs and FPGAs because of which they had to shut down PoW. Yah Satoshi envisioned all this   Bunch of scammy people associated behind the scenes with this as well as up front who will go underground in the coming days once the final tricks are pulled off from this latest scam and the idiot bagholders are what the rest of BTCTalk will have to endure listening to sorry sob stories.

Web 3.0? Decentralized? Trustless? BlockNET 2500 BTC IPO? Content serving from nodes? Code review pump and dumps? These clowns are all over the place. It is amazing to me that a crap coin like this is valued at 70K. Just dump it out and get it over.

Also why is Busoni all of a sudden allowing this? His lawyers are suddenly fine with this crap given they did the right thing by not allowing SuperNET ICO?

You know, no-one ever claimed the Rev1 bounty to discover a senders address from the blockchain.

Funny isn't it. A scam coin as you say, that has such a level of anonymity? How can this be I hear you ask?

Well, it just is. Because Dan was writing code when you were still in nappies. And it's closed source for now so no fucker rips it off.

Lets see what you're saying when Rev3 drops. I'll be laughing all the way to the bank, and you'll all be saying "Shit! I thought it was a scam!"

Github.

Whitepaper.

Prove cryptography. Math. Probability.

No one gives a rats ass about the sender address bullshit. That is just a tiny bit of privacy that we want. And even if no one has bothered yet, it is because no one gives a rats ass about bullshit mined out garbage.

[slapper]

Tell it to the SEC http://www.sec.gov/complaint.shtml

I have more than 1 bitcointalk account.

I would never have guessed if you hadn't told me!

Yah man it is all a big FUD. It is a conspiracy. You will be able to sell poop for $1 million one day and don't listen to all these naysayers. 

[slapper]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

You know it is extremely distressing to see someone with your background and time in Bitcoin world to be taking any of this crap seriously. It is just not expected and a crying shame.

What evidence are you looking for? Evidence is all laid out and well known. There is a reason no one wants to buy this shitcoin.

[URSAY]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.  Broad opinions are not evidence.

[slapper]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

[URSAY]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

I've already got plenty of evidence and factual data compiled from both perspectives.  You seem to have nothing.

[slapper]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

I've already got plenty of evidence compiled both ways.  You seem to have nothing.

This is exactly how their PR guy used to communicate. The guy who probably used "substantiate" more than the # of shitcoins he probably peddles on a daily basis.

The joke and onus is on you. Do you have a whitepaper explaining cryptography and math behind what your coin claims to do ?

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

Do you want me to prove OJ did it? 

[URSAY]

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

If I want something I take care of it myself.  I don't actually need anything from you.  What I'm saying is if you want to make very broad claims then back them up.  If you can't back them up then it's unreasonable to present your theory while insulting someone...anyone around you.

[G-Bert]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

I've already got plenty of evidence compiled both ways.  You seem to have nothing.

This is exactly how their PR guy used to communicate. The guy who probably used "substantiate" more than the # of shitcoins he probably peddles on a daily basis.

The joke and onus is on you. Do you have a whitepaper explaining cryptography and math behind what your coin claims to do ?

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

Do you want me to prove OJ did it? 

just wondering... robin williams...that you? 

[slapper]

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

If I want something I take care of it myself.  I don't actually need anything from you.  What I'm saying is if you want to make very broad claims then back them up.  If you can't back them up then it's unreasonable to present your theory while insulting someone...anyone around you.

I don't need to provide anything. But this is for you to get started https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.0

Find out how this coin ended PoW.

Find out how these guys just used some bozos to join their team as faces the world should care about as if they had any credibility.

Find out how some of the most shady people like Jasin Lee were directly associated with this shit coin.

Find out how complete utter bullshit terms are thrown around on a daily basis hoping some noob falls for it.

Find out how loljosh was paid 0.8 Bitcoin to start this coin.

Find out how they mocked every other coin with absolutely nothing to back themselves up first.

Find out who some of the early pumpers were and how they dumped at the peak and laughed their asses off to even see how far this coin went with bullshit initial claims that were proven to be complete BS.

Find out how they pump and dump using reviews as an excuse. 100s of bitcoin core coders and cryptographers dont abuse their actual names to do something like this. All with some recent bullshit street cred. Other legitimate devs dont do this either.

The list is very long. It is just that the moderated thread served a great purpose for them to curb these things to be brought up and it should have been brought up regularly to save the noobs.

And now they want 2500 BTCs   What the fuck is wrong with you people. Are you fucking serious?

[slapper]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

I've already got plenty of evidence compiled both ways.  You seem to have nothing.

This is exactly how their PR guy used to communicate. The guy who probably used "substantiate" more than the # of shitcoins he probably peddles on a daily basis.

The joke and onus is on you. Do you have a whitepaper explaining cryptography and math behind what your coin claims to do ?

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

Do you want me to prove OJ did it? 

just wondering... robin williams...that you? 

No you have a hangover from hanging out in a self moderated thread all day giving each other congratulatory hand jobs for a rim job well done. GTFO and hope some noob can buy your shitcoin some day.

[G-Bert]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

I've already got plenty of evidence compiled both ways.  You seem to have nothing.

This is exactly how their PR guy used to communicate. The guy who probably used "substantiate" more than the # of shitcoins he probably peddles on a daily basis.

The joke and onus is on you. Do you have a whitepaper explaining cryptography and math behind what your coin claims to do ?

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

Do you want me to prove OJ did it? 

just wondering... robin williams...that you? 

No you have a hangover from hanging out in a self moderated thread all day giving each other congratulatory hand jobs for a rim job well done. GTFO and hope some noob can buy your shitcoin some day.

 

we'll see what happens ay.

I wonder though, why are u so angry? Or, why do you give a shit if you're not? Its not like you are kindly trying to save us from a scam out of the goodness of your heart.

you linked to a DRK vs XC thread that no one has posted in for 2 months since everyone decided it was a pointless pissing match.

What I'm getting at is what is your point? why bother? u think its a scam fuck off and stfu. xx

[URSAY]

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

If I want something I take care of it myself.  I don't actually need anything from you.  What I'm saying is if you want to make very broad claims then back them up.  If you can't back them up then it's unreasonable to present your theory while insulting someone...anyone around you.

I don't need to provide anything. But this is for you to get started https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=631052.0

-DRK vs. XC thread for the most part?

Find out how these guys just used some bozos to join their team as faces the world should care about as if they had any credibility.

-Not sure what this means

Find out how some of the most shady people like Jasin Lee were directly associated with this shit coin.

-That's been covered quite a bit and dealt with I believe.

Find out how complete utter bullshit terms are thrown around on a daily basis hoping some noob falls for it.

-Another broad statement I will try and decode.  While I agree that sometimes the PR speak is not the best, that is not an easy job.

The PR can be dumbed down at times.
Find out how loljosh was paid 0.8 Bitcoin to start this coin.

-

so I copied darkcoins closed source code?


the only scam is darkcoins 50% premine

No he meant X11, the PoW he came up with. I think initial mixers were some copied from some other coin. loljosh should have the details. Ask him.

okay so you think loljosh created xnodes?

I don't know what your smoking but the xnode protocol was developed by myself and other developers.  It is based on my 20 years of experience of designing, coding and deploying advanced network solutions.

here is an example of some of my work ----- >>>>>>>>>

http://seclists.org/interesting-people/2002/Feb/107

Find out how they mocked every other coin with absolutely nothing to back themselves up first.

-Which coins did they mock?

Find out who some of the early pumpers were and how they dumped at the peak and laughed their asses off to even see how far this coin went with bullshit initial claims that were proven to be complete BS.

-Bitcoin gets pumped and dumped.  All the alts get it.
 
Find out how they pump and dump using reviews as an excuse. 100s of bitcoin core coders and cryptographers dont abuse their actual names to do something like this. All with some recent bullshit street cred. Other legitimate devs dont do this either.

-"reviews as an excuse"...huh?

The list is very long. It is just that the moderated thread served a great purpose for them to curb these things to be brought up and it should have been brought up regularly to save the noobs.

And now they want 2500 BTCs   What the fuck is wrong with you people. Are you fucking serious?

-I'm more interested in xc then BlockNet.

[slapper]

When you have name calling with accusations your argument seems weak.  Presenting evidence with acutal links and an objective view would seem like a better approach.

Evidence is all laid out and well known.

No it is not.  Please post it.

Yes it is. Not going to do the job for you. Go find it for yourself.

I've already got plenty of evidence compiled both ways.  You seem to have nothing.

This is exactly how their PR guy used to communicate. The guy who probably used "substantiate" more than the # of shitcoins he probably peddles on a daily basis.

The joke and onus is on you. Do you have a whitepaper explaining cryptography and math behind what your coin claims to do ?

What evidence are you looking for anyway?

Do you want me to prove OJ did it? 

just wondering... robin williams...that you? 

No you have a hangover from hanging out in a self moderated thread all day giving each other congratulatory hand jobs for a rim job well done. GTFO and hope some noob can buy your shitcoin some day.

 

we'll see what happens ay.

I wonder though, why are u so angry? Or, why do you give a shit if you're not? Its not like you are kindly trying to save us from a scam out of the goodness of your heart.

you linked to a DRK vs XC thread that no one has posted in for 2 months since everyone decided it was a pointless pissing match.

What I'm getting at is what is your point? why bother? u think its a scam fuck off and stfu. xx

My point was a response to URSAY asking me to provide evidence in this court of law since I seem to be a prosecutor and have evidence that cannot be searched on their own since everything is in some corner of my brain.

Thats when you faggoted inside saying I am someone who I dont know what the deal is.

Then you got angry because I called you out for the scumbag that you seem to be and now you are pissed off.

The correct route for you should have been to talk to URSAY and go back to your moderated thread of the decentralized trustless privacy platform 3.0 Proof of Blockchain mating end to end encrypted chat blocknet content serving solution to raise 2500 BTC because it is what Satoshi had envisioned and couldn't complete.

Don't drop the soap. Fucking prick.